Affective Interaction
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Affective Interaction

on

  • 852 views

I did some brief research on the area of Affective Interaction as part of the Advanced Interaction Techniques course of 2009, and presented the results of my research work

I did some brief research on the area of Affective Interaction as part of the Advanced Interaction Techniques course of 2009, and presented the results of my research work

Statistics

Views

Total Views
852
Views on SlideShare
850
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 2

http://www.lmodules.com 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • RosalindPicard, nomerecorrentenestaárea. Lider do Affective Computing Group do Media Lab do MIT.
  • Psicológicos:repercussõespsicológicas. Descriçõesverbais (think-aloud);;Checklists;;Questionários;;Self-Reporting;;Fisiológicos:reacçõesfisicas. Ritmocardíaco;;pressãosanguinea;;respiração;;EEG;;actividade muscularComportamentais: mudanças de comportamento. Expressõesfaciais;;Postura;;Modulaçãodavoz;;Desempenhocognitivo;;Gestos
  • Exemplo: e-commerce – pessoamaissusceptível a comprarartigosmaiscaros se seencontrar num estado de espiritopropício
  • Problema da incorrecta interpretação das leituras. Algumas (biomédicas) são geralmente certeiras a um primeiro nivel. Outras estão sujeitas a interpretaçãoProblema da instrusividade. Os utilizadores apreciam a sua privacidade. Alguns deles – nomeadamente os biomédicos – são muito intrusivosUm problema que pode surgir: despoletar uma emoção pode desencadear outras involuntariamenteQuestões éticas
  • Exemplos de aplicaçõesdateoriadainteracçãoafectiva
  • Umavariedade de tecnologias
  • Idealmente, a presença dos mecanismoscomputacionais é imperceptivelpara o utilizador no dia a diaRealidadeaumentada: utilizadorpode-se focarnarealidadefisica(tarefas do dia-a-dia), aomesmo tempo queestáemcontactoconstante com a realidade virtual (mecanismoscomputacionais)
  • Wiener:matemáticoamericanofamosopordesenvolvimentosnoscamposdaengenhariaelectrónica, datelecomunicação, e de sistemas de controlo. Fundadordacibernética.Cibernética: formaliza a noção de feedback, e estáintrinsecamenterelacionada com o estudo de sistemas de controlo. Aplica-se nãoapenas a nivelfisico e electrónico, comotambém a nível social.Desenvolveuaindaoutrasaplicaçõesàsemelhançadaluvaauditiva.Apologistadacomunicaçãoporanalogia.
  • Custo dos materiais: $25000Conceito do robot baseado no Gremlin, Gizmo.1 Linux 500mhz, 1 NT 450mhz, 4 Motorolla 68332, 9 PCs 400mhz, 1 PC 500mhz4 color CCD cameras, 2 wide field of view cameras, 1 0.5inch CCD foveal cameraCadaprocessadorrelacionado com umaparte dos mecanismos de captação e expressão de emoção.Video!!
  • Umaaplicaçãoprática. Emsala de aula, estudantes de ensinosecundáriousaramluvadurante a aula.Verificou-seque, emgeral, o nivel do LED era muitobaixo.Aumentavaquandoaosalunos era pedidoqueelaborassemalgumatarefaqueparaelestivesseinteresseOs alunoscomentaramque a luvalhesproporcionouumamaneira de aprenderemalgomaissobreelespróprios
  • Com o toolkit foramdesenvolvidasváriasaplicações de demonstração(James the Butler, FantasyA)http://gaips.inesc-id.pt/safira/demonstrators.html
  • Aplicaçõesque se adaptamaoutilizadorÉ sugeridoque o principio orientadordeve ser o de satisfazer o utilizador, e não o da performance oudesempenhomáximos
  • Adaptabilidadeaoque o utilizadorquerQuando e como?
  • O utilizador tem de interromper a tarefaparapodercancelarestaopção
  • Pedir feedback querequerumadistracçãoporparte do utilizador do seutrabalho = mau
  • Interpretar o que o utilizadorquer, emvez deexplicitamentelhoperguntar
  • Aproximaçãodapsicologiacognitivaao design de interfaces pessoa-máquina
  • Emoçõeslevam a Moods (estados de espirito)Moods restringem as experiências dos utilizadores
  • Usam-se variadosmecanismos e métodosparaavaliarestasreacções

