Five Ways Technology Can Save Faculty Time

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Five Ways Technology Can Save Faculty Time - Presentation Transcript

    1. 5 Ways Technology Can Save Faculty Time September 4, 2008 Everett Community College New Faculty Institute
    2. The 5 Ways
      • An Online FAQ paired with Online Contact Policy
      • Online Rubrics
      • Online Peer Review
      • Learning Objects
      • Hyperlinked Autotext
    3. Online FAQ With Online Contact Policy
      • What is it
      • How to accomplish this
      • Efficacy
      • Caveats
    4. Online FAQ With Online Contact Policy
      • What is it
        • FAQ’s list routine questions students always ask with instructor responses
        • Provide “Contact Policy” where students stipulate that they will contact instructor after going to FAQ’s first
        • Contact Policy states how instructor to be contacted – phone or email
        • Contact Policy states time frame instructor will respond – including weekends
    5. Online FAQ With Online Contact Policy
      • How to accomplish this
        • Examples
          • http://jon.visick.faculty.noctrl.edu/faq.htm
          • http://www.olemiss.edu/courses/his105/faq.html
    6. Online FAQ With Online Contact Policy
      • Efficacy
        • Saves space and time (does not have to be in syllabus each time)
        • Reduces number of routine questions
        • Can respond to more substantive questions
        • Can send students to FAQs when appropriate
        • Need to update the FAQ regularly
    7. Online FAQ With Online Contact Policy
      • Caveats
        • This is not your unwillingness to communicate with them
        • Explain rationale for using FAQ and Contact Policy
          • Allows them to find answers to many questions on their own
          • Allows you more time to respond to their substantive, non-routine questions
    8. Online Rubrics
      • What is it
      • How to accomplish this
      • Efficacy
      • Caveats
    9. Online Rubrics
      • What is it
        • Instructor articulates the grading criteria for an assignment in explicit and methodical manner
        • Clarity about the grading criteria is primary goal
    10. Online Rubrics
        • Examples of rubrics used by instructors
          • For group presentations: http://cfaonline.asu.edu/the220/assignmnts/grouppresentrubric.html
          • For class presentations: http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
          • For scholarly writing: http://www.duke.edu/~trout/hist03spr/rubric.html
          • For e-portfolios: http://www.west.asu.edu/achristie/546/eprubric.htm
    11. Online Rubrics
        • Benefits
          • Facilitate and accelerate instructor’s grading process
          • Help to ensure that instructor’s assessment criteria remain consistent
          • Sharing a rubric with students allows them to evaluate their work in a detailed and methodical manner prior to submission
    12. Online Rubrics
        • Kinds
          • Holistic
            • First presents various levels of success then lists features that are associated with each level
          • Analytic
            • First presents various features and then lists levels of success that can characterize each feature
    13. Online Rubrics
        • How to design effective rubrics
          • An Introduction to the Poser of Rubrics http://polaris.umuc.edu/de/ezine/features/sept_oct_2004/rubrics.htm
          • Rubrics http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/rubrics.htm
          • Responding to Writing Assignments: Managing the Paper Load. http://www.adm.uwaterloo.ca/infotrac/tips/respondingtowritingassts.pdf
          • Assessment. http://www.artsandscience.utoronto.ca/teaching/assessment.htm
    14. Online Rubrics
      • Efficacy
        • Using Rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership. http://www.ascd.org/portal/site/ascd/menuitem.459dee008f99653fb85516f762108a0c/
        • Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. http://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v10n3.pdf
        • The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education. http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4/
    15. Online Rubrics
      • Caveats
        • Rubrics encourage students to nitpick, quibble with instructor over minute details of an assessment
        • To preclude this, instructors should spend time discussing rubric with students before using it
          • Explain how instructor and students can use it effectively
        • Having students assist in creation of rubric can be effective
          • Empowers students
          • Engages them in process of assessment
          • Encourages them to use rubric as guide when they are working on assignments
    16. Online Peer Review
      • What is it
      • How to accomplish this
      • Efficacy
      • Caveats
    17. Online Peer Review
      • What is it
        • Students become engaged with problem or assignment in another role – critic or editor
        • Fosters acquisition of skills and higher order thinking
        • Diminishes amount of feedback that the instructor needs to provide
        • Reduce amount of time spent grading and assessing student work
