“ I firmly believe there is no such thing as children’s literature,” Early writes. “Children’s literature exists as an idea in the adult mind about the ways one speaks to children, about how we adults configure childhood. Children’s literature celebrates the imagination we think is necessary for us to engage childhood as adults. It is a way for adults, in short, to distinguish children from adults.”
Quoted by Liam Otten in “ More mainstream than ever, children's literature remains hard to define, poorly understood and frequently underestimated .”
What Is Children's Literature? Belles Lettres, Vol. III, no. 3 [Original article no longer online]
Hard as it is to define, children’s literature is now recognized as an important field of study, both in itself and for the insights it yields into literature as a whole — as well as into the family life, society and thinking of any given period, and the minds of the many major authors influenced by it.
John Cech: Inspiring Children With Words (The article is down at the bottom of the webpage!)
“ Children’s books represent our first encounters with literature, in which we hear words used beautifully and tune ourselves to the rhythms of our language. One can’t overstate the value of children's literature. Millions of people who will never read Tolstoy or Shakespeare will read Charlotte’s Web - and never forget the experience. Einstein kept a volume of Grimm’s Fairy Tales on his night table throughout his life because he said they sparked his imagination.”
“ . . . too many adults want children to read, and read with enthusiasm, without conceding to them any vestige of the sense of real control that is one of the social and psychological triumphs of reading. Children, who are trying to “win at growing up” as Beverly Cleary’s (1984, p. 182) Ramona so succinctly expresses the challenge, are being given a false passport that lets them only into a fenced-off field.”
“ Risk, Safety, and Control in Young People's Reading Experiences .”
“ . . . what turns off young readers? A moral approach to literature. A lack of clever wickedness. And an outdated belief in an outdated version of Canada. . . . Books that are good for you. Canadian cultural nationalism is the literary equivalent of Sunday school, and young people won’t sit through it.”
Quoted in Mackey, “ Risk, Safety, and Control in Young People's Reading Experiences .”
Does educational value “cancel out” the personal value of a book?
Comment on Amazon.com :
“ . . . instead of intimidating a young audience away, Harry Potter is showing children as young as 8 that reading is one of the most wonderful pastimes available to them. It’s working! Please, as educators, parents, and librarians, encourage that. I read those “classics” in Middle School, Johnny Tremain and The Moon is Down almost lost me as a reader forever. They were dry and horrible and full of educational value.”
Spotlight Reviews: Literature Guide: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (Grades 4-8) See the review titled “ Just what is great literature anyway?”