Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Lnc Alumni Group Water Presentation #2



Dr Wesley Schultz, Psychology Professor, California State University San Marcos, January 2009, Conservation PPT to Leadership North County Alumni Group

Dr Wesley Schultz, Psychology Professor, California State University San Marcos, January 2009, Conservation PPT to Leadership North County Alumni Group



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



4 Embeds 27

http://wrightoncomm.typepad.com 23
http://www.slideshare.net 2
https://www.linkedin.com 1
http://www.slideee.com 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Lnc Alumni Group Water Presentation #2 Lnc Alumni Group Water Presentation #2 Presentation Transcript

  • Water Conservation: Moving From Awareness to Action Wesley Schultz, Ph.D. California State University Breakfast presentation for Leadership North County. Wesley Schultz, Department of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, CA, 92078. [email_address] . (760) 750-8045. January 27, 2009
  • About the Presenter
    • Ph.D. in applied social psychology
    • Academic position (professor)
    • Consulting and training through Action Research, Inc.
    • Numerous consulting, training, and marketing projects
      • Private : Southern California Edison (energy), Hewlett Foundation, SD Water Authority, Brookfield Zoo, EDCO Waste Management, KAB
      • State: California Integrated Waste Management Board (used oil recycling, waste tires), TN, FL, TX
      • Local and County : Napa, Madera, Los Angeles, San Diego
        • Cities of Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, Casper
      • Federal: National Academy of Sciences, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Justice, U.S. Air Force
      • International : United Nations, London Zoological Society, WWF
  • Conservation Means Behavior
    • Reduce consumption
    • Purchasing Decisions (landscaping)
    • New Technologies (low flow)
  • A Little Psychology
    • Scientific study of behavior
    • People act for reasons
    • Successful behavior change strategies require an understanding of the individual and situational factors that motivate and/or constrain behavior
    • Many examples of failed (or not tested) and even boomerang effects
  • Tools for Promoting Water Conservation
    • 1. Education
    • Involves disseminating information
    • Assumes that lack of behavior results from lack of knowledge
      • (this is generally not true)
    • Consistently across behavioral domains, research has shown small-to-null effects
  • So You Want to Change Behavior?
  • Tools for Promoting Water Conservation
    • 2. Price
    • Cost directly affects behavior
    • Problems with price triggers:
      • Specificity (no spillover)—think incentives for low-flow toilets
      • Framing (conservation now framed as “transaction”)
      • Can potentially undermine long-term changes (Cialdini’s fence)
  • Tools for Promoting Water Conservation
    • 3. Awareness
    • Crisis can induce change
    • Individuals rally around a cause (for a short period of time)
    • Crisis messages can boomerang if used for too long
    • And what happens when the crisis passes?
  • Tools for Promoting Water Conservation
  • Social Norms
    • A promising alternative
    • Conservation often means deviating from the norm (this message will boomerang)
    • Need to promote community support:
      • Your neighbors are conserving
      • People will disapprove if you don’t conserve
      • How much you consume relative to others
  • Tools for Promoting Water Conservation VIDEO CLIP
  • Can we reduce consumption?
    • Yes, but new tools will be required
    • Price-triggers can work (but come with side effects)
    • Information generally won’t work
    • Awareness and crisis will work for a short period
    • Fostering social norms provides a promising alternative
  • References
    • Ennett, S., Tobler, N., Ringwalt, C., & Flewelling, R. (1994). How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcomes evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1394-1401.
    • Farquhar, J. W., Williams, P. T., Maccoby, N., & Wood, P. D. (1990). Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 359-365.
    • Fortmann, S. P., Winkleby, M. A., Flora, J. A., Haskell, W. L., & Taylor, C. B. (1990). Effects of long-term community health education on blood pressure and hypertension control. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132, 629-646.
    • Harmon, M. A. (1993). Reducing the risk of drug involvement among early adolescents: An evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education. Evaluation Review, 17, 221-239.
    • Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 105-127.
    • Nolan, J., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Griskevicius, V., & Goldstein, N. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin .
    • Oskamp, S., Burkhardt, R., Schultz, P., Hurin, S., & Zelezny, L. (1998). Predicting three dimensions of residential curbside recycling: An observational study. Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 37-42.
    • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4 th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    • Schultz, P. W., Khazian, A., & Zaleski, A. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4-23.
    • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, education, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection (pp. 67-82). Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
    • Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434 .
    • Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2008). If you build it, will they come? Designing outreach programs that change behavior. In A. Cabaniss (Ed.), Handbook on household hazardous waste . Lanham, MD: Government Institutes Press.
    • Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
    • Wolitski, R. J., and the CDC AIDS Community Demonstration Project Research Group. (1999). Community-level HIV intervention in five cities: Final outcome data from the CDC AIDS Community Demonstration Projects. American Journal of Public Health.
    • Werner, C., & Makela, E. (1999). Motivations and behaviors that support recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 373-386.