Ad Testing Research and Findings - SES NYC 2007

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites

    Ad Testing Research and Findings - SES NYC 2007 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Ad Testing Research & Findings
    2. What are the Keys to Successful Testing? • Design your test around a single question • Have a large differentiation b/w tested elements • Account for changes in temporal behavior • Collect enough data to reduce margin of error • Segment results to provide added insight • Act on the results! 2
    3. Test 1: Is Running Ads on Brand Queries a Waste of Money? Example SERP w/o Ad Example SERP w/ Ad 3
    4. Test Design • 1 week ads on 1 week off • No issues of seasonality or promotion • 30 Branded Keywords • 1 version of ad 4
    5. Did the Ads Drive Traffic? NO • Google -1.3% • Yahoo -8.7% • Live -7.3% 5
    6. Did the Ads Increase Conversion Rate? YES • Google +17.9% • Yahoo +32.1% • Live +11.7% 6
    7. Did the Ads Increase RPV? YES • Google +15.4% • Yahoo +47.0% • Live +27.5% 7
    8. New Questions • Right Time? Marketing to Intent? • Power of Persuasion? • Power of Brand in Search? 8
    9. Test 2: What is the Best Ad to Increase Conversion? Ad Testing Element 1 Multivariate Testing Works Element 2 Increase Conversion Rates Element 3 ottodigital.com/ads Element 4 4x3 L9 Orthogonal Array 4 Elements 3 Variations 9
    10. Test Design • 9 Ads Created and Tagged w/ URL Parameter • Landing and Thank You Page Tagged • Ad Serving Optimization Turned OFF 10
    11. What does an L9 Array Really Look Like? Recipe (9) Title (3) D1 (3) D2 (3) URL (3) A - Control {keyword} Search {AdGroup} Compare Products www.brand.com suppliers Today B {keyword} Find {keyword} suppliers Search Thousands of www.brand.com/ Products {keyword} C {keyword} Find Parts fast at (brand) {keyword} catalog www.brand.com/ search catalogs D {keyword} suppliers Search {AdGroup} Compare Products www.brand.com/ suppliers Today catalogs E {keyword} suppliers Find {keyword} suppliers Search Thousands of www.brand.com Products F {keyword} suppliers Find Parts fast at (brand) {keyword} catalog www.brand.com/ search {keyword} G {keyword} catalog Search {AdGroup} Compare Products www.brand.com/ suppliers Today {keyword} H {keyword} catalog Find {keyword} suppliers Search Thousands of www.brand.com/ Products catalogs I {keyword} catalog Find Parts fast at (brand) {keyword} catalog www.brand.com search 11
    12. What Were the Results? Recipe Visitors Conversion Lift A - Control 11.80% 5.88% --- B 14.30% 4.29% -27.05% C 14.04% 6.08% 3.42% D 9.34% 2.57% -56.29% E 13.00% 6.16% 4.72% F 9.42% 5.38% -8.50% G 10.06% 5.04% -14.32% H 10.41% 5.13% -12.82% I 7.63% 8.04% 36.71% 12
    13. What is the breakdown? • Other Ads the Used Winning URL – Control – +4.72% • Other Ads the Used Winning D1 – +3.42% – -8.5% • Other Ads the Used Winning Title – -14% – -12% 13
    14. What Ad Elements Influenced Conversion? Element Winning Alternative Influence on Conversion Title {keyword} suppliers 13.54% D1 Find {keyword} suppliers 53.53% D2 Search Thousands of Products 23.56% URL 9.37% www.brand.com/{keyword} 14
    15. What’s Better? Winning Recipe Best Predicted {keyword} catalog {keyword} suppliers Find parts fast at (brand) Find {keyword} suppliers {keyword} catalog search Search Thousands of Products www.brand.com www.brand.com/{keyword} 15
    16. What’s Better? Winning Recipe Best Predicted {keyword} catalog {keyword} suppliers Find parts fast at (brand) Find {keyword} suppliers {keyword} catalog search Search Thousands of Products www.brand.com www.brand.com/{keyword} Best Predicted +52% Lift in Conversion Rate 15
    17. Test 3: What are the effects of Quality Score? 16
    18. Who & What Determines Relevance? Recipe A-C Title: “{keyword}” Recipe Impressions Conversion Rate Recipe A 265,909 5.72% Recipe B 265,045 5.09% Recipe C 264,784 5.49% 17
    19. Who & What Determines Relevance? Recipe D-F Title: “ Find {keyword}” Recipe Impressions Conversion Rate Recipe D 47,093 8.59% Recipe E 47,289 5.24% Recipe F 47,066 7.76% 18
    20. Who & What Determines Relevance? Recipe G-I Title: “The Wait is Over” Recipe Impressions Conversion Rate Recipe G 46,518 9.84% Recipe H 46,795 8.11% Recipe I 46,579 11.76% 19
    21. Who Decides Relevance? Group G-I had • 17% of the Impressions of A-C • 32% of the Conversions of A-C • 82% higher Conversion Rate than A-C 20
    22. Jonathan Mendez, Chief Strategy Officer Thanks! • optimizeandprophesize.com - My Blog • ottodigital.com/blog - OTTO Blog • offermatica.com - Technology & Parent 21
    23. Jonathan Mendez, Chief Strategy Officer Thanks! • optimizeandprophesize.com - My Blog • ottodigital.com/blog - OTTO Blog • offermatica.com - Technology & Parent 21

    + jonathanmendezjonathanmendez, 3 years ago

    custom

    1793 views, 2 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1793
      • 1790 on SlideShare
      • 3 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 2 views on http://www.optimizeandprophesize.com
    • 1 views on http://www.slideshare.net

    more

    All embeds
    • 2 views on http://www.optimizeandprophesize.com
    • 1 views on http://www.slideshare.net

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories