SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
1|P ag e




Contents.                                      Definition 1.7[3]: Let U be an initial
 The concept of lattices.                     universe set and E be a set of
 Basic Definitions regarding soft sets        parameters. Let P (U) denotes the
     .                                         power set of U and A be a non-empty
 Examples showing soft set and                subset of E. A pair (F, A) is called a
     lattices.                                 soft set over U, where F is a mapping
 Introduction to soft lattices .              given by F: AP (U).
 Certain results and theorems .
1. THE CONCEPT OF LATTICES.                    Definition 1.8[3]: For two soft sets
Definition 1.1[1]: A lattice L is a            (F,A) & (G, B) over a common
partially ordered set in which every pair      universe U, we say that (F,A) is a soft
of elements has the least upper bound          subset of (G, B) if;
(∨-join) and the greatest lower bound          (1). A  B, and.
(∧-meet).                                      (2).    A, F () and G() are
It is denoted by (L, ∨, ∧).                    identical approximations.
                                                       ( F ()⊆ G() ) .
Definition 1.2[1]: A nonempty subset           We write (F, A) ⊆ (G, B).
R of L is said to be a sub-lattice of L
if,a, b ∈ R implies a ∨ b, a ∧ b ∈ R.          Definition 1.9[3]: Two soft sets (F,A)
                                               and (G, B) over a common universe U
Definition 1.3[1]: A nonempty subset I         are said to be soft equal if (F, A) is a
of L is said to be an ideal of L if,           soft subset of (G, B) and (G, B) is a soft
(1) a, b ∈ I implies a ∨ b ∈ I, and            subset of (F, A).
(2) for any a, b ∈ L such that a ≤ b and       i.e. (F, A) ⊆ (G, B) and (G, B) ⊆ (F, A).
b ∈ I implies a ∈ I
                                               Definition 1.10[3]: Union of two soft
Definition 1.4[2]: A lattice (L, ∨, ∧) is      sets (F1, E1) and (F2, E2) over the
said to be distributive if;                    common universe U is the soft set (F3,
x ∧ (y ∨ z) = (x ∧ y) ∨ (x ∧ z) and            E3).where E3 = E1  E2, and e E3.
x ∨ (y ∧ z) = (x ∨ y) ∧ (x ∨ z);x,y,z∈ L.               F1(e)        if e E1-E2
                                               F3(e)= F2(e)            if e E2-E1
Definition 1.5[2]: A lattice (L, ∨, ∧) is               F1(e)  F2(e) if e E1E2
said to be modular if ; for all y in L,        Write as, (F1, E1) (F2, E2)= (F3, E3).
x ≤ z  x ∨ (y ∧ z) = (x ∨ y) ∧ z.
                                               Definition 1.11[3]: Intersection of two
Definition 1.6[2]: A mapping f of a             soft sets (F1,E1) and (F2, E2) over a
lattice (L1, ∨1, ∧1) into a lattice (L2, ∨2,   common universe U is the soft set (F3,
∧2) is said to be a lattice                    E3). where E3 = E1  E2 ; and e  E3,
homomorphism if;
                                                         F3(e)=F1(e)  F2(e)
f (a ∨1 b) = f (a) ∨2 f (b) and
                                               Write as,(F1, E1)  (F2, E2) = (F3, E3).
f (a ∧1 b) = f (a) ∧2 f (b) ; a, b in L1.
         If such a mapping is one-one
                                               Definition 1.12[4]: Let (F, A) and (G,
and onto, then it is called as a lattice
                                               B) be two soft sets over the common
isomorphism.
                                               universe U . Then (F, A) AND (G, B)
2|P ag e




denoted by (F, A) ∧ (G, B) and is          6. (F, E) ⋂ ((G, E) ⋃ (H, E)) = ((F, E)
defined by;                                    ⋂ (G, E)) ⋃ ((F, E) ⋂(H, E)).
(F, A) ∧ (G, B) = (H, A × B),    where,    7. (F, E) ⋃ ((F, E) ⋂(G, E)) = (F, E).
H(α, β) = F (α) ∩ G(β),  (α, β) ∈A×B.     8. (F, E) ⋂ ((F, E) ⋃(G, E)) = (F, E).
                                           9. (F, E) ⋃ Φ = (F, E) and (F, E) ⋂ Φ
Definition 1.13[4]: Let (F, A) and (G,         = Φ.
B) be two soft sets over the common        10. (F, E) ⋃ A = A and (F, E) ⋂ A = (F,
universe U. Then (F, A) OR (G, B)              E).
denoted by (F, A) ∨ (G, B) and is          11. (F, E) ⋃(F c, E) =   and
defined by;                                              (F, E) ⋂(F c, E) = Φ
(F, A) ∨ (G, B) = (H, A × B) where,
H ((α, β)) = F (α) ∪ G(β),(α, β)∈A×B.     2. INTROCTION TO S.LATTICES.

