MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

on

  • 996 views

Presentation given to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee on October 21, 2013. The presentation details the district's MCAS results in English language arts, mathematics, and science for every ...

Presentation given to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee on October 21, 2013. The presentation details the district's MCAS results in English language arts, mathematics, and science for every grade level. It also displays the accountability rating for every school based upon the performance that the Massachusetts DESE (Department of Elementary & Secondary Education) has established.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
996
Views on SlideShare
471
Embed Views
525

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

12 Embeds 525

http://mursd.blogspot.com 468
http://mursd.blogspot.ru 18
http://www.mursd.blogspot.com 16
http://www.blogger.com 7
http://www.mursd.blogspot.ru 5
http://mursd.blogspot.in 3
http://mursd.blogspot.com.br 3
http://mursd.blogspot.de 1
http://mursd.blogspot.ca 1
http://mursd.blogspot.fr 1
http://mursd.blogspot.ae 1
http://mursd.blogspot.co.nz 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013 Presentation Transcript

  • 1.  Mendon-Upton Regional Schools 2013 MCAS Results & Accountability Status Presentation to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee October 21, 2013
  • 2. Purpose of Presentation  Provide a broad overview of MCAS performance of the district in relationship to the State in ELA, Math, and Science  Provide a context for MCAS results by examining similar districts’ performance  Clarify the state’s accountability system model  Identify areas that pose a challenge and plans to address those challenges
  • 3. Strengths  District Math scores improved 5% from 2012 to 2013  District ELA scores improved 3% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 3 ELA scores improved 7 % from 2012 to 2013  Grade 3 Math scores improved 15% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 8 Math scores improved 14% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 10 Math scores improved 7% from 2012 to 2013
  • 4. English Language Arts District MCAS Results 
  • 5. ALL Grades ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 6. 3rd Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 7. 4th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 8. 5th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 9. 6th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 10. 7th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 11. 8th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 12. 10th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 13. Mathematics District MCAS Results 
  • 14. ALL Grades Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 15. 3rd Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 16. 4th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 17. 5th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 18. 6th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 19. 7th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 20. 8th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 21. 10th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 22. Science, Technology & Engineering District MCAS Results
  • 23. 5th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 24. 8th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 25. 10th Grade Biology : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  • 26. Massachusetts’ Accountability System for Schools 
  • 27. Accountability Classifications • Based on the premise of halving achievement gap by 2017 • Uses CPI (Composite Performance Index) metric • Also uses PPI (Progress & Performance Index) factors such as moving students to higher categories, SGP, and graduation/dropout rates • Schools classified as Level 1-5 based upon achievement of target CPI goals for all students and each subgroup based upon multiple years of ELA and math MCAS data as well as PPI factors • Whatever the lowest rating is for any school within the district, that must be the rating for the district
  • 28. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Narrowing Targets for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
  • 29. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
  • 30. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)
  • 31. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough Math (Grades 3-4) Level 3
  • 32. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
  • 33. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
  • 34. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)
  • 35. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4) Level 1
  • 36. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe ELA (All Grades 5-8)
  • 37. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & 2013 Results- Miscoe ELA
  • 38. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe Math (All Grades 5-8)
  • 39. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & ResultsMiscoe Math Level 2
  • 40. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc ELA (Grade 10)
  • 41. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc ELA
  • 42. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc Math (Grade 10)
  • 43. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc Math Level 1
  • 44. Comparison to Neighboring Districts District Bellingham Blackstone-Millville Douglas Grafton Hopedale Hopkinton Mendon-Upton Milford Northbridge Sutton Uxbridge ELA Science Proficient or Math Proficient Proficient or or Higher Higher Higher 73% 59% 60% 68% 61% 56% 71% 61% 59% 78% 73% 67% 80% 69% 64% 87% 81% 80% 81% 72% 70% 71% 62% 64% 65% 50% 52% 72% 63% 60% 65% 58% 53%
  • 45. Comparison to like districts (DART) ELA Proficient Math Proficient or or higher higher Georgetown 76% 68% Groton-Dunstable 84% 77% Hanover 82% 69% Ipswich 82% 69% Lynnfield 90% 79% Mendon-Upton 81% 72% Nashoba 83% 80% Newburyport 82% 71% North Reading 83% 76% Norwell 90% 76% Scituate 86% 82% Tyngsborough 79% 71% District Science and Tech Proficient or higher 57% 81% 65% 65% 74% 70% 70% 71% 70% 81% 71% 66%
  • 46. Challenges  Over the past four years, some grades and subgroups are showing progress in ELA and math MCAS, while others are static or declining  Our high needs subgroup scores are lower than the aggregate- the major driver is the results of our special education students  More students need to move from proficient to advanced  Writing is an identified area in need of improvement  Math proficiency rates take a dip in 5th grade
  • 47. Immediate Action Steps  Schools have analyzed disaggregated data at all levels and developed action plans  Writing committee formed and research begun on writing resources and programming  Curriculum mapping process launched, team trained in Rubicon Atlas  Vertical conversations on curriculum have begun  Academic Support grant to assist with secondary interventions for high need students
  • 48. Future Action Steps Data— Educators need more training in data analysis protocols Curriculum— Align curriculum to the Common Core Standards Vertically align curriculum using Rubicon Atlas system High Needs Subgroup Increase training in inclusive instructional practices for all teachers Increase use of comprehensive data to target interventions
  • 49. Targeted Investments  Curriculum Development—Time, training and support  Writing Program—Resources and professional development  Increase Non-fiction resources at elementary level  Coaching model for literacy and mathematics