• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
AI 2009 NMC

AI 2009 NMC






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



3 Embeds 12

http://www.linkedin.com 9
https://www.linkedin.com 2
http://www.lmodules.com 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    AI 2009 NMC AI 2009 NMC Presentation Transcript

    • Using Multi-Media for Scholarly Communication Flora McMartin, Broad-based Knowledge Alan Wolf, Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison John Ittelson, CSU Monterey Bay Carl Berger, University of Michigan 1 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • An Introduction to Academic Intersections Flora McMartin, Editor in Chief 2 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Agenda 9:00 – 9:10 AM – Introductions 9:10 – 9:40 AM – Overview of Models 9:40 – 10:25 AM – Introduction to AI 10:25 – 10:40 AM – User Evaluation 10:40 – 10:50 AM – Break 10:50 – 11:40 AM – Practice Authoring 11:40 – 12:00 PM – Wrap Up 3 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Participants will * Explore sites that are moving in the direction of integrated multi-media as a way of communicating scholarship * Discuss the goals and vision of the AI and how they can participate in it * Start a submission for AI * Discuss working in the AI (and other multi-media environments) * Discuss how to work with others to develop submissions * Explore assessment techniques for introducing multimedia publishing * Introduced our vision for the future and some of the challenges we face in accomplishing that vision 4 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Introductions 5 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Scholarly Multimedia 6 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Questions for you What is the dominant form of media for presenting scholarship in your discipline? Have you seen changes in how scholarship is presented? Are there elements of your work that might be equally or better suited by means other than written word? 7 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • digital works Online peer reviewed publications Scholarly electronic editions Specifications Research tools Hypermedia Instructional technology Research blogs From the MLA Digital Work Wiki 8 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Using multiMedia in Peer reviewed publications Progression from auxiliary web sites to online journals with embedded media Replacement of some traditional sections of publications with media What are the next steps? 9 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Submissions rch sea y re Resea g ke ents in re r bench ch progres ntin a rep rese nvironm utors knowl to clinical s and the tr b ons or e ntri as e t gener dge both herapies r nslation o a i buti iences, iate. Co such ontr d ropr platfor ten ms a traditi l public. within eli f f the re es on the indings fro ed ia c xts, au app o W m the ch m , conte dia are existin g rit ata transm nal print jou ritten wo search co rapid tran Ri l op w ion of d it the r rd an m sf ngs nd me ith eve s e intrica nals are no d sta munity an er of f indi a or kw r to d inclu eractiv cies o t f mod longer suff ic picture d the ng w o he ni lear raged to Tub e by t ther int also ern re i - searc cient to acc based You ted o are - Jour enc ou , or men ns, or essa ys nal of h. uratel iver supple Visua y r, D latio hoto lized Flick butions s, simu ic, or p Exper iment tri lip h edia s con video c grap nd M As i eo, ga llu s ets, . Vid t s. arnin throu strated ents forma of Le g or hu h the pr by p lem e rnal ub ovis lished a e tabl l Jou man ac cep nat iona •If th -c ion e de omputer of exam cles, JIM rti Inter subm sc in p E -The issio ription o teractio les whic authors whic n f n h mo c h co , the art new int , e.g. re co an bring •The nvey icle erac mpe ad, oreti to re mus t t be ive med lling alive the in ste ia in parti c ad cula al article ers its i integra ia fo ly co ir nvey submis d xt; me g te ew •Aut re s nt te rms hum si ce n ein of hors xample or litera eractivit d with il a substa an-h ons repla and nd se igms sh exch c so ange an provi f intera re review tu y. lustr n ative tive par uma n to f old ng a arad publi to s bet de re ctive s can extra t of t ek o i p e , ween ad m cts o he t seusion knowased ut, w ason now ' stud ers with edia . illus f the sn f of b p re ents, b med doe ge a ays text- ply ever trate extra etter acc their ia ors ra w id im t cts o ess t anal ect ncou oster e rig hip. S r wha -Jou ors rnal fv oq yses V e f th lars , fo ect of In ideo obs ualitativ with we er to and ho d -V terac erva e da rd exp l sc t nee . o t tive t Med ion data a, such a t a a a ia in tha dition rks th medi , s dia Educ etc. logu tra y wo multi ation e onl st in exi 10 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Auxiliary Media PLOS One SciVee Nature 3D view Multimedia 11 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Embedded Media International Journal of Learning and Media 12 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Media and Text Journal of Visualized Experiments 13 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • MultiMedia as publication Vectors 14 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • What do you think? by Sidereal Used under a Creative Commons license 15 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • AI’s Vision: Re-thinking Re-seeing Re-doing the Scholarly Journal 16 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • The Vision • Online & peer-reviewed • Accounts of research or creative works within or across academic disciplines, courses and curricula or programs • Multiple media as a fundamental aspect of higher education in the 21st century. • Provide a media rich venue for exploring the new knowledge emerging from the integration of technology, scholarly and creative works, and the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education 4 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • www.academicintersections.com 5 18 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Components of a Published Work 1. Abstract • Assessment, Evaluation 2. Introduction – Science Laptop Study – Evidence Based Design: The Open Learning 4.Future Directions or Initiative Conclusion 3. The body of the – Developing the Listening Mind article, 3-4 sections 5.Acknowledgements – Bringing Life to Greek 6.Bibliography Architecture – Podcasting Lectures: 7.Author's Statement Lessons Learned from – Think globally, act globally Formative and Summative Evaluations 6 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Peer Review Criteria The Submission: •Addresses academic intersections related to the journal's purpose. •Presents a media-rich academic/creative work. •Is grounded in the literature in a manner that is relevant and accurate with respect to the expectations of the home discipline or disciplines. •Provides adequate documentation or description so that others might implement. 7 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Required for Publication • Author's Statement. • Work has NOT been published elsewhere in its present form. • Presents new perspectives, new technologies, new pedagogies or new ways of intersecting the key domains targeted by AI. • Broadens readers' understanding and thinking; moves the authors' field(s) forward in terms of either pedagogy or scholarship (or both). • Is relevant to higher education. • Presents research, scholarship or creative works; it is NOT a piece of advocacy or a 'puff' piece promoting a commercial product. 8 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Authoring for AI 9 22 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Creating Your Work for Publication 23 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Authoring Process 1.Join Apple Learning Interchange –( http://edcommunity.apple.com/ali/ index.php) 2.Join the group: Academic Intersections Community • Log in to ALI and from your home page select: Submissions • Then select: Create a Story or Exhibit • Begin authoring! download guide 24 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Assessment and Evaluation Why, What, When, Where and How Carl Berger Professor and Dean Emeritus University of Michigan 25 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Why assessment? •Information is better than shooting blind •Data wins out in the end •Where do you get those great stories that sell •Documenting change •Looking back (and forward) 26 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • What? •Looking at themes •Measuring more than content •Slicing it thin enough 27 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • When? •Before to get ready •During to find what's needed to change •After to find out what worked •Follow up to find if you've made a difference 28 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Where •In situ •In workshops •In conferences •In deans and directors meeting •And in regents/trustees meetings 29 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How • Keep it simple • Three things about each • About five questions about each concept • Space for stories 30 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Sample 31 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Multiple questions same theme 32 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Finish with open comments 33 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • What you can learn 34 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How people learn Producing online publications using rich media and interactivity Knowlege Confidence Experience 37 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How people learn Producing online publications using rich media and interactivity Before During After Knowlege Confidence Experience 37 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How people learn Producing online publications using rich media and interactivity Before During After Knowlege Confidence Experience 37 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How people learn Producing online publications using rich media and interactivity Before During After Knowlege Confidence Experience 37 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • How people learn Producing online publications using rich media and interactivity Before During After Knowlege Confidence Experience 37 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Summary • Simple • As many times a possible • Multi-Dimensional • Several on the same theme • Analyze • Present to as many as possible • Tell Stories • Use data to support or refute 38 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • http://sciencecommons.org/projects/publishing/ 40 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • 41 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • 42 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • MIT Faculty Open-Access Policy Passed by Unanimous of the Faculty, March 18, 2009 The Faculty of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is committed to disseminating the fruits of its research and scholarship as widely as possible. In keeping with that commitment, the Faculty adopts the following policy: Each Faculty member grants to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology nonexclusive permission to make available his or her scholarly articles and to exercise the copyright in those articles for the purpose of open dissemination. In legal terms, each Faculty member grants to MIT a nonexclusive, irrevocable, paid-up, worldwide license to exercise any and all rights under copyright relating to each of his or her scholarly articles, in any medium, provided that the articles are not sold for a profit, and to authorize others to do the same. The policy will apply to all scholarly articles written while the person is a member of the Faculty except for any articles completed before the adoption of this policy and any articles for which the Faculty member entered into an incompatible licensing or assignment agreement before the adoption of this policy. The Provost or Provost's designate will waive application of the policy for a particular article upon written notification by the author, who informs MIT of the reason. 43 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Open Access OverviewFocusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprintsThis is an introduction to open access (OA) for those who are new to the concept. I hope it's short enough to read, long enough to be useful, and organized to let you skip around and dive into detail only where you want detail. It doesn't cover every nuance or answer every objection. But for those who read it, it should cover enough territory to prevent the misunderstandings that delayed progress in our early days. I welcome your comments and suggestions.If this overview is still too long, then see my very brief introduction to OA. It's available in a dozen languages and should print out on just one page, depending on your font size.Once you're acquainted with the general idea of OA, follow new developments through my blog and newsletter, and see what you can do to help the cause. Peter Suber Last revised June 19, 2007. 44 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • 45 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Artworks used in this presentation • David Hockney, (Feb. 19, 1983) Sitting in the Zen Garden at the Ryoanji Temple, Kyoto.http:// www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~cbeardon/dcollage/collage3/ semantics/spacetime2.html • Walyou, (accessed, May 26, 2009) http:// www.walyou.com/blog/2008/10/30/how-to-build-star- treks-starship-enterprise-at-the-office/ • Nam June Pai, V Buddha (1974). Closed Circuit video i bronze sculpture, http://www.paikstudios.com/index.html 46 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Thank You Flora – flora.mcmartin@gmail.com Alan – alanwolf@wisc.edu John – jittelson@mac.com Carl – cberger@umich.edu 47 Tuesday, June 16, 2009
    • Electronic version of handout • http://bit.ly/zJY7o --- planning sheet • http://bit.ly/3wMSlz --- presentation • http://tinyurl.com/nmc2009-2 - survey 45 Tuesday, June 16, 2009