McGraw-Hill
4The CriticalThinking, Reading,
andWriting Connection
4-24-2
McGraw-Hill
Learning Outcomes
The student will learn techniques for:
• Interpreting written texts.
• Participating ...
4-34-3
McGraw-Hill
Pre-read and Anticipate
(LO 4.1)
Prior to reading…
• Publication information: Determine where
and when ...
4-44-4
McGraw-Hill
Pre-read and Anticipate
(contd.)
Prior to reading…
• Overview: Skim through the text, paying close
atte...
4-54-5
McGraw-Hill
Read and Analyze(LO 4.1)
Take your time
• Main idea: Determine the thesis; is the point
clear?
• Suppor...
4-64-6
McGraw-Hill
Re-read and Annotate (LO 4.1)
Read a second time while taking notes.
• Define: List words that are unfa...
4-74-7
McGraw-Hill
Discussions about Readings
(LO 4.2)
• Read carefully and have notes on the
material handy.
• Skim the q...
4-84-8
McGraw-Hill
Discussions about Readings
(contd.)
• Share your opinions even if they are
different; be considerate of...
4-94-9
McGraw-Hill
Interpreting Visual Texts
(LO 4.3)
• Determine the focus of the image.
• Look for the conveyed purpose ...
4-104-10
McGraw-Hill
Interpreting Visual Texts
(contd.)
• Establish the author’s credibility.
• Check for the posting date...
4-114-11
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (4.4)
• Band wagon: implying that an idea must
be accurate if it is popular
• Card ...
4-124-12
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (contd.)
• Circular reasoning or begging the question:
attempting to support a posi...
4-134-13
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (contd.)
• False analogy: comparing things that differ in
the most important respec...
4-144-14
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (contd.)
• Hasty generalization: drawing a conclusion
without having sufficient evi...
4-154-15
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (contd.)
• Glittering generality: using emotionally
charged words to gain audience ...
4-164-16
McGraw-Hill
Logical Fallacies (contd.)
• Stereotyping: attaching a trait to members of
a particular religious, et...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Russell writenow ch04

113

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
113
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Russell writenow ch04

  1. 1. McGraw-Hill 4The CriticalThinking, Reading, andWriting Connection
  2. 2. 4-24-2 McGraw-Hill Learning Outcomes The student will learn techniques for: • Interpreting written texts. • Participating in class discussions about readings. • Interpreting visual texts, including photographs, graphs, advertisements, and Web sites. • Identifying logical fallacies.
  3. 3. 4-34-3 McGraw-Hill Pre-read and Anticipate (LO 4.1) Prior to reading… • Publication information: Determine where and when the article was originally published. • Biographical information: Establish the author’s background and qualifications; decide if bias may be possible. • Title: Think about the title of the piece and what expectations it creates.
  4. 4. 4-44-4 McGraw-Hill Pre-read and Anticipate (contd.) Prior to reading… • Overview: Skim through the text, paying close attention to headings and visual images; read introductory paragraphs and topic sentences. • Predictions: Based on your pre-reading, establish what you already know and predict what you expect to learn.
  5. 5. 4-54-5 McGraw-Hill Read and Analyze(LO 4.1) Take your time • Main idea: Determine the thesis; is the point clear? • Supporting points: Identify specific details and examples used to prove the thesis • Rhetorical star: Establish the five points of the rhetorical star
  6. 6. 4-64-6 McGraw-Hill Re-read and Annotate (LO 4.1) Read a second time while taking notes. • Define: List words that are unfamiliar. • Summarize: List the main points and supporting details. • Visualize: Create a visual organizer of the material. • Synthesize: Make connections with the readings. • Question and Evaluate: Ask a variety of questions.
  7. 7. 4-74-7 McGraw-Hill Discussions about Readings (LO 4.2) • Read carefully and have notes on the material handy. • Skim the questions at the end of the selection. • Listen to the discussion with an open mind.
  8. 8. 4-84-8 McGraw-Hill Discussions about Readings (contd.) • Share your opinions even if they are different; be considerate of others’ opinions. • Ask questions about the text if you feel confused. • Take notes during the discussion.
  9. 9. 4-94-9 McGraw-Hill Interpreting Visual Texts (LO 4.3) • Determine the focus of the image. • Look for the conveyed purpose or message. • Establish the target audience. • Compare any written text with the visual representation. • Decide if the image is logical or misleading. • Determine if the image is effective.
  10. 10. 4-104-10 McGraw-Hill Interpreting Visual Texts (contd.) • Establish the author’s credibility. • Check for the posting date. • Verify the information. • Look for reference citations. • Use previous strategies to evaluate visual images. • Check if the hyperlinks work and are appropriate. • Determine if the material is effective and accurate.
  11. 11. 4-114-11 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (4.4) • Band wagon: implying that an idea must be accurate if it is popular • Card stacking: providing evidence for only one side of a case, deliberately omitting essential information that could change the reader’s opinion • Character attack or ad hominem: attacking the speaker rather than the issue
  12. 12. 4-124-12 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (contd.) • Circular reasoning or begging the question: attempting to support a position by simply restating it in a different way • Either/or reasoning: suggesting there are only two possible solutions to a problem when, in reality, there could be many potential options to resolving the issue
  13. 13. 4-134-13 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (contd.) • False analogy: comparing things that differ in the most important respects • False authority or testimonial: using an authority or celebrity figure to support a point • False cause or post hoc: suggesting that, because one thing happened after another, the first event caused the second one
  14. 14. 4-144-14 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (contd.) • Hasty generalization: drawing a conclusion without having sufficient evidence • Non sequitur: the conclusion does not logically follow the evidence that is provided • Red herring: diverting the reader’s attention away from the main issue by introducing something irrelevant
  15. 15. 4-154-15 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (contd.) • Glittering generality: using emotionally charged words to gain audience approval • Slippery slope: suggesting that if one change occurs, then other unwanted changes will follow
  16. 16. 4-164-16 McGraw-Hill Logical Fallacies (contd.) • Stereotyping: attaching a trait to members of a particular religious, ethnic, racial, age, or other group • Tradition: assuming that because something has always been done a certain way, it must be the correct way
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×