Questions about essay #1
Literary Theory: The Extrinsic Lens
Questions about Essay 1
When is it due?
How long should it be?
What formatting style are we using?
How do we submit the paper?
Any other questions?
In his book, An Essay on Criticism (1966) Graham
Hough distinguishes two categories of literary
theories. The first category—the intrinsic theories—is
concerned with the moral nature of literature. Theories
in this category primarily emphasize the total essence
of literature. The second is what he describes as the
extrinsic theories, which talk about the formal nature
of literature and more specifically what it is.
The intrinsically inclined literary theory isolates a work
of literature from its external reality. The supporters of
this classification see a text of literature as having no
relationship, either intended or implied, with the
external world. They assert that a work exists in its
own world. The critical theorists in this category are
the Formalists (The New Critics), Structuralists and
Post-structuralists or the Deconstructionists.
The Extrinsic Theories
The extrinsically inspired literary theories tend to associate a
literary piece with its external world. We see a departure
from the isolationist philosophy of the intrinsic critics.
Extrinsic criticism generally asserts that a work of literature
is both a representation of the age and a reflection of the
world in which it operates. Extrinsic theories value a text of
literature as a product of the external world: the creator’s
vision, imagination, and understanding. In this kind of
criticism, the artist is said to be inside of the literary
production, creating characters to carry out his mission.
Some modern literary theories in this category are
Psychoanalytical, Marxist, Feminist and Post-colonialist
Feminist criticism is concerned with “the ways in which literature
(and other cultural productions) reinforce or undermine the
economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of
women" (Tyson). This school of theory looks at how aspects of
our culture are inherently patriarchal (male dominated) and “this
critique strives to expose the explicit and implicit misogyny in
male writing about women" (Richter 1346). This misogyny,
Tyson reminds us, can extend into diverse areas of our culture:
"Perhaps the most chilling example [...] is found in the world of
modern medicine, where drugs prescribed for both sexes often
have been tested on male subjects only" (83).
Feminist Theory and Criticism
The objectives of the criticism include
To uncover and develop a female tradition of writing
To interpret symbolism of women’s writing so that it will be
lost or ignored by the male point of view.
To rediscover old texts
To analyze women writers and their writing’s from a female
To increase awareness of the sexual politics of language and
Feminist criticism has, in many ways,
followed what some theorists call the
three waves of feminism:
First Wave Feminism
Ran from late 1700s-early
1900's: writers like Mary
Vindication of the Rights of
Women, 1792) highlight the
inequalities between the
sexes. Activists like Susan B.
Anthony and Victoria
Woodhull contribute to the
movement, which leads to
National Universal Suffrage
in 1920 with the passing of
the Nineteenth Amendment
Second Wave Feminism
From early 1960s-late 1970s:
building on more equal working
conditions necessary in America
during World War II, movements
such as the National Organization
for Women (NOW), formed in
1966, cohere feminist political
activism. Writers like Simone de
Beauvoir (Le deuxième sexe,
1972) and Elaine Showalter
established the groundwork for
the dissemination of feminist
theories dove-tailed with the
American Civil Rights movement
Third Wave Feminism
From early 1990s-present: resisting the perceived essentialist (over
generalized, over simplified) ideologies and a white, heterosexual, middle
class focus of second wave feminism, third wave feminism borrows from
post-structural and contemporary gender and race theories to expand on
marginalized populations' experiences. Writers like Alice Walker work to
“reconcile [feminism] with the concerns of the black community [and] the
survival and wholeness of her people, men and women both, and for the
promotion of dialog and community as well as for the valorization of
women and of all the varieties of work women perform" (Tyson 97).
Assumptions of New Criticism
The boundaries between self and other, text and world
are considered firm.
The critic is/should be a neutral observer.
The literary work is regarded as a self-enclosed universe
with its own logic. It stands apart from the world but
illuminates the world.
The literary work should be studied for its distinctively
literary elements, and for how they operate in relation
to each other in the world of the work. The work is
valuable for its own sake, not for any extrinsic purpose.
Assumptions of Feminist Criticism
Women are oppressed by patriarchy economically, politically, socially,
and psychologically; patriarchal ideology is the primary means by which
they are kept so
In every domain where patriarchy reigns, woman is other: she is
marginalized, defined only by her difference from male norms and values
All of western civilization is deeply rooted in patriarchal ideology, for
example, in the biblical portrayal of Eve as the origin of sin and death in
While biology determines our sex (male or female), culture determines
our gender (masculine or feminine)
All feminist activity, including feminist theory and literary criticism, has
as its ultimate goal to change the world by prompting gender equality
Gender issues play a part in every aspect of human production and
experience, including the production and experience of literature,
whether we are consciously aware of these issues or not.
In Groups, Discuss
What is the primary
focus of feminist
criticism and theory?
How do feminist
critics and theorists
regard the role of
women in literature?
Q: What is the purpose of deeply analyzing how women are objectified and
pigeon holed into various role in literature?
Q. In what ways has Feminist Criticism and theory always been relevant to
society in the past and present?
Qs: If the term “feminism” is somehow repellent to the larger culture, do we
really need (or want) to cling to it? On the other hand, many have pointed out
that that very aversion proves that we need feminism. Isn’t it also a sign that
feminism is doing something right by provoking mainstream society? But at
what point (if ever) does provocation become counterproductive?
Q: Why does Tyson, when describing inequalities between men and women on
the second page, elect to put (white) in front the words men and women?
Q: How can we address the inequalities among women in feminism?
Read: Andrew Marvell’s “To
His Coy Mistress” and “‘To His
Coy Mistress’: A Feminist
Post # 11: QHQ: “To His Coy
Mistress,” or “‘To His Coy
Mistress’: A Feminist Reading.”
Bring: Andrew Marvell’s “To
His Coy Mistress” and “To His
Coy Mistress”: A Feminist