Rapid A/B Testing 10 Principles (Jared Waxman)

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Big picture: A platypus. Widely ridiculed as being a sorry excuse for an animal, Tail of beaver, beak of a duck. Perhaps the result of design by committee. G-d wanted to cut out early for the weekend, and assigned his helpers to figure it out. No one was the clear leader, and this is what they came up with. Anybody want their site looking like this?Why it’s important:*The more opinions into the test concepts, the more conservative or closer to status quo it will be. Then you’ll get less of a signal, harder to read the test. More likely to waste your effort.*Also, the design of experiment is more likely to be compromised with a lot of opinions going in, and therefore what learning you get tends to be less clear, true, or extensible to future decisions

    Big Picture: At a large organization, testing and analytics folks often feel like this little scared lion cub about to be run over by a stampede. Once Management realizes how valuable testing & analytics really is, everyone comes at you with their project. Needs it now. And doesn’t care much that it doesn’t fit with the priorities you’ve been given, or is beyond the bandwidth of your resources or traffic.Why It’s Important?*You don’t want the squeakiest wheel to get the grease. You want to move the most important metrics in your business.*You want to attract and retain talent, and don’t want them overloaded, underappreciated, and unwilling to stay*You want to have a plan for executing through peaks

    4 Favorites

    Rapid A/B Testing 10 Principles (Jared Waxman) - Presentation Transcript

    1. Sept 16-17
      Vancouver, CANADA
      Fast & Furious – 10 Principles for Rapid Testing
      Presenting Lessons In Testing From
      Makers of Quicken, QuickTax and Quickbooks
      Jared Waxman
      jared@benchmark-analytics.com
    2. Intuit Small Business – Web Business
      How much: On order of ~$100 M annual revenue transacted online
      What: Desktop software, Services, Software-as-a-Service (subscription model)
      Where: 45 Websites, 10 Shopping Carts
      Traffic: QuickBooks.com ~ 1 M monthly unique cookies
      2
      Jared Waxman
    3. QuickBooks.com – Various Timepoints
      3
      Jared Waxman
    4. I’ve tested…
      I’ve run 1 or MORE tests against
      each of these hypotheses:
      How much does a Free product cannibalize Paid products?
      What’s the optimal way to position a Free product in the lineup to maximize all units while minimizing paid cannibalization?
      Does one Free offering cannibalize less than another Free offering?
      What is the most effective “voice” used in describing the product?
      What category of images sells the product the best?
      4
      Jared Waxman
    5. …and tested…
      Do videos sell better than static images?
      Do expanded versus collapsible product specs perform better?
      Does having a special price for upgraders yield higher overall sales than a flat pricing model? Does it improve customer sentiment?
      Does exposing retail options significantly shrink direct online sales?
      Which discount % level of promotional price discounts yields highest revenue?
      Does adding cart CTA on home and line-up pages increase conversion or change pathing?
      What is the optimal color, size, placement, and copy on CTAs?
      5
      Jared Waxman
    6. …and tested…
      Where is the optimal place in the purchase funnel for customer to configure their product?
      Where is the optimal place in the purchase funnel to ask for credit card info?
      How many pages in the checkout flow is optimal?
      What home page weighting of offerings moves us to the desired platform mix while continuing to grow revenue?
      How effective are certain product chooser tools, demo, or guides in moving conversion rates?
      How effective is a certain cart abandonment tactic in moving conversion rates?
      6
      Jared Waxman
    7. …and tested…
      Where is the right step in the purchase funnel to cross-sell other offerings?
      How many cross-sell offerings are optimal for a given funnel step?
      Should cross-sells be passive or intrusive?
      How effective and efficient is proactive chat in boosting over conversion?
      How many CTAs and/or featured offerings are optimal on the home page?
      How many offerings is optimal within the line-up?
      7
      Jared Waxman
    8. …and tested…
      Are bullet points or prose styles more effective on landing pages?
      Are PPC ad group specific links on landing pages more effective than generic links?
      What’s the likelihood of successful for a new product offering if added to the online store?
      How would a New User vs Existing User focused site perform against overall online revenue?
      Can lift conversion rates by guessing at New vs Existing and then sending them down different paths?
      How effective would a simple User Contribution System be at engaging and converting prospects?
      8
      Jared Waxman
    9. …and tested.
      Does simplifying the home page by removing promotions on the homepage to other auxiliary Company sites/product offerings reduce the net traffic that gets sent?
      Do menu titles perform better if they are job-oriented or product-oriented?
      Do promos perform better as %s or as $s off?
      Do promos perform better as %/$ off vs Free Shipping?
      Does a certain messaging approach consistently outperform another regardless of specifics?
      9
      Jared Waxman
    10. What has been the benefit of testing?
      10
      Half our growthin the online business comes from testing the pure site experience. The other half from acquisition programs.
