Authentication & Reputation, Adding Business Value In The Real World - Presentation Transcript
Authentication & Reputation – Adding Business Value in The Real World
Agenda
Introductions & Agenda Review
The Big Picture
IP-based Blocklists and Reputation
Domain-based Authentication & Reputation
The Future
Q&A
Introductions
Patrick Peterson, Vice President Technology, IronPort Systems
Alberto Mujica, President and CEO, Reputation Technologies, Inc
Barry Abel, VP of Field Operations, Message Systems
Bill McInnis, Director, Message Level
The Big Picture REPUTATION CERTIFICATION 1 4 Who do you claim to be? Validate Identity Risk of badness/probability of goodness based on historical factors Third-party affirmation Make decision, take action IDENTITY ACTION 2 AUTHENTICATION 3
Identity
Patrick Richard Peterson
Allow onto airplane?
Allow into USA?
Owner of house on Whitney Street, San Francisco, CA?
IronPort Systems
Credit worthy?
www.cisco.com
Authorized resellers?
Authentication (of Identity)
Handshake
Photograph
Chip
Fingerprint
Signature, Notary
Retina scan
Consumer Credit Reputation
Three Credit Bureaus sell credit reports
Fair Isaac provides underlying technology
“ Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FIC) is the leading provider of decision management solutions powered by advanced analytics. … Today, the company’s solutions, software and consulting services power more than 180 billion smarter business decisions each year for companies worldwide.”
Business Credit Reputation
D&B ( NYSE:DNB ) is the world’s leading source of commercial information and insight on businesses, enabling companies to Decide with Confidence® for over 165 years.
Certification
Third-party that certifies (accredits) that an entity complies with certain standards or practices
Facts about IP Based Authentication
Not really authentication, better referred to as identification
Difficult or impossible to spoof
IP based identification runs into limitations when
Senders are on shared email servers (Like giving a license to a car and not a person)
Behind proxies
Senders would like to send different kinds of messages from the same IP
RBLs provide Good/Bad responses, not a range of responses
Current Situation with IP Based Authentication
DKIM and/or SPF authentication are prerequisites for domain based authentication and therefore reputation
Once either SPF and/or DKIM are widely adopted reputation can be based on domain names
Email reputation providers like ReturnPath, Habeas and Reputation Technologies require static IP addresses
Because SPF and DKIM are not yet over the tipping point email reputation providers like ReturnPath, Habeas and Reputation Technologies have to use IP identification instead of domain authentication
Barry Abel, Message Systems VP Field Operations
Authenticating Domains
SenderID and DKIM
Both work to verify that every e-mail message originates from the Internet domain from which it claims to have been sent.
SenderID
DKIM
Current Status of DKIM & Sender ID
DKIM
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) made DKIM a standard in May 2007
Already in wide use
Sender ID*
Every day, 20 million forged messages are detected by Sender ID-enabled domains.
Reputable marketers that have adopted Sender ID have realized improved deliverability, with up to 85 percent fewer messages mistakenly marked as spam in Windows Live Hotmail.
With spam increasing 40 percent in the past 12 months, spam in Hotmail users’ inboxes has actually been reduced by 50 percent; Sender ID contributed 8 percent of that reduction.
*Microsoft news release dated 5/18/07
Why Use Domain Authentication
ISP are using various technologies to protect their customers and themselves.
Like going into battle ISP need multiple layers of protection
Authentication/Reputation
Anti-spam
Anti-virus
Policy Enforcement
To gain access through these lines of defense you need to have the same technologies.
Bill McInnis
Director, Message Level
DO SOMETHING!!!
Strongly worded suggestions being offered by Associations for members to implement SPF and DKIM
DMA, BITS, ESPC
Example: BITS is recommending TLS, SPF, SIDF and DKIM within 18 months
Associations can talk 10x faster than their constituents can move
Many ISPs are committed to using authentication to evaluate email
Hotmail
Yahoo/Gmail
SPF and DKIM pros
SPF
Allows companies to identify mail servers where mail is authorized to come from
Relatively easy for senders to support
Many ISPs utilize SPF as a factor in email delivery
DKIM
More heavyweight solution
Allows a company to cryptographically sign an email
Allows ISP’s to identify signatures and associated messages that compute correctly and handle those messages different
SPF and DKIM Cons
SPF
Breaks some current use cases of email – Forwarding, etc
Senders don’t know what receivers are doing, if anything
Doesn’t not protect anything the end users sees – 2821 address (xyz.com) 2822 address (chase.com) – Does this make SPF worth much of anything?
DKIM
Doesn’t break forwarding - No reliable replay protection –
Potential for signature breakage
Cannot reliable detect bad messages
No data for senders
Many traditional problems associated with PKI key propagation and changes
Authentication Alone Creates a False Sense of Security Delivered-To: [email_address] Received: by 10.67.65.8 with SMTP id s8cs550968ugk; Tue, 8 May 2007 10:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.105.19 with SMTP id d19mr6545698agc.1178643934853; Tue, 08 May 2007 10:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: [email_address] Received: from mail03.bankofamerica.cl (mail03.bankofamerica.cl [200.75.25.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 14si2200432wrl.2007.05.08.10.05.33; Tue, 08 May 2007 10:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of administrator@bankofamerica.cl designates 200.75.25.175 as permitted sender) From: "Bank of America" [email_address] To: [email_address] Subject: Reactivate your Account
S3: Authentication and Reputation: Adding Business Value in the Real World
It's not a secret that the adoption of authentication and reputation standards is hitting critical mass in organizations around the globe. Almost 40 percent of all email is authenticated with Sender ID and/or DKIM, but what does that mean to an organization? Is authenticated email helping businesses improve efficiencies and protect their inboxes?
Attendees will learn the direct impact authentication and reputation can have on business goals and bottom lines. From brand protection to deliverability to curtailing spam, learn how adopting and taking action based on authentication and reputation can dramatically affect businesses on many levels.
MODERATOR: Patrick Peterson, VP Technology, IronPort
PANELIST: Barry Abel, VP of Field Operations, Message Systems
PANELIST: Bill McInnis, Director, Message Level
PANELIST: Alberto Mujica, President and CEO, Reputation Technologies Inc.
less
0 comments
Post a comment