The promotion of CA in the South African Landcare programme during the last decade: evolution and impact of action research. Hendrik J Smith

  • 375 views
Uploaded on

A presentation from the WCCA 2011 conference in Brisbane.

A presentation from the WCCA 2011 conference in Brisbane.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
375
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Promotion of Conservation Agriculture in the South African LandCare Programme during the Last Decade: Evolution and Impact of Action Research HJ Smith, MC Matlou, L Maribeng, MV Kidson, G Trytsman WCCA 25-29 September 2011, Brisbane, Australia
  • 2. Background
    • 1997 - South African LandCare Study Tour to Australia
      • National LandCare conference in Adelaide
    • 1998 - LandCare South Africa was established as a top priority initiative for the South African government
    • 1999 – funding to ARC
    The goal of the South African LandCare programme is to: ‘ optimise productivity through the sustainable use of natural resources to improve food security, job creation and the quality of life of the South African people’
  • 3. A tentative start …
    • Aim : Promote sustainable practices to combat soil related production problems among small-scale farmers, e.g. poor soil fertility and acidity
    • YES to CA
    • Totally inappropriate training and background
      • CA and community-based NRM and research
  • 4. Natural Science-based approach
    • On-farm, researcher-managed trials (demo plots)
      • Statistical ‘white-peg’ approach
    • Monitoring on farmers fields
      • Soil, leave and yield samples
    • Feedback
      • Information days
      • Pamphlets
      • Scientific reports
      • Scientific conferences
      • Post-graduate qualifications
      • Peer-reviewed articles
  • 5. Testing “LandCare theories”
    • “ Pre-development” survey (semi-structured interviews)
    • Training
      • Once-off training session for farmers and extension
    • Farmer-managed trials
    • Multi-disciplinary teams
    • Cooperatives
  • 6. Action Research as Methodology Critical reflection Action (Implementation) Ideas Frequent events (e.g. weekly, monthly)
    • Action research allows experimentation with ‘ideas’ and real world experience where learning is in the hands of the participants.
    • This learning can then be tested in subsequent learning cycles.
  • 7. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK From Paradigms to Practice PARADIGM Constructivism METHODOLOGIES Action Research : Landcare, FPR, FSA, FFS, M&E, experiential-, social- and discovery learning TOOLS, METHODS & TECHNIQUES Visioning, farmer-led experimentation, farmer groups / networks
  • 8. Development of Action Research process in PhD research (Smith, 2006) Learning
      • Real World problem situation A
      • (Area of application)
    ACTION: in LandCare Project REFLECTION using SSM and cognitive mapping Findings / Theories about: F, M, A Learning Research Themes F: Framework of ideas M: Methodology
  • 9. Action Research Process
  • 10. Where are we now? Implementation & Integration process
  • 11. Season-long awareness & training processes
    • Initiate with awareness event
    • Based on cropping calendar
    • Frequent very practical sessions in farmers’ situations
    • Part of continuous learning process
  • 12. Farmer-led experimentation … using CA principles
    • Participating farmers
    • Some inputs & equipment
    • Simple paired designs
    • Reflection, learning, adaptation
    • … socially constructing individual CA systems
    Plan Observe Reflect Act
  • 13. Indicators Sustain- ability dimensions Baseline values (2001) 1 year after start (2002) 2 years after start (2003) 3 years after start (2004) 4 years after start (2005)
    • Soil Organic Carbon (% C) [3]
    • % Residue Cover [30]
    • pH (topsoil) [5.5]
    • Ca – topsoil (mg kg -1 ) [240]
    • Mg – topsoil (mg kg -1 ) [80]
    • P – topsoil (mg kg -1 ) [8-12]
    • K – topsoil (mg kg -1 ) [120]
    • Acid Saturation (%) [20-30]
    • Earthworms
    • # conservation tillage implements converted
    Bio-technical feasibility 1.6 5 4 343 108 6 139 46 0 0 1.6 10-15 4.1 425 139 7 142 39 0 0 1.6 10-15 4.3 620 223 10 153 24 0 0 2 15 4.15 560 181 11.3 239 30 0 143 2 15 4.10 537 173 11.3 241 32 0 143
    • Farmer-to-farmer extension: # number of farmers trained
    • Participation in farmer forums
    • Number of farmer-managed trials (# leader farmers)
    • Number of training courses for leader farmers (cumulative)
    • # field days (cumulative)
    • # PSE tools for group learning
    • Estimated area under CA (ha)
    • Farmer cooperatives
    Social acceptability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 18 2 1 0 2 2 85 80 18 5 10 0 48 24 214 70 18 5 20 2 175 ? 365 50 20 5 25 3 400 ?
    • Maize Yield (ton ha -1 )
    • [4 ton ha -1 ]
    • Gross Margin (R ha -1 )
      • [R3000 ha -1 ]
    Economic viability 1.5 -R200 3.2 Maize: R800 Soya: R1000 Intercrop: R2480 3.1 Maize: R800 Soya: R1000 Intercrop: R2480 4.9 M – R1500 S – R2500 IC – R3442 LEISA – R2800 4.2 M – R1500 S – R2500 IC – R3442 LEISA – R2800
  • 14. Performance on Farmer-led trials (Bergville / Emmaus LandCare Project)
  • 15. Social learning
    • Small learning groups (5 persons)
    • Larger group of 25-35
    • Farmer networks
    • Community structures
    • Multi-stakeholder (innovation) platforms
    Plan Act Observe Reflect Act Plan Observe Reflect Act
  • 16. Future Implications
  • 17.
    • The impact of action research in the promotion of CA in the LandCare Programme during the last decade
      • Led to an increasing awareness , demand and response on all levels that [CA x AR] has the potential to bridge the gap between science and society and address critical environmental and societal challenges.
    • What we are aiming for in the next decade:
      • Scaling out and up/down (mainstreaming)
        • ‘ Framework’ for awareness, funding, integration and wider impact
      • Innovation platforms / networks driven by action research (all levels)
      • Capacity building in CA and Action Research (all levels)
  • 18.
    • Thank You