Legal anthropologist of gor!
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Legal anthropologist of gor!

on

  • 456 views

Games+Learning+Society 2010 conference presentation.

Games+Learning+Society 2010 conference presentation.

Issues of ethics and research methodology in studying an unusual online community.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
456
Views on SlideShare
456
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Legal anthropologist of gor! Legal anthropologist of gor! Presentation Transcript

    • Legal Anthropologist of Gor!
      a research conundrum
      John Carter McKnight
      PhD Student,
      Human & Social Dimensions of Science & Technology
      Arizona State University
    • the conundrum
      what to do when
      the customs of your research site
      are at odds with
      those of your professional community
    • the research question
      how is “canon” deployed
      in Second Life Gorean
      roleplay communities
      for political ends?
    • who cares?
      the political wielding of canon within and among communities is relatively (totally?) unexplored at the micro level
      and something of a pressing issue at the global level: fundamentalisms, strict construction
      SL Gor as a process and culture model
    • but…
      methodolgical/ethical issues
      are at least as important!
      internet social science research
      norms contrast powerfully with
      those of the community at issue
      wish it away? side with the
      professional community?
      or…?
    • what’s Gor?
      28 novels by John Norman
      from 1967 to 2009
      Edgar Rice Burroughs pastiche
      Ideology of slavery and
      absolute female subjugation
      an “ontological politics”
      (Law 2004) of essentialism
    • Goreans before SL
      novels out of print 1988-2007
      fandom built around readily available used paperbacks
      “Lifestyle Gor” and online forums
      a fandom of doing more than making
      focus on social/sexual relations
      private, quiet, underground
    • then came Second Life
      ~50,000 active Goreanroleplayers in SL!
      (Au, 2009)
      2007 - recurring conflict between GoreanRP’ers and SL mainstream
      retreat behind the silk curtain – Gorean autarky
      building, machinima, fashion - and RP
    • why study SL Gor?
      very little academic work done
      (Bardzell & Odom 2008, Sixma 2009)
      important site of
      online governance
      a larger political question –
      the appeal and implications
      of submission
    • but Goreans don’t like us!
      after the 2007 conflicts, many Goreans wary of mainstream interaction
      particular aversion to academics
      normative conflicts
      bad methodology
      above all, that conflict of ontological politics
    • a Goreanoldtimer says…
      “You might want to be careful how many people know that you are a) male IRL and b) doing research. …
      Those of us who have been at this for a long time (I have about 15 years myself, including some time as a lifestyler) have seen way too many half cocked academics throw down the abuse card at us, and tend to be gun shy.”
      (“Tiberius” 2010)
    • how to study an RP community?
      from the outside - observation
      reliance on self-reporting – but with Gor there’s that ontological-political gap
      an outsider can see the “what,” but not feel the “why” (Kendall 2009, 2010)
      no easy external observer’s position in SL, unlike LJ roleplay (the “visitor” tag as lab coat)
    • how to study an RP community?
      from the inside - participation
      enables access to emotive dimension
      breaks the insider/outsider dichotomy
      reverses power relations – from lab coat and clipboard to n00b (Hine 2000)
      n00bery is a license to ask research questions
    • but SL introduces complications
      disclosure
      reflexivity
      negotiating the ontological-political gap
    • disclosure - the anthro norm
    • profile disclosure
      breaks the magic circle
      violates norms of RP
      arguably breaches general SL norms
      privileges the culture of the observer over that of the participant
      (see Bardzell 2010 for a nice analysis of the SL profile)
    • and yet…
      non-disclosure is ethically dubious at best
      invites exactly the reaction it’s intended to avoid (betrayal over normative violations)
      expected/required/mandated by observer culture (e.g., IRB approval/exemption)
    • reflexivity
      SL Gor as digitally *embodied*
      the (digital) body is the research site and ontological-political battleground
      issues of canon are issues of the essential nature of the gendered body
      The Gorean experience is that of both the male and female, the privileged and the enslaved
    • unnatural acts
      this is why cross-gender RP is both anathema and essential
      not the only invisible border crossing:
      cross-gender RP reflects the traversing of the IC/OOC borderlands/la frontera
      the Gorean doesn’t live in the essentialism, but in the ironic duality
    • squaring the circle
      change the ontological-political conflict from a bug to a feature
      pair Gorean essentialism with postmodernism
      analyze Gor through the lens of cyborg feminism (Harraway 1991)
    • the cyborg
      “is resolutely committed to partiality, irony, intimacy, and perversity. It is oppositional, utopian, and completely without innocence.
      No longer structured by the polarity of public and private, the cyborg defines a technological polis based partially on a revolution of social relations in the oikos, the household.” (1991, 151)
      This seems an excellent job description for a critical participant observer of SL Gor!
    • what does this all mean?
      embody the dichotomies
      male/female
      free/slave
      IC/OOC
      observer/participant
      reflexivity
      don’t privilege
      observer norms
    • a cyborg feminist methodology?
      “We usually think that holding to the protocols of experimentation and verification is the most difficult thing. But in fact the most difficult thing is to renounce the truth and the possibility of verification, to remain as long as possible on the enigmatic, ambivalent, and reversible side of thought.”
      (Baudrillard, 2000)
    • contact me!
      John Carter McKnight, MIA, JD
      john.mcknight@asu.edu
      johncartermcknight.com
      Blog, CV, presentations
      + Twitter, Facebook, last.fm
      LinkedIn, Goodreads, etc.
      Second Life: KaseidoQuandry