Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0


Mendon-Upton Regional Schools
2013 MCAS Results &
Accountability Status

Presentation to the
Mendon-Upton Regional Scho...
Purpose of Presentation
 Provide a broad overview of MCAS performance of the

district in relationship to the State in EL...
Strengths
 District Math scores improved 5% from 2012 to 2013
 District ELA scores improved 3% from 2012 to 2013
 Grade...
English Language Arts
District MCAS Results


ALL Grades ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
3rd Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
4th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
5th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
6th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
7th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
Mathematics
District MCAS Results


ALL Grades Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
3rd Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
4th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
5th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
6th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
7th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
Science, Technology & Engineering
District MCAS Results
5th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. :
MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. :
MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade Biology : MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher
Massachusetts’
Accountability System for Schools


Accountability Classifications
• Based on the premise of halving achievement gap by
2017
• Uses CPI (Composite Performance...
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Narrowing Targets for
Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for
Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for
Clough Math (Grades 3-4)

Level 3
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for
Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for
Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)

Level 1
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe ELA (All Grades 5-8)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets &
2013 Results- Miscoe ELA
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe Math (All Grades 5-8)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & ResultsMiscoe Math

Level 2
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc ELA (Grade 10)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc ELA
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc Math (Grade 10)
Composite Performance Index (CPI)

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc Math

Level 1
Comparison to Neighboring Districts
District
Bellingham
Blackstone-Millville
Douglas
Grafton
Hopedale
Hopkinton
Mendon-Upt...
Comparison to like districts (DART)
ELA Proficient Math Proficient or
or higher
higher
Georgetown
76%
68%
Groton-Dunstable...
Challenges
 Over the past four years, some grades and subgroups

are showing progress in ELA and math MCAS, while
others ...
Immediate Action Steps
 Schools have analyzed disaggregated data at all levels and

developed action plans
 Writing comm...
Future Action Steps
Data—
Educators need more training in data analysis protocols
Curriculum—
Align curriculum to the Co...
Targeted Investments
 Curriculum Development—Time, training and

support

 Writing Program—Resources and professional

d...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

1,123

Published on

Presentation given to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee on October 21, 2013. The presentation details the district's MCAS results in English language arts, mathematics, and science for every grade level. It also displays the accountability rating for every school based upon the performance that the Massachusetts DESE (Department of Elementary & Secondary Education) has established.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,123
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
16
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013"

  1. 1.  Mendon-Upton Regional Schools 2013 MCAS Results & Accountability Status Presentation to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee October 21, 2013
  2. 2. Purpose of Presentation  Provide a broad overview of MCAS performance of the district in relationship to the State in ELA, Math, and Science  Provide a context for MCAS results by examining similar districts’ performance  Clarify the state’s accountability system model  Identify areas that pose a challenge and plans to address those challenges
  3. 3. Strengths  District Math scores improved 5% from 2012 to 2013  District ELA scores improved 3% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 3 ELA scores improved 7 % from 2012 to 2013  Grade 3 Math scores improved 15% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 8 Math scores improved 14% from 2012 to 2013  Grade 10 Math scores improved 7% from 2012 to 2013
  4. 4. English Language Arts District MCAS Results 
  5. 5. ALL Grades ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  6. 6. 3rd Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  7. 7. 4th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  8. 8. 5th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  9. 9. 6th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  10. 10. 7th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  11. 11. 8th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  12. 12. 10th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  13. 13. Mathematics District MCAS Results 
  14. 14. ALL Grades Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  15. 15. 3rd Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  16. 16. 4th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  17. 17. 5th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  18. 18. 6th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  19. 19. 7th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  20. 20. 8th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  21. 21. 10th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  22. 22. Science, Technology & Engineering District MCAS Results
  23. 23. 5th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  24. 24. 8th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  25. 25. 10th Grade Biology : MURSD vs. State % of students proficient or higher
  26. 26. Massachusetts’ Accountability System for Schools 
  27. 27. Accountability Classifications • Based on the premise of halving achievement gap by 2017 • Uses CPI (Composite Performance Index) metric • Also uses PPI (Progress & Performance Index) factors such as moving students to higher categories, SGP, and graduation/dropout rates • Schools classified as Level 1-5 based upon achievement of target CPI goals for all students and each subgroup based upon multiple years of ELA and math MCAS data as well as PPI factors • Whatever the lowest rating is for any school within the district, that must be the rating for the district
  28. 28. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Narrowing Targets for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
  29. 29. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
  30. 30. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)
  31. 31. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough Math (Grades 3-4) Level 3
  32. 32. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
  33. 33. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
  34. 34. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)
  35. 35. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4) Level 1
  36. 36. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe ELA (All Grades 5-8)
  37. 37. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & 2013 Results- Miscoe ELA
  38. 38. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Miscoe Math (All Grades 5-8)
  39. 39. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & ResultsMiscoe Math Level 2
  40. 40. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc ELA (Grade 10)
  41. 41. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc ELA
  42. 42. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap NarrowingTargets for Nipmuc Math (Grade 10)
  43. 43. Composite Performance Index (CPI) Proficiency Gap Targets & Results Nipmuc Math Level 1
  44. 44. Comparison to Neighboring Districts District Bellingham Blackstone-Millville Douglas Grafton Hopedale Hopkinton Mendon-Upton Milford Northbridge Sutton Uxbridge ELA Science Proficient or Math Proficient Proficient or or Higher Higher Higher 73% 59% 60% 68% 61% 56% 71% 61% 59% 78% 73% 67% 80% 69% 64% 87% 81% 80% 81% 72% 70% 71% 62% 64% 65% 50% 52% 72% 63% 60% 65% 58% 53%
  45. 45. Comparison to like districts (DART) ELA Proficient Math Proficient or or higher higher Georgetown 76% 68% Groton-Dunstable 84% 77% Hanover 82% 69% Ipswich 82% 69% Lynnfield 90% 79% Mendon-Upton 81% 72% Nashoba 83% 80% Newburyport 82% 71% North Reading 83% 76% Norwell 90% 76% Scituate 86% 82% Tyngsborough 79% 71% District Science and Tech Proficient or higher 57% 81% 65% 65% 74% 70% 70% 71% 70% 81% 71% 66%
  46. 46. Challenges  Over the past four years, some grades and subgroups are showing progress in ELA and math MCAS, while others are static or declining  Our high needs subgroup scores are lower than the aggregate- the major driver is the results of our special education students  More students need to move from proficient to advanced  Writing is an identified area in need of improvement  Math proficiency rates take a dip in 5th grade
  47. 47. Immediate Action Steps  Schools have analyzed disaggregated data at all levels and developed action plans  Writing committee formed and research begun on writing resources and programming  Curriculum mapping process launched, team trained in Rubicon Atlas  Vertical conversations on curriculum have begun  Academic Support grant to assist with secondary interventions for high need students
  48. 48. Future Action Steps Data— Educators need more training in data analysis protocols Curriculum— Align curriculum to the Common Core Standards Vertically align curriculum using Rubicon Atlas system High Needs Subgroup Increase training in inclusive instructional practices for all teachers Increase use of comprehensive data to target interventions
  49. 49. Targeted Investments  Curriculum Development—Time, training and support  Writing Program—Resources and professional development  Increase Non-fiction resources at elementary level  Coaching model for literacy and mathematics
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×