Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Acing application lifecycle management in SharePoint
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Acing application lifecycle management in SharePoint


Published on

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide
  • Like a human life, an application’s lifecycle is demarcated by significant events. It begins with an idea: Why don’t we build something that does this? Once the application is created, the next big event is deployment, when the application goes into production. And finally, when it no longer has business value, the application reaches end of life and is removed from service.
  • Devs“It works on my machine”“Can’t find the source control for this version”“Haven’t got the source control”“I’ve made changes in SharePoint Root”“I copied it to the GAC manually”Admins“We don’t know where to deploy it!”“What version is in Production?”
  • Automate building of WSPEnforce that all artefacts get deployed via WSP.No manual copying of files to SharePoint RootDisaster RecoveryCheck in policyBuild StampingBuild ServerSeparate serverDon’t install SharePoint on it!Get administrators to push to environments…or automate it (PowerShell 2.0 remoting)
  • SharePoint is now a part of the toolset out of the gates!
  • Sandboxed-compatible Visual Web Part This item template enables you to use a visual designer to create SharePoint web parts that can be deployed in a SharePoint 2010 sandboxed solution.Sandboxed Compilation This extension displays build errors when you use types or members in a SharePoint 2010 sandboxed project which are not allowed in the SharePoint sandbox environment.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Acing Application Life Cycle Management in SharePoint Jeremy Thake Chief Architect Level: Intermediate
    • 2. Jeremy ThakeAvePoint LabsAuthor Chief Architect
    • 3. Agenda• What ALM is• Approaches to ALM• ALM Maturity Model• Getting started• Case Study
    • 4. What is ALM?
    • 5. Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) is a continuous process of managing the life of an application through governance, development and maintenance.WikiPedia
    • 6. ALM is the marriage of business management to software engineering made possible by tools that facilitate and integrate requirements management, architecture, coding, testing, tracking, and release management.WikiPedia
    • 7. Three aspects of ALMDavid Chappell (2008)
    • 8. GovernanceDavid Chappell (2008)
    • 9. DevelopmentDavid Chappell (2008)
    • 10. OperationsDavid Chappell (2008)
    • 11. Focus for today…development• Requirements management• Architecture• Coding• Testing• Tracking• Release management
    • 13. Today’s poll question• I am developing Visual Studio SharePoint projects• I am packaging all custom code as a WSP• I am using source control• I am using a build server• I am using SPDisposeCheck• I am doing unit testing
    • 14. Coding• Source Control – “Copy of” projects – No source code for a build (labeling) – Branching – Shelving
    • 15. Coding• Code Analysis – Consistent code Naming standards Casing Formatting – Disposing correctly – Defensive coding – Readable coding
    • 16. Coding• Debugging – Breakpoints in code – Inspecting live objects – Prevents debug statements throughout code unnecessary logging whilst in development that stays
    • 17. Testing• Unit Testing• Integration Testing• Web Testing• Lab Management
    • 18. Tracking• Tasks• Issues• Bugs• Risks
    • 19. Release management• Continuous Integration• Automation! – release packages – unit testing – code analysis – build numbers• Red/Green – Don’t break the build!
    • 20. ArtifactProvisioning
    • 21. Declarative vs. Imperative• Declaratively – Provision some artifacts – SPI’s built into Visual Studio• Imperatively – Provision / de-provision all – Run class methods – Easier to debug & test – Defensive coding – Code samples – Wrapper classes
    • 22. SharePoint Designer• Promotion between environments• Should certain artifacts be packaged as a WSP?• Manual copying and pasting files• Restricting use by policy• Using third party tools to manage deployments
    • 23. One farm, many feature versions active SITE A SITE B SITE C SPDevWiki SPDevWiki SPDevWiki V1.0.0.0 V3.0.0.0 V3.0.0.0 V2.0.0.0 V3.0.0.0 SPDevWiki SPDevWiki SPDevWiki V1.0.0.0 V2.0.0.0 V3.0.0.0
    • 24. App Model• Code executed off SharePoint• Can be any language executed on any web server• Client-side object model executed on pages hosted in SharePoint
    • 25. Automated Builds
    • 26. Build Process
    • 27. Build Process
    • 28. Unit and Integration Testing• No interfaces• Integration• Tiered layer development• Design Patterns• TypeMock Isolator, Moles/Pex, SharePoint Emulator
    • 29. Load and Performance Testing• Visual Studio Ultimate• Stress test code – Simulating users• Highlights overuse of creating new SPSite objects• Validates server roles and hardware
    • 30. ALM MaturityModel
    • 31. Where are you? Automated Testing Automated Deployment Automated Source Builds control No Source Control
    • 33. The Microsoft approach• Visual Studio 2010 Team System – Visual Studio 2010 – Team Foundation Server 2010 – Test Professional 2010 – Project Server 2010• ALL INTEGRATED• TFS in the cloud is coming!
    • 34. Visual Studio 2010
    • 35. TFS 2012 and SharePoint 2013• Supported now• sharepoint-2013-with-team-foundation- server-2012/
    • 36. SharePoint 2010 Build server• It doesn’t work out of the box ;-) – Need to put assemblies on TFS server• SharePoint/TFS Continuous Integration Starter Pack
    • 37. SharePoint 2013 Build Server• SharePoint Server 2013 Client Components SDK Preview – us/download/details.aspx?id=30355• Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 4 – us/download/details.aspx?id=8279
    • 38. The cheaper• Source control – TortoiseHg and Mercurial• Continuous Integration – JetBrains Team City
    • 39. NothingButsharepoint.comCase study
    • 40. Approach• – $10 a month for a mercurial solution• No automated builds – as I do releases...but from Source Code• Using AvePoint’s DocAve Deployment Manager to deploy from Dev to Test to Production
    • 41. Additional Tools• Developer Dashboard stsadm -o setproperty -pn developer-dashboard -pv ondemand• Microsoft.SharePoint.Emulators (NuGet)• SPDisposeCheck (• VS2010 SharePoint Power Tools (• CKS:Dev (• Fiddler (• SharePoint Manager 2010 (
    • 42. Q&A Jeremy Thake @jthake