Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Capstone Pub699
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Capstone Pub699

269

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
269
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page i of 91Running head: SUNSHINE INFORMATION REQUEST PROCESS An Evaluation of the Information Management Process in the Facilities and Construction Management Department, School Board of Broward County, Florida by Julie J. Rada to Barry University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Public Administration This Applied Capstone Project has been accepted for the faculty of Barry University by: _______________________________________ Stephen E. Sussman, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Public Administration
  • 2. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page ii of 91 Executive Summary Sunshine legislation exists to ensure that government agencies operate in an openenvironment and provide public access to agency documents. The principle behind suchregulation goes to the heart of republican democracy wherein the people are the government.Transparency and compliance are keys to fostering informed public participation, as well as toprovide responsible governance that is responsive to public opinion. For this reason informationmanagement is a crucial function in public administration. An evaluation of the information processes in Facilities and Construction Management atthe School Board of Broward County was undertaken to provide insight into the dynamicsinvolved in dealing with stakeholder requests. As a prelude to the study, a literature review wasperformed to provide an historical perspective on government in the sunshine, and study thebody of research relating to compliance, public opinion, and media influence on administrativefunction, as well as relevant case law.The ensuing analysis of the department‘s availableinformation process data was conducted based on that body of knowledge. Data was examined and evaluated as it relates to various facets of the informationresponse processes. The volume of information requests, turnaround time from date of inquiry tocompletion, entities involved in fulfillment of those requests, parties generating requests, andtopics of interest were all analyzed. Answers were sought to questions concerning who makespublic records requests, the nature of information is being sought, whether external factorstrigger requests, how change in leadership affects the response process, and, ultimately, theefficiency of the response process.
  • 3. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page iii of 91 Assessment results indicate that the department‘s information processes are effective, andthat they are in compliance with specified guidelines concerning response completion time.Stakeholders requesting information represent diverse relationships, and there is significantcorrelation between stakeholder status and the subject matter sought. Evidence tends to supportthe contentions that both change in leadership and external factors impacted the process duringthe period studied.
  • 4. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page iv of 91 Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY IIISSUE STATEMENT 1LITERATURE REVIEW 3INTRODUCTION 3PUBLIC OPINION 3INFORMING THE PUBLIC 5THE MEDIA 8TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND COMPLIANCE 13FEDERAL INFORMATION POLICY 15STATE OF FLORIDA INFORMATION POLICY 19SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA INFORMATION POLICY 22METHODOLOGY 23INFORMATION REQUESTS 23DOCUMENT REQUESTS 24THE MEDIA CONNECTION 24FINDINGS 25INFORMATION REQUESTS 25DOCUMENT REQUESTS 31THE MEDIA CONNECTION 35RECOMMENDATIONS 37APPENDIX A 39PRECEDENT-SETTING FOIA LITIGATION 39APPENDIX B 41FLORIDA CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE I – DECLARATION OF RIGHTS 41APPENDIX C 42SBBC POLICY NUMBER1343.000 42APPENDIX D 43INTERVIEW QUESTIONS 43APPENDIX E 45FCM INFORMATION REQUESTS RAW DATA 45
  • 5. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page v of 91APPENDIX F 50FCM INFORMATION REQUESTS CODE BOOK 50APPENDIX G 51FCM DOCUMENT REQUESTS RAW DATA 51APPENDIX H 55FCM DOCUMENT REQUESTS CODEBOOK 55APPENDIX I 56SUPERINTENDENT’S DIRECTIVE 56APPENDIX J 57REFERRAL 57APPENDIX K 58CHART 1 – MONTHLY VOLUME 58APPENDIX L 59CHART 2 – TURNAROUND TIME 59APPENDIX M 60CHART 3 – AVERAGE TURNAROUND – LEADERSHIP TRACK 60APPENDIX N 61CHART 4 – SINGLE DEPARTMENT PROCESSING 61CHART 5 – MULTI-DEPARTMENT PROCESSING 61APPENDIX O 62CHART 6 – REQUESTING PARTIES 62APPENDIX P 63CHART 7 – MONTHLY BREAKDOWN BY STAKEHOLDER 63APPENDIX Q 64CHART 8 – REQUEST RECEIPT METHODS 64APPENDIX R 65CHART 9 – MONTHLY VOLUME 65APPENDIX S 66CHART 10 – TRANSACTION RESOLUTION 66CHART 11 – FEES COLLECTED 66
  • 6. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page vi of 91APPENDIX T 67CHART 10 – REQUESTING PARTIES 67APPENDIX U 68CHART 13 – TOPIC 68CHART 14 – TOPIC (OTHER THAN BID-RELATED) 68APPENDIX V 69CHART 15 – VOLUME DISTRIBUTION BY TOPIC 69APPENDIX W 70CHART 16 – BID PROCESS/DOCUMENT REQUEST COMPARISON 70APPENDIX X 71CHART 17 – TURNAROUND 71APPENDIX Y 72BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NEWS ARTICLES JULY 2008 – JUNE 2010 72 Sun-Sentinel 72 The Miami Herald 76WORKS CITED 82
  • 7. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 1 of 91 Issue Statement Information management plays a vital role in public administration. Effectivetransmission of information facilitates intra-organizational communication, and is essential forinteractions between the agency and the public, the media, and overhead agencies. Sunshinelegislation mandates open access to public records, and is intended to foster transparency ingovernance. As a public agency the Facilities and Construction Management (FCM) department of theSchool Board of Broward County (SBBC) is subject to state and federal Sunshine Laws. It isresponsible for construction and renovation of all SBBC facilities and capital improvements. Assuch, FCM personnel interact with a variety of stakeholders in the execution of its business. An analysis of FCM‘s records pertaining to its information management process couldprovide insight into stakeholder identity, areas of concern, and how effective the responseprocess is. This study will attempt to answer these questions: 1. Who is making public recordsrequests? 2. What information is being sought? 3. Do external factors trigger requests? 4. Doeschange in leadership affect the response process? 5. How efficient is the response process?6. Isthere collaboration among departments in the response completion process? Operative hypotheses are as follows: 1. FCM receives information requests from avariety of stakeholders. 2. There is a strong correlation between stakeholder status andinformation requested. 3. External factors such as media coverage influence informationrequests. 4. Change in leadership impacts the response process. 5. FCM fulfills informationrequests within time frames prescribed by SBBC policy, and is in compliance with Sunshine
  • 8. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 2 of 91requirements.6. FCM frequently collaborates with other departments in completing theinformation request process. Evaluation of current processes may reveal areas where policies and procedures can beimproved, or alternatively, provide affirmation as to their efficacy. Additionally, it may proveuseful in achieving a measureable degree of predictability concerning causal relationshipsrelative to public interest in FCM functions. The intent behind this study is to provide abeneficial service to the department, and to offer support for process improvements suggested bystaff members.
  • 9. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 3 of 91 Literature ReviewIntroduction Information management is defined as ―a multi-faceted process involving the collection,processing, storage, transmission, and use of information‖ (Feinberg, 1986, p. 615). Differentregulations pertain to each facet of the process. In discussing management of federal informationpolicy Feinberg reveals that ―businesses have become major requesters; submitters ofinformation are seeking new protections for their data; (and) the costs of providing informationhave been significantly higher than Congress anticipated‖ (p. 615). Codification of federalinformation policy originated with the enactment of a ―housekeeping‖ statute in 1789, saw majorrevisions in the 1940‘s and 1960‘s, and is subject to continuous refinement. All three branches ofgovernment and the private sector have been actively involved in shaping this legislation. This study relates to the transmission phase of information management. While effectivecommunication is importantwithin any agency, it is an essential for the public administrator indealing with extra-organizational entities(Cohen, Eimicke, & Heikkila, 2008). Among these arethe general public, legislatures, overhead agencies, interest groups, and the media.The primaryfocus of this study concerns the distribution of information to interested parties. In particular,attention will be directed toward an exploration of the importance of public records andinformation management in promoting the ideals of accountability, transparency, and informedpublic opinion.Additionally, the issue of compliance with state and federal regulation isexamined as it relates to agency interaction with legislatures and overhead agencies.Public Opinion Public opinion playsan integral role in fostering an informed public. Its eminence in
  • 10. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 4 of 91politics and governance in the United States originated with the framing of our constitution,made implicit through the First Amendment. Several works are available on the topic. James Madison’s Psychology of Public Opinioninforms that recent developments in thefield of public opinion have led to a renewed interest in Madison‘s conception of its role and theappropriate extentto which it should play a part ingovernmental process (Gabrielson, 2009).Citing contemporary literature that ranges from limiting the role as a means for selection of goodrepresentatives to a vehicle for highly significant involvement in self-directed governance,Gabrielson contends that the key questions concern Madison‘s view not only of the public‘scapacity for making political decisions, but whether public reason can prevail over passion in arepublic. Acomprehensive qualitative analysis of Madison‘s essays and letters is undertaken thattracks the maturation of his philosophical views toward informed citizenry. The tensions inherentin our political system are mirrored in his discussions concerning reason versus emotion andaffection relative to establishing an informed decision-making process. According to Gabrielson,Madison ―relies on both the social passions and reason to settle public opinion, especially whenthose passions are supported by the reason of the few and the few appeal to the reason of themany‖ (p. 441). Ultimately this treatise reflects the belief that Madison considered it the public‘sresponsibility to monitor the actions of its representatives and call for action when appropriate,as well as his advocacy for debate that allows for passion tempered by logic. Public administration theorists have held varying views on the role of public opinion inthe discipline‘s practical application. In promoting administration as a practical science andestablishing the framework for its academic application, Woodrow Wilson advocated foradministrators having broad powers and unhampered discretion in order to be efficient(Wilson,(1887) 2004). He posited that this would afford the means to achieve the highest potential for
  • 11. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 5 of 91open and honest success. As justification, he argued that public opinion would be theauthoritative critic concerning administrative performance, but cautioned that there must be aproper relation between public opinion and administration. Wilson‘s managerial approach as adapted by Frederick Taylor, Leonard White, LutherGulick, Simmons and Dvorin, and Max Weber dictates that administration must be separate andapart from politics(Rosenbloom, (1983) 2004). Rosenbloom does not address the subject inrelation to the legal approach to administration, however, as is evident from the media coverageof litigation involving theDepartment of the Interior and the Minerals Management Serviceconcerningthe Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster, this method is not immune to the realm ofpublic opinion. With regard to the political approach Rosenbloom evokes Wallace Sayre‘ssentiment that ―…the fundamental problem in a democracy is responsibility to popularcontrol…‖ (p. 447). Public opinion is fundamental to the political approach to publicmanagement. This school of thought stresses representativeness, political responsiveness, andaccountability. Political administrative management spawned the Freedom of Information Act, aswell as other ―sunshine‖ provisions and ―sunset‖ requirements.Informing the Public An article appearing in The Public Opinion Quarterly during the Truman era critiques thefederal government‘s recently created agency position, the public information officer(Fitzpatrick, 1947-1948).Fitzpatrick‘s introductory comments acknowledge the inherent tensionbetween the public and administrative agencies in the governmental process. ―Nevertheless, it isgenerally accepted that whenever the American people are properly informed of governmentalactivities, they are more likely to understand what is being done, and why‖ (p. 530).
