Chapter 3 Working In Hospital Emergency Departments

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Chapter 3 Working In Hospital Emergency Departments - Presentation Transcript

    1. Working in Hospital Emergency Departments: Guidelines for Crisis Intervention Workers - Chapter 3. Instructor: Jeff Garrett Ph.D.
    2. Problems Patients Face in ER • Medical Emergencies (physical injuries, illness, and death). • Isolated from natural support systems. • Unfamiliar surroundings and hospital procedures. • Acute emotional disturbance.
    3. SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM • Increased Visits to the ER • Overcrowded, long waiting periods. • Nonmedical issues can often be neglected. • Nonmedical issues can be quite severe and may influence recovery from the medical issues.
    4. New Challenges • Differentiating accidental injuries due to abuse (e.g., domestic violence, child abuse, and elder abuse). • Making these judgments requires knowledge and takes time. • With an already overworked staff, these types of patients can be easily over-looked. • Some hospitals have developed special in- service training to identify these types of problems.
    5. New Challenges • Other hospitals rely on outside programs developed to work with these types of populations. • Crisis workers can minimize the chance that victims of abuse are overlooked. • Medical personnel have become aware that nonmedical issues are essential factors to be reckoned with in patient care. • Thus, the demand for crisis services in emergency departments is clear.
    6. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE • Training, unfortunately, has not kept pace with increased