The Purpose: The goal of my research is to discover: Why should students and teachers should be encouraged to utilize the use of Digital Interactive Note booking instead of traditional note-taking during class lectures in higher education?
Outline Topics & Subtopics Technology Insisted Instruction Recall study technique note-taking Examining the differences in examinee performance on computerized testing using digital note-booking in the classroom. Comparison paper pencil test and computer test Electronic note-taking
Benefits Importance Digital Notes-Taking What we already know for other research studies:
Exposure of 1hr of 3hr TEC can increase testing performance scores.
Guided learning using the combination of traditional lectures and TEC together is the most beneficial style of students learning.
Attitude and student control over learning produces positive results.
Benefits Importance Computerized-Testing
According to Forsyth (1997), Computer based teaching methods: 1.Improve the transfer of information. 2.Increased instructional focus 3.Enhanced Motivation. 4.Stimulates creative Expression. No dull text, because I need Vivid graphics too!
Which learning Style is Effective to enhance computerized testing? notes
Computerized Teaching According to Forsyth, “Skinner early vision of a teaching machine that would shape students’ behavior through reinforcement”(p.207)
Student Surveys Questionnaire Class and university records Variables LearningOutcomes
Paper and Pencil Testing Research that opposes my theory that use of digital tools more effective? Pearson: Test, Measure, and Research Computer-Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies Bulletin_9.pdf
& Computerized Testing
Computer Testing Associated withAnxiety Do Digital note-booking help decrease anxiety when taking computerized tests? Will digital note-booking in classroom decrease anxiety when taking computer formatted tests ?
Digital Tools: Enhance Digital Note-Taking
Bridging our Future in Learning Is Digital note-booking in our future? Computerized Testing is a fast effective academic measurement tool. If computer-based testing is in our future, then digital note-taking skills need to ne adaptive in our teaching.
References: Forsyth, D. R., & Archer, C. R. (1997). Technologically assisted instruction and student mastery, motivation, and matriculation. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 207–212. Gijlers, H. H., Saab, N. N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T. T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252- 267. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Kronzer, Nicole. (2009, July 10). Writing Digital: Teaching Poetry.[Video] Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com. Landrum, R. (2010). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Providing Instructor Lecture Notes to Students: Match or Mismatch? Teaching of Psychology,37(3), 216-221. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Lawson, T. J., Bodle, J. H., & McDonough, T. A. (2007). Methods & Techniques: Techniques for Increasing Student Learning From Educational Videos: Notes Versus Guiding Questions. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 90-93. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Pemberton, J. R., Borrego Jr., J., & Cohen, L. M. (2006). Using Interactive Computer Technology to Enhance Learning. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 145-147 .Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
References: Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the Virtual Generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 69-80. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Rhodes, T. L. (2011). Making Learning Visible and Meaningful Through Portfolios. Change, 43(1), 6-13. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Säljö, R. R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the nature of learning. Journal of Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53-64. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Todoroki, S., Konishi, T., & Inoue, S. (2006). Blog-based research notebook: Personal informatics workbench for high-throughput experimentation. Applied Surface Science, 252 (7), 2640-2645. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Wang, Hong & Shin, D. (2009). Computer- Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies. Pearson Assessment,(9), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com.