  • 12. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 6 of 91 Fitzpatrick writes that the greatest challenges faced in government information programsare internal in nature. The most basic of these is how much authority is vested in the publicinformation officer. Next is the question of where within the hierarchy this position resides,which is complicated by the involvement of intermediaries between the information officer andadministrators. Division of authority and responsibility within the agency create difficulties indetermining who is authorized to release information. Delays caused by these hurdles can createadverse public relations resulting in loss of trust in the agency, as well as negative perceptionsconcerning administrative performance. Stalled delivery of information is often exacerbatedwhen the information being sought is provided to the party requesting it by an outside source.Additional problems involve agency personnel communicating public information without theadvice of the information officer, misuse or misrepresentation of agency information byadministrative personnel, and the bureaucratic tendency toward hesitancy in admitting to errorwhen it has been discovered. The effective public administrator recognizes that the interests of the agency must bebalanced with the interests of those who are the beneficiaries of the information they supply, andappreciatesthat an informed public is an essential component of governance (Cohen, Eimicke, &Heikkila, 2008). A prudent administrator relies on the public information officer, when available,as the most effective means for information dissemination. Effects of external information impinging on public information utilized in the decision-making process are studied in Social Value of Public Information(Morris & Shin, 2002). Morrisand Shin contend that public information has a dual role - to convey fundamental information,and to facilitate focused thinking. ―Sunspots‖ and ―noise‖ are referenced as influences that mightresult in distortion of public information. When this distortion occurs, the effects are detrimental
  • 13. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 7 of 91to the social planner. Just as public information has significant impact, so does the incursion ofnoise in the public psyche. They posit that public information risks the danger of being tooeffective in influencing actions; when overreaction occurs, any noise damage is magnified. Government agencies are faced with numerous interrelated issues in formulatingdisclosure policies. Specific concerns include how much information should be disclosed, howoften, and in what form. The challenge is to find a balance between providing timely preliminaryor incomplete information versus delaying response in order to provide more accurate data. Thisbecomes increasingly more difficult with increased scrutiny or monitoring of agency activities. An interesting study conducted by Christopher Wlezien demonstrates how the public‘sspending preferencescorrelate to policy outputs (1995). He developed a thermostatic modelincorporating spending preferences relative to a set of five social programs, as well as defensepolicy. Utilizing time series regression analysis, he found that changes in spending preferencesreflect changes in levels of spending preferred, as well as in spending decisions themselves.Public preference changes are inversely related to spending decisions. When appropriationsincrease, preferences are adjusted downward, and vice versa. Public spending preferences tendtoward being more liberal when economic expectations are more optimistic, and moreconservative when they are not. Unless something happens to change them, preferences tend toremain unchanged. In his conclusion Wlezien writes: ―… most striking is that the publicresponds to appropriations, which are policy decisions, not to the more tangible outlays thatresult from appropriations‖ (p. 998). The efficacy of his model is dependent upon the publicobtaining the most accurate information available otherwise the public would prove to be a faultythermostat. Knowledge as power is a recurring theme in the democratic process, and knowledge gap
  • 14. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 8 of 91has long been a topic of concern (Jerit, Barabas, & Bolsen, 2006). In their study of theinformation environment, Jerit, Barabas and Bolsen narrowed their focus from generalknowledge to surveillance knowledge, i.e. sufficient understanding of issues enabling individualsto monitor government activity. They sought to determine whether knowledge could beimproved by increased media coverage, and how that increased knowledge impacted theknowledge gap. Their findings indicated that the greater volume of coverage increasedknowledge across the spectrum. In the case of print news, more plentiful information increaseddifferences in knowledge level attributed to education. There was not a significant increase in theknowledge gap with increased television coverage. In terms of relative gains, the least educateddid better. As suggested by Jerit, et al., further study aimed at gap reduction would be beneficialin exploring means through which to foster the ideal of informed political participation. Inclusionof alternative information sources could also provide additional insight into individualmonitoring habits.The Media Government is highly dependent upon the media as a vehicle for communicating with thepopulace. Several studies have been completed concerning the role of media in politics as ameans of informing public opinion, ensuring disclosure and transparency, and its influence inagenda setting.Interaction between the press, the public, decision makers and policy constructhas provided fertile ground for study in multiple scholarly disciplines. Complexities of theserelationships, as well as variations on theme make the subject timeless. The preceding sections sufficiently examine the relationship between the media and thepublic for the purposes of this study. An understanding of the dynamics between the press and
  • 15. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 9 of 91policymaking is beneficial in terms of its import to the public administrator, as well as thepotentialimpact on the general public. A major cross-disciplinary study concerning media and agenda setting was published inPublic Opinion Quarterly in 1983 (Cook, et al.). Its authors claimed to be the first to ―…examine how the same media presentation shapes the judgments of both the general public andpolicy makers and also how the presentation affects subsequent policy‖ (pp. 16-17). This studywas unique in that it involved a collaboration of the researchers with a team of investigativereporters. Inasmuch as the researchers were fully appraised as to the content and records thatwould be used in a televised investigative report, as well as the date on which it would air, theywere able to conduct both pre- and post-broadcast surveys. An experimental group was asked towatch the target program, while a control group was asked to view a news magazine program ona different channel airing at the same time. A test population was randomly selected from thegeneral public, with those respondents randomly assigned to either the experimental group or thecontrol group. One to two hour interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of policy makerparticipants prior to the news report, with a post airing telephone survey lasting ten to fifteenminutes. This sampling population consisted of government elites (53 percent) and specialinterest elites (47 percent), all at the state level.Cook, et al. felt it inappropriate to requestindividuals of this echelon to watch a television program, and posited that when high-levelpolicymakers are not personally attuned to the media, they rely on staff to provide them withrelevant information. Thus they are indirectly exposed to its effects. Of those responding, thegroup was evenly split between those who were exposed to the presentation and those who werenot. The breakdown in subgroups revealed 63 percent exposure to 37 percent lacking awareness
  • 16. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 10 of 91of the broadcast among government elites, with 37.5 percent of special interest elites reportingexposure to the program compared to 62.5 percent indicating non-exposure. In summation the data suggests a strong correlation between watching the target programand the public perception of issue importance. Post survey results ranked the target issue assecond in priority, up from fourth in the antecedent survey. The finding supports the concept ofthe ―agenda-setting function of the media among members of the general public‖ (Cook, et al.,p.25). Policy elites are not all similarly influenced by news media presentations. In this study theinvestigative report altered the perception of government elites, but not that of special interestelites. Results revealed an alteration in perception of the importance of the issue on the part ofgovernmental policy makers, their belief that action was necessary, and their perception of howthe public views issue priorities. However, the issue remained last in priority for thesepolicymakers. Lack of significant change among special interest elites in this study wasattributed to their nature. Special interest groups are already knowledgeable about and advocatethe issues to which they are committed. Through their evaluation pertaining to the impact of the studied report on policy, Cook etal. reveal a connection between the media investigators and the U.S. Permanent Subcommitteeon Investigations. This was a mutually beneficial relationship in that the subcommittee sought toattract public attention to the issue through the media, and the investigative team‘s motivationwas to include the government‘s reaction in their story. The broadcast concluded with anannouncement that Senate hearings were imminent, and the following day a news release settingthe hearing dates was issued. Expert testimony was provided during the hearings by some of theinvestigators, who were subsequently lauded for their ―initiative in securing their … findings‖ (p.31). Cook, et al. concluded that while public perception and the agendas of policy makers were
  • 17. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 11 of 91both affected by media coverage in the case studied, it was the ongoing collaboration ofgovernment staff members with journalists that ultimately led to political action. Media thrives on scandals and accidents, and the crises caused by them have drawnattention to regulatory issues that would not have otherwise been placed on the political agenda(Kemp, 1984).Dissemination of information about an incident is a prerequisite to its becoming apolitical issue. Kemp cites the journalistic axiom that ―an event which wasn‘t reported didn‘thappen‖ (p.403). Public concern about issues cannot be generated unless opinion leaders and themedia broadly disseminate what is observed and known about their occurrence. In her data analysis Kemp contends, ―accidents and scandals are dramatic eventsfacilitating mobilization for quick action rather than deliberation and study. … If there is to beany institutional response, it must come quickly before public attention is turned elsewhere‖ (p.413). Kemp sought to determine the impact of accidents and scandals on political support forregulatory agencies in the White House and Congress. Budgetary data for the Securities andExchange Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal AviationAdministration was utilized to test for the effect of accidents and scandals occurring over aperiod of approximately thirty years. For all three agencies accidents and scandals wereimportant factors in budgeting outcomes and regulatory policy. Party control as well as therelative status of the three agencies factored into the specific magnitude, direction, and quality ofresponse from Congress and the presidency. A look at environmental policy demonstrates how dramatic events have impacted agencyadministration. Major incidents that have had an effect on policymaking include Three MileIsland, Love Canal, the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the Bhopal disaster, and Chernobyl (Cooper,2007). A sampling of legislation that arose from these incidents, as well as public concern over
  • 18. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 12 of 91other environmental issues includes: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1975; ToxicSubstances Control Act 1976; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, andLiability Act (Superfund) 1980; Alaska National Interest Conservation Act 1980; Hazardous andSolid Waste Amendments 1984; Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)1986; Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act 1986; Safe Drinking Water Amendments of1986; Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986; Federal Water QualityAct 1987; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Amendments 1988; OceanPollution Act 1990; Oil Pollution Prevention Act 1990; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990;Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act 1992; Federal Facilities Compliance Act1992; and California Desert Protection Act 1994. Public information was key to exposingdangers, real or perceived, that demanded the attention of government. Access to agency recordsis crucial as a means to satisfy the public that their interests are being adequately protected. Scandal and impropriety evoke strong responses from the American public, especiallywhen government and its officials are involved. Among those with the highest profile areWatergate, the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, and human rights violations that occurredat Abu Ghraib. Violation of public trust is not a new concern, but in recent years intensifiedscrutiny of government and bureaucratic agencies in Broward, Dade, and Palm Beach Countieshas had significant impact, and been greatly facilitated through accessibility to publicinformation. Several officials have been removed from office for their abuses, with some servingprison time on criminal charges. A surge in concern about the actions of representatives on bothstate and local levels has spawned ethics review committees in various agencies and placedethics regulation on ballots in recent elections. The Threshold of Public Attention asks ―what would happen if all the mass media ceased
  • 19. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 13 of 91to function?‖ (Neuman, 1990). It answers that government would be immobilized. This studyfocuses on the transition from initial stages of public awareness toward a threshold that moves amatter from one of private concern to a public, political issue. In addressing the evolution ofagenda-setting theory Neuman incorporates McCombs and Shaw‘s proposition that ―the pressmay not be successful much of the time in telling people what to think, but … stunninglysuccessful in telling its readers what to think about‖ (p. 160). While the media and the publicboth respond to real-world cues, the media acts a conduit of information. The potential forfiltering, distortion, and amplification is elemental in agenda-setting theory. In discussing public response function theory Neuman refers to Downs‘s ―issue-attention‖ cycle(p. 164). Downs contended that public interest has a systematic life cycle, andthat changes in public perception are more closely related to this five-stage cycle than to changesin real conditions. Stage one is the pre-problem stage where a problem exists, but publicattention has not been captured. The discovery stage, stage two, reflectsa major increase inattention and the problem transitions into a political issue. This is the threshold. In stage three aplateau is reached and enthusiasm for the issue begins to wane. Stage four, the decline - thepublic becomes restless, inattentive, and frustrated. In the fifth stage, the post-problem periodrelegates the issue to a state of limbo. Neuman reported findings in his study produced consistentbut somewhat weak evidence in support of threshold and saturation effects. Relativeresponsiveness to different issue types produced the biggest differences issue by issue.Transparency, Accountability, and Compliance Timing, logistics and information sensitivity are all of concern in relation to transparency.Andrea Prat of the London School of Economics identified circumstances whereby conformism