      Testing is highly leveraged growth – a handful of employees. Produces 3-digit ROI.
      Acquisition programs requires serious cash and overall produces 2-digit ROI.
      Jared Waxman
    11. Today’s Focus: Organization Design
      11
      These gears must all work together.
      Each deserves separate treatment.
      Focus of this presentation
      Jared Waxman
    12. Fast & Furious
      My Testing Team throughput in just 12 business days:
      • 5 tests (3 of which shown on next page) including 1 microsite
      • 11 Factors Tested
      • 26 Recipes In All
      1 Big Winner: 20% increase on the success formula
      Annual impact ~ $10M
      Plus…
      1 Loser (but killed quickly)
      Some breakevens
      Jared Waxman
    13. Then Narrow
      (8 Recipes)
      3/4/09
      Control
      Product A: Index 1.60
      Formula: Index 1.20 WE/WD
      3
      Narrow Again
      (4 Recipes)
      4/9/09
      Go Broad
      (8 recipes)
      2/20/09
      1
      2
      4
      Product A: Index 2.00
      And Broad, Again!
      3/9/09
      Formula: Index 1.29 Weekend, .91 Weekday
      Rapid Testing Team
      Formula: Index 0.50
      Jared Waxman
    14. Top 10 “Go Fast” Testing Principles
      10. Testing “Strike Force” with no outside dependencies
      9. Exactly one “Approver”
      8. One straight-forward formula for success
      7. Inform at go-live, then again with results
      6. Fully-baked ideas as the starter, then testing team tightens it. After phase 1, iterate with true MVT and refine as appropriate.
      5. Test ideas based in theory and customer data. Then go test, not talk.
      4. Manage to deadlinewith quality. Reduce scope as needed!
      3. Take in ideas from anywhere and everywhere. Don’t take in orders.
      2. Open, flexible test calendar basing next tests on data from existing ones. No pre-slotted commitments
      and finally…
      If you follow the prior 9 principles you’ll be able to deliver…
      1. One-Day Test Sprints! From schedule-it to go-live in 8 hrs.
      Jared Waxman
      14
    15. Process & Traps
      15
      Traps:
      • Perfection
      Traps:
      • Debate
      Traps:
      • Ownership issues
      • Re-tests, small tests
      Traps:
      • The “Evil And”
      • Management not aligned – competing goals
      Jared Waxman
    16. In the org, you’ll encounter…
      Digging Deeper into Organization Design
      Jared Waxman
    17. HiPOs
      17
      Jared Waxman
    18. HiPOs: Tips
      Get Management to understand why testing success probability means it’s in their interest to have a healthy distance from individual test designs. It’s in your interest too.
      Get Management engaged at the right level – setting hierarchy of goals and resourcing for highly leveraged testing.
      18
      Jared Waxman
    19. Targets
      19
      Jared Waxman
    20. Targets: Tips
      Set by Management, not testing team.
      Testing Team Lead responsible to push back if needs more constraints.
      Put in place a hierarchy of success metrics.
      Should be consistent across seasons, managers, businesses.
      Revenue per visitor (RPV) typically at top of hierarchy.
      Can assign each success metric it’s own team.
      20
      Jared Waxman
    21. Design by Committee
      Jared Waxman
    22. Design By Committee: Tips
      Hire a Test Lead whose business instinct and creative eye you know and trust.
      Keep him/her in the kitchen on business strategy.
      Then let him/her be the one and only approver on what goes live.
      Ideas get thrown “over the wall” to the testing team.
      Testing Teams set up as neutral, with no built-in biases towards specific businesses, ideas, or managers.
      Idea submitter and/or related business unit have no official role during the execution phase.
      22
      Jared Waxman
    23. Sacred Cows
      Jared Waxman
    24. Sacred Cows: Tips
      24
      Assign Executives to Goals Hierarchy. Assign Segment Marketers job of throwing ideas “over the wall”. Assign the Test Lead the job of selecting and executing.
      Separate Segment Marketers from Testing.
      Get a clear list of constraints, a consistent success metric, and then challenge everything.
      Outside viewpoint. Much easier to get people think outside the box when they know some crazy-sounded idea worked somewhere else.
      Test big. And if you can’t, test small. Remember you can also pull if it’s losing money.
      Influence through your framing. Testing can be framed not as a challenge, but a way to quantify a “known” lever so it can be expanded or further optimized.
      Jared Waxman
    25. Stampedes
      Jared Waxman
    26. Stampedes: Tips
      Cordon off your Testing Teams to focus your highly leveragable resources
      Set clear, long-term goals for the Teams.
      Empower the Team Leads to decide priorities, timing, workload.
      Leverage outside agencies to rapidly expand capabilities and expertise as needed.
      26
      Jared Waxman
    27. Fast & Furious – 10 Principles for Rapid Testing
      Sept 16-17
      Vancouver, CANADA
      Presenting Lessons In Testing From
      Jared Waxman
      jared@benchmark-analytics.com
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Jared WaxmanJared Waxman Nominate

    custom

    759 views, 4 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Smart web and ecommerce companies companies are tur more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 759
      • 750 on SlideShare
      • 9 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 4
    • Downloads 15
    Most viewed embeds
    • 9 views on http://www.benchmark-analytics.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 9 views on http://www.benchmark-analytics.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories