Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Unpacking the 2010 Census (2013 Updated Version) - Part 1

69

Published on

"Unpacking the 2010 Census: The New Realities of Race, Class, and Jurisdiction" is co-sponsored by Hope in the Cities and the Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities. The program examines the …

"Unpacking the 2010 Census: The New Realities of Race, Class, and Jurisdiction" is co-sponsored by Hope in the Cities and the Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities. The program examines the dramatically changing landscape of human need and what we must do collectively to address the plight of our neighbors and to build a just and inclusive community in metropolitan Richmond, Virginia. This presentation was conceived, researched and designed by Dr. John V. Moeser, Senior Fellow at the Bonner Center for Civic Engagement at the University of Richmond. Part 1 of the "Unpacking the 2010 Census" presentation focuses on the current data and demographics in metropolitan Richmond.

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
69
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Create map of poorest and richest in each county/update slide
  • Transcript

    • 1. John V. MoeserSenior Fellow, Bonner Center for Civic Engagement University of Richmond With the Assistance of Dillon Massey, Student Coordinator UR Bonner Center for Civic Engagement
    • 2. Scott Clark Michael Rogers Transit Analyst, GRTC Transit System Alumni, University of Richmond Prepared the GIS map of bus routes and employment centers Obtained for his senior thesis two photographs of the construction of the Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike from the Library of Virginia Archives Brian Koziol Research Analyst, Housing Opportunities Made Equal (HOME) Developed the GIS Maps of trustee sales in HOLC Michael Sarahan neighborhoods and the chart on changing opportunities Retrieved HOLC Data from the National Archives along Interstate 64 through Richmond Ken Studer & Rex Anson-Dwamena Kenny McLemore Social Epidemiologists Housing Policy Analyst, Dept. of Economic and Community Virginia Office of Minority Health and Health Equity Development, City of Richmond Prepared the map of subsidized housing concentration in Richmond Anne Waring Communications Manager, VA Department of Human Resource Management Dr. Robert Nelson Supplied the percent of state employees earning less than Director, Digital Scholarship Lab, University of Richmond $35,000Developed the GIS 1937 HOLC map with overlay of 2009 census data
    • 3. Table of Census DataContents History Employment, Housing, & Land Policy Interventions
    • 4. Richmond Planning District
    • 5. 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates
    • 6. 2011 Poverty Thresholds U.S. Bureau of the CensusPoverty threshold for a four-person family unit is $23,021Poverty thresholds for one person: • Under age 65 is $11,702 • 65 or over is $10,788
    • 7. 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 1990 2000 2010 2011Chesterfield 4.30% 4.80% 5.90% 6.10%Hanover 4.30% 4.10% 4.30% 4.90%Henrico 5.50% 6.20% 9.60% 10.20%Richmond 19.80% 18.10% 25.30% 26.30%Goochland 7.70% 6.70% 7.10% 5.20%Powhatan 5.70% 5.40% 4.70% 4.40%Charles City 15.80% 9.50% 9.70% 8.90%New Kent 4.90% 5.10% 4.40% 5.70%
    • 8. Richmond Poverty Rates: 1970-201130.0% 18.0% 19.3% 19.8% 25.3%20.0% 26.3%10.0% 18.2% 0.0% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011
    • 9. 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1990 2000 2010 2011Chesterfield 5.9% 6.1% 8.3% 8.1%Hanover 4.5% 4.1% 4.6% 5.2%Henrico 7.2% 8.4% 14.2% 15.0%Richmond 35.8% 33.4% 38.7% 40.5%Goochland 8.4% 7.8% 6.5% 6.8%Powhatan 5.7% 8.6% 4.1% 2.9%Charles City 21.7% 13.3% 8.0% 8.4%New Kent 5.6% 8.0% 5.0% 8.8%
    • 10. 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0%Chesterfield 18.3%Hanover 15.0%Henrico 26.9%Richmond 50.4%Goochland 24.2%Powhatan 32.0%Charles City 35.3%New Kent 16.1%
    • 11. Poverty Growth/Decline: 2000-2011 (2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates) 66%34% 36% 23% 14% -17% -25% -22%
    • 12. Goochland Powhatan Chesterfield 1% 1% 17%Richmond 48% Hanover 4% Henrico 29%
    • 13. Suburbs City 53% 47%
    • 14. Disparity Between Poorest and Wealthiest Census Tracts Based on Median Household Income (2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates) Ratio of Census Tract with Highest $250,000 Household Income to Lowest $200,000Charles City: 1.13-----1Chesterfield: 5.35-----1Goochland: 1.92-----1 $150,000Hanover: 3.24-----1Henrico: 9.82-----1New Kent: 1.27-----1 $100,000 HighestPowhatan: 1.34-----1 LowestRichmond: 18.81-----1 $50,000Single wealthiest tract = $226,667 (Henrico) $0Single poorest tract = $9,926 (Richmond) Richmond Goochland Chesterfield New Kent Henrico Powhatan Hanover Charles CityRatio: 22.84-----1
    • 15. Other Hispanic White 4% 11% 34%Asian 4% Black 47%
    • 16. 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1990 2000 2010 2011White 4.7% 4.5% 6.8% 7.2%Black 20.7% 17.9% 18.3% 18.9%Asian 11.1% 9.8% 12.3% 13.3%Hispanic/Latino 8.0% 15.5% 24.4% 24.4%
    • 17. 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% City SuburbsWhite 32.6% 67.4%Black 60.6% 39.4%Asian 39.0% 61.0%Hispanic/Latino 38.2% 61.8%
    • 18. Latino PovertyJeff Davis Highway Jeff Davis Highway Midlothian Hull Street
    • 19. Crestview Staples Mill Jackson Whitcomb Creighton Short Pump Deep Run (Broad Street Bryan Park Gilpin Court Sandston & Glenside) Area Ward Court Court Homeownership Rate 69% 72% 58% 82% 39% 30% 0% 26% 16% 80% Poverty Rate 2.0% 2.6% 11.3% 14.2% 17.3% 20.2% 69.0% 64.8% 45.7% 1.1%Percent Population with Public 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 23.5% 20.2% 11.6% 0.0% Assistance Income Percent Population Traveling 5.9% 5.0% 14.0% 2.6% 6.4% 5.9% 32.1% 22.0% 17.7% 10.6%More than 45 Minutes to WorkPercent Visited a Doctor in Past 34% 35% 36% 30% 39% 33% 17% 16% 17% 29% 12 Months Dropout Rate 1.2% 1.4% 2.2% 4.6% 3.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 4.5% Math Score 97 99 92 91 86 71 71 71 71 84

    ×