  • 20. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 14 of 91was a result of an agent‘s knowledge that his or her actions were being observed (2005). Onlyfear of failure deters conformism. More to the point of thiseconometric study, the concludingstatements pose that ―an action, or the intention to take an action, should not be revealed beforethe consequences of the action are observed‖ (p. 869). The expectation should be thattransparency on decisions and consequences go hand in hand. An exploratory analysis of sunshine regulations as applied to institutions of highereducation discusses Cleveland‘s contention that mandated openness, when applied to publiccolleges and universities, poses a ―trilemma‖ for society (McLendon & Hearn, 2006). Inherenttension is created among competing societal objectives: ensuring accountability to the public,protecting individual rights, and allowing institutions sufficient autonomy to achieve their publicmissions. The purpose of this study was to gain perspective on stakeholders‘ views regarding theimpact of sunshine regulations on the governance of institutions of higher learning. Samplingconsisted of a two-stage process. Six states were selected for their diversity along social, legal,and organizational dimensions. Then respondents were selected from among six categories;members of institutional governing boards, senior campus and system officials, faculty senateleaders, newspaper personnel versed in the field, state attorneys general and their staff, and statelegislators and agency officials. Analysis revealed no evidence of ―declining openness in highereducation, and no evidence of outright revolt against sunshine laws‖ (p.675). Respondentsexpressed commitment of openness in both principle and in practice. Most felt that safeguardingof individual privacy rights, as well as maintaining institutions capable of achieving theirpurpose efficiently and effectively were equally important. Balancing the three creates tensionand poses challenges when implementing sunshine laws in the collegiate environment. An economic study on media capture and accountability assessed relationships between
  • 21. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 15 of 91features of the media industry, media capture, and political outcomes(Besley & Prat, 2006).Media capture signifies a collusive relationship between the press and government, ergo itcreates a scenario that is antithetical to the precept of accountability. Analysis resultsindicated―media pluralism is of paramount importance‖ and should be considered in mergerreviews by regulatory agencies (p. 732). Besley and Pratt conclude that increased mediacompetition reduces bias and fosters an environment true to the intent of accountability. Despite revisions to both federal and state sunshine legislation, differences in opinionover interpretation of production requirements based on form and format of information continueto cause friction. Government Records: It’s the Message, Not the Medium, a trade publicationarticle, reviews three cases involving resistance on the part of both state and federal agencies inresponding to requests for production of records produced electronically and/or through the useof personal equipment (Swartz, 2008). A cursory review of FOIA audits and research containedin The National Security Archives at George Washington University reveals a fairlycomprehensive critique of compliance on the federal level.Federal Information Policy The United States maintains an open information policy that is based on diverse andfragmented administrative practice laws (Cooper, 2007). It is a system of interrelated andoverlapping constitutional and statutory elements that sometimes conflict. The language of theConstitution and Supreme Court interpretations of its articles and amendments are at the heart ofthe system. Core statutory elements include the Freedom of Information Act, Right to PrivacyAct, Government in the Sunshine Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, Federal Advisory CommitteeAct, and E-Government Act. Additional statutory elements are the Health Insurance Portability
  • 22. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 16 of 91and Accountability Act, the USA Patriot Act, Homeland Security Act, Computer Security Act,the Clinger Cohen Act, Paperwork Elimination Act, and Family Education Rights and PrivacyAct. Various environmental factors affecting information policy involve political pressure,national security, intergovernmental relations, market forces, technological innovation, andglobalization. Included among the legislation amassed during in the New Deal Era was theAdministrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §551 et seq.(Cooper, 2007). This statute appliesto all federal agencies not otherwise specifically exempted, and provides minimum standards towhich these agencies must adhere. In original form the APA included provisions intended topromote openness and responsiveness in government, including the administration ofinformation policy. Beginning in 1955, U.S. Rep. John Moss (D-CA), a leading consumer advocate,spearheaded a committee that investigated, promulgated reports and held hearings ongovernment information policy. At that time Section 3 of the APA governed the means by whichthe public could obtain information from federal governmental agencies (The FOIA andPresident Lyndon Johnson, n.d). Organizations involved with formulating the policy included theAmerican Bar Association, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and ―committees of newspapermen,editors and broadcasters‖ (The Congressional Record, 1966, p. 13642). Enacted in 1966, The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, constitutesthe greatest portion of the APA. It establishes that any person, including U.S. citizens, foreignnationals, organizations, associations, and universities can file a FOIA request. TheAdministrative Procedures Act contained less precise verbiage affording agencies responding torequests reasons to deny those requests based on arbitrary interpretations as to who might be
  • 23. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 17 of 91entitled to receive information requested from them, i.e. how is ―need to know‖ defined. The decade from instigation through fruition was extremely active. In addition to theCold War, major political events during this time include: McCarthyism and Senator JosephMcCarthy‘s decline in reputation; the third and fourth decades of the nearly 50-year reign of J.Edgar Hoover, his investigation into subversives and prominent figures he distrusted as well ashis refusal to investigate the mafia; the Viet Nam War; the civil rights movement; and theassassination of President John F. Kennedy followed by the Warren Commission investigation.Any one of these coupled with citizenry harboring innate distrust of government provide ampleammunition to bolster demands that the government respond to citizens‘ desire to know howtheir government is operating, what is happening as a result of those actions, and how their livesare or will be affected. Judicial review was added to the FOIA over President Gerald Ford‘s veto during theWatergate Investigation. During President Ronald Reagan‘s tenure Congress took action to putsome branches of the CIA out of the Act‘s reach. President Bill Clinton was successful inexpanding the FOIA to cover electronic media(The Freedom of Information Act Turns 35, nd),andthe 2002 amendment signed by President George W. Bush limits the ability of foreign agentsto request records from U.S. intelligence agencies (The FOIA and President George W. Bush,nd). Much debate has taken place concerning the public‘s right to know versus nationalsecurity. President Johnson‘s statement, issued when he signed the Act, addressed this concern.―This legislation springs from one of our most essential principles: a democracy works best whenthe people have all the information that the security of the nation permits. No one should be ableto pull curtains of secrecy around decisions which can be revealed without injury to the public
  • 24. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 18 of 91interest‖ (Press Secretary, 1996). There are exemptions delineating what will not be provided:national security information; internal personnel rules and practices; substantial internal matterswhen disclosure would risk circumvention of a legal requirement; internal matters that areessentially trivial in nature; information exempt under other laws; confidential businessinformation; inter or intra agency communication that is subject to deliberative process,litigation, and other privileges; personal privacy; law enforcement records that implicate one ofsix enumerated concerns;financial institutions; and geological information (FOIA Basics, Whatare the FOIA expemtions?, nd) As summarized by the U.S. Attorney General upon enactment of the original version, theessential principles supporting the Freedom of Information Act are reflected in its policygoals(Cooper, 2007). First, ―that disclosure be the general rule, not the exception‖ (p. 446).Second, equal rights of access to all individuals. Third, the burden to justify withholding of adocument is on government, not the individual making the request. Fourth,improperly deniedaccess to a document triggers the right to sue for injunctive relief. Fifth, there ―should be afundamental shift in the attitudes and policies regarding government information of those inpositions of responsibility‖ (p. 446). Operation of FOIA policy varies from administration to administration, and responseprocedures among federal agencies are diverse. Differences in interpretation of the Act‘sprovisions further complicate the process. Also problematic is the need to balance constitutionalrights that sometimes conflict with one another. There is a significant volume of case lawinvolving administration of the Act. A summary of precedent-setting FOIA litigation is includedin Appendix A.
  • 25. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 19 of 91State of Florida Information Policy Sunshine regulation varies greatly from state to state. The State of Florida is renownedfor the priority it places on openness in government. Its public records law was enacted in 1909,and in 1967 legislation was passed to include public access to agency meetings (State of Florida,2009b). In 1992 a constitutional amendment was passed to guarantee continued openness ingovernment, extended coverage to the legislature, and included the judiciary. Appendix Bcontains pertinent excerpts of Article 1, Section 24, pertaining to the Information Law.WhenFlorida enacted its original legislation it was the second state to codify informationpolicy(McLendon & Hearn, 2006). By the end of the ten-year period after Florida initiatedcomprehensive reform of its statutes in 1954, twenty-six states had enacted openness ingovernment laws. Following Watergate, another wave of statutory reform occurred. According toMcLendon and Hearn Florida ranked second highest among the fifty states in Cleveland‘s 1985openness ordering. The State of Florida has published a reference guide for compliance with its publicrecords and open meeting laws(State of Florida, 2009a). The manual contains two parts: Part Icovers the Government in the Sunshine Law, §286.011 FS. Part II pertains to the Public RecordsLaw, §119.01(11) FS. Written in question and answer format, it is a comprehensive treatment ofthe sunshine legislation replete with black letter law annotations including Attorney GeneralOpinions, pertinent legislation, and relevant case law. Public records as defined by statute include all documents, papers, letters, maps, books,tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material,regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or receivedpursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any
  • 26. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 20 of 91agency‖ (p.46). The broad scope of the definition is intended to be comprehensive enough toincorporate new forms of technology that may evolve. Unless otherwise exempted by law, alldocuments will remain available for public inspection. By definition, the term agency includes: ―any state, county, district, authority, ormunicipal officer, department, division, board, bureau, commission, or other separate unit ofgovernment created or established by law including, for the purposes of this chapter, theCommission on Ethics, the Public Service Commission, and the Office of Public Counsel, andany other public or private agency, person, partnership, corporation, or business entity acting onbehalf of any public agency‖ (p. 48). Additionally, ―Art. I, s. 24(a), Fla. Const., establishes aconstitutional right of access to ‗any public record made orreceived in connection with theofficial business of any public body, officer, or employee of the state, or personsacting on theirbehalf, except with respect to those records exempted pursuant to this section or specificallymadeconfidential by this Constitution‘" (p. 48). The legislative, executive, and judicial branchesofgovernment; counties, municipalities, and districts; and each constitutional officer, board, andcommission, or entitycreated pursuant to law or by the Constitution, are included in thisdefinition. As a means of evaluating when a private entity is acting on behalf of a public agency, theFlorida Supreme Court adopted a "totality of factors" approach. Factors listed by the SupremeCourt include the following: the level of public funding; commingling of funds; whether theactivity was conducted on publicly-owned property; whether services contracted for are anintegral part of the public agencys chosen decision-making process; whether the private entity isperforming a governmental function or a function which the public agency otherwise wouldperform; the extent of the public agencys involvement with, regulation of, or control over the
  • 27. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 21 of 91private entity;whether the private entity was created by the public agency;whether the publicagency has a substantial financial interest in the privateentity;for whose benefit the private entityis functioning.The compliance manual includes extensive discussion pertaining to theapplicability of the law in government‘s utilization of alternative methods of administration suchas contracting for services, public-private enterprises, and various vehicles utilized in thedelegation of duties or authority to conduct business on behalf of government. Exemptions affecting application of the Records Law are enumerated in §119.071, andare similar in nature to the exemptions provided under the FOIA. Exemptions are grouped byagency administration, agency investigations, security, and other personal information.§119.0711 delineates executive branch agency exemptions. Agency-specific exemptions that fallunder §119.0712 pertain to the Department of Health, and the Department of Highway Safetyand Motor Vehicles. Local government agency and court files are provided exemptions in§§119.073 and 119.074, respectively. There is a significant body of case law concerning jurisdictional control when federal andstate law conflict as to prohibited disclosure (p. 126). As a general rule, in the instance ofabsolute conflict between the two, federal law prevails by virtue of the Supremacy Clause.Where a federal agency located within the state purely for the benefit of Florida residents, e.g.the Housing Authority, state disclosure requirements take precedence over federally prohibiteddisclosure, even when federal funding is involved. Thus, agency function dictates theapplicability of regulation. In general the state views compliance with FOIA requirements as ameans for the federal government to monitor its activities on the state level. Penalties for violation of the Information Law are covered in §119.10. These arespecified according to degree. Unintentional violation by a public officer is a noncriminal
  • 28. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 22 of 91infraction and subject to a fine not to exceed $500. A public official who knowingly violates thegeneral exemptions provision is subject to suspension and removal or impeachment, and issubject to punishment for commission of a misdemeanor of the first degree. Any person whowillfully and knowingly violates any of the chapter provisions commits a first-degreemisdemeanor. It is a third-degree felony to violate the provisions for protection of victims ofcrimes or accidents.School Board of Broward County, Florida Information Policy The information policy of the School Board of Broward County is codified under PolicyNumber 1343.000 and is presented, with attendant rules, in Appendix C.―The Broward CountySchool District is committed to operating ‗In The Sunshine‘(sic) and has established a reputationas being reporter-friendly. As a way to streamline communication, the District created a one-of-a-kind process that ensures reporters unprecedented access to all aspects of the nations fifthlargest school district‖(School Board of Broward County, nd b). In order to support a free flowof information, the Department of Public Relations and Governmental Affairs has implemented aprocess that includes workshops, staff development training, and a support system. Their website includes publications that provide guidance for working with the press, and the process to befollowed by staff in providing information to the public. Clearly, information management is a crucial function within any public agency. As withany process, a review of existing practices can be helpful in revealing any problem areas, andensuringregulatory or policy compliance. In addition to gaining a better understanding of policiesand procedures, it affords an opportunity to improve effectiveness and efficiency.
  • 29. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 23 of 91 Methodology The purpose of this study is to evaluate information management within the SBBC‘sFacilities and Construction Management department. It is an eclectic analysis of the processesutilized for transmission of information in complying with SBBC policy as well as state andfederal regulations.Focused interviews were conducted with key personnel to clarify the processthrough which the department responds to information and document requests. These interviewscentered on probative questions intended to clarify department policy and procedures for theinquiry response process. Pre-determined interview questions are provided in Appendix D. Subsequent to completion of the interviews, access was provided to records from whichto glean the data necessary to complete this study.In the interest of preserving the anonymityofpersonnel indicating that preference, for cohesive purposes this paper distinguishes personnelaccording to area of responsibility in the transmission process;i.e. either information requests, ordocument requests. The former is identified as the access professional, and the latter as therecords specialist.Information Requests Relevant data was extracted from a database maintained by the access professional in theDeputy Superintendent‘s office and provided electronically to facilitate examination ofinformation requests processed in that environment. The coded raw data is included in AppendixE, with codebook presented in Appendix F. This sampling included the entire databasecomprised of 196 entries during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 fiscal years. It representsdissemination of information outside the normal course of department business. Data was
  • 30. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 24 of 91examined and evaluated as it relates to the volume of requests, turnaround time from date ofinquiry to completion, entities involved in fulfillment of those requests, parties generatingrequests, and topics of interest.Document Requests The records specialist in the document management and reception office provided accessto hard copy recordation of document requests spanning an eighteen-month period from January2009 through June 2010. Data was obtained from copies of letters, e-mail, facsimiletransmissions, and information contained in Document Request and Release Forms that areutilized by this office. A spreadsheet of pertinent information was prepared with informationderived from these records to facilitate analysis of document transmissions. Coded raw data isreflected in Appendix G, with codebook shown in Appendix H. All available records wereincluded in this sampling, resulting in a data set containing 156 document requests. Anassessment was undertaken to reveal modes of inquiry, requesting parties, topics of interest,manner of resolution, fees collected, volume of requests, and turnaround time. In as much asnearly seventy percent of document requests pertained to some facet of bidding functions, thoserequests were compared with bid status information as currently reflected in the Demandstardatabase posted on the department‘s web site. Timing of phase-specific requests were referencedagainst bid status and the dates indicated for advertisement, submission deadline, and tabulation.The Media Connection Archives of The Miami Herald and Sun-Sentinel were scanned in an effort to identifyarticles containing references to FCM operations. A bibliography was compiled reflectingpublications referencing department personnelfrom July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010.
  • 31. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 25 of 91 FindingsInformation Requests Information requests are processed by the access professional in accordance with SBBCpolicy and by adherence to a directive issued by the Office of the Superintendent ofSchools(AccessProfessional, interview, September 28, 2010). Procedure dictates that thedepartment of Public Relations and Governmental Affairs be notified and copied on allinformation requests for tracking purposes. The directive appears in Appendix I. Requests aredirected to the Deputy Superintendent of FCM via a referral form, included here in Appendix J,viathe Superintendent subsequent to obtaining a tracking number. Delivery may be effectedthrough interdepartmental mail, fax, or e-mail. Upon receipt of a Referral, the access professional provides a copy to the deputysuperintendent for his review. The deputy superintendent responds to matters that he isknowledgeable about, or assigns the matter to appropriate staff for completion. After logging theReferral into a database, the access professional delivers the Referral to the staff member towhom it is assigned. Response is drafted by the individual assignee and provided to the deputysuperintendent for review. Once approved and finalized, the information is transmitted by theaccess professional as directed on the Referral. The matter is then logged out of the system andthe Referral is closed. This procedure has been in place throughout the access professional‘s eight-yeartenure.Estimated time expenditure in relation to total workload is five percent. Reported averageturnaround from receipt to fulfillment is two weeks. Unusual circumstances may requireextended time involved in both effort and fulfillment. During the period of this study, a response
  • 32. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 26 of 91to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement exacted ninety percent of the accessprofessional‘s time during the four weeks needed to complete records compilation. A review of the information request database reveals one entry covering twenty-oneseparate anonymous complaints. Otherwise, each of the remaining 195 entries represent a singlerequest. Of the 216 information requests processed during the two-year period covered in thisstudy, 113 were completed during the 2008-2009 fiscal year, and 103 for fiscal year 2009-2010.Monthly volume ranged from a low of two requests in January 2010, to a high of twenty-sevenrequests in July of 2008. Overall completion average was nine requests per month. Volumetrends are shown in Chart 1 in Appendix K. Turnaround time is graphically presented in Chart 2, Appendix L. Completion time wascalculated in days elapsed from date of inquiry through date of fulfillment. Weekends wereexcluded, with no adjustments made for other periods of office closure such as holidays.Insufficient information was available to ascertain lag time due to Referral processing prior toreceipt by FCM; therefore in some instances the actual processing time while in FCM may beshorter than the figures reflect. During the two-year period studied eight requests were completedon the inquiry correspondence date. Performance breakdown is as follows: 45.12 percent werefulfilled within the first week after receipt; an additional 24.65 percent fell within the secondweek; the third week an additional 6.98 percent were completed; and by the end of the fourthweek, total completion rate was 76.75 percent. The longest completion time recorded was 150days; however, notes included with that entry appear to suggest that the original correspondencewas directed to department staff and subsequently escalated to Referral status. There isinsufficient information available to further clarify timing relative to this outlier. Additionally,fifth week transmissions are heavily impacted by the twenty-one anonymous complaints
  • 33. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 27 of 91previously noted. Their presence is an anomaly discussed further throughout this analysis.Absentempirical data refuting the supposition that extended fulfillment periods were due to requestsentailing protracted investigation, completion time falls within the parameters established bySBBC policy and Sunshine requirement. Thus, hypothesis 5 as it pertains to the informationresponse process is supported. A leadership change occurred at FCM mid-way through the second year of the periodstudied. Turnaround time was further evaluated to provide enlightenment on how the changeimpacted completion schedules, with results shown in Chart 3, Appendix M, wherein the twoindividuals are designated DS and ADS. Effective December 31, 2009, DS retired after sevenyears of service. ADS was appointed Acting Deputy Superintendent as of January 1, 2010. Chart3 reflects average number of completion days broken into three stages. Stage one covers requestsprocessed during 2008 through 2009 under DS. During this span process time averaged 10.4days prior to adjusting for the outlier anonymous complaints, which drops the average to 7.6days. July through December 2009 comprises the second stage, also on the watch of DS.Average process time during this period was eleven days. Stage three encompasses Januarythrough June 2010, during which completion time averaged 18.89 days under ADS. This findingsupports hypothesis 4; leadership change impacts the response process. External influences affecting the timing vary and insufficient data exists to determinetheir exact nature; however, this increase during the second stageover the prior year coincideswith the occurrence of significant negative press coverage. Issues of note include the arrest of aSBBC board member on ethics related charges that included allegations of improprieties in thecontractor selection process, and a scathing audit report submitted by SBBC‘s internal auditorsinitially in ―draft‖ form and prior to inclusion of a response from FCM. Stage three begins under
  • 34. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 28 of 91new leadership with ADS. The 18.89-day average registered on the fulfillment track, whenadjusted for the 150-day response outlier, drops toan average turnaround time of 16.05 days.Again, there is insufficient data to definitively explain the extended time frame. It is not unlikelythat the issues presented during the preceding six months continued to generate interest, andperhaps escalated in stage three. Additionally, it is reasonable to presume that ADS requiredextended processing time to familiarize himself with the information requested in order toprovide the most accurate responses. This finding provides weak support for hypothesis 3pertaining to the influence of external factors on the information process. FCM information requests frequently involve collaboration with other departmentswithin the division, and other divisions within the district. For the period covered by this study,88.36 percent of requests were resolved with minimal collaboration, i.e. at most a singledepartment cooperated in resolution. Among those, 54 percent made no reference to any otherSBBC entity, seventeen percent were either co-opted with or reassigned to Design Services,twelve percent involved Facilities Management and Property Site Acquisitions, five percent werereferred to the Chief Financial officer, and two percent transferred to document managementwith compliance instructions. Single shot participants include an Area Superintendent, thebuilding department, environmental conservation/utilities management personnel, EmployeeRelations, and Human Resources. These relationships are pictured in Chart 4, Appendix N.Multi-departmental transactions comprise the remaining 13.59 percent of total inquiries andinvolved either cooperative processing, or those departments were copied on responses. Abreakdown of departments involved appears in Chart 5 at Appendix N.Collaboration findingssupport the expectations stated in hypothesis 6. Results of the analysis concerning submittals by interested parties provides a snapshot of
  • 35. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 29 of 91the diversity in stakeholders participating in the information process over the two-year period,and is evidenced in Chart 6 at Appendix O.Overhead agencies accounted for 41.4 percent of thetotal, and included local, state and federal levels. City and county agencies filed 52 requestsduring the time frame, compared to 35 inquires at the state level, and two federal contacts.Concerned citizens shared the spot for second most contacts at 35. Combined requests fromprofessionals numbered 25, with contractors, consultants, and subcontractors included in thissubset. Business contacts tendered 22 inquiries, followed by the outlier anonymous group at 21.Seventeen requests represented inter-departmental activity. Those of undetermined origin wereclassified as other. The variety of stakeholders identified in this analysis supports hypothesis 1. Abreakdown of stakeholder requests on a monthly basis is provided in Chart 7, Appendix P. Theoutlier anonymous subset stands out in this graph.Mean turnaround time by group is as follows:business one day, professionals 2.2 days, state agencies eight days, local agencies 3.5 days,federal agencies 1.5 days, concerned citizens 27 days, and inter-departmental offices nine days. Subject matter, i.e. the nature of the request, is the final facet analyzed in the informationprocess. The business subset included offers of services or supplies, property managementmatters such as lease issues and common area maintenance, utilities rates, developer siteofferings and impact fees. Professional stakeholders were concerned with contract reassignment,Notices to Owner and contract issues, the competitive bid process, contractor appeals, additionalfees in connection with extension of services, permitting issues, environmental review, landlease, site lease, and law suits. Nine projects were identified in this group: Coconut Creek HighSchool, Westglades Middle School, Coral Glades auditorium, West Pines Middle School,Colbert Elementary School, Hawkes Bluff Elementary School, and Flamingo ElementarySchool.