Affective Interaction Affective Interaction Presentation Transcript

  • Mário Carranca, 2009
  •  Fieldof research in Human-Computer Interaction “An affective human-computer interaction is one in which emotional information is communicated by the user in a natural and comfortable way, recognized by the computer, and used to help improve the interaction.” (Reynolds, Picard) 2 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Adaptabilityis essential  Paradox of adaptability and stability  Pleasing the user versus satisfying the user’s needs  Artificial Intelligence as part of HCI 3 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Adaptability 4 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • 5 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Explicitly requesting too much information from the user will result in deterioration of her relationship with the application 6 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Aim on instinctive HCI Reading the user  instead of prompting the user.  Technological obstacles Standard HCI technology based on user initiative  and conscious, rational, non-instinctive decisions 7 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • A cognitive approach 8 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Analysis of a Human-Computer Interface from an Affective perspective consists on analyzing the impacts of this interaction on the user’s emotional state. Emotion: short-term subconscious reaction to stimuli  Moods: longer-term settlement of an emotion or chain  of emotions. 9 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Moods affect: memory;  cognition;  evaluation;  expectations;  opinions;  motor behaviour;  what emotions are experienced (hence what  other moods can be experienced)  (Derbaix,1999)  Moods lead the user in a certain direction 10 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  The X-Factors (Subbaraman, 2007): Emotions  Sensations  Moods  Beauty  Expectations  Evaluations   Heuristicevaluation methods for these factors in an interface: Psychological (most common in usability evaluation)  Physiological  Behavioural  11 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Triggeringuser’s moods through stimuli  Capture user’s emotions and use them to improvise and manage situations  Generate more ideas and metaphors to trigger emotional reactions in the interfaces 12 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  How accurate are these evaluation methods?  How intrusive are these evaluation methods?  In what emotion should the designer focus?  Should the designer actively attempt to manipulate the user’s mood? 13 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Real World approaches to Affective Interaction 14 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Input: Motion and pressure sensors  Cameras  Microphones  Biomedical devices and sensors  Standard input technologies…   Output: VR  Robotics  LEDs  Standard output technologies…  15 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Concept introduced by Picard and Healey (1997)  Computational objects as part of clothes and wearable accessories  The idea is for these objects to be in constant contact with the wearer, preferably in a way that isn’t disruptive of her activities  The applications of this concept precede Picard and Healey by many years 16 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Developed by Norbert Wiener, acclaimed mathematician and the father of Cybernetics.  The glove intercepted sound stimuli through electromagnetic components  The stimuli were converted into analogous tactile stimuli for the deaf wearer to feel  Wiener defended that: “Analogy is communication, and communication is  analogy” 17 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Developed at MIT as part of  Cythia Breazeal’s doctoral research project (late 1990s)  Capable of demonstrating facial expressions and vocalizations  Equipped with several multi-purpose cameras and a microphone  Stimuli processed by several computers using MIT cross-department software over different operating systems 18 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Developed at MIT Media Lab by Jocelyn Scheirer and Rosalind Picard  Glove equipped with a LED measures skin conductivity, or electrodermal response to stimuli, a reliable indicator of psychological arousal “Arousal has been found to be a strong predictor of  attention and memory”  The LED’s intensity changes according to the wearer’s electrodermal response 19 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Developments in Affective Interaction 20 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Supporting  Affective Interactions for Real-Time Applications Developed by GAIPS at INESC-ID.  Researchers searched to inspire themselves in the way  humans make decisions, and compute algorithms that simulate it It was the first project in this area under the European  Commission’s support 21 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  The SAFIRA Toolkit is aimed at developing affective applications.  Its simple structure allows for easy integration: 1. Affective Acquisition  2. Emotion Processing  3. Affective Expression  4. Inter-component Messaging  22 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  •  Evaluator user in an MIT feedback mechanism experiment: “I liked it being set up such that as soon as I realized  there was a problem, I could gripe.”  Users like to be able to convey their feelings about an interface without wasting time or losing their reduced attention span  Affective interaction is an area with many possibilities to be explored  Technology is still a barrier, but the progress in micro and nanotechnology has proved useful 23 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • Subbamaran, Karthi, http://www.slideshare.net/ESS/affective-  interaction Amadeu, Flávia, “Humano-Computador em Interações Afetivas”  Bynum, Terrell Ward, “Norbert Wiener’s Vision: The Impact of “the  Automatic Age” on Our Moral Lives” Picard, Rosalind, “Affective Computing”  Ferreira, Cristina Alexandra, “Abordar a computação afectiva sob várias  perspectivas” Paiva et al., “SAFIRA- Supporting Affective Interactions in Real-time  Applications” Paiva et al., “SenToy in FantasyA: Designing an Affective Sympathetic  Interface to a Computer Game”, 2002 Derbaix, C., Pecheux, C.: “Mood and children: Proposition of a  measurement scale”, 1999 Starner et al, “Augmented Reality Through Wearable Computing”, 1997  Post et al, “E-broidery: Design and fabrication of textile-based  computing”, 2000 Picard and Scheirer, “The Galvactivator: A glove that senses and  communicates skin conductivity”, 1997 24 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction
  • 25 CARRANCA, Mário - Affective Interaction