Today:

    Public Law:
    Constitutional Law:
The Charter – some cases
R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67
R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697
319. (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private
conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against ...
Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and
 the Law v. Canada (Attorney General),
 [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4
43. Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of
a parent is justified in using force by way of correcti...
Majority decision

 Justice Binnie’s dissent

 Justice Arbour’s dissent

Justice Deschamps’ dissent
Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney
  General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624
Next class…

• Private Law: Contract Law
    •Please do the readings!
CML2117 Introduction to Law, 2008 - Lecture 16 - Charter cases
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

CML2117 Introduction to Law, 2008 - Lecture 16 - Charter cases

773 views
692 views

Published on

Charter cases

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
773
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

CML2117 Introduction to Law, 2008 - Lecture 16 - Charter cases

  1. 1. Today: Public Law: Constitutional Law: The Charter – some cases
  2. 2. R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67
  3. 3. R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697
  4. 4. 319. (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2) (a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true; Criminal Code of Canada
  5. 5. Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4
  6. 6. 43. Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances. Criminal Code of Canada
  7. 7. Majority decision Justice Binnie’s dissent Justice Arbour’s dissent Justice Deschamps’ dissent
  8. 8. Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624
  9. 9. Next class… • Private Law: Contract Law •Please do the readings!

×