  • 36. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 30 of 91 Among the overhead agencies, federal inquiries pertained to economic stimulus, andschool closures guidelines. State agency requests involved public hearings and workshops, thefive-year plan, environmental problems, budget input, class size reduction, revised rules, andcommunity matters. Among budget considerations were educational plant surveys, PECO(capital funding), Castaldi reports, the Qualified Zone Academy Bond, and special reports.Environmental queries pertained to site contamination, and notices of violation. Haitian reliefand public land ownership data complete the list of identified subject matter. City and Countyinquiries included lease agreements, map amendments, plat recordation, Inter-local agreements,concurrency issues, budget issues, maintenance and operating costs, annual energy costinformation, and contract termination status reports. Also included were commendationinformation, affordable housing, portables, and a few school specific inquiries. SBBC inter-departmental queries concerned workshops and hearings, status updates, Inter-local agreements,concurrency, class size reduction, and portables for Haiti. General Public inquiries related primarily to specific construction projects includingcafeterias, auditoriums, pool construction, the bus facility, bathrooms, and estimated completiondates. Concerned citizens also submitted questions regarding bike racks, safety issues, portables,basketball courts, after hours lighting, under utilized school sites, and raised concerns overbudget cuts. One query was received about the district‘s first environmental school, anothersought particulars of contamination notification requirements, and two requests related to non-indigenous flora. Schools specifically identified in this subset include: three for Plantation HighSchool, two each for Taravella High School, South Broward High School, and RivergladesElementary School, and one for Coral Glades High School, Blanche Ely High School, DriftwoodMiddle School, Virginia Schuman Young Elementary School, Hollywood Hills High School,
  • 37. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 31 of 91Silver Lakes Middle School, Broadview Elementary School, and Lake Forest ElementarySchool. Inquiries submitted anonymously could not be evaluated for subject matter. Submissionof bulk information requests via single Referral was atypical in this study, and no details wereavailable in the database that would facilitate further analysis. Questions concerning thesetransactions remain unanswered due to time constraints, as well as limitations relating to fileaccessibility.However, the findings concerning request subject matteroffer significant support forhypothesis 2. There is a strong correlation between stakeholder status and information requested.Document Requests Requests for documents, like information requests, are processed in the mannerprescribed by SBBC policy and procedures (RecordsSpecialist, interview, November 10, 2010).Current practice dates back approximately two years when procedures were revamped by PublicRelations and Governmental Affairs. Prior to that SBBC‘s legal department dictated the process.Major changes included an improved tracking system, and providing cost estimates prior toundertaking response action. Requests are generated by facsimile, e-mail, mail, and walk-intraffic as pictorially represented in Chart 8, Appendix Q. No action is undertaken without firstobtaining a tracking number from Governmental Affairs. The records specialist adheres to a hardand fast first in, first out rule for handling requests. Exceptions are made only for time sensitivematters, or by directive from upper management. Optiscan has been in place for approximatelyten years, and has enabled self-service document retrieval by department staff as needed,resulting in a reduction of interaction between department staff and personnel in the documentsmanagement office. Visits from the audit department, however, have increased significantly
  • 38. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 32 of 91since July 2009. Auditors come by on a monthly basis to review documents. Prior visits occurredtwo to three times per year. In discussing possible areas for improvement, the records specialist indicated frustrationin knowing that there are documents that are not being captured. This is a logistical problemoccasioned by the physical plant layout at FCM. The facility is located in an old elementaryschool comprised of ten freestanding structures, each with its own facsimile machine. Therecords specialist has advocated for having a single facsimile machine for the department at itsnew facility when it relocates during the first quarter of next year. A suggestion was also made toincorporate an online interactive, or e-mail linked public records request on the FCM web site.Division management is ostensibly considering both suggestions. As reflected in Appendix R, Chart 9, a review of the data logged for document requestsduring the eighteen-month period studied revealed that inquiries peaked at 31 in March of 2009,and trended downward to a low of one in April 2010. Overall average equates to 8.67transactions per month. Over eighty-seven percent of responses were provided either by directcontact between the records specialist‘s office, or by giving instructions for retrieval ofinformation from the FCM web site.Remaining requests were: referred to a project manager,4.49 percent; outsourced for copy service, 2.56 percent; and 5.13 percent designated as droppedreflects documents no longer needed by the party making the request. Chart 10, Appendix Scharts these responses. Also in Appendix S is Chart 11, which tracks fees collected. No costanalysis was conducted, but a look at amounts collected is useful in estimating the size of theresponse as it relates to paper usage. Based on reported fees at $.15 per page, sizeable projectsinclude four in the 50 to 130-page range, four between 130 and 200 pages, four with page countsranging from 200 to 330 pages, three comprised of 330 to 530 pages, and one at more than 530
  • 39. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 33 of 91pages. About four and a half percent of document requests were outsourced, but no indicationwas given concerning either the cost or the number of pages involved. Parties submitting document requests during the eighteen-month period evaluated werecategorized into the following subsets: architects, attorneys, consultants, contractors, media,subcontractors, and other. Contractors submitted the bulk of requests at 81 percent of totalinquiries. As revealed in Chart 12, Appendix T, they were followed by attorneys ranked at eightpercent, subcontractors with four percent, consultants showing three percent, architectscomprising two percent, and both media and other subsets registering at one percent. Though lessdiverse than stakeholders involved in the information process, this finding provides furthersupport for hypothesis 1. Comparison of graphic renderings reveals a strong correlation between requesting partiesand subject matter. Appendix U, Chart 13 depicts the overall breakdown by subject, and Chart14reflectsthe breakdown of queries concerning document inquiries unrelated to the bid process. Bidads, bid process, pre-bid, and post bid requests account for over seventy percent of totaldocument requests. After segregating these transactions from the total, project specificinformation, drawings and specifications, and payment inquiries topped requests at twentypercent each. Contract documents ranked mid-range at a13.33 percentshare. Appointments forreview only purposes, i.e. no copies delivered, comprised 8.89 percent of total, as did requestsfor QSEC documents and miscellaneous information.This data on document subject matter offersadditional strong support for hypothesis 2. Overall monthly volume distribution is as reflected inChart 15, Appendix V. Inasmuch as bid-related documents dominated the fulfillment process during thiseighteen-month period, this subset was further evaluated by comparing requests with information
  • 40. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 34 of 91currently contained in the Demandstar database posted on the FCM website. Dates provided inthat database pertaining to advertisement, submittal deadline, and score tabulation were trackedagainst pre-bid and post bid request data. In this instance, pre-bid incorporated the bid ads andbid process request categories. The results are displayed in Chart 16, Appendix W. At first blushit appears that there is an anomaly in that post bid document requests preceded bid processcompletion. It is possible that there was some misinterpretation concerning data retrieved fromhard copy records; however, review of inquiry responses provides another probable indication.Of the nearly twenty percentof requests fulfilled through referral to the FCM website, themajority related to post bid matters including requests for score sheets, awarded contracts, bidtabulations, and similar items. Many were submitted prior to award of contract and includednotification concerning the timing involved in the bid process. Evaluation results pertaining to response time for this office should be reasonablyaccurate. Each request, with few exceptions, referenced date of inquiry, date of receipt by FCM,and fulfillment date. Nearly sixty percent of responses are completed the same day as the inquirywas received. Within two days, total deliveries constituted eighty percent of total received. Chart17, Appendix X graphs fulfillment trends. Longer response times on the balance of transactionscan be attributed to the size of the request, i.e. total number of documents involved in a singlerequest, delays occasioned by awaiting approval of cost estimates, and time elapsed inattempting to fulfill dropped requests, e.g. the party no longer neededor wantedthe documentsrequested.This data indicates excellent response time. As the data relating to production ofdocuments is more reliable than the results obtained concerning the information process, thisfinding offers more convincing support of hypothesis 5 that FCM is in compliance with SBBCpolicy and Sunshine laws.
  • 41. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 35 of 91The Media Connection As originally conceptualized, it was contemplated that this study would includeevaluation of media impact on FCM‘s information management process. Little was uncovered inthe way of media information requests in the data available for review. Only two requestsdirectly attributable to media usage were found. One was a request from a student journalistconcerning construction projects. The other came from a Sun-Sentinel reporter seekingdocuments pertaining to an ADA contract administration issue. An article questioning thepropriety of the contract award was published nine days after the documents were delivered. Media representatives make direct contact with the Deputy Superintendent‘s office. Onlyrequests for documents flow through the Referral process. FCM follows media contact protocolas posted on the Public Relations and Government Affairs website. Additionally, journalists areable to obtain information via other sources such as the minutes for school board meetings andworkshops, as well as from the offices of the superintendent and board members. A review ofThe Miami Herald and Sun-Sentinel archives for the period July 1, 2008through June 30, 2010, produced a significant volume of articles. Excluding letters to theeditor,those containing mention of the DS and ADS that related in some manner to SBBCoperations involving FCM are chronicled ina bibliography of those articleswhich appears inAppendix Y. Relatively little coverage occurred during the first year of this study; eight articleswere returned the query response. There was an850 percent increase in articles published fromJune 1st through December 31, 2009. Coverage decreased from January 1st through June 30,2010, to approximately 41 percent of the volume for the preceding six-month period. The absence of any empirical data relating to media contact in the information requests
  • 42. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 36 of 91logs or document requests records, compounded by the time constraints of this project precludesfurther evaluationat this time. Attempting to make any correlation between the media and thedepartment‘s information management process would constitute an undertaking that exceeds thescope of this study.Accordingly, although partially supported by findings on the informationprocess, additional analysis is required to properly test hypothesis 3 concerning the impact ofexternal factors and media coverage.
  • 43. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 37 of 91 Recommendations Based on the results of this evaluation FCM‘s information request process and documentrequest process appear to be functioning efficiently. Should there be an interest in improving orenhancing these processes, this report contains sufficient data that can be used to identifypossible areas for improvement. Addressing the Records Specialist‘s concerns regarding documents not being captured,the suggestion that the department have a single facsimile source is highly recommended, andcan be easily implemented upon relocation to new facilities. In the interim, a potentialmechanism to help facilitate document capture might be to post a notice by each of the facsimilemachines spread across the campus reminding personnel of the need to ensure proper handling ofdocuments. This message could be reinforced by a repeat appearance of quality control concernson staff meeting agendas. The suggestion, also offered by the Records Specialist, that a web-based documentrequest system be implemented also has merit and bears further consideration. Electronicprocessing of document requests would enhance control and monitoring. An update of theContracts portion of the web site shouldalso be considered to enhance effectiveness, withcompletion to coincide with implementation of any web-based interactive system. Revampingthe site to provide information on the bidding and contract award process in a more user-friendlyformat for the benefit of stakeholders is recommended. As an aside, the Departments & Directorslist posted on SBBC‘s web site needs to be updated concerning Facilities personnel. The Records Specialist advised that the Document Request and Receipt form is obsoleteand in the process of being revised. Along the lines of document revision, consideration should
  • 44. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 38 of 91be given to creating a form web-referral response on department letterhead that can betransmitted electronically by e-mail, or sent by facsimile. The practice employed in distributinginstructions on how to access bid tabulations, for example, was to affix typewritten instructionsto a copy of the original request which was then sent back by facsimile to the party who placedthe inquiry. A form on official letterhead has a more professional appearance. There is one final recommendation. The information professional and documentsspecialist have extensive knowledge and experience with FCM‘s information process. In theeventuality that either should retire or otherwise vacate their position, consideration should begiven to succession planning with regard to these vital functions.
  • 45. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 39 of 91 APPENDIX A Precedent-Setting FOIA LitigationEPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73 (1973) – agencies must release segregable information from partially exempt document.Vaugn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973) – Vaughn index of withheld documents must be prepared and justification for withholding provided.National Parks & Conservation Assn. v. Morton, 498 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1974) – establishes tests for whether information provided to the government can be withheld as ―confidential‖.NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.IU, 421 U.S. 132 (1975) – elaboration on deliberative process.Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976) – procedures for agencies in handling backlogs of FOIA requests, and circumstances under which an agency can obtain an Open America stay. (Open America stay subsequently restricted by the 1996 Amendment)Phillippi v. CIA, 546 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1976) – approval of agency response of ―neither confirm nor deny‖ under national security exemption.Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136 (1980) – the Office of the President is not an agency for purposes of FOIA.Forsham v. Harris, 445 U.S. 169 (1980) – agency must first either create or obtain a record before it becomes an ―agency record‖.U.S. Dep’t of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) – affords broad interpretation to personnel, medical, and similar files.
  • 46. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 40 of 91 APPENDIX A-2 Precedent Setting FOIA Litigation-2FBI v. Abramson, 456 U.S. 615 (1982) – information originally compiled for law enforcement purpose and the recompiled into a non-law enforcement records can still be protected.U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Julian, 486 U.S. 1 (1988) – FOIA exemption should not be invoked to protect the requester from him/herself.U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) – guidance on privacy interests, on defining ‖public interest‖, and balancing interests.U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136 (1989) – record must be under the agency‘s control at the time of the FOIA request.Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1992) – new test for protecting information that has been ―voluntarily‖ provided.U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (1993) – agency must show specific circumstances to have an expectation of confidentiality.Armstrong v. Executive Office of he President, 1 F.3d 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1993) – both electronic and printed versions of e-mail message may be federal records. Agencies may be sued for not meeting obligations to manage e-mail records. Provision for court review of President‘s guidelines for managing presidential records.(Nisbet, 2000)
  • 47. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 41 of 91 APPENDIX B Florida Constitution: Article I – Declaration of RightsSECTION 24. Access to public records and meetings. — (a) Every person has the right to inspect or copy any public record made or received inconnection with the official business of any public body, officer, or employee of the state, orpersons acting on their behalf, except with respect to records exempted pursuant to this section orspecifically made confidential by this Constitution. This section specifically includes thelegislative, executive, and judicial branches of government and each agency or departmentcreated thereunder; counties, municipalities, and districts; and each constitutional officer, board,and commission, or entity created pursuant to law or this Constitution. I This section shall be self-executing. The legislature, however, may provide by general lawpassed by a two-thirds vote of each house for the exemption of records from the requirements ofsubsection … , provided that such law shall state with specificity the public necessity justifyingthe exemption and shall be no broader than necessary to accomplish the stated purpose of thelaw. The legislature shall enact laws governing the enforcement of this section, including themaintenance, control, destruction, disposal, and disposition of records made public by thissection, except that each house of the legislature may adopt rules governing the enforcement ofthis section in relation to records of the legislative branch. Laws enacted pursuant to thissubsection shall contain only exemptions from the requirements of subsections (a) or (b) andprovisions governing the enforcement of this section, and shall relate to one subject. (d) All laws that are in effect on July 1, 1993 that limit public access to records or meetingsshall remain in force, and such laws apply to records of the legislative and judicial branches,until they are repealed. Rules of court that are in effect on the date of adoption of this section thatlimit access to records shall remain in effect until they are repealed.History.—Added, C.S. for C.S. for H.J.R.‘s 1727, 863, 2035, 1992; adopted 1992; Am. S.J.R.1284, 2002; adopted 2002 (State of Florida).
  • 48. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 42 of 91 APPENDIX C SBBC Policy Number1343.000“1 3 4 3INSPECTION & EXAMINATION OF PUBLIC RECORDSEVERY PERSON WHO HAS CUSTODY OF A PUBLIC RECORD SHALL PERMIT. THERECORD TO BE INSPECTED ANDEXAMINED BY ANY PERSON DESIRING TO DO SO,AT ANY REASONABLE TIME, UNDER REASONABLE CONDITIONSAND UNDERSUPERVISION BY THE CUSTODIAN (DESIGNEE) OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. THERULES LISTED BELOWSHALL COVER THE CHARGES FOR THIS SERVICE.AUTHORITY: F. S. 230.22 (1) (2)F. S. 119.07Policy Adopted: 1 0 / 1 6 / 9 0 AMENDED RULES APPROVED: 6 / 2 / 9 2RULES1 . For duplicated copies of not more than 14‖ x 8 1/2‖ in size, a fee of fifteen (15) cents per one-sided copy shall becharged. For all other copies, the actual cost of the copy shall be charged. Forpurposes of this rule, ―actual cost‖shall mean the cost of materials and supplies used to duplicatethe record, but not the labor cost or overhead cost.2 . The Board shall charge an additional five (5) cents (total of twenty {20} cents) for each two-sided duplicated copy.3 . The Board authorizes the Superintendent to charge an additional reasonable charge for thelabor and overheadassociated with the duplication of oversized documents, such as maps,photographs, blueprints, computer reports and labels, etc.4 . If the nature or volume of public records requested to be inspected, examined, or copied issuch as to requireextensive use of information technology resources or extensive clerical orsupervisory assistance by districtpersonnel, the Superintendent (designee) may charge in additionto the actual cost of the duplication, the laborcost of the personnel providing the service. Forpurposes of this rule, ―extensive‖ means that it will take morethan fifteen (15) minutes to locate,review for confidential information, copy and refile the requested material.5. 4. The Board may charge up to one dollar ($1.00) per copy for a certified copy of a publicrecord.AUTHORITY: F. S. 230.22 (1) (2)F. S. 119.07RULES ADOPTED: 10/16/90 AMENDED RULES ADOPTED: 6/2/92‖ (School Board ofBroward County, nd a).
  • 49. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 43 of 91 APPENDIX D Interview QuestionsThis purpose of this interview is to obtain and clarify information pertaining to FCM‘sprocedures relative to responding to information requests. I am conducting an analytical studyfor academic purposes; however, it is intended that the project have potential benefit to thedepartment.Before we begin, do I have permission to use your name in my report, or would you prefer toremain anonymous?Yes _______No _______Please answer the following questions as completely as possible.1. Does FCM currently have written procedures for responding to requests for information? a. If so, is it possible for me to obtain a copy? b. If not, I would like to ask you to help me to define the current process by providing details concerning the procedure followed in responding to information requests. i. How does the department receive information requests? ii. What is done with a request for information after it is received? iii. How is a response to information request delivered? iv. What is the turnaround time from initial receipt of information request to completion and delivery of response? v. Is there anything else that will help to provide a clear understanding of the process?2. How long has the current procedure been in effect?
  • 50. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 44 of 91 APPENDIX D-2 Interview Questions-23. If the procedure changed within the two-year period from 7/1/2008 and 6/30/2010, how does the previous procedure differ from the current procedure?4. This study involves fiscal years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010. Is it possible for you to provide an estimate of the percentage of time you expended on information requests in relation to your overall duties? If so, what would that percentage be on a monthly basis?5. To the extent that you supervise other staff that participates in the information response process, what percentage of staff time is expended on information requests on a monthly basis?Thank you for your time, and for providing me with information that will be useful to me incompleting my analysis.
  • 51. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 45 of 91 APPENDIX E FCM Information Requests Raw DataReferral # Date Turnaround Requester Responder09-178 0902 5 BTU ?10-186 1002 49 CA ASUP10-135 1002 8 B BLDG09-792 0906 4 SA BLDG08-1880 0812 2 FA CFO08-1645 0810 5 SA CFO Aug-51 0812 2 SA CFO09-206 0812 53 SA CFO09-470 0904 3 SA CFO09-1030 0908 8 SA CFO09-1205 0909 8 SA CFO09-428 0904 1 Z CFO09-748 0906 1 Z CFO09-862 0907 1 FA CFO/ASUPS10-401 1004 87 CA CTACE09-465 0904 s SA DC08-1326 0808 3 C DOCMGT09-421 0904 44 SUB DOCMGT09-1163 0909 8 SUB DOCMGT09-1473 0911 2 SUB DOCMGT08-1230 0807 1 CA DS08-1825 0811 2 CA DS08-1826 0811 2 CA DS08-1853 0811 7 CA DS09-117 0902 6 CA DS09-251 0902 3 CA DS09-375 0903 2 CA DS09-376 0903 2 CA DS09-445 0904 2 CA DS09-446 0904 2 CA DS09-458 0904 2 CA DS09-1033 0908 2 CA DS09-1076 0908 7 CA DS09-1244 0910 8 CA DS09-1271 0910 17 CA DS09-1347 0910 6 CA DS09-1364 0910 5 CA DS09-1440 0911 8 CA DS09-1448 0911 5 CA DS10-121 1001 1 CA DS10-283WR 1003 2 CA DS10-364 1003 7 CA DS10-532 1005 9 CA DS
  • 52. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 46 of 91 APPENDIX E-2 FCM Information Requests Raw Data-2Referral # Date Turnaround Requester Responder10-533 1005 9 CA DS10-542 1005 9 CA DS10-636 1005 6 CA DS08-1762 0811 2 SA DS08-1761 0811 2 SA DS Sep-61 0902 13 SA DS Sep-62 0902 13 SA DS08-1433 0810 83 Z DS09-885 0908 27 Z DS09-359 0903 1 CA DS/LEG Oct-90 1002 1 B EC/UM10-273 1003 7 CA EC/UM Sep-85 0901 4 DS ER09-363 0905 21 ANON FAC08-1235 0808 11 B FAC08-1531 0809 4 B FAC08-1808 0811 1 B FAC09-269 0903 3 B FAC09-815 0907 1 B FAC09-834 0907 56 BM FAC09-171 0902 8 BM FAC09-543 0905 6 BM FAC09-161 0902 9 C FAC08-1257 0808 1 CA FAC08-1625 0810 8 CA FAC09-1124 0911 61 CA FAC09-420 0904 4 CONS FAC09-106 0901 3 L FAC08-1167 0807 s S FAC08-1135 0808 9 S FAC08-1506 0809 3 S FAC08-1731 0811 10 S FAC08-1506 0809 77 S FAC Aug-89 0901 8 S FAC08-1105 0807 4 SA FAC08-1353 0808 s SA FAC08-1379 0809 2 SA FAC08-1458 0809 6 SA FAC 13-Aug 0812 1 SA FAC09-266 0903 3 SA FAC09-374 0903 2 SA FAC09-562 0905 6 SA FAC09-1133 0909 10 SA FAC
  • 53. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 47 of 91 APPENDIX E-3 FCM Information Requests Raw Data-3Referral # Date Turnaround Requester Responder09-1134 0909 10 SA FAC09-1419 0911 10 SA FAC09-1511 0912 7 SA FAC09-1491 0912 1 SA FAC09-330 0905 1 School FAC09-1415 0911 4 SUB FAC09-612 0904 14 TF FAC09-612 0905 s TF FAC08-1502 0809 4 Z FAC08-1677 0812 5 Z FAC08-1724 0810 s Z FAC Sep-57 0912 s Z FAC 5-Aug 0901 12 Z FAC09-230 0902 13 Z FAC09-857 0907 15 Z FAC09-1109 0909 13 Z FAC09-1117 0909 13 Z FAC09-1131 0910 43 Z FAC09-1232 0910 1 Z FAC09-1500 0912 6 Z FAC08-1431 0809 s Z FAC09-191 0902 6 B FAC09-796 0809 27 CA FAC09-882 0907 7 S FAC09-740 0906 2 SA FAC09-794 0906 1 SA FAC09-1316 0910 16 SUB FAC09-885 0908 27 Z FAC09-1500 0912 1 Z FAC Oct-89 1002 2 B FAC10-309 1004 25 C FAC10-500 1007 87 C FAC10-501 1007 87 C FAC10-502 1007 87 C FAC10-503 1007 87 C FAC10-706 1006 6 C FAC10-125 1002 7 CA FAC10-390 1004 8 CA FAC10-506 1005 5 SA FAC Oct-91 1001 1 Z FAC10-205 1002 6 Z FAC10-220 1002 4 Z FAC10-312 1003 8 Z FAC
  • 54. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 48 of 91 APPENDIX E-4 FCM Information Requests Raw Data-4Referral # Date Turnaround Requester Responder10-554 1007 77 Z FAC10-656 1006 11 Z FAC10-657 1006 10 Z FAC10-665 1006 20 Z FAC10-668 1006 20 Z FAC10-678 1006 9 Z FAC10-681 1006 9 Z FAC Sep-31 0901 3 SA FAC/ASUP/SCH/FCM/DOCMGT09-1510 0912 7 SA FAC/CFO09-439 0904 2 SA FAC/CFO/FCP/FCM09-1547 0912 1 A FAC/CONR10-214 1007 150 C FAC/CON10-361 1003 3 C FAC/CON09-545 0905 1 CA FAC/DC08-1781 0811 2 SA FAC/DOCMGT/FCM09-1296 0911 30 C FAC/DS08-1798 0811 2 B FAC/FCM 1-Sep 0901 7 B FAC/FCM09-1449 0911 5 SUB FAC/FCM08-1451 0809 7 C FAC/FCM09-1331 0911 14 Z FAC/FCM09-791 0907 21 TF FAC/FCM09-285 0903 7 Z FAC/FCM09-222 0906 69 Z FAC/FCM/FCP09-363 0906 1 Z FAC/FCP/FCM09-898 0908 21 CA FAC/FMPSA08-1098 0808 14 B FAC/FMPSA09-949 0908 21 B FAC/FMPSA09-561 0906 13 CA FAC/FMPSA09-871 0907 5 CA FAC/FMPSA09-1004 0909 41 CA FAC/FMPSA/DC/GREL09-896 0907 6 B FCM09-977 0908 1 S FCP09-933 0907 3 TF FCP09-932 0907 2 TF FCP08-1169 0807 5 D FMPSA08-914 0807 3 L FMPSA09-1297 0910 4 B FMPSA09-1483 0911 14 B FMPSA09-1524 0912 5 B FMPSA08-1413 0809 5 CA FMPSA08-1898 0812 2 CA FMPSA09-105 0901 3 CA FMPSA
  • 55. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 49 of 91 APPENDIX E-5 FCM Information Requests Raw Data-5Referral # Date Turnaround Requester Responder09-162 0902 5 CA FMPSA10-269 1003 8 CA FMPSA10-377 1004 7 CA FMPSA10-527 1004 3 CA FMPSA09-1021 0908 1 CONS FMPSA09-795 0906 1 D FMPSA09-1380 0911 4 D FMPSA09-1380 0911 3 D FMPSA09-177 0902 8 O FMPSA08-1232 0807 1 SA FMPSA Sep-38 0901 5 SA FMPSA09-1065 0910 2 TC FMPSA09-985 0908 6 CA FMPSA/LEG10-643 1005 3 O HR09-842 0907 5 L LEG10-633 1005 3 SUB LEG09-801 0907 s TC LEG09-840 0907 8 CA LEG/DS10-272 1003 7 CA PPO10-637 1005 12 B PPO10-691 1006 7 Z PPO09-1397 0911 17 SA SAF09-744 0906 8 CA FMPSA08-1377 0809 2 L FMPSA
  • 56. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 50 of 91 APPENDIX FFCM Information Requests Code Book
  • 57. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 51 of 91 APPENDIX GFCM Document Requests Raw Data
  • 58. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 52 of 91 APPENDIX G-2FCM Document Requests Raw Data-2
  • 59. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 53 of 91 APPENDIX G-3FCM Document Requests Raw Data-3
  • 60. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 54 of 91 APPENDIX G-4FCM Document Requests Raw Data-4
  • 61. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 55 of 91 APPENDIX HFCM Document Requests Codebook
  • 62. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 56 of 91 APPENDIX ISuperintendent’s Directive
  • 63. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 57 of 91APPENDIX J Referral
  • 64. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 58 of 91 APPENDIX KChart 1 – Monthly Volume
  • 65. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 59 of 91 APPENDIX LChart 2 – Turnaround Time
  • 66. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 60 of 91 APPENDIX MChart 3 – Average Turnaround – Leadership Track
  • 67. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 61 of 91 APPENDIX NChart 4 – Single Department ProcessingChart 5 – Multi-Department Processing
  • 68. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 62 of 91 APPENDIX OChart 6 – Requesting Parties
  • 69. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 63 of 91 APPENDIX PChart 7 – Monthly Breakdown by Stakeholder
  • 70. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 64 of 91 APPENDIX QChart 8 – Request Receipt Methods
  • 71. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 65 of 91 APPENDIX RChart 9 – Monthly Volume
  • 72. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 66 of 91 APPENDIX SChart 10 – Transaction Resolution Chart 11 – Fees Collected
  • 73. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 67 of 91 APPENDIX TChart 10 – Requesting Parties
  • 74. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 68 of 91 APPENDIX U Chart 13 – TopicChart 14 – Topic (Other than Bid-Related)
  • 75. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 69 of 91 APPENDIX VChart 15 – Volume Distribution by Topic
  • 76. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 70 of 91 APPENDIX WChart 16 – Bid Process/Document Request Comparison
  • 77. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 71 of 91 APPENDIX XChart 17 – Turnaround
  • 78. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 72 of 91 APPENDIX Y Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 Sun-SentinelEast and Kathy Bushouse Staff Writers, G. (2008, November 12). PLAN TO SEND PORTABLES TO HAITI DELAYED A BIT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 6B.Odiduro Staff Writer, S. (2008, December 14). SCHOOL CELEBRATES ITS NEW DIGS - HOLLYWOODS ORANGE BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HAS RIBBON CUTTING FOR NEW FACILITY. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (South East Broward ed.), 1.Scott Wyman at 3, P. (2009, March 10). SCHOOL BOARD LIKELY TO DISCUSS MIXED SIGNALS ON HOUSING. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.Odiduro Staff Writer, S. (2009, March 29). WATER WORKS - HOLLYWOOD STARTS WATER LINE PROJECT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (South East Broward ed.), 1.CRINKLAW dcrinklaw@tribune.com, D. (2009, April 23). NORTH SIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A LIKELY SITE FOR GREEN OVERHAUL. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1.HYDE Commentary, D. (2009, May 4). BIG STEP, HARD FALL - LIGHTS OUT IN GEORGIA: HAWKS OUST HEAT IN GAME 7 DEBACLE ALL IS NOT LOST: UGLY FINISH, BUT FUTURE LOOKS PRETTY PROMISING. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1C.MAYO COMMENTARY, M. (2009, July 9). DID BROWARD SCHOOLS GET SOAKED AFTER HURRICANE?. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, July 10). REPAIRS AUDIT WRONG, SCHOOLS OFFICIALS SAY - WORK AFTER WILMA WAS DONE AT DISCOUNT, DIRECTOR INSISTS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Akilah Johnson on July 16, P. (2009, July 16). LOBBYIST RON BOOK WEIGHS IN ON THE SAGA OF THE HURRICANE REPAIR AUDIT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.Anthony Man on July 16, P. (2009, July 16). LOBBYIST RON BOOK WEIGHS IN ON THE SAGA OF THE HURRICANE REPAIR AUDIT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.
  • 79. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 73 of 91 APPENDIX Y-2 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 2Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, July 24). OUTSIDE AUDITOR TO LOOK AT SCHOOL REPAIR COSTS - BROWARD DISTRICT CHIEF SEEKS REVIEW OF $765,608 IN BILLS PANEL DISPUTED AFTER WILMA. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.McMahon Staff Writer, P. (2009, September 24). WE ARE NOT DONE, PROSECUTORS WARN BROWARD PUBLIC OFFICIALS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 10A.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, September 25). AUDITORS WARNED OF FRAUD FOR YEARS - TROUBLES HAVE PLAGUED SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMBOARD MEMBER GALLAGHER BOASTED OF HER CLOUT, FBI SAYS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.McMahon, P. (2009, September 26). GRAND JURY SET IN CORRUPTION INQUIRY. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Palm Beach ed.), 1B.McMahon, P. (2009, September 26). GRAND JURY SCHEDULED IN CORRUPTION INQUIRY - FEDERAL AGENTS RETURN TO ASK MORE QUESTIONS IN BROWARD GOVERNMENT HALLS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Bushouse and Dana Williams Staff Writers, K. (2009, September 27). WITH ENROLLMENT DOWN, SOME SCHOOLS REBUILDING - CAMPUSES IN WEST BROWARD ARE CROWDED WHILE OTHERS IN EAST GET UNNEEDED MONEY, CRITICS SAY. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Mazzei and Hannah Sampson The Miami Herald, P. (2009, September 27). WATCHDOGS LONG VIEWED SCHOOL BUILDING CONTRACTS - CRITICS IN BROWARD NOT SURPRISED BY FEDERAL INVESTIGATION INTO HOW BOARD AWARDED MILLIONS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 3B.McMahon, P. (2009, September 29). FBI CHECKING INTO CHARITYS FINANCES - GROUP HELPED DRAW YOUTH TO GAME OF GOLF. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Palm Beach ed.), 6B.McMahon, P. (2009, September 29). FBI CHECKS EGGELLETION CHARITY FINANCES - GROUP HELPED YOUTH GET INVOLVED WITH GOLF. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Wyman, S. (2009, September 30). BROWARD OFFICIALS SHOWS UP, BUT SUBPEONA
  • 80. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 74 of 91 APPENDIX Y-3 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 3 ERRED. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, October 2). CORRUPTION INQUIRY DRAWS SCHOOL BOARD INTO BAD LIGHT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, October 10). SPIRALING COSTS - CONSTANT MODIFICATIONS STALL SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, WASTE TAX DOLLARS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.OMatz, M. (2009, October 20). BOARD MEMBER ADVOCATED FOR $500,000 FEE BREAK – KRAFT FAILED TO DISCLOSE CONNECTION. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, October 21). NEW SCHOOL A STUDY IN BUILDING TROUBLES - CONSULTANT PREDICTED WOES FOR ELEMENTARY THAT SPARKED BACKLASH IN NEIGHBORHOOD. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, October 23). SCHOOL BUS DEPOT CONCERNS EASE. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 3B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2009, October 31). FRIENDSHIP OPENS DOOR TO BUILDING OPPORTUNITY - SCHOOL AUDITORS CITE LACK OF CERTIFICATION. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Brittany Wallman on November 4, P. (2009, November 4). SCHOOL BOARDERS ARGUE OVER PRESENCE OF POLITICIANS ON SELECTION COMMITTEE. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.OMatz Staff Writer, M. (2009, November 4). SCHOOL OFFICIALS DEBATE REFORMS - CORRUPTION INQUIRY PUTS SPOTLIGHT ON BUILDING DECISIONS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Kathy Bushouse on December 1, P. (2009, December 1). BROWARD SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION CHIEF GARRETSON TO RETIRE DEC. 31. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.OMatz and Kathy Bushouse Staff Writers, M. (2009, December 2). BROWARD SCHOOLS BUILDING CHIEF QUITS - GARRETSON, DEPARTMENT HAVE BEEN UNDER FIRE AMID FBI INVESTIGATION. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.
  • 81. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 75 of 91 APPENDIX Y-4 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 4Johnson Staff Writers, A. (2009, December 3). SEARCH ON FOR SCHOOLS POST. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 8B.Johnson, A. (2009, December 7). TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS REASSIGNED. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 2B.OMatz, M. (2009, December 10). SCHOOLS WAIT YEARS TO SEEK REFUNDS - BROWARD HAS RECOVERED ABOUT $4 MILLION RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION SINCE06. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.OMatz Staff Writer, M. (2009, December 11). DAYS AFTER GALLAGHER ARREST, OFFICIAL SOUGHT PENSION. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 3B.Burstein Staff Writer, J. (2009, December 27). 2009 - A LOOK BACK: CORRUPTION - A FLASHY ATTORNEY, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER WERE AMONG THOSE CAUGHT UP IN FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Kathy Bushouse on January 4, P. (2010, January 4). INTERIM LEADER NAMED FOR FACILITIES DEPARTMENT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.Bushouse Staff Writer, K. (2010, January 20). SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION CUTS JEOPARDIZE JOBS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Bushouse Staff Writer, K. (2010, February 18). ARCHITECT MAY SUE OVER SCRAPPED SCHOOL PLANS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2010, March 2). ARCHITECT FIRM RECEIVED PAY FOR UNBUILT SCHOOL - SCHOOL DISTRICT KEPT PAYING DESPITE SCRAPPING PLANS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.Johnson Staff Writer, A. (2010, March 3). BOARD KILLS CONTRACT FOR SCHOOL PLANS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 3B.Akilah Johnson on March 17, P. (2010, March 17). BROWARD SCHOOLS SUPERINTENDENT ON FACILITIES AUDIT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Online ed.), Web.OMatz Staff Writer, M. (2010, March 17). BROWARD SCHOOLS AUDIT FINDS ABUSES - OVERBILLING, MASSIVE OVERTIME ON LONG LIST. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.
