Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Making the web work for science - UND
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Making the web work for science - UND

1,004

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,004
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. making the web work for science kaitlin thaney @kaythaney ; @mozillascience univ. of north dakota / 5 feb 2014
  • 2. doing good is part of our code
  • 3. help researchers use the power of the open web to change science’s future.
  • 4. (0)
  • 5. science is still (largely) rooted in 17th c. practices. (and not in that “retro is cool” sort of way.)
  • 6. early forms of knowledge sharing
  • 7. our current systems are designed to create friction. despite original intentions.
  • 8. “ What Des-Cartes did was a good step. You have added much several ways, & especially in taking ye colours of thin plates into philosophical consideration. If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants. “ - Isaac Newton, 1676
  • 9. existing system is imperfect
  • 10. data,
  • 11. ability to reproduce experiments,
  • 12. incentive to change,
  • 13. “ traditions last not because they are excellent, but because influential people are averse to change and because of the sheer burdens of transition to a better state ... “ Cass Sunstein
  • 14. (1)
  • 15. “open science” - access to content, data, code, materials. - emergence of “web-native” tools. - rewards for openness, interop, collaboration, sharing. - push for ROI, reuse, recomputability, transparency.
  • 16. research cycle idea publish lit review share results analyze materials retest collect data experiment
  • 17. types of information (added complexity) articles proceedings hypothesis/query prof activities mentorship teaching activities negative results content non-digital “stuff” protocols parameters analysis code datasets models
  • 18. blocking points (to name a few ...) idea access publish attaining materials share results analyze retest collect data experiment
  • 19. “... up to 70% of research from academic labs cannot be reproduced, representing an enormous waste of money and effort.” - Elizabeth Iorns, Science Exchange
  • 20. Source: Michener, 2006 Ecoinformatics.
  • 21. (2)
  • 22. is open enough? what does it mean to “operate on/like the web”?
  • 23. code (interop) community (people) code/data literacy (means to learn/engage)
  • 24. our systems need to talk to one another.
  • 25. “One worry I have is that, with reviews like this, scientists will be even more discouraged from publishing their code [...] We need to get more code out there, not improve how it looks.”
  • 26. code as a research object what’s needed to reuse ?
  • 27. code as a research object http://xkcd.com/285/
  • 28. “There’s greater reward, and more temptation to bend the rules.” - David Resnik, bioethicist
  • 29. (3)
  • 30. we need to even (/ elevate) the playing field.
  • 31. facing a digital skills gap
  • 32. “Reliance on ad-hoc, selfeducation about what’s possible doesn’t scale.” - Selena Decklemann
  • 33. learn from open source (culture as well as technology)
  • 34. current activity: 129 instructors (60+, training) 109 bootcamps 3700+ learners
  • 35. we need to build capacity, not just more nodes.
  • 36. “research hygiene” instill best (digital, reproducible) practice
  • 37. in an increasingly digital, datadriven world, what core skills, tools do the next-generation need?
  • 38. education as a means of building community ... globally, as well as across disciplines.
  • 39. (4)
  • 40. shifting practice (and getting it to stick) is challenging. ... but not impossible.
  • 41. disciplines as cultures
  • 42. can we do the same for research on the web? 63 nations 10,000 scientists 50,000 participants
  • 43. what are the necessary components? tools and technology cultural awareness, best practice connections, open dialogue skills training
  • 44. (5)
  • 45. operating in isolation doesn’t scale.
  • 46. coordination and collaboration are key. design for interoperability. remember the non-technical challenges.
  • 47. join us (and the conversation.) teach, contribute, learn. http://software-carpentry.org http://mozillascience.org
  • 48. questions? kaitlin@mozillafoundation.org @kaythaney ; @mozillascience

×