Quick Upload

Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Share on Facebook
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
« Prev Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Next »
Add a comment If you have a SlideShare account, login to comment; otherwise comment as a guest.

    Jason Rhode Dissertation Overview

    from jrhode, 10 months ago Add as contact

    839 views | 1 comments | 1 favorites | 0 embeds (Stats)

    Desc: Overview of the dissertation of Jason F. Rhode, Ph.D. entitled, "Interaction Equivalency in Self-Paced Online Learning Environments: An Exploration of Learner Preferences"

    Embed customize close
     

    Categories

    Education

    Groups/Events

    More Info

    This slideshow is Public

    Views: 839 Comments: 1 Favorites: 1 Downloads: 9

    View Details: 839 on Slideshare 0 from embeds
    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

    If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Slideshow Transcript

    1. Slide 1: Int eract ion equivalency in self- paced online learning environm ent s: An explorat ion of learner preferences Dissert at ion Defense Jason F. Rhode 1 1/17/2008
    2. Slide 2: Jason F. Rhode • Ph.D. candidat e, Capella Universit y • Specializat ion: Inst ruct ional Design for Online Learning 2
    3. Slide 3: Int roduct ion int eract ion self-paced learning em erging com m unicat ion approaches 3
    4. Slide 4: Background • Subst ance and funct ion of online int eract ions varies • Int eract ion is essent ial for a qualit y learning experience • Unanswered quest ions concerning learners’ int eract ion preferences and degree in which int eract ions are perceived t o be equivalent 4
    5. Slide 5: St at em ent of t he Problem • Int eract ion ident ified as a key elem ent t o successful online learning program s • Lit t le em pirical evidence current ly exist s as t o t he value t hat learners place upon various t ypes of int eract ions in a self-paced learning environm ent 5
    6. Slide 6: Types of Int eract ions 6
    7. Slide 7: Int eract ion Equivalency Theorem 7
    8. Slide 8: Purpose of t he St udy • Expand upon previous research advocat ing for purposeful design of int eract ion • Exam ine t he com posit ion of t he online learning experience of adult learners in self-paced learning environm ent • Explore what form s of int eract ion self- paced online learners value m ost as well as what im pact t hey perceive int eract ion t o have on t heir overall 8 online learning experience
    9. Slide 9: Research Quest ions 1. What form s of int eract ion do adult learners engage in m ost in self-paced online courses? 2. What form s of int eract ion do adult learners value m ost in self-paced online courses? • What form s of int eract ion do online adult learners ident ify as equivalent in self-paced online courses? • What im pact do adult learners perceive int eract ion t o have on t heir self-paced 9 online learning experience?
    10. Slide 10: Research Design • Mixed m et hods approach • Sem i-st ruct ured in-dept h int erviews conduct ed near t he conclusion of t he course 10
    11. Slide 11: Sam pling Design • Part icipant s – Online adult learners enrolled in a fully-online professional developm ent cert ificat e program offered by Valley Forge Christ ian College • Part icipant select ion – Convenience sam ple: all learners (n= 13) in Sept . 2007 sect ion of “ Advanced Web Com m unicat ions” and Aug. 2007 sect ion (n= 1) invit ed t o part icipat e – Tot al of 10 learners agreed t o part icipat e 11 (n= 10)
    12. Slide 12: Part icipant Dem ographics 12
    13. Slide 13: Measures • Sem i-st ruct ured, in-dept h int erviews conduct ed over t he phone, each approx. 1 hr. in lengt h • Quest ions addressed 3 m ain t ypes of int eract ion and form al vs. inform al nat ure of such int eract ions 13
    14. Slide 14: Dat a Collect ion Procedures • Approval from Capella Universit y IRB and VFCC Academ ic Affairs • Inst rum ent and prot ocol was pilot t est ed • Int erviews conduct ed via phone and recorded, t ranscribed, and coded • Int erview t ranscript s sent t o int erviewees t o confirm accuracy 14
    15. Slide 15: Et hical Issues • Learners had no obligat ion t o part icipat e • Int erview dat a st ored securely using assigned id codes in place of part icipant nam es • Pseudo nam es used in place of act ual nam es 15
    16. Slide 16: Dat a Analysis Procedures • Ident ified em ergent t hem es from t he dat a t hat will serve as foundat ional schem a for furt her dat a organizat ion and analysis • Frequency analysis of ordinal dat a 16
    17. Slide 17: Expect ed Findings • It was expect ed t hat one or m ore t ypes of int eract ion will surface as being preferred for adult learners • Learners m ay recognize cert ain int eract ions as equivalent 17
    18. Slide 18: Analysis of Research Quest ion # 1 • What form s of int eract ion t o learners engage in m ost in self- paced online courses? 18
    19. Slide 19: Engagem ent in Int eract ion • Well-design cont ent report ed as one of t he st rongest aspect s of t he course • Pract ical applicat ion assignm ent s am ong m ost beneficial • Overwhelm ingly posit ive responses t o course com m unit y, CMUOnet 19
    20. Slide 20: Report ed Involvem ent • Most report ed using course blog and social bookm arks • Inst ruct ors blog was very helpful for m ost • Part icipant s didn’t at t em pt t o cont act out side expert s • In-course discussion was lim it ed 20
    21. Slide 21: Analysis of Research Quest ion # 2 • What form s of int eract ion do adult learners value m ost in self-paced online courses? 21
    22. Slide 22: 22
    23. Slide 23: 23
    24. Slide 24: 24
    25. Slide 25: Analysis of Research Quest ion # 3 • What form s of int eract ion do online adult learners ident ify as equivalent in self-paced online courses? 25
    26. Slide 26: Findings • Blogging valued equally, and in som e inst ances higher, t han asynchronous discussion via t he LMS • Int eract ions wit h inst ruct or and cont ent deem ed equivalent or nearly equivalent , wit h int eract ions wit h ot her learners of less im port ance • Part icipant s hesit ant t o agree t o any degradat ion of inst ruct or or cont ent int eract ions but m any agreed t hat learner int eract ions could be replaced 26
    27. Slide 27: Analysis of Research Quest ion # 4 • What im pact do adult learners perceive int eract ion t o have on t heir self-paced online learning experience? 27
    28. Slide 28: Findings • Em ail was t he preferred m ode of int eract ion wit h inst ruct or, blogging preferred for int eract ion wit h ot hers • Feedback from inst ruct or was report ed as very im port ant • Course size vs. qualit y • Part icipant s ident ified a correlat ion bet ween qualit y of int eract ion and qualit y of learning experience 28
    29. Slide 29: Int eract ion Mat rix: Core Elem ent s 29
    30. Slide 30: Int eract ion Mat rix: Form al 30
    31. Slide 31: Int eract ion Mat rix: Inform al 31
    32. Slide 32: Int eract ion Mat rix 32
    33. Slide 33: Conclusions • Depending on t he specific circum st ance, not all form s of int eract ion m ay be eit her equally valued by learners or effect ive • Inform al int eract ions were as im port ant as form al int eract ions in det erm ining t he qualit y of t he online learning experience • Blogging was shown t o be equivalent t o or even superior t o inst ruct or-direct ed asynchronous discussion via t he 33 discussion board in a LMS
    34. Slide 34: Furt her St udy • Explore perspect ives of learners in varying disciplines/inst it ut ions/social-cult ural backgrounds/online learning environm ent s • Differing learner populat ions • Unique aspect s of em ergent asynchronous com m unicat ions such as blogging, collaborat ive aut horship, social bookm arking, and social net working • To what ext ent can a social net work syst em m eet t he needs of designers, inst ruct ors, and learners and t herefore be capable of replacing an LMS? • What im pact does course size have on t he self- paced online learning experience? 34