  • 82. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 76 of 91 APPENDIX Y-5 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 5McMahon and Kathy Bushouse Staff Writers, P. (2010, March 18). GALLAGHER PLEADS GUILTY TO BRIBERY, RESIGNS SEAT - DEFENSE, PROSECUTION RECOMMEND SENTENCE OF 3 YEARS, 1 MONTH. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.OMatz Staff Writer, M. (2010, March 18). SCHOOLS MUDDLE MAY COST TAXPAYERS. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Mazzei The Miami Herald, P. (2010, April 23). ETHICS PANEL WANTS TO REIN IN BOARD MEMBERS - TRIO LOOKING AT HOW DISTRICT OPERATES. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 12A.Sivasankaran Staff writer, A. (2010, April 25). WORK ON STADIUM AT ISSUE - DONOR WANTS MONEY BACK IF PARKLAND SCHOOL PROJECT ISNT COMPLETED SOON. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (North West Broward ed.), 1.OMatz Sun Sentinel, M. (2010, April 30). DISTRICT SCRUTINIZES BILLS FOR TWO SCHOOL PROJECTS - OFFICIALS PAYING CONSULTANT TO CLEAR UP QUESTIONS OVER HOW MILLIONS WERE SPENT. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.OMatz Sun Sentinel, M. (2010, May 19). SCHOOLS STAFFERS TOLD TO HIRE ARCHITECT - COMMISSIONERS HUSBAND LANDED WORK. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.Johnson Sun Sentinel, A. (2010, May 27). BOB PARKS WONT SEEK RE-ELECTION - SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER DECIDES NOT RUN AFTER ALMOST 25 YEARS OF SERVICE. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B.McMahon Sun Sentinel, P. (2010, May 28). GALLAGHER: I ABUSED ALCOHOL, PAIN PILLS - FALLEN POLITICIAN SEEKS LENIENT PRISON TERM. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1A.OMatz Sun Sentinel, M. (2010, June 8). BUILDING AT COOPER CITY HIGH IS SINKING. Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (Broward Metro ed.), 1B. The Miami HeraldSOLER, E. (2009, March 15). HOLLYWOOD: Construction begins on long-delayed Hollywood school - A long-delayed and controversial elementary school project on Lincoln Street in
  • 83. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 77 of 91 APPENDIX Y-6 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 6 Hollywood is finally under construction.. Miami Herald, The (FL) (BW ed.), BW1.SOLER Special to The Miami Herald, E. (2009, March 15). Schools construction begins. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1BE.JOHNSON, A. (2009, July 10). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Construction officials: Repairs audit wrong - Contractors making repairs after Hurricane Wilma did not overcharge the school district, officials said.. Miami Herald, The (FL) (D1 ed.), B7.WEAVER, J. (2009, September 23). 3 Broward politicians arrested in FBI corruption stings. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.WEAVER, J. (2009, September 24). FEDERAL INVESTIGATION: 3 Broward politicians arrested in FBI public corruption stings - A county commissioner, School Board member and former Miramar commissioner have been charged in separate fraud cases. The FBI probe continues, with a focus on alleged corruption in the countys school building program.. Miami Herald, The (FL) A1.WEAVER, J. (2009, September 24). 3 politicians are implicated in FBI sting. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1A.WEAVER, J. (2009, September 24). Three Broward politicians arrested. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1A.MAZZEI AND HANNAH SAMPSON, P. (2009, September 27). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward schools construction scandal was expected, watchdogs say - Some Broward school district observers say they are not surprised by the arrest of a School Board member after raising questions for years about the way contracts are awarded.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.MAZZEI AND HANNAH SAMPSON pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, September 27). Watchdogs: Arrest of Gallagher not a shock. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 6B.SHERMAN, A. (2009, October 1). BROWARD COUNTY: New details of Broward corruption probe emerge - A Sunrise commissioner worked alongside the FBI in a corruption probe that continues to explore school and county contracts.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.SHERMAN, A. (2009, October 1). New details of Broward corruption probe emerge. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 5B.SHERMAN, A. (2009, October 1). New probe details emerge. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.
  • 84. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 78 of 91 APPENDIX Y-7 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 7MAZZEI, P. (2009, October 2). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward School Board talks over big problems - The Broward school district faces a rocky road ahead in its relations with the public. On Thursday, board members got some of their concerns off their chests.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B4.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, October 2). Board talks over big problems. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 4B.MAZZEI AND HANNAH SAMPSON, P. (2009, October 20). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Ethics question arises over Broward School Board member Stephanie Kraft - Broward school district records show a School Board members husband had ties to a developer -- and she was pushing for a deal with that company.. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.SAMPSON AND PATRICIA MAZZEI, H. (2009, October 20). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward School Board members ask: More ethics lessons, please - Broward school district records show a School Board members husband had ties to a developer -- and she was pushing for a deal with that company.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.MAZZEI, P. (2009, October 20). Watchdogs urge Broward school district to act quicker over audits. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI, P. (2009, October 20). Broward school audit watchdogs say quicker action needed. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI AND HANNAH SAMPSON pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, October 20). Kraft ethics question arises. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.HIAASEN AND PATRICIA MAZZEI, S. (2009, October 21). Sting led to arrest of Broward School Board member. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI, P. (2009, October 21). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Watchdogs urge Broward school district to act quicker over audits - The Broward school districts audit watchdogs say administrators need to take quicker action to address issues raised in worrisome audits.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.SAMPSON AND PATRICIA MAZZEI, H. (2009, October 21). BROWARD SCHOOL BOARD: Broward School Board members air their ethics ideas - A refresher on state ethics laws is on some Broward School Board members minds, as is a crackdown on campaign contributions.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B2.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, October 21). Action urged over audits. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1B.
  • 85. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 79 of 91 APPENDIX Y-8 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 8SAMPSON AND PATRICIA MAZZEI hsampson@MiamiHerald.com, H. (2009, October 21). Board members seek ethics lessons. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 2B.HIAASEN AND PATRICIA MAZZEI, S. (2009, October 22). BROWARD SCHOOLS: New details emerge in FBIs kickback sting on Broward School Board - An undercover FBI agent used a fake name but a real glass company to pull off a sting that led to the arrest of Broward School Board member Beverly Gallagher.. Miami Herald, The (FL) A1.HIAASEN AND PATRICIA MAZZEI shiaasen@MiamiHerald.com, S. (2009, October 22). Mystery man was pivotal in FBI sting. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1A.HIAASEN AND PATRICIA MAZZEI shiaasen@MiamiHerald.com, S. (2009, October 22). FBI mystery man played key role in kickback investigation. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1B.MAZZEI, P. (2009, October 28). BROWARD SCHOOLS: School Board debates whether to reclaim money - Broward school officials do not yet know if they will try to get more than $765,000 back after an audit said contractors overbilled for repairs.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B2.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, October 28). Board debates $765K question. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1B.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, October 28). School Board debates whether to reclaim money. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 2B.MAZZEI, P. (2009, November 2). Broward schools have too many empty seats. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI, P. (2009, November 3). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward schools have too many seats – On Tuesday, board members will unravel how the district ended up with so much extra space that the state has told it to stop building. The issue could prompt controversial boundary changes down the road.. Miami Herald, The (FL) A1.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, November 3). School district has too many seats. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1A.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, November 3). School district has too many empty seats. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 5B.MAZZEI, P. (2009, November 4). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward School Board, state disagree on definition of empty seats - A Broward School Board meeting on extra classroom space as a result of overbuilding turned into a discussion about how empty
  • 86. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 80 of 91 APPENDIX Y-9 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 9 seats should be counted.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.MAZZEI, P. (2009, November 10). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Ely High may get delayed field - As the Broward school district gets scrutinized for its construction program, one school may finally get an athletic field project under way.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, November 4). Board and state disagree on definition of empty. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, November 10). Ely may get delayed field. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.MAZZEI, P. (2009, December 1). Broward schools construction chief to retire. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI, P. (2009, December 2). BROWARD SCHOOLS: School building chief to quit - The Broward schools construction chief has announced his retirement, citing family reasons -- and not a federal probe involving the districts building program.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.BEHNE mbehne@MiamiHerald.com, M. (2009, December 2). LOCAL, SECTION B. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 6B.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2009, December 2). School building chief to quit. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.MAZZEI, P. (2010, January 24). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Broward schools budget gap could force more layoffs - Broward School Board members are beginning to tackle proposed budget cuts for the next school year, with the possibility of layoffs.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2010, January 24). Budget gap could force more layoffs. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1B.SAMPSON hsampson@MiamiHerald.com, H. (2010, February 18). Saving money proves costly. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1B.SAMPSON hsampson@MiamiHerald.com, H. (2010, February 18). Board cuts projects, but still has to pay. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 7B.MAZZEI, P. (2010, March 19). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Audit finds Broward school building funds misspent - An audit found a slew of problems with the Broward school systems construction department, but watchdogs praised steps being taken to address them.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B1.
  • 87. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 81 of 91 APPENDIX Y-10 Bibliography of News Articles July 2008 – June 2010 - 10MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2010, March 19). Audit finds building funds misspent. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 1B.MAZZEI, P. (2010, April 22). Ethics commission may suggest term limits for Broward School Board. Miami Herald, The (FL) n.pag.MAZZEI, P. (2010, April 23). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Ethics panel: Limit role of Broward School Board members - A commission examining Broward schools outlined its planned proposals Thursday, focusing on the role and power of School Board members.. Miami Herald, The (FL) B4.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2010, April 23). Ethics panel: Limit role of board members. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 4B.MAZZEI, P. (2010, May 7). BROWARD SCHOOLS: Audit: Broward school district overpaid millions on cafeteria projects - An audit found problems with the way the Broward school district accepted bids on more than a dozen cafeteria construction projects, which resulted in millions overpaid and breaches of state law.. Miami Herald, The (FL) A1.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2010, May 7). District overpaid millions on cafeterias. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Final ed.), 7B.MAZZEI pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com, P. (2010, May 7). Audit finds district overpaid millions for cafeteria projects. Miami Herald, The (FL) (Broward ed.), 1A.Retrieved from NewsBank on-line database (Americas Newspapers), November 30, 2010
  • 88. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 82 of 91 Works CitedBesley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? media capture and government accountability. The American Economic Review , 96 (3), 720-736.Cohen, S., Eimicke, W., & Heikkila, T. (2008). The effective public manager: achieving success in a changing government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., et al. (1983). Media and agenda setting: effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 47 (1), 16-35.Cooper, P. J. (2007). Public law & public administration (Fourth ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Feinberg, L.E., (1986). Managing the freedom of information act and federal information policy. Public Administration Review, 46 (6), 615-621.Fitzpatrick, D. (1947-1948). Public information activities of government agencies. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 11 (4), 530-539.FOIA Basics, What are the FOIA expemtions? (nd). Retrieved Nov. 4, 2008 from The National Security Archive: "http://www.gsu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/guide.html"Gabrielson, T. (2009). James Madisons psychology of public opinion. Potlitcal Research Quarterly, 62 (3), 431-444.Jerit, J., Barabas, J., & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (2), 266-282.
  • 89. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 83 of 91Kemp, K. A. (1984). Accidents, scandals, and political support for regulatory agencies. The Journal of Politics, 46 (2), 401-427.McLendon, M. K., & Hearn, J. C. (2006). Mandated openness in public higher education: a field study of state sunshine laws and institutional governance. The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (4), 645-683.Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2002). Social value of public information. The American Economic Review, 92 (9), 1521-1534.Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 54 (2), 159-176.Nisbet, M. M. (2000, Mar.). Precedent-setting FOIA litigation: significant court decisions that have shaped the freedom of information act. Retrieved Nov. 08, 2010 from The National Security Archive: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/asaplitigation.pdfPrat, A. (2005). The wrong kind of transparency. The American Economic Review, 95 (3), 862- 877.Press Secretary, O. o. (1996, Jul, 4). Statement of the president upon signing S. 1160. Retrieved Nov, 5, 2008 from The National Security Archive: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarch/nsa/foia/lbj.htmlRosenbloom, D. H. ((1983) 2004). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. In J. M. Shafritz, A. C. Hyde, & S. J. Parkes, Classics of Public Administration (Fifth ed., pp. 446-457). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadswoorth.School Board of Broward County. (nd b). Public relations & governmental affiars department. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2010 from Broward county public schools:http://www.broward schools.com/prga/publications.htm
  • 90. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 84 of 91School Board of Broward County. (nd a). SBBC policies. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2010 from Broward county public schools: http://www.broward.k12.fl.us/sbbcpolicies/docs/P1343.000pdfState of Florida. (2009a). Government-in-the-sunshine manual. Retrieved Nov. 07, 2010 from mufloridalegal.com: http://myfloridalegal.com/webfiles.nsf/WF/MRAY- 6Y8SEM/$file/Sunshine.pdfState of Florida. (2009b). The "sunshine" law. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2010 from Government in the sunshine: http://myflsunshine.com/sun.nsf/pages/lawState of Florida. (n.d.). The Florida constitution. Retrieved Nov. 0, 2010 from Online sunshine: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=Constitution&Submenu=3&Tab=sta tutes#A08Swartz, N. (2008, Jan/Feb). Government records: its the message, not the medium. Information Management Journal, 22-24.The Congressional Record. (1966, Jun. 20). Congressional Record -- House. Retrieved Nov. 05, 2008 from The National Security Archive: "http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/lbj.htmlThe FOIA and President George W. Bush. (nd). Retrieved Nov. 08, 2010 from The National Security Archive: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/bush.htmlThe FOIA and President Lyndon Johnson. (n.d). Retrieved Nov. 08, 2010 from The National Security Archive: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/lbj.htmlThe Freedom of Information Act Turns 35. (nd). Retrieved Nov. 08, 2010 from The National Security Archive: "http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/foia/special.html"Wilson, W. ((1887) 2004). The study of administsration. In J. M. Shafritz, A. C. Hyde, & S. J. Parkes, Classics of Public Administration (Political science quarterly 2) (Fifth ed., pp.
  • 91. FCM Information Management J. Rada Page 85 of 91 22-34). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39 (4), 981-1000.

×