        • OLE prevents students from losing one another’s work
        • Makes it easy for several students to review same assignment at same time
        • Match authors and reviewers randomly and anonymously
    18. Online Peer Review
      • How to accomplish this
        • Have students assess and grade one another’s assignments
        • Online CPR has method of ‘calibrating’ students
        • Online CPR program then randomly and anonymously provides each student with three assignments submitted by classmates, which he or she then grades
          • Average of these grades become grade assigned to the assignment
        • Calibrated Peer Review program: http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/
    19. Online Peer Review
      • Efficacy - Use of self-, peer, and co-assessment in higher education:
        • Web-based peer review
        • http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/13/20373/00940995.pdf?arnumber=940995
        • http://stke.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1/9/tr2?rss=1
        • Calibrated Peer Review
        • http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/
        • http://cit.duke.edu/tools/assessment/calibrated_peer_review.html
        • Calibrated Peer Review and assessing student outcomes
        • http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/papers/1066.pdf
    20. Online Peer Review
      • Caveats
        • Students need to be taught how to peer review
        • Can require a significant investment of time from instructor
        • Students need a social skill – how to be taught how to provide and accept criticism in tactful but forthright manner
        • Being critical, in an academic context, is a good thing
    21. Learning Objects
      • What is it
      • How to accomplish this
      • Efficacy
      • Caveats
    22. Learning Objects
      • What is it
        • Digital resource that can be reused to support learning
        • Can be a PDF file, applet, interactive application, MP3 file, web page, database, streaming video file, etc.
        • Small in scope
        • Someone else has already made them
        • Stored and catalogued in various learning object repositories
    23. Learning Objects
      • How to accomplish this
        • Repositories
          • MERLOT: http://www.merlot.org
            • http://library.acadiau.ca/tutorials/plagiarism/
          • LOLA Exchange: http://www.lolaexchange.org/
            • http://learningobjects.wesleyan.edu/virtualvillage/
          • Open Courseware: http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/index.htm
          • LON-CAPA – open source freeware http://www.lon-capa.org/
            • http://demo.lon-capa.org/res/msu/kortemey/demo/public/BlockOnSlopeBCpt.problem
          • Other Repositories: http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/CIE/AOP/LO_collections.html
    24. Learning Objects
      • Efficacy
      • Instructional repositories and referatories: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0405.pdf
      • A learning object success story: http://sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v9n1/pdf/v9n1_mason.pdf
    25. Learning Objects
      • Caveats
        • Learning objects may be on a university server and difficult to access or the link is no longer available
        • Learning object potential problems: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM05410.pdf
    26. Hyperlinked Autotext
      • What is it
      • How to accomplish this
      • Efficacy
      • Caveats
    27. Hyperlinked Autotext
      • What is it
        • Allow user to jump from one document to another with a single click
        • Autotext allows person creating or editing a document to insert frequently-used passages of text by typing a shortcut.
        • Autotext can be used to insert passages of text that include hyperlinks.
        • “ Just-in-time” approach to providing learning resources is effective
    28. Hyperlinked Autotext
      • How to accomplish this
        • A program called Camtasia to record a video which demonstrates, step-by-step, how to create hyperlinked autotext entries in Microsoft Word. http://lt3.uwaterloo.ca/~markmorton/hyperlinked-autotext.wmv
    29. Hyperlinked Autotext
      • Efficacy
        • Increases speed of grading essays
        • Students found inserted hyperlinks to learning resources to be beneficial
        • Increases student’s knowledge of WHY the error is incorrect
    30. Hyperlinked Autotext
      • Caveats
        • Students must submit work electronically
        • Instructor has to grade electronically
        • Easier to type rather than write longhand
        • Significant time to set-up auto-text library
    31. Questions
      • Contact WAOL @ www.waol.org or
      • Contact WAOL     (Toll free) 1-888-580-9011     (Spokane area) 509-434-5155

    + Kayeri AkweksKayeri Akweks, 2 years ago

    custom

    757 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    5 Ways Technology Can Save Faculty Time While Enhan more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 757
      • 757 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 14
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories