AndrianiPiki<br />How does engagement <br />with CSCL affect the learning outcomes?<br />What are the barriers and enabler...
CONCEPTUAL framework<br />Personal Factors<br />Individual Engagement<br />strategies<br />Learning outcomes<br />Group En...
Mixed methodology<br />Observation <br />Focus groups<br />    Video-recordings<br />Learner Engagement in CSCL<br />In-de...
Case study in cscl<br />
Case study in cscl<br />Participants<br />MSc in Business Information Systems<br />Diverse academic backgrounds<br />20-45...
Case study in cscl (video) <br />
Emergent themes<br />Students’ goals Vs. Lecturers’ expectations <br />Career-oriented Vs. Learning –oriented<br />Externa...
Thankyou!<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Andriani Piki

565 views
506 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
1 Comment
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
565
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
1
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Learning Theory: Systems Model (Biggs, 1993), Collaborative Learning (Dillenbourg, 1999), CSCL (Stahl et al., 2006)Engagement Theory: Kearsley &amp; Shneiderman, 1999; Involvement Theory (Astin, 1999)Small Group theory: McGrath, 1997; Stahl et al., 2006Astin, A.W. (1999). Student Involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518-529.Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, Victoria. Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher education Research and Development 12, 73-86. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by &quot;collaborative learning&quot;? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon, Elsevier Science. Kearsley, G., &amp; Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement Theory: A framework for technology-based teaching andlearning. Available from: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htmMcGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 7-27.Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., &amp; Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Andriani Piki

    1. 1. AndrianiPiki<br />How does engagement <br />with CSCL affect the learning outcomes?<br />What are the barriers and enablers to engagement?<br />How do PG students engage with CTs? <br />Web 2.0<br />
    2. 2. CONCEPTUAL framework<br />Personal Factors<br />Individual Engagement<br />strategies<br />Learning outcomes<br />Group Engagement strategies<br />Socio-<br />Technical Factors<br />Learning Theory +<br />Engagement Theory + <br />Small Group Theory<br />
    3. 3. Mixed methodology<br />Observation <br />Focus groups<br /> Video-recordings<br />Learner Engagement in CSCL<br />In-depth <br />investigation<br />Exploration of Students’ Blogs<br />Questionnaires<br />(Hammersley & Atkinson, 2007; Miles & Huberman, 1994; Rosenberg, 2000; Yin, 2003)<br />
    4. 4. Case study in cscl<br />
    5. 5. Case study in cscl<br />Participants<br />MSc in Business Information Systems<br />Diverse academic backgrounds<br />20-45 years old <br />71% had work experience<br />23 different countries<br />
    6. 6. Case study in cscl (video) <br />
    7. 7. Emergent themes<br />Students’ goals Vs. Lecturers’ expectations <br />Career-oriented Vs. Learning –oriented<br />External incentives Vs. Self-motivation<br />
    8. 8. Thankyou!<br />

    ×