Eshet & Geri Cnie 2008

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Group

    Eshet & Geri Cnie 2008 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Print or digital? Critical reading in the information era Yoram Eshet and Nitza Geri
    2. Critical thinking in the information era: A survival skill for the information consumer
    3. The manipulative nature of news headlines International Business Times, May, 19 th , 2007 According to Dor (2001), most information in news resources is manipulative or biased.
    4. Manipulative Headlines
    5. The Onion: Dedicated to falcification & deception www.onion.com
    6. The problem: Are we able to consume information critically? Chalked to death Tel Aviv: Air pollution 4 times than allowed Tel Aviv: Air pollution 3 times then recommended
    7. News representation taxonomy (Dor, 200 1 )
      • “ Objective” representation
      • Naïve bias
      • Wicked bias
    8. And why is it so important?
      • “ In the book 1984, humans are indoctrinated against their will whereas in the modern era, they are being indoctrinated in a free will "
      • Slavoj Žižek (2002) Welcome to the Desert of the Real
    9. People, but especially youth are easily manipulated (Eshet & Hamburger, 2004)
    10. Bombarded by information
      • A constant increase in the exposure to digital information
      • Forecast: By 2020, 70% of information will be digital (Romano, 2000).
      • Ambiguous findings concerning critical reading in a digital format
    11. Print versus digital: What do we know?
      • Reading: Slower in a digital text
      • Cognitive load : Higher in a digital text
      • Ownership: Lower in a digital text
      • Navigation: Disorientation problems in a digital text
      • General preferences: Short text : Digital. Long text: Print
    12. The research: I s there a difference in critical reading between print and digital format?
      • Participants
      • 40 high school students (20 males & 20 females)
      • 40 college students (20 males & 20 females)
      • Print group
      • 20 high school students (10 males & 10 females)
      • 20 college students (10 males & 10 females )
      • Digital group
      • 20 high school students (10 males & 10 females)
      • 20 college students (10 males & 10 females)
      • Tasks
      • Critical analysis of 5 news items (sport, politics, science, art, economy)
      • Each item appears in both print and digital formats.
      • Identify all manipulations made in news items
      • Write a critical report
      • Grading
      • Close similarity between the referees’ grades and the grades given by the authors (Pearson Correlation range 0.809 to 0.997, all significant at the 0.01 level, two-tailed) suggests a high coherence of the evaluation criteria utilized in this research.
    13. Findings: Print vs. digital Total sample No significant influence of format for total participants group
    14. Print vs. Digital: Gender influence No significant influence of format in a gender level
    15. Print vs. digital: Age influence          High school: More critical in a digital format College: More critical in a print format
    16. High school vs. college (regardless of format)     Significant differences in critical reading
    17. Males vs. females (regardless of format)      Significant differences in critical reading
    18. The medium and the message (M. McLuhan): Summary of major findings
      • Significant influence of age on performance:
      • High school students performed better in digital compared to print formats.
      • College students performed better in print compared to digital formats.
      • Significant differences in sub-groups (e.g. PH, PC, DH, DC)
      • Significant differences regardless of format:
      • Age
      • Gender
    19. Discussion: 3 perspectives of print vs. digital
      • The usability perspective
      • The cognitive perspective
      • The information economics perspective
    20. The usability perspective
      • The usability principle: Users perform better in familiar and friendly environments
      • The generation gap: Youth are more used to digital & adults to print platforms
    21. The cognitive perspective
      • Youth perform better than adults in non-linear, branching hypertext environments
      Eshet & Hamburger (2004)
    22. The information economics perspective
      • The performance of users reflects the perceived value they assign to of information.
      • Format affects the information’s perceived value and user performance.
    23. We hope this talk has inspired you with some new ideas THANKS

    + jj_leggojj_leggo, 2 years ago

    custom

    244 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 244
      • 244 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags

    Groups / Events