Instructional Design Project Management (Presentation) Madison 2009


Published on

Do academics at your institution cringe when they hear "project management", "timelines" or "deadlines"? As a project manager, do you struggle with balancing your project management principles and practices with the university’s academic course development and design philosophies? These are typical challenges and you are not alone! Through the blending of collective efforts, both business and academic goals can be respected, realized and transformed into a new, agile, scalable model by leveraging Web 2.0 project management and collaboration tools to support a collaborative course development process package that even the most reluctant and skeptical academic and project manager can work with.

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Instructional Design Project Management (Presentation) Madison 2009

  1. 1. Instructional Design Project Management 2.0: A Model of Development and Practice<br />Jennifer Staley<br />Phil Ice<br /><br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />Introductions<br />Instructional Development & Design Process<br />Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework<br />Collaboration Tools & Supports<br />Q&A<br />Contact Info<br />
  3. 3. In the Beginning…<br /><ul><li>3 Employees
  4. 4. No Instructional Design Process
  5. 5. No Online Learning Framework
  6. 6. No Collaboration Tools
  7. 7. One year to develop, design & integrate 47 courses</li></li></ul><li>Instructional Design Process w/ Project Management Principles<br />Online Learning Model<br />Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework<br />Collaboration Tools & Supports<br />Facilitate Collaboration, Establish Community & Encourage Communication<br />
  8. 8. ADDIE Instructional Systems Design Model<br />
  9. 9. APUS ID Process Model<br />
  10. 10. Instructional Design Project Management<br />
  11. 11. Community of Inquiry Framework<br />a process model of learning in online and blended educational environments<br />grounded in a collaborative constructivist view of higher education<br />assumes effective online learning requires the development of a community of learners that supports meaningful inquiry and deep learning<br />
  12. 12. (Garrison et al., 2000, p.2)<br />
  13. 13. Social Presence<br />the ability of participants in a community of inquiry to project themselves socially and emotionally -- as ‘real’ people<br />the degree to which participants in computer mediated communication feel socially and emotionally connected <br />
  14. 14. Social Presence - Elements<br />affective expression (expressing emotion, self-projection)<br />open communication (learning climate, risk free expression)<br />group cohesion (group identity, collaboration)<br />
  15. 15. Cognitive Presence<br />the extent to which learners are able to construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse in a critical community of inquiry <br />
  16. 16. Cognitive Presence - Elements<br />triggering event (sense of puzzlement)<br />exploration (sharing information & ideas)<br />integration (connecting ideas)<br />resolution (synthesizing & applying new ideas)<br />
  17. 17. Teaching Presence<br />the design, facilitation and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes<br />
  18. 18. Teaching Presence<br />design and organization (setting curriculum & activities)<br /> facilitation (shaping constructive discourse)<br /> direct instruction (focusing & resolving issues)<br />
  19. 19. CoI Survey<br />9 social presence items (3 affective expression, 3 open communication, 3 group cohesion) <br />12 cognitive presence items (3 triggering, 3 exploration, 3 integration, 3 resolution)<br />13 teaching presence items (4 design & facilitation, 6 facilitation of discourse, 3 direct instruction)<br />
  20. 20. CoI Survey Validation<br />tested in graduate courses at four institutions in the US and Canada<br />principal component factor analysis<br />three factor model predicted by CoI framework confirmed<br />Arbaugh, Cleveland-Innes, Diaz, Garrison, Ice, Richardson, Shea & Swan - 2008<br />
  21. 21. Communication, Collaboration and Community<br />
  22. 22. Phil Ice<br /><ul><li>Email:
  23. 23. Twitter: technostats
  24. 24. Facebook & LinkedIn</li></ul>Contact Us<br />Jenn Staley<br />Email:<br />Twitter: jennystaley<br />Facebook & LinkedIn<br />
  25. 25. References<br />Abdous, M. & He, W. (2008). Streamlining the online course development process by using project management tools. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 181-188.<br /> <br />Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., and Swan, K.P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11 (3/4), 133-136.<br />Dick, W., & Carey, L.(1978). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Glenview, IL.: Scott, Foresman.<br />Florida Gulf Coast University. (2006). Principles of online design: Instructional design. Retrieved April 22, 2008, from<br /> <br />Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.<br /> <br />Ice, P. & Kupczynski, L. (2009). Student perceptions of group and individualized feedback in online courses. Conference Proposal to be presented at the SERA 2009 Conference in San Antonio.<br /> <br />McGriff, S. (2001). Project management for instructional design in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 2000). <br /> <br />Pickett, A., Shea, P., & Fredericksen, E. (2001). The sln course design process. The SUNY Learning Network: Advanced Learning and Information Services. The State University of New York.<br /> <br />Reigeluth, C. M. & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current states. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from<br /> <br />Swan, K., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. eMentor, 24I(2). Retrieved August 8, 2008, from <br />