Definition 1.14[4]: The complement of      L- Lattice, A- any nonempty set.
a soft set (F, A) is denoted by (F, A)C    A set-valued function F: A → ℘(L)
and is defined by,(F, A)C = (FC, ‫ך‬A);
                                           can be defined as,
       where FC: ‫ך‬A→P(U) is a
                                           F (x) = {y ∈ L/ x R y}.
mapping given by FC(‫ך‬α)=U- F(α); 
                                           The pair (F, A) is a soft set over L.
α  ‫ך‬A.
                                           Definition 2.1[6]: Let (F, A) be a soft
Definition 1.15 [4]: A soft set (F, A)     set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a
over U is said to be a null soft set       soft lattice over L if F (x) is a sub-
denoted by ∅                               lattice of L, for all x ∈ A.
    if,   A, F ( )   (null set).              Let triplet M = (f, X, L) ,where
                                           L is a complete lattice , f : X → L is
Definition 1.16 [4]: A soft set (F, A)     a map-ping, X is a universe set, then M
over U is said to be absolute soft set     is called the soft lattice .
denoted by A if   A, F ( )  U.                 The set of all soft lattices over L
clearly, A c   &  c  A                 is denoted by Sl (L).
Lemma 1.1[2]:The operation ” ∪ ” in        Definition 2.2[6]: A soft lattice (f, X,
S(U ) is idempotent and associative.       L) is said to be null soft lattice,
                                           if ∀ǫ ∈ X, f(ǫ) = 0.
Lemma 1.2[2]: In SE (U), the
following holds                            Definition 2.3[6]: A soft lattice (f, X,
1. (F, E) ⋃ (F, E) = (F, E) and            L) is said to be absolute soft lattice, if
               (F, E) ⋂ (F, E) = (F, E).   ∀ǫ ∈X, f(ǫ) = 1.
2. (F, E) ⋃ (G, E) = (G, E) ⋃ (F, E) &
    (F, E) ⋂ (G, E) = (G, E) ⋂(F, E).      Example 2.1[2]: Consider the lattice L
3. (F, E) ⋃ ((G, E) ⋃ (H, E)) = ((F, E)    as shown in Figure. Let A = {a, b, d}.
    ⋃ (G, E)) ⋃ (H, E).                    F (x) = {y∈ L: x R y ⇔ x ∨y = 1}.
4. (F, E) ⋂ ((G, E) ⋂ (H, E)) = ((F, E)
    ⋂ (G, E)) ⋂ (H, E).                    Then F (a) = {1, f },
5. (F, E) ⋃ ((G, E) ⋂ (H, E)) = ((F, E)    F (b) = {1, e},       F (d) = {1, c, e, f }.
    ⋃ (G, E)) ⋂ ((F, E) ⋃(H, E)).
3|P ag e




Therefore, F (x) is a sub-lattice of L, for
all x ∈ A. Hence (F, A) ∈ Sl(L).
                                                                           Figure 3



                           Figure 1

                                                Then F (0) = {0, a, b, c, d, 1},
                                              F (a) = {0, b, c, d}, F (b) = {0, a, c},
                                              F (c) = {0, a, b},         F (d) = { 0, a},
                                              F (1) = {0}.
Example 2.2[2]. Consider the lattice L                  Here, F (b) = {0, a, c},
as shown in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b, c,                F (c) = {0, a, b}      are not sub-
d, 1}.                                        lattices of L.
Define,                                                Therefore, (F, A) ∉ Sl(L). Take
F(x)={y ∈ L: x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = 1}.              B = {0, a, d, 1} ⊂ A.
Then F (0) = {1}, F (a) = {1,                          Then FB (0) = {0, a, b, c, d, 1},
b, c, d},     F (b) = {1, a, c, d},           FB (a) = {0, b, c, d}, FB (d) = {0, a},
                                              FB (1) = {0}. Therefore, (F /B, B) ∈
F (c) = {1, a, b, d},      F (d) =            Sl(L).
{1, a, b, c},        F (1) = {0, a,
b, c, d, 1}.                                  Proposition 2.1[2]. Every lattice can
In F (a), b, c ∈ F (a).                       be considered as a soft lattice.
But b ∧ c = 0 ∉ F (a).
                                              Proposition 2.2[2]. Let (F, A), (H, B)
         Therefore, F (a) is not              ∈ Sl(L) be such that A ∩ B ≠ ∅ and
a sub-lattice of L.                           F (e) ∩ H (e) ≠ φ for all e ∈ A ∩ B.
         Similarly, F (b), F (c),             Then their intersection;
F (d) are not sub-lattices of L.                     (F, A) ∩ (H, B) ∈ Sl(L).
Hence, (F, A) ∉ Sl(L).
                                              Proposition 2.3.[2]. Let (F, A), (G, B)
                                              ∈ Sl(L). If A ∩ B = ∅, then,
                                                      (F, A) ∪ (G, B) ∈ Sl(L).
                           Figure 2
                                              Proposition 2.4.[23]. Let (F, A), (G, B)
                                              ∈ Sl(L) be such that F (x) ∩ G(y) = φ,
                                              for all x ∈ A, y ∈ B.
                                              Then (F, A) ⋀ (G, B) ∈ Sl(L).

