NAIOP: Sustainable Development

1,002 views

Published on

Presentation to NAIOP of Southern Nevada. Brief discussion of sustainable development trends. Case study of actual performance of a LEED Gold commercial building.

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,002
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

NAIOP: Sustainable Development

  1. 1. 7/17/2009 LEED-CS LEED-CI 2008 2009 Sustainable Development Julie Walleisa, AIA, LEED AP NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 1 Sustainable development trends NAIOP’s role Case Study: Jefferson Green NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 2 1
  2. 2. 7/17/2009 Trend #1: LEED continues to evolve NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 3 LEED 2009 Consistency Updated standards ASHRAE 90.1-2007 NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 4 2
  3. 3. 7/17/2009 LEED 2009: Regionalization Bonus credits by zip code 6 options 4 points available Ex: Las Vegas 89119 Stormwater Quantity Heat Islands: Nonroof Water Efficient Landscaping Water Use Reduction Onsite Renewable Energy Construction Waste Management NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 5 LEED 2009: Weightings More emphasis: LEED 2.2 SS Energy 7% 20% WE Transportation 22% EA 7% MR Less emphasis: 19% 25% EQ Materials ID Indoor environment LEED 2009 6% SS 14% 25% WE EA 13% 9% MR EQ 33% ID NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 6 3
  4. 4. 7/17/2009 Trend #2: Green buildings have higher value NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 7 What does LEED cost? NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 4
  5. 5. 7/17/2009 LEED Cost National studies 0-2% cost premium Federal agencies – 1% Our experience 0.5% - 5% cost premium Payback depends on energy > 1% and no real payback 1.3% and 2 year payback 5% and 5 year payback Rolled into budget Estimate 2-5% NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 9 LEED Benefits 2008 CoStar Study $11/sf higher rent 4% higher occupancy $171/sf higher sales price NAIOP Development ’08 Developers seeing this in other markets Typically not the case in Southwest National companies requiring LEED NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 10 5
  6. 6. 7/17/2009 Trend #3: Regulation Proliferation of ordinances Move from incentives to regulation LEED as code Energy and water requirements NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 11 Municipal Incentives: Chicago, IL: LEED = expedited permitting, fee waivers Anchorage, AK: LEED = permit fee rebates Babylon, NY: LEED = refund of USGBC fees Baltimore Cnty, MD: LEED = tax credits Cincinnati, OH: LEED = 100% property tax exemption El Paso, TX: LEED = grant program Jacksonville, FL: LEED = expedited permitting, density bonus Pittsburgh, PA: LEED = 20% FAR bonus, 20% height bonus Bellingham, WA: LEED Silver = 0.5 FAR bonus Chandler, AZ: LEED Silver = expedited plan review USGBC fee rebates Los Angeles, CA: LEED Silver = expedited permitting Miami Beach, FL: LEED Silver = expedited permitting, USGBC fee rebates NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 6
  7. 7. 7/17/2009 Municipal Requirements: Albany, CA: LEED = commercial over 10,000sf Alexandria, VA: LEED = all private buildings Annapolis, MD: LEED = commercial over 7,500sf Babylon, NY: LEED = commercial over 4,000sf Boston, MA: LEED = private over 50,000sf All projects (any size) must submit checklist Long Beach, CA: LEED = private over 5,000sf Los Angeles, CA: LEED = private over 50,000sf Baltimore, MD: LEED Silver = commercial over 10,000sf Mountain Village, CO: LEED Silver = commercial over 5,000sf Pasadena, CA: LEED Silver = private over 50,000sf Taos, NM: LEED Silver = commercial over 6,000sf NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 13 Municipal Requirements: Not just LEED level: Energy-based requirements/incentives MD, NM, NY, OR Water-based requirements CA, NM NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 14 7
  8. 8. 7/17/2009 Federal Drivers: Federal leases GSA: LEED Silver EPA: ENERGY STAR rating DOE: LEED Gold preference Federal tax deduction 50% energy savings over ASHRAE National Model Energy Code 30% savings over 90.1-2004 in 2010? House - American Clean Energy and Security Act Senate - Clean Energy Leadership Act NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 15 NAIOP’s Role Government Affairs Position papers Cost studies USGBC pilot on distribution centers Conferences & webinars NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 8
  9. 9. 7/17/2009 Jefferson Green NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 2 separate LEED projects LEED-CS Gold + LEED-CI Gold LEED-CS LEED-CI NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 9
  10. 10. 7/17/2009 Project Drivers: Speculative building Multiple tenants Market rate Performance Energy Water Tenant amenities LEED certification NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 10
  11. 11. 7/17/2009 NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 11
  12. 12. 7/17/2009 Envelope: Orientation Shading R-19 walls Low-e glazing Operable windows Reflective roof R-30 roof insulation NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Process: Iterative design process Performance Aesthetics Modeling/Calcs Energy vs daylight vs budget NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 12
  13. 13. 7/17/2009 Building Systems: Underfloor air distribution Evaporative cooling Direct/indirect Free cooling Refrigerated backup Rooftop AHUs Gas boilers T5 fluorescent lighting 45% energy savings NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 13
  14. 14. 7/17/2009 Interior Environment: NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Interior Environment: NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 14
  15. 15. 7/17/2009 Material Conservation: 32% recycled content 67% regional materials Innovation points (old version of LEED) Mainly standard materials – steel, concrete, gypsum board Aluminum frames 45% recycled Carpet 30% recycled 80% construction waste recycled NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Material Conservation: Natural linoleum flooring and tackwall Low-emitting materials GREENGUARD certified furniture NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 15
  16. 16. 7/17/2009 Site & Landscape: Preserved existing trees Directed run-off to planted areas Xeric landscaping Irrigation from the city’s non-potable line – no potable use for landscape Cutoff light fixtures to minimize light pollution Bike racks Designated smoking area NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Integrated Design Process: LEED Management Process SD Project Strategy Set realistic goals DD Design Decisions Form, systems, materials Calculations & Documentation Refine design CD QA Process Check drawings and specs Bid Samples & Support Control bid inflation CA CA process Plans, progress, submittals Occ LEED certification Follow-through NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 16
  17. 17. 7/17/2009 Performance Modeled at 45% better than ASHRAE Qualified for partial federal tax deduction Invested in envelope and systems – 5% Projected 5-7 year payback Model: $100,000/yr savings Water: 222,000 g/yr indoor NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Performance ENERGY STAR rating of 99 EUI = 34 to 36 kBtu/sf/yr 2008 2009 Energy costs $0.70/sf/yr (avg $1.80-$2.00) Over $100,000/yr in savings 5 year payback Utility bills lower than previous building Impact on recruitment, retention, productivity NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 17
  18. 18. 7/17/2009 Performance BENEFITS: ENVIRONMENT Environmental Impact (from DPS 2008 report) Jefferson Green operations saved in 2008: 6,290,000 kBtus energy 858 tons CO2 emissions 598 pounds of cardboard 18,050 pounds of paper 85 pounds of plastic Impact adds up across projects Impact adds up over time NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini What’s next? Energy costs will continue to rise Better payback/income Risk avoidance More tenants expecting LEED More legislation & initiatives Move toward carbon credits or carbon taxes Greening existing buildings NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 18
  19. 19. 7/17/2009 Questions? www.dpsdesign.org Julie Walleisa, AIA, LEED AP juliew@dpsdesign.org NAIOP SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 2009 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 37 19

×