Making the web work for science - UND
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Making the web work for science - UND

on

  • 1,164 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,164
Views on SlideShare
1,136
Embed Views
28

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 28

https://twitter.com 28

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Making the web work for science - UND Making the web work for science - UND Presentation Transcript

  • making the web work for science kaitlin thaney @kaythaney ; @mozillascience univ. of north dakota / 5 feb 2014
  • doing good is part of our code
  • help researchers use the power of the open web to change science’s future.
  • (0)
  • science is still (largely) rooted in 17th c. practices. (and not in that “retro is cool” sort of way.)
  • early forms of knowledge sharing
  • our current systems are designed to create friction. despite original intentions.
  • “ What Des-Cartes did was a good step. You have added much several ways, & especially in taking ye colours of thin plates into philosophical consideration. If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants. “ - Isaac Newton, 1676
  • existing system is imperfect
  • data,
  • ability to reproduce experiments,
  • incentive to change,
  • “ traditions last not because they are excellent, but because influential people are averse to change and because of the sheer burdens of transition to a better state ... “ Cass Sunstein
  • (1)
  • “open science” - access to content, data, code, materials. - emergence of “web-native” tools. - rewards for openness, interop, collaboration, sharing. - push for ROI, reuse, recomputability, transparency.
  • research cycle idea publish lit review share results analyze materials retest collect data experiment
  • types of information (added complexity) articles proceedings hypothesis/query prof activities mentorship teaching activities negative results content non-digital “stuff” protocols parameters analysis code datasets models
  • blocking points (to name a few ...) idea access publish attaining materials share results analyze retest collect data experiment
  • “... up to 70% of research from academic labs cannot be reproduced, representing an enormous waste of money and effort.” - Elizabeth Iorns, Science Exchange
  • Source: Michener, 2006 Ecoinformatics.
  • (2)
  • is open enough? what does it mean to “operate on/like the web”?
  • code (interop) community (people) code/data literacy (means to learn/engage)
  • our systems need to talk to one another.
  • “One worry I have is that, with reviews like this, scientists will be even more discouraged from publishing their code [...] We need to get more code out there, not improve how it looks.”
  • code as a research object what’s needed to reuse ?
  • code as a research object http://xkcd.com/285/
  • “There’s greater reward, and more temptation to bend the rules.” - David Resnik, bioethicist
  • (3)
  • we need to even (/ elevate) the playing field.
  • facing a digital skills gap
  • “Reliance on ad-hoc, selfeducation about what’s possible doesn’t scale.” - Selena Decklemann
  • learn from open source (culture as well as technology)
  • current activity: 129 instructors (60+, training) 109 bootcamps 3700+ learners
  • we need to build capacity, not just more nodes.
  • “research hygiene” instill best (digital, reproducible) practice
  • in an increasingly digital, datadriven world, what core skills, tools do the next-generation need?
  • education as a means of building community ... globally, as well as across disciplines.
  • (4)
  • shifting practice (and getting it to stick) is challenging. ... but not impossible.
  • disciplines as cultures
  • can we do the same for research on the web? 63 nations 10,000 scientists 50,000 participants
  • what are the necessary components? tools and technology cultural awareness, best practice connections, open dialogue skills training
  • (5)
  • operating in isolation doesn’t scale.
  • coordination and collaboration are key. design for interoperability. remember the non-technical challenges.
  • join us (and the conversation.) teach, contribute, learn. http://software-carpentry.org http://mozillascience.org
  • questions? kaitlin@mozillafoundation.org @kaythaney ; @mozillascience