                                              Definition 2.4.[3]. Let (F, A) and (H,
Example 2.3 [2]. Consider the lattice
                                              K) be two soft lattices over L. Then (H,
L as shown in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b,
                                              K) is a soft sub-lattice of (F, A) if
c, d, 1}.
                                              1. K ⊆ A,
Define,
                                              2. H (x) is a sub-lattice of F (x), x ∈ K
F (x) = { y ∈ L : x R y⇔ x ∧ y = 0}.
                                              .
4|P ag e




Example 2.4.[2]. Consider the lattice L        A) be a soft sub-lattice of (H, B). If f is
as shown in Figure 3. Let A = {0, a, b,        a homomorphism from L1 to L2, then
c, d, 1}.                                      (f (F ), A) is a soft    sub-lattice of (f
Let K = {0, b, c, d}.                          (H ), B).
Define, F : A → ℘(L) by
                                               Definition 2.6[2]. Let (F, A) and (H, B)
F (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = x}.           be two soft lattices over L1 and L2
                                               respectively.
Then F (0) = {0},         F (a) = {0, a},      Let f : L1 → L2 and g : A → B.
F (b) = {0, b},           F (c) = {0, c},      Then (f, g) is said to be a soft lattice
F (d) = {0, b, c, d},     F (1) = {0, a, b,    homomorphism if, f is a lattice
                                               homomorphism from L1 onto L2, g is a
c, d, 1}.
                                               mapping from A onto B,
        Define the set-valued function                 f (F (x)) = H (g(x)), for all x ∈
                                                       A. Then (F, A) ∼ (H, B).
        H : K → P (L) by
H (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = x, x
                                               Example 2.5[2]. Consider the lattice L1
∈ K }.                                         and L2 as shown in Figures .
 Then H (0) = {0},        H (b) = {0, b},
H (c) = {0, c},       H (d) = {0, b, c, d}.
   Therefore, (F, A), (H, K ) ∈ Sl(L).
Here K ⊆ A and H (x) is a sub-lattice
of F (x), for all x ∈ K .

         Therefore, (H, K ) is a soft sub-     Let A = {0, a, b, 1} and B = {0 ′, 1′}.
lattice of (F, A).                             Define,
                                               F (x) = {y ∈ L1: x R y ⇔ x ∨ y= x, x ∈
                                               A}.
Proposition 2.5[2]. Let (F, A), (H, A)         Then, (F, A) ∈ Sl(L1). Define the
∈ Sl(L). Then (F, A) is a soft sub-            set-valued function H by;
lattice of (H, A) if and only if F (x) ⊆        H (x) = {y ∈ L2 : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y =
H (x), for all x ∈ A.
                                               x, x ∈ B}.
Corollary 2.1[2]. Every soft lattice is a      Then (H, B) ∈ Sl(L2).
soft sub-lattice of itself.                     Define f : L1 → L2 by f (0) = 0′,
        That is, if (F, A) is a soft lattice   f (a) = 0′,     f (b) = 1′,     f (1) = 1′.
over L, then (F, A) is a soft sub-lattice      Define g : A → B by g(0) = 0′,
of (F, A).                                     g(a) = 0′,        g(b) = 1′,    g(1) = 1′.
                                                           Then f is a lattice
Definition 2.5[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft
                                               homomorphism from L1 onto L2 and g
lattice over L1. Let f be a lattice
homomorphism from L1 to L2. Then               is a mapping from A onto B.
 (f (F ))(x) = f (F (x)), for all x ∈ A.               Also f (F (x)) = H (g(x)), for all x
                                               ∈ A.
Proposition 2.6[2]. Let (F, A) and (H,                  Hence (F, A) is a soft lattice
B) be soft lattices over L1 such that (F,      homomorphic to (H, B).
5|P ag e




Definition 2.7[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft        Then F (a) = {0, a},         F (b) = {0, b},
set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a        F (c) = {0, c},              F (d) = {0, d}.
soft distributive lattice over L if F (x)      Here F (x) is a distributive Sub-lattice
is a distributive sub-lattice of L, for all    of L, for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is
x ∈ A.                                         a soft distributive lattice over L. But L
                                               is not a distributive lattice.
Example 2.6[2]. Consider the lattice L
as shown in Figure . Let A = {a, b, c}.        Theorem 2.2[2].
Define F (x) ={y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y           (1) Let (F, A) be a soft distributive
=x}.                                           lattice over L and (H, B) be a soft sub-
                                               lattice of (F, A). Then (H, B) is a soft
                                               distributive lattice over L.

                                               (2) Let (F, A) be a soft distributive
                                               lattice over L1. Let (H, B) be a soft
                                               lattice homomorphic image of (F, A)
                                               over L2.      Then (H, B) is a soft
Then F (a) = {0, a}, F (b) = {0, a, b},        distributive lattice over L2.
F (c) = {0, a, b, c}.
 Here F (x) is a distributive sub-lattice of   Definition 2.8[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft
                                               set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a
L, for all x ∈ A.
                                               soft modular lattice over L if F (x) is a
Therefore, (F, A) is a soft distributive       modular sub-lattice of L, for all x ∈ A.
lattice over L.
                                               Example 2.8[2]. Consider the lattice L
Proposition 2.7[2]. Let L be a                 as shown in figure.
distributive lattice. Then every (F, A) ∈      Let A = {0, a, b, c, 1}.Define, F (x) =
Sl (L) is a soft distributive lattice over     {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = 0}.
L.                                             Then, F (0) = L,      F (a) = {0, b, c, f },
                                               F (b) = {0, a, c, e}, F (c) = {0, a, b, d},
Remark 2.1[2]. The converse of the             F (1) = {0}.
above theorem is not true.                      Here F (x) is a modular sub-lattice of
        That is, if (F, A) is a soft           L, for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is a
distributive lattice over L then L need        soft modular lattice over L.
not be a distributive lattice.
        The following example illustrates      Proposition 2.8[2]. Let L be a modular
this remark.                                   lattice. Then every (F, A) ∈ Sl (L) is a
                                               soft modular lattice over L.

