Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Argumentation 3.0 - COMMA2010

777

Published on

Presentation about argumentation on the Social Semantic Web, for Jodi Schneider, Alexandre Passant, Tudor Groza, John G. Breslin, “Argumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve …

Presentation about argumentation on the Social Semantic Web, for Jodi Schneider, Alexandre Passant, Tudor Groza, John G. Breslin, “Argumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments” In COMMA 2010, Desenzano del Garda, Italy, September 8-10, 2010. http://jodischneider.com/pubs/comma2010.pdf

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
777
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • http://www.comma-conf.org/
  • Find out… when microbloggers express approval of or provide brief counterpoints to blog posts, or where forums and listservs point to and extend wiki Talk page disputes
  • Simplifies. But would need adoption by major hosts. “Argument Blogging needs mainly evangelism and integration with hosted systems to help the World Wide Argument Web [16] emerge, and a federated network in order to make it scalable and resistant to disruption.”
  • Adoption by large sitesUse by individuals in large numbersargumentation ecosystem for social media, aligning Semantic Web models for argumentation with those for social media, AIF (alone) doesn’t solve this (yet)Social Websites may not be in RDFAIF expects argument schemesSocial Semantic Web schemes (FOAF, SIOC) mainly model the overall structure.
  • Facebookargumentation ecosystem for social media, aligning Semantic Web models for argumentation with those for social media, AIF (alone) doesn’t solve this (yet)Social Websites may not be in RDFAIF expects argument schemesSocial Semantic Web schemes (FOAF, SIOC) mainly model the overall structure.
  • How long does a comment remain visible? – indefinitely (depends on bot archiving, human archiving)How easy is it to quote? – not directly supportedHow is agreement expressed? – someone makes an edit, or states that they agreeArguments happen across the Social Web.The affordances and interaction patterns of each site affect which types of conversations are well-supported—and thus what kind and how much argumentation occurs.
  • How long does a comment remain visible? Very brieflyHow easy is it to quote? Depends somewhat on message lengthHow is agreement expressed? RT *may* indicate agreement, depending on comments added. @replies can be used to say “good job” or something similarArguments happen across the Social Web.The affordances and interaction patterns of each site affect which types of conversations are well-supported—and thus what kind and how much argumentation occurs.
  • depending on the community, use-case, etc.Heavily tested, scaled implementations?
  • Sindice SIOC widget:Shows posts, comments, and topics, from across the Web from sites which use the SIOC ontology.http://www.johnbreslin.com/taxonomy/term/1606 “if you look at the post author or click into any comments list, each user now has a speech bubble beside the username. Clicking on this bubble will show you posts, comments and topics created by that user across the "SIOC-o-sphere".argumentation ecosystem for social media, aligning Semantic Web models for argumentation with those for social media, AIF (alone) doesn’t solve this (yet)Social Websites may not be in RDFAIF expects argument schemesSocial Semantic Web schemes (FOAF, SIOC) mainly model the overall structure.
  • argumentation ecosystem for social media, aligning Semantic Web models for argumentation with those for social media, AIF (alone) doesn’t solve this (yet)Social Websites may not be in RDFAIF expects argument schemesSocial Semantic Web schemes (FOAF, SIOC) mainly model the overall structure.
  • Adoption by large sitesUse by individuals in large numbersargumentation ecosystem for social media, aligning Semantic Web models for argumentation with those for social media, AIF (alone) doesn’t solve this (yet)Social Websites may not be in RDFAIF expects argument schemesSocial Semantic Web schemes (FOAF, SIOC) mainly model the overall structure.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Argumentation 3.0How Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments
      Jodi Schneider, Alexandre Passant, Tudor Groza, John G. Breslin
      COMMA 20102010-09-10
      Desenzano del Garda, Italy
    • 2. World Wide Argument Web (WWAW)
      2
      What if instead of following mailing lists, blogs, online magazines, scientific journals…
      You could follow ARGUMENTS?
      Who is arguing about this topic? Or product? Or idea?
      Is their view positive or negative?
      Are their ideas credible?
      Are they trustworthy? Do people I trust, trust them?
      What arguments are they making?
    • 3. Parts of the WWAW exist
      3
      An interchange format
      Argument Interchange Format
      Argument schemes
      e.g. Walton
      Argument-related ontologies
      IBIS, ScholOnto, SWAN/SIOC, …
      Prototype interfaces
      Argument blogging
      Arvina, MAgtALO
    • 4. Argument blogging (AIF+DGDL [22])
      4
    • 5. Generate argument maps from conversations (Arvina, MAgtALO)
      5
      Source: Mark Snaith, ODET 2010
    • 6. What’s missing from the WWAW?
      Users
      Collation & querying across the Web
      • ArgDF?
      Trust & credibility layer
      6
    • 7. Social Semantic Web
      7
    • 8. Social Semantic Web can bring…
      Users (Social Web)
      Facebook: 500 million active users, 22 billion minutes/dayhttp://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
      LinkedIn: 75 million usershttp://press.linkedin.com/
      Collation & querying across the Web (Semantic Web)
      • based on semantics with search engines like Sindice
      Trust & credibility layer (Social Semantic research)
      Restricting to the friends or colleagues you trust
      … Or even, Ted for golf, and Roberto for restaurant tips!
      8
    • 9. Argumentation on today’s Social Web
      Numerous sites with different ‘genres’:
      Forums, Blogs, Wikis, Microblogging, …
      Affordances like:
      How long does a comment remain visible?
      How easy is it to quote?
      How is agreement expressed?
      9
    • 10. Arguments in Web 2.0 & Social Web: Wikis – Wikipedia article discussion
      10
    • Arguments in Web 2.0 & Social Web: Microblogs
      11
    • What’s missing for large sites?
      Is ‘agree’/ ‘disagree’ enough?
      If there’s more complexity, will my users adopt it?
      What kind of interfaces make this palatable + easy?
      Which ontology should I use?
      What features are important? Depends on a given community, type of environment
      “Show me the data”
      chicken & egg problem
      12
    • 24. What’s missing for individual users?
      To get users to comment:
      Make it easy-to-use
      Need enough space for the message length
      Context matters:
      Am I looking at the most recent message?
      Who wrote the message I’m replying to?
      13
    • 25. Collating blog comments
      Collation & querying across the Web
      14
      Sindice SIOC plugin for WordPress blogs: did a commenter post on other websites?
    • 26. Social Semantic Web research area
      Trust & credibility layer
      Golbeck, Computing with Social Trust, Springer 2008
      Hartig, Querying Trust in RDF Data with tSPARQL, ESWC 2009
      15
      http://www.w3.org/2007/03/layerCake.svg
    • 27. WWAW + Social Semantic Web
      Users
      Collation & querying across the Web
      Trust & credibility layer
      16
    • 28. Thank you!
      Contact:
      jodi.schneider@deri.org
      Twitter: @jschneider
      http://jodischneider.com/
      17

    ×