Wall Street Journal Education, Hoxby Study SummarizedDocument Transcript
WALL STREET JOURNAL EDUCATION
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
Charter Schools Pass Key Test in Study
By JOHN HECHINGER and I ANTHE JEANNE DUGAN
New York City students who win a lottery to enroll in charter schools outperform those who don't win spots and go on to attend traditional
schools, according to new research to be released Tuesday.
The study, led by Stanford University economics Prof. Caroline Hoxby, is likely to fire up the movement to push states and school districts to
expand charter schools -- one of the centerpieces of President Barack Obama's education strategy.
Students dance at Harlem Success Academy in New York this spring. President Barack Obama wants to expand the number of charter
Among students who had spent their academic careers in charter schools, the average eighth grader in Ms. Hoxby's study had a state
mathematics test score of 680, compared with 650 for those in traditional schools. The tests are generally scored on a roughly 500 to 800
scale, with 650 representing proficiency.
Ms. Hoxby's study found that the charter-school students, who tend to come from poor and disadvantaged families, scored almost as well as
students in the affluent Scarsdale school district in the suburbs north of the city. The English test results showed a similar pattern. The study
also found students were more likely to earn a state Regents diploma, given to higher-achieving students, the longer they attended charter
This year, the Renaissance Charter School in Queens and the Democracy Prep Charter School in Harlem each had 1,500 applicants for 80
seats. Rennaissance co-principal Stacey Gauthier says 90% of students achieve proficiency in the state test and end up going to college.
"We have to perform well or we lose our charter," she says. "It makes us step up our game."
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, argued that New York City's charter schools aren't representative of
the nation's, because the state caps charter schools and agencies vet them thoroughly before authorizing them, assuring they are of higher
quality than elsewhere.
Charter schools are publicly funded schools, typically with nonunion teachers, that are granted more freedom by states in curriculum and
hiring, and are often promoted as a way to turn around failing schools.
Critics of charter schools have long argued that any higher test scores were not necessarily attributable to anything the schools were doing,
but to the students themselves, on the premise that only the most motivated students and families elected charters. Ms. Hoxby's study
sought to address that argument by comparing students who attend charters directly with similarly motivated students -- those who sought to
attend charters but were denied a seat through a random lottery. She concluded the charters did have a positive effect.
Charter supporters, including many conservatives, have often cited the school-choice research of Ms. Hoxby, a well-known economist who is
also a fellow at Stanford's right-leaning Hoover Institution.
New York City's 99 charter schools are concentrated in poorer neighborhoods such as Harlem and the South Bronx. Some 30,000 students
attend and another 40,000 are on waiting lists -- a small fraction of the 1.1 million students in the nation's largest school district.
Ms. Hoxby's study noted a strong correlation between achievement and charter programs with the following practices: a longer school day,
merit pay for teachers and a disciplinary policy that punishes small infractions and rewards courtesy.
"We want to make New York City the Silicon Valley of charter schools," says schools Chancellor Joel Klein, who supports lifting statewide
caps. "This study shows that when districts aren't antagonistic to charter schools, and instead welcome them, the results are very powerful."
But Ms. Weingarten, the union leader, cited another study this year from the Center for Research on Education Outcomes -- also at Stanford
-- that looked at charters in 16 states and found that half did no better than traditional schools, and more than a third performed worse.
Pierina Arias, an Ecuadorean immigrant, turned to the Renaissance charter after her twins were rejected by a private school because they
didn't speak English. "I was crying," says Ms. Arias. "I didn't know what to do." The twins won charter admission in a lottery, recently
graduated with honors and are both in college, she says.
Patricia Hesselbach won a place in Democracy Prep's lottery for her 14-year-old daughter, Ayanna Mason, now a ninth grader. She had
been at a traditional public school and needed to take outside courses to keep up with such basics as reading, her mother says. At
Democracy Prep, Ms. Hasselbach says, her daughter is thriving. "They hold them to high expectations, and make sure they have discipline
and dedication," Ms. Hesselbach says.
But Cynthia Lee, a hospital manager in Harlem, entered ten lotteries to get her 13-year-old daughter into Democracy Prep and didn't win a
place. So, the single mother enrolled her daughter in a Catholic school for $3,100 a year. "I had no choice," she says. "I'd rather pay every
last dime than put her in a public school."
Write to John Hechinger at firstname.lastname@example.org and Ianthe Jeanne Dugan at email@example.com