Example 2.7[2]. Consider the lattice L         Remark 2.2[2]. The converse of the
as shown in Figure 2. Let A = {a, b,           above theorem is not true.
c, d}.                                                 That is, if (F, A) is a soft
Define,                                        modular lattice over L then L need not
F(x)= {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = y}.             be a modular lattice. The following
                                               example illustrates this remark.
6|P ag e




Example 2.9[2]. Consider the lattice L
as shown in Figure. Let A = {a, b, c,                  Then, F (0) = {0},
d}.                                           F (a) = {0, a},         F (b) = {0, a, b},
Define,                                       F (c) = {0, c},     F (1) = {0, a, b, c, 1}.
F(x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = y}.           Therefore, (F, A) ∈ Sl(L).
Then F (a) = {0, a},      F (b) = {0, b},              Let B = {a, b, c}.
F (c) = {0, c},       F (d) = {0, b, c, d}.           Define the set-valued function
Here F (x) is a modular sub-lattice of L,     G by
for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is a          G(x) = {y ∈ L : xRy ⇔ x∧y = y}.
soft modular lattice over L. But L is not     Then G(a) = {0, a}, G(b) = {0, a, b},
a modular lattice.                            G(c) = {0, c}.
                                              Therefore, (G, B) is a soft set over L.
                                              Here B ⊂ A.
Theorem 2.4[2].                                        Also G(x) is an ideal of F (x),
 (1) Let (F, A) be a soft modular lattice     for all x ∈ B.
over L and (H, B) be a soft sub-lattice               Therefore, (G, B) is a soft lattice
of     (F, A). Then (H, B) is a soft          ideal of (F, A).
modular lattice over L.
(2) Let (F, A) be a soft modular lattice
over L1. Let (H, B) be a soft lattice
homo- morphic image of (F, A) over
L2. Then (H, B) is a soft modular lattice
over L2.

Definition 2.9[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft
lattice over L. A soft set (G, B) over L
is called a soft lattice ideal of (F, A) if
…..1. B ⊆ A,
    2. G(x) is an ideal of F (x), for all x
        ∈ B.

Example 2.10[2]. Consider L as shown
in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b, c, 1}.

Define,
F (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y =
y}.

More Related Content

What's hot

On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...
On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...
On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...IOSR Journals
 
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsOn Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsBRNSS Publication Hub
 
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector Bundles
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector BundlesHecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector Bundles
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector BundlesHeinrich Hartmann
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)inventionjournals
 
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...inventionjournals
 
Partial ordering in soft set context
Partial ordering in soft set contextPartial ordering in soft set context
Partial ordering in soft set contextAlexander Decker
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementSusovan Pal
 
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equationOn the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equationCemal Ardil
 
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...UniversitasGadjahMada
 
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed Sets
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed SetsBetween α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed Sets
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed SetsIJMER
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceresearchinventy
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) inventionjournals
 
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra   * Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesContra   * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesIJMER
 
H214148
H214148H214148
H214148irjes
 
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...AIRCC Publishing Corporation
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologybkrawat08
 

What's hot (19)

On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...
On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...
On Some Types of Fuzzy Separation Axioms in Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy ...
 
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsOn Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
 
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector Bundles
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector BundlesHecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector Bundles
Hecke Curves and Moduli spcaes of Vector Bundles
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
 
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...
On Coincidence Points in Pseudocompact Tichonov Spaces and Common Fixed Point...
 
Partial ordering in soft set context
Partial ordering in soft set contextPartial ordering in soft set context
Partial ordering in soft set context
 
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statement
 
Au4103292297
Au4103292297Au4103292297
Au4103292297
 
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equationOn the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
 
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...
ON OPTIMALITY OF THE INDEX OF SUM, PRODUCT, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM OF FINITE BA...
 
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed Sets
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed SetsBetween α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed Sets
Between α-closed Sets and Semi α-closed Sets
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
 
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
 
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra   * Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesContra   * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
 
H214148
H214148H214148
H214148
 
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...
RESIDUAL QUOTIENT AND ANNIHILATOR OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS OF RING AND MO...
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
 

Viewers also liked

W01p2virus wayman robert
W01p2virus wayman robertW01p2virus wayman robert
W01p2virus wayman robertrobsworld
 
W01m1heart wayman robert
W01m1heart wayman robertW01m1heart wayman robert
W01m1heart wayman robertrobsworld
 
Comisa brochure 2011
Comisa brochure 2011Comisa brochure 2011
Comisa brochure 2011peeter01
 
Semianr 2. (2)
Semianr 2. (2)Semianr 2. (2)
Semianr 2. (2)jobishvd
 
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnico
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnicoComisa energy opuscolo tecnico
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnicopeeter01
 
Presentation1 wayman robert
Presentation1 wayman robertPresentation1 wayman robert
Presentation1 wayman robertrobsworld
 

Viewers also liked (9)

W01p2virus wayman robert
W01p2virus wayman robertW01p2virus wayman robert
W01p2virus wayman robert
 
W01m1heart wayman robert
W01m1heart wayman robertW01m1heart wayman robert
W01m1heart wayman robert
 
Designing Trendz
Designing TrendzDesigning Trendz
Designing Trendz
 
Designing Trendz
Designing TrendzDesigning Trendz
Designing Trendz
 
Comisa brochure 2011
Comisa brochure 2011Comisa brochure 2011
Comisa brochure 2011
 
Semianr 2. (2)
Semianr 2. (2)Semianr 2. (2)
Semianr 2. (2)
 
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnico
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnicoComisa energy opuscolo tecnico
Comisa energy opuscolo tecnico
 
Presentation1 wayman robert
Presentation1 wayman robertPresentation1 wayman robert
Presentation1 wayman robert
 
2012 09-08-josug-jeff
2012 09-08-josug-jeff2012 09-08-josug-jeff
2012 09-08-josug-jeff
 

Similar to Report sem 1

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of CalculusFundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of Calculusgizemk
 
piya_new__1_ (1).pdf
piya_new__1_ (1).pdfpiya_new__1_ (1).pdf
piya_new__1_ (1).pdfSusantaBanik6
 
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)IJERA Editor
 
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...Alexander Decker
 
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional Programs
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional ProgramsAn Algorithm For Generalized Fractional Programs
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional ProgramsKim Daniels
 
An application if ivfss in med dignosis
An application if ivfss in med dignosisAn application if ivfss in med dignosis
An application if ivfss in med dignosisjobishvd
 
Some results on fuzzy soft multi sets
Some results on fuzzy soft multi setsSome results on fuzzy soft multi sets
Some results on fuzzy soft multi setsIJCI JOURNAL
 
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological SpacesOn Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spacesiosrjce
 
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCETHE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCEFrank Nielsen
 

Similar to Report sem 1 (20)

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of CalculusFundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
 
03_AJMS_279_20_20210128_V2.pdf
03_AJMS_279_20_20210128_V2.pdf03_AJMS_279_20_20210128_V2.pdf
03_AJMS_279_20_20210128_V2.pdf
 
publish paper
publish paperpublish paper
publish paper
 
math camp
math campmath camp
math camp
 
piya_new__1_ (1).pdf
piya_new__1_ (1).pdfpiya_new__1_ (1).pdf
piya_new__1_ (1).pdf
 
Urysohn's lemma
Urysohn's lemmaUrysohn's lemma
Urysohn's lemma
 
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
 
1. I. Hassairi.pdf
1.  I. Hassairi.pdf1.  I. Hassairi.pdf
1. I. Hassairi.pdf
 
1. I. Hassairi.pdf
1.  I. Hassairi.pdf1.  I. Hassairi.pdf
1. I. Hassairi.pdf
 
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
 
Art07
Art07Art07
Art07
 
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional Programs
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional ProgramsAn Algorithm For Generalized Fractional Programs
An Algorithm For Generalized Fractional Programs
 
An application if ivfss in med dignosis
An application if ivfss in med dignosisAn application if ivfss in med dignosis
An application if ivfss in med dignosis
 
Some results on fuzzy soft multi sets
Some results on fuzzy soft multi setsSome results on fuzzy soft multi sets
Some results on fuzzy soft multi sets
 
05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
05_AJMS_300_21.pdf05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
 
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
 
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological SpacesOn Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
 
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCETHE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE
THE CHORD GAP DIVERGENCE AND A GENERALIZATION OF THE BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE
 
Aa4
Aa4Aa4
Aa4
 
Paper 1
Paper 1Paper 1
Paper 1
 

Recently uploaded

Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfTechSoup
 
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsFood processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsManeerUddin
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfPatidar M
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxCarlos105
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
 
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsFood processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxFINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
 

Report sem 1

  • 1. 1|P ag e Contents. Definition 1.7[3]: Let U be an initial  The concept of lattices. universe set and E be a set of  Basic Definitions regarding soft sets parameters. Let P (U) denotes the . power set of U and A be a non-empty  Examples showing soft set and subset of E. A pair (F, A) is called a lattices. soft set over U, where F is a mapping  Introduction to soft lattices . given by F: AP (U).  Certain results and theorems . 1. THE CONCEPT OF LATTICES. Definition 1.8[3]: For two soft sets Definition 1.1[1]: A lattice L is a (F,A) & (G, B) over a common partially ordered set in which every pair universe U, we say that (F,A) is a soft of elements has the least upper bound subset of (G, B) if; (∨-join) and the greatest lower bound (1). A  B, and. (∧-meet). (2).    A, F () and G() are It is denoted by (L, ∨, ∧). identical approximations. ( F ()⊆ G() ) . Definition 1.2[1]: A nonempty subset We write (F, A) ⊆ (G, B). R of L is said to be a sub-lattice of L if,a, b ∈ R implies a ∨ b, a ∧ b ∈ R. Definition 1.9[3]: Two soft sets (F,A) and (G, B) over a common universe U Definition 1.3[1]: A nonempty subset I are said to be soft equal if (F, A) is a of L is said to be an ideal of L if, soft subset of (G, B) and (G, B) is a soft (1) a, b ∈ I implies a ∨ b ∈ I, and subset of (F, A). (2) for any a, b ∈ L such that a ≤ b and i.e. (F, A) ⊆ (G, B) and (G, B) ⊆ (F, A). b ∈ I implies a ∈ I Definition 1.10[3]: Union of two soft Definition 1.4[2]: A lattice (L, ∨, ∧) is sets (F1, E1) and (F2, E2) over the said to be distributive if; common universe U is the soft set (F3, x ∧ (y ∨ z) = (x ∧ y) ∨ (x ∧ z) and E3).where E3 = E1  E2, and e E3. x ∨ (y ∧ z) = (x ∨ y) ∧ (x ∨ z);x,y,z∈ L. F1(e) if e E1-E2 F3(e)= F2(e) if e E2-E1 Definition 1.5[2]: A lattice (L, ∨, ∧) is F1(e)  F2(e) if e E1E2 said to be modular if ; for all y in L, Write as, (F1, E1) (F2, E2)= (F3, E3). x ≤ z  x ∨ (y ∧ z) = (x ∨ y) ∧ z. Definition 1.11[3]: Intersection of two Definition 1.6[2]: A mapping f of a soft sets (F1,E1) and (F2, E2) over a lattice (L1, ∨1, ∧1) into a lattice (L2, ∨2, common universe U is the soft set (F3, ∧2) is said to be a lattice E3). where E3 = E1  E2 ; and e  E3, homomorphism if; F3(e)=F1(e)  F2(e) f (a ∨1 b) = f (a) ∨2 f (b) and Write as,(F1, E1)  (F2, E2) = (F3, E3). f (a ∧1 b) = f (a) ∧2 f (b) ; a, b in L1. If such a mapping is one-one Definition 1.12[4]: Let (F, A) and (G, and onto, then it is called as a lattice B) be two soft sets over the common isomorphism. universe U . Then (F, A) AND (G, B)
  • 2. 2|P ag e denoted by (F, A) ∧ (G, B) and is 6. (F, E) ⋂ ((G, E) ⋃ (H, E)) = ((F, E) defined by; ⋂ (G, E)) ⋃ ((F, E) ⋂(H, E)). (F, A) ∧ (G, B) = (H, A × B), where, 7. (F, E) ⋃ ((F, E) ⋂(G, E)) = (F, E). H(α, β) = F (α) ∩ G(β),  (α, β) ∈A×B. 8. (F, E) ⋂ ((F, E) ⋃(G, E)) = (F, E). 9. (F, E) ⋃ Φ = (F, E) and (F, E) ⋂ Φ Definition 1.13[4]: Let (F, A) and (G, = Φ. B) be two soft sets over the common 10. (F, E) ⋃ A = A and (F, E) ⋂ A = (F, universe U. Then (F, A) OR (G, B) E). denoted by (F, A) ∨ (G, B) and is 11. (F, E) ⋃(F c, E) = and defined by; (F, E) ⋂(F c, E) = Φ (F, A) ∨ (G, B) = (H, A × B) where, H ((α, β)) = F (α) ∪ G(β),(α, β)∈A×B. 2. INTROCTION TO S.LATTICES. Definition 1.14[4]: The complement of L- Lattice, A- any nonempty set. a soft set (F, A) is denoted by (F, A)C A set-valued function F: A → ℘(L) and is defined by,(F, A)C = (FC, ‫ך‬A); can be defined as, where FC: ‫ך‬A→P(U) is a F (x) = {y ∈ L/ x R y}. mapping given by FC(‫ך‬α)=U- F(α);  The pair (F, A) is a soft set over L. α  ‫ך‬A. Definition 2.1[6]: Let (F, A) be a soft Definition 1.15 [4]: A soft set (F, A) set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a over U is said to be a null soft set soft lattice over L if F (x) is a sub- denoted by ∅ lattice of L, for all x ∈ A. if,   A, F ( )   (null set). Let triplet M = (f, X, L) ,where L is a complete lattice , f : X → L is Definition 1.16 [4]: A soft set (F, A) a map-ping, X is a universe set, then M over U is said to be absolute soft set is called the soft lattice . denoted by A if   A, F ( )  U. The set of all soft lattices over L clearly, A c   &  c  A is denoted by Sl (L). Lemma 1.1[2]:The operation ” ∪ ” in Definition 2.2[6]: A soft lattice (f, X, S(U ) is idempotent and associative. L) is said to be null soft lattice, if ∀ǫ ∈ X, f(ǫ) = 0. Lemma 1.2[2]: In SE (U), the following holds Definition 2.3[6]: A soft lattice (f, X, 1. (F, E) ⋃ (F, E) = (F, E) and L) is said to be absolute soft lattice, if (F, E) ⋂ (F, E) = (F, E). ∀ǫ ∈X, f(ǫ) = 1. 2. (F, E) ⋃ (G, E) = (G, E) ⋃ (F, E) & (F, E) ⋂ (G, E) = (G, E) ⋂(F, E). Example 2.1[2]: Consider the lattice L 3. (F, E) ⋃ ((G, E) ⋃ (H, E)) = ((F, E) as shown in Figure. Let A = {a, b, d}. ⋃ (G, E)) ⋃ (H, E). F (x) = {y∈ L: x R y ⇔ x ∨y = 1}. 4. (F, E) ⋂ ((G, E) ⋂ (H, E)) = ((F, E) ⋂ (G, E)) ⋂ (H, E). Then F (a) = {1, f }, 5. (F, E) ⋃ ((G, E) ⋂ (H, E)) = ((F, E) F (b) = {1, e}, F (d) = {1, c, e, f }. ⋃ (G, E)) ⋂ ((F, E) ⋃(H, E)).
  • 3. 3|P ag e Therefore, F (x) is a sub-lattice of L, for all x ∈ A. Hence (F, A) ∈ Sl(L). Figure 3 Figure 1 Then F (0) = {0, a, b, c, d, 1}, F (a) = {0, b, c, d}, F (b) = {0, a, c}, F (c) = {0, a, b}, F (d) = { 0, a}, F (1) = {0}. Example 2.2[2]. Consider the lattice L Here, F (b) = {0, a, c}, as shown in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b, c, F (c) = {0, a, b} are not sub- d, 1}. lattices of L. Define, Therefore, (F, A) ∉ Sl(L). Take F(x)={y ∈ L: x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = 1}. B = {0, a, d, 1} ⊂ A. Then F (0) = {1}, F (a) = {1, Then FB (0) = {0, a, b, c, d, 1}, b, c, d}, F (b) = {1, a, c, d}, FB (a) = {0, b, c, d}, FB (d) = {0, a}, FB (1) = {0}. Therefore, (F /B, B) ∈ F (c) = {1, a, b, d}, F (d) = Sl(L). {1, a, b, c}, F (1) = {0, a, b, c, d, 1}. Proposition 2.1[2]. Every lattice can In F (a), b, c ∈ F (a). be considered as a soft lattice. But b ∧ c = 0 ∉ F (a). Proposition 2.2[2]. Let (F, A), (H, B) Therefore, F (a) is not ∈ Sl(L) be such that A ∩ B ≠ ∅ and a sub-lattice of L. F (e) ∩ H (e) ≠ φ for all e ∈ A ∩ B. Similarly, F (b), F (c), Then their intersection; F (d) are not sub-lattices of L. (F, A) ∩ (H, B) ∈ Sl(L). Hence, (F, A) ∉ Sl(L). Proposition 2.3.[2]. Let (F, A), (G, B) ∈ Sl(L). If A ∩ B = ∅, then, (F, A) ∪ (G, B) ∈ Sl(L). Figure 2 Proposition 2.4.[23]. Let (F, A), (G, B) ∈ Sl(L) be such that F (x) ∩ G(y) = φ, for all x ∈ A, y ∈ B. Then (F, A) ⋀ (G, B) ∈ Sl(L). Definition 2.4.[3]. Let (F, A) and (H, Example 2.3 [2]. Consider the lattice K) be two soft lattices over L. Then (H, L as shown in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b, K) is a soft sub-lattice of (F, A) if c, d, 1}. 1. K ⊆ A, Define, 2. H (x) is a sub-lattice of F (x), x ∈ K F (x) = { y ∈ L : x R y⇔ x ∧ y = 0}. .
  • 4. 4|P ag e Example 2.4.[2]. Consider the lattice L A) be a soft sub-lattice of (H, B). If f is as shown in Figure 3. Let A = {0, a, b, a homomorphism from L1 to L2, then c, d, 1}. (f (F ), A) is a soft sub-lattice of (f Let K = {0, b, c, d}. (H ), B). Define, F : A → ℘(L) by Definition 2.6[2]. Let (F, A) and (H, B) F (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = x}. be two soft lattices over L1 and L2 respectively. Then F (0) = {0}, F (a) = {0, a}, Let f : L1 → L2 and g : A → B. F (b) = {0, b}, F (c) = {0, c}, Then (f, g) is said to be a soft lattice F (d) = {0, b, c, d}, F (1) = {0, a, b, homomorphism if, f is a lattice homomorphism from L1 onto L2, g is a c, d, 1}. mapping from A onto B, Define the set-valued function f (F (x)) = H (g(x)), for all x ∈ A. Then (F, A) ∼ (H, B). H : K → P (L) by H (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = x, x Example 2.5[2]. Consider the lattice L1 ∈ K }. and L2 as shown in Figures . Then H (0) = {0}, H (b) = {0, b}, H (c) = {0, c}, H (d) = {0, b, c, d}. Therefore, (F, A), (H, K ) ∈ Sl(L). Here K ⊆ A and H (x) is a sub-lattice of F (x), for all x ∈ K . Therefore, (H, K ) is a soft sub- Let A = {0, a, b, 1} and B = {0 ′, 1′}. lattice of (F, A). Define, F (x) = {y ∈ L1: x R y ⇔ x ∨ y= x, x ∈ A}. Proposition 2.5[2]. Let (F, A), (H, A) Then, (F, A) ∈ Sl(L1). Define the ∈ Sl(L). Then (F, A) is a soft sub- set-valued function H by; lattice of (H, A) if and only if F (x) ⊆ H (x) = {y ∈ L2 : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y = H (x), for all x ∈ A. x, x ∈ B}. Corollary 2.1[2]. Every soft lattice is a Then (H, B) ∈ Sl(L2). soft sub-lattice of itself. Define f : L1 → L2 by f (0) = 0′, That is, if (F, A) is a soft lattice f (a) = 0′, f (b) = 1′, f (1) = 1′. over L, then (F, A) is a soft sub-lattice Define g : A → B by g(0) = 0′, of (F, A). g(a) = 0′, g(b) = 1′, g(1) = 1′. Then f is a lattice Definition 2.5[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft homomorphism from L1 onto L2 and g lattice over L1. Let f be a lattice homomorphism from L1 to L2. Then is a mapping from A onto B. (f (F ))(x) = f (F (x)), for all x ∈ A. Also f (F (x)) = H (g(x)), for all x ∈ A. Proposition 2.6[2]. Let (F, A) and (H, Hence (F, A) is a soft lattice B) be soft lattices over L1 such that (F, homomorphic to (H, B).
  • 5. 5|P ag e Definition 2.7[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft Then F (a) = {0, a}, F (b) = {0, b}, set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a F (c) = {0, c}, F (d) = {0, d}. soft distributive lattice over L if F (x) Here F (x) is a distributive Sub-lattice is a distributive sub-lattice of L, for all of L, for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is x ∈ A. a soft distributive lattice over L. But L is not a distributive lattice. Example 2.6[2]. Consider the lattice L as shown in Figure . Let A = {a, b, c}. Theorem 2.2[2]. Define F (x) ={y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∨ y (1) Let (F, A) be a soft distributive =x}. lattice over L and (H, B) be a soft sub- lattice of (F, A). Then (H, B) is a soft distributive lattice over L. (2) Let (F, A) be a soft distributive lattice over L1. Let (H, B) be a soft lattice homomorphic image of (F, A) over L2. Then (H, B) is a soft Then F (a) = {0, a}, F (b) = {0, a, b}, distributive lattice over L2. F (c) = {0, a, b, c}. Here F (x) is a distributive sub-lattice of Definition 2.8[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft set over L. Then (F, A) is said to be a L, for all x ∈ A. soft modular lattice over L if F (x) is a Therefore, (F, A) is a soft distributive modular sub-lattice of L, for all x ∈ A. lattice over L. Example 2.8[2]. Consider the lattice L Proposition 2.7[2]. Let L be a as shown in figure. distributive lattice. Then every (F, A) ∈ Let A = {0, a, b, c, 1}.Define, F (x) = Sl (L) is a soft distributive lattice over {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = 0}. L. Then, F (0) = L, F (a) = {0, b, c, f }, F (b) = {0, a, c, e}, F (c) = {0, a, b, d}, Remark 2.1[2]. The converse of the F (1) = {0}. above theorem is not true. Here F (x) is a modular sub-lattice of That is, if (F, A) is a soft L, for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is a distributive lattice over L then L need soft modular lattice over L. not be a distributive lattice. The following example illustrates Proposition 2.8[2]. Let L be a modular this remark. lattice. Then every (F, A) ∈ Sl (L) is a soft modular lattice over L. Example 2.7[2]. Consider the lattice L Remark 2.2[2]. The converse of the as shown in Figure 2. Let A = {a, b, above theorem is not true. c, d}. That is, if (F, A) is a soft Define, modular lattice over L then L need not F(x)= {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = y}. be a modular lattice. The following example illustrates this remark.
  • 6. 6|P ag e Example 2.9[2]. Consider the lattice L as shown in Figure. Let A = {a, b, c, Then, F (0) = {0}, d}. F (a) = {0, a}, F (b) = {0, a, b}, Define, F (c) = {0, c}, F (1) = {0, a, b, c, 1}. F(x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = y}. Therefore, (F, A) ∈ Sl(L). Then F (a) = {0, a}, F (b) = {0, b}, Let B = {a, b, c}. F (c) = {0, c}, F (d) = {0, b, c, d}. Define the set-valued function Here F (x) is a modular sub-lattice of L, G by for all x ∈ A. Therefore, (F, A) is a G(x) = {y ∈ L : xRy ⇔ x∧y = y}. soft modular lattice over L. But L is not Then G(a) = {0, a}, G(b) = {0, a, b}, a modular lattice. G(c) = {0, c}. Therefore, (G, B) is a soft set over L. Here B ⊂ A. Theorem 2.4[2]. Also G(x) is an ideal of F (x), (1) Let (F, A) be a soft modular lattice for all x ∈ B. over L and (H, B) be a soft sub-lattice Therefore, (G, B) is a soft lattice of (F, A). Then (H, B) is a soft ideal of (F, A). modular lattice over L. (2) Let (F, A) be a soft modular lattice over L1. Let (H, B) be a soft lattice homo- morphic image of (F, A) over L2. Then (H, B) is a soft modular lattice over L2. Definition 2.9[2]. Let (F, A) be a soft lattice over L. A soft set (G, B) over L is called a soft lattice ideal of (F, A) if …..1. B ⊆ A, 2. G(x) is an ideal of F (x), for all x ∈ B. Example 2.10[2]. Consider L as shown in Figure. Let A = {0, a, b, c, 1}. Define, F (x) = {y ∈ L : x R y ⇔ x ∧ y = y}.