MSN Messenger 6.1 Whiteboard Usability Evaluation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Notes on slide 1

Good afternoon! My name is Jonas. I’m joined by my groupmates: Stan, Kathy and Yong Today, we will be talking about our project – evaluation of the Whiteboard feature in MSN Messenger.

2 Favorites

MSN Messenger 6.1 Whiteboard Usability Evaluation - Presentation Transcript

  1. MSN Messenger 6.1 Whiteboard Usability Evaluation SI 622 Winter 2004 Yong Kim, Stan Drozdetski, Jonas Kong, Kathy Lee
  2. Overview
    • Product Description
    • Methods & Tools
    • Findings
    • Recommendations
    • Conclusion
    Overview
  3. MSN Messenger 6.1 Whiteboard
    • Collaborative features ported from NetMeeting
    • Real time shared graphical workspace
    • To be integrated into Longhorn
    Product Description
  4. MSN Messenger 6.1 Whiteboard Product Description Action Toolbar Color Selection Page Navigation
  5. Methods & Tools (1)
    • GTN
    • Personas & scenarios (formal & informal use)
    • Comparative evaluation (3 IM clients & 4 groupware applications)
    • Online Survey (207 responses)
    Methods & Tools
  6. Methods & Tools (2)
    • Cognitive walkthrough
    • Heuristic evaluation (2 scenarios)
    • Usability test (7 participants)
    • Vocabulary analysis
    Methods & Tools
  7. A few extensions…
    • Literature review at each evaluation (e.g., task design)
    • Card sorting to categorize findings through iterative clustering
    • Real whiteboard in metaphor analysis
    Methods & Tools
  8. What we learned
    • Functionality is there
    • But, not very usable
    • Still, users liked it!
    Findings
  9. Functionality is there
    • Compares favorably with competitors
    • But, lack of support for image file types
    Findings
  10. But, not very intuitive
    • A whiteboard in namesake only
      • Some positive aspects
      • Some negative ones (demo: drawing & erasing)
    Findings
  11. But, not very intuitive (2)
    • No correspondence in task flow
    • A real whiteboard
      • immediate & continuous feedback
      • talk & draw at the same time
      • only one drawing tool
    Findings
  12. Not very understandable
    • Poor labeling and visual representation
    what does this do? Findings eraser?
  13. Not very friendly
    • Fatal errors
    uh oh hmm I think I crashed something… Findings
  14. Not very helpful
    • Help? There is help…for NetMeeting!
    • Help is not contextual
    Findings
  15. Still, users liked it!
    • ‘ Useful’ (3/7)
    • ‘ Collaborative’ (2/7)
    • ‘ Fun’ (2/7)
    • ‘ Valuable’ (1/7)
    • ‘ Empowering’ (1/7)
    Findings
  16. Some ideas
    • Short term
      • Improve tools / icons
    • Long term
      • Simplify interaction
    Recommendations
  17. Get rid of Eraser
    • Vector-based graphics prohibit partial erase
    • Use ‘Del’ or ‘Backspace’ instead
    Recommendations
  18. More expressive cursor
    • Reflect the tool and color selected
    • Show to the remote participant
    Recommendations
  19. Drag n’ Drop
    • A straightforward way to introduce outside content
    Recommendations
  20. Survey Users
    • Address vocabulary problem by surveying users for word choice, tools needed
    Recommendations
  21. Yahoo! Doodle
    • Integrated drawing surface, text and voice chat
    • Only one drawing tool
    Recommendations
  22. Final Remarks
    • NetMeeting vs. MSN Messenger
    • Make it useful AND usable
    • Whiteboard will attract users to MSN
    Conclusion Conclusion
  23. Thank you for listening! Any Questions? ?

+ kathyjlkathyjl, 3 years ago

custom

3556 views, 2 favs, 2 embeds more stats

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 3556
    • 3550 on SlideShare
    • 6 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 2
  • Downloads 0
Most viewed embeds
  • 5 views on http://www.stanford.edu
  • 1 views on http://fachak.biz

more

All embeds
  • 5 views on http://www.stanford.edu
  • 1 views on http://fachak.biz

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories