• Save
Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Models vs. Cloud Capacity Models
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Models vs. Cloud Capacity Models

on

  • 4,215 views

The presentation compares traditional infrastructure capacity models to cloud capacity models.

The presentation compares traditional infrastructure capacity models to cloud capacity models.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,215
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
3,975
Embed Views
240

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

4 Embeds 240

http://www.jitscale.com 223
http://www.slideshare.net 15
http://www.arjandejong.nl 1
https://www.jitscale.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Apple Keynote

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • <br />

Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Models vs. Cloud Capacity Models Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Models vs. Cloud Capacity Models Presentation Transcript

  • Traditional Capacity Models vs. Cloud Capacity Models
  • Infrastructure Costs Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Time
  • Infrastructure Costs Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Time Conclusion:
  • Infrastructure Costs Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • Large CAPEX due to hardware investment
  • Infrastructure Costs Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • Large CAPEX due to hardware investment • Financing overcapacity
  • Infrastructure Costs Traditional Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • Large CAPEX due to hardware investment • Financing overcapacity • Customer dissatisfaction when actual demand outperforms available capacity
  • Infrastructure Costs Jitscale Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Time
  • Infrastructure Costs Jitscale Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Time Conclusion:
  • Infrastructure Costs Jitscale Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • No investment in hardware; from CAPEX to OPEX
  • Infrastructure Costs Jitscale Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • No investment in hardware; from CAPEX to OPEX • No nancing of overcapacity
  • Infrastructure Costs Jitscale Infrastructure Capacity Model Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Time Conclusion: • No investment in hardware; from CAPEX to OPEX • No nancing of overcapacity • Customer satisfaction because capacity automatically scales to meet actual demand
  • Traditional Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Hardware Demand Actual Demand
  • Traditional Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Hardware Demand Actual Demand Conclusion:
  • Traditional Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Hardware Demand Actual Demand Conclusion: • Large CAPEX to meet actual demand peak
  • Traditional Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Hardware Demand Actual Demand Conclusion: • Large CAPEX to meet actual demand peak • Financing overcapacity between batch processes
  • Jitscale Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Actual Demand Jitscale Capacity
  • Jitscale Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Actual Demand Jitscale Capacity Conclusion:
  • Jitscale Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Actual Demand Jitscale Capacity Conclusion: • No CAPEX, only operational expenditure
  • Jitscale Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Actual Demand Jitscale Capacity Conclusion: • No CAPEX, only operational expenditure • No need to nance overcapacity between batch processes
  • Jitscale Batch Processing Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Time Actual Demand Jitscale Capacity Conclusion: • No CAPEX, only operational expenditure • No need to nance overcapacity between batch processes • Capacity automatically available when needed
  • Traditional Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time
  • Traditional Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion:
  • Traditional Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • Large capital expenditure due to unpredictable demand of campaigns
  • Traditional Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • Large capital expenditure due to unpredictable demand of campaigns • Inef cient use of available capacity for campaigns
  • Traditional Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Hardware Demand Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • Large capital expenditure due to unpredictable demand of campaigns • Inef cient use of available capacity for campaigns • Customer dissatisfaction when campaign becomes too successful
  • Jitscale Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time
  • Jitscale Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion:
  • Jitscale Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • No need to invest in hardware
  • Jitscale Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • No need to invest in hardware • Ef cient use of capacity, since it automatically scales per campaign
  • Jitscale Campaign Capacity Model Infrastructure Costs Estimated Demand Jitscale Capacity Actual Demand Campaign 1 Actual Demand Campaign 2 Time Conclusion: • No need to invest in hardware • Ef cient use of capacity, since it automatically scales per campaign • Campaigns are always available, even when very successful
  • Why Jitscale?
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds.
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management Your infrastructure is made available only when necessary, on an hourly basis. Jitscale also manages all technical aspects of your application and platform pro-actively, 24/7, 365 days a year, anywhere in the world.
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management Your infrastructure is made available only when necessary, on an hourly basis. Jitscale also manages all technical aspects of your application and platform pro-actively, 24/7, 365 days a year, anywhere in the world. Service level agreement
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management Your infrastructure is made available only when necessary, on an hourly basis. Jitscale also manages all technical aspects of your application and platform pro-actively, 24/7, 365 days a year, anywhere in the world. Service level agreement The entire service provided by Jitscale will be detailed in a comprehensive SLA.
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management Your infrastructure is made available only when necessary, on an hourly basis. Jitscale also manages all technical aspects of your application and platform pro-actively, 24/7, 365 days a year, anywhere in the world. Service level agreement The entire service provided by Jitscale will be detailed in a comprehensive SLA. Pay per success
  • Why Jitscale? Cloud over cloud infrastructure Your data can be diffused over multiple clouds. Auto-scaling infrastructure and management Your infrastructure is made available only when necessary, on an hourly basis. Jitscale also manages all technical aspects of your application and platform pro-actively, 24/7, 365 days a year, anywhere in the world. Service level agreement The entire service provided by Jitscale will be detailed in a comprehensive SLA. Pay per success You only invest in server capacity and management that is actually used and can cut costs by 75% compared to traditional infrastructures.
  • Jitscale provides fully managed, on demand, global, auto-scaling, virtualized and shared IT infrastructure as-a-service. For more information, please visit our website: www.jitscale.com