JISC Project: CRM Self Analysis Tools and Process Mapping

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites

    JISC Project: CRM Self Analysis Tools and Process Mapping - Presentation Transcript

    1. JISC Project: CRM Self Analysis Tools and Process Mapping Project Findings and Tools Dr Matthew Donaghy Project Manager
    2. What was the vision?
      • To develop an open source self-analysis toolkit, empowering Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to think through their people, process and technology issues before, during or after a Business and Community Engagement (BCE) orientated Customer Relationship Management (CRM) implementation.
      • In other words: Look before you leap!
    3. What did we deliver?
      • Process Maps
      • On how different HEIs (peripheral, tactical, strategic) manage their processes where CRM and BCE are concerned
      • Self Analysis Tools (‘Easy to Use’, Open Source)
      • Focussing on how HEIs can think through people, process and technology issues prior, during or after CRM implementation. This means tools / diagnostics on:
      • Linking CRM to BCE strategy
      • Change readiness
      • Process Mapping
      • Risk management (and scoring)
      • Thinking through security / ownership
      • Implementation planning
      • Checklists
    4. How did we do it?
      • Process Mapping and Research!
      • Over 20 Institutions (HEIs and FECs)
      • Peripheral, Tactical, Strategic
      Team Work!
    5. What did we find (Process Maps)?
      • For ‘peripheral’ institutions, our process research found that many HEIs shared similar characteristics:
      • Limited approach to information sharing
      • Sporadic use of technology to maintain BCE contacts (but more of a localised ‘c-drive’ culture)
      • Some interoperability between systems but nonetheless cultural issues in terms of a lack of willingness by schools or departments to share contacts and knowledge
    6. An example....
    7. What did we find (Process Maps)?
      • For ‘tactical / strategic’ institutions, our process research noted that:
      • There is clear leadership embedded in the process (VC in HEI E );
      • Strategic thinking and transparent policy development has supported information sharing approaches ( HEI E and F on information sharing);
      • There is ‘buy in’ to the processes ( FEC As commitment to reducing departmental workload);
      • Systems can be tailored to suit individual departments ( HEI H have their own software support unit; FEC A are working towards CRM screens that appear ‘familiar’ to users).
    8. An example....
    9. Tools
      • www.nottingham.ac.uk/gradschool/crm/
    10. Next Steps
      • Finished project end of Jan 09 (on time and on budget)
      • Dissemination
      • Tools ‘testing’ (July 09)
      • Thank You!
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Andrew StewartAndrew Stewart Nominate

    custom

    814 views, 2 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Overall project update. The vision: To develop an more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 814
      • 811 on SlideShare
      • 3 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 3 views on http://bce.jiscinvolve.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 3 views on http://bce.jiscinvolve.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories