Friction Skin Identification

  • 2,245 views
Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
2,245
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
13
Comments
1
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Friction Ridge Identification
  • 2.
    • Created as a supplement to
    • Chapter 15 of
    • Fingerprint Identification
    • By William Leo
    • Copyright © 2004
    • All Rights Reserved
  • 3.
    • “ Workers familiar with finger-print minutiae all affirm that there are no two duplicate prints of different fingers. They recognize many qualities other than the mere occurrences of details. The minutiae, like total patterns, have individuality. The interruption between two ridge ends may be short or long, the ridges may or may not deviate in direction as they terminate; bifurcations exhibit varying spreads, and many similar individual distinctions of minutiae occur.
  • 4.
    • When all these finer qualities are appreciated, it is not surprising that identifications of individuals are possible when only partial prints are available.”
      • Finger Prints, Palms and Soles
      • An Introduction to Dermatoglyphics
    • Doctors Harold Cummins & Charles Midlo
    • 1943, Pages 154 & 155
  • 5.
    • All areas of friction skin ( fingerprints, palms, and the toes and soles of the feet) are:
    • Permanent - Do not naturally change with time.
    • Unique - Therefore Allowing individualization
  • 6. Ridge Features and Clarity
    • The level of clarity or quality of detail will determine the type of features available for comparison and the amount of detail needed to identify.
    • This is why there is not a pre-determine standard as to the amount of detail needed for an identification
  • 7. Level 1 Detail
    • Ridge Flow
    • Class characteristics only – No individualizing detail
    • Fingerprint patterns and ridge flow (shape)
  • 8. Level 2 Detail
    • Individual Ridge Path
    • Major ridge features
    • Ridge endings, bifurcations, etc, their positions and relationship to other features
    • Allows individualization
  • 9. Level 3 Detail
    • Individual ridge Appearance
    • Highest level of detail
    • Smallest features (pore & ridge structure) are visible for comparison.
    • The most individualizing detail
  • 10.
    • “ A finger print is too complex a structure and its numerous details, definite as they are, are as arbitrary in their occurrence and arrangement as are the pebbles on the beach, no square foot of which could ever be duplicated by any other. It is always so with natural objects; the details are so numberless, and so independent of the rest, that there are no duplicates.”
    • Personal Identification, Page 324-325
    • Wilder PhD and Wentworth, 1918
  • 11. The Identification Process
    • The ACE/V Method
    • Analysis
    • Comparison
    • Evaluation
    • Plus
    • Verification
  • 12. Analysis
    • The print is examined to determine what detail is present and it’s quality (levels of clarity).
    • Does the print contain sufficient detail to be compared and identified?
    • What area of friction skin may it have come from?
  • 13. Comparison
    • The unknown print is orientated to the known exemplar.
    • A side by side comparison is made.
  • 14. Possible Conclusions
    • An identification (individualization)
    • An elimination
    • Inconclusive
  • 15. Evaluation
    • Is the detail (features) in agreement or in other words are they the same?
    • If so an identification is made.
    • Is the detail (features) different?
    • If so an elimination is made
    • If there is insufficient detail to I.D. or eliminate, the comparison would be inconclusive
  • 16. Verification
    • The ACE process is repeated by another examiner – independently
    • This is done as a quality control and to identify errors.
    • The fact that results can be repeated or duplicated independently demonstrates that fingerprint identification is not subjective.