Faculties use and rate of Web 2.0 tools for personal learning as a way of understanding drivers and barriers for adoption ...
Background <ul><li>Working as  online tutor/f2f trainee in the area of TEL </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborating in the design a...
From background to motivation <ul><li>Explore new ways of extending traditional faculty development methodologies with mor...
From background to motivation <ul><li>I decided to focus my study on: </li></ul><ul><li>Faculties rating and utilisation o...
Context and related work <ul><li>New methological approaches adopted in the process of adaptation to the Bologna accords (...
Mapping Web 2.0 utilisation in HE Micro level (at a personal and informal base) Managing information / Critical thinking a...
TEL networks
Thanks [email_address]
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Ramon Ovelar

373

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
373
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ramon Ovelar

  1. 1. Faculties use and rate of Web 2.0 tools for personal learning as a way of understanding drivers and barriers for adoption as teaching tools Ramón Ovelar Basque Country University (Spain )
  2. 2. Background <ul><li>Working as online tutor/f2f trainee in the area of TEL </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborating in the design and content of Web sites with TEL ressources </li></ul><ul><li>Giving support to faculties for TEL implementation in the classroom </li></ul><ul><li>AND, during this years, getting involved in learning communities and networks </li></ul>
  3. 3. From background to motivation <ul><li>Explore new ways of extending traditional faculty development methodologies with more active and collaborative systems. ¿bottom up? ¿why not? </li></ul><ul><li>Enhancing learning with technology in any modality (f2f, blended, informal…) </li></ul><ul><li>Overcoming barriers for Web 2.0 “peripheral technologies” in the current process of transformation to Bologna </li></ul>
  4. 4. From background to motivation <ul><li>I decided to focus my study on: </li></ul><ul><li>Faculties rating and utilisation of Web 2.0 tools as an instrument for: </li></ul><ul><li>personal learning </li></ul><ul><li>teaching in the context of adaptation to the Bologna methodological approaches. </li></ul><ul><li>Why? </li></ul><ul><li>A new perspective for understanding opportunities and barriers for Web 2.0 in HE </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying bottom-up approaches for promoting TEL innovative practices </li></ul>
  5. 5. Context and related work <ul><li>New methological approaches adopted in the process of adaptation to the Bologna accords (Lifelong Learning, Active learning…) </li></ul><ul><li>Technological innovation in HE and faculties role in the adoption of innovative TEL practices </li></ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 uptake in the context of HE formal education and other related contexts (students, informal learning, faculty development). </li></ul>
  6. 6. Mapping Web 2.0 utilisation in HE Micro level (at a personal and informal base) Managing information / Critical thinking about the information they found on the Internet / Working in a collaborative basis / Learning about safety and privacy issues / Learning to create and keep learning networks Meso level (tools and/or activities proposed by teachers) Barriers related to skills or access / Web 2.0 tools suporting students learning / Web 2.0 supporting teaching / Web 2.0 tools supporting the goals of Bologna process (active learning, new definition of roles, lifelong learning) Macro level (beyond the classroom context) Institutional provision of Web 2.0 learning tools / Should universities foster the emergence of networks and communities / Support and promotion of e-portfolio
  7. 7. TEL networks
  8. 8. Thanks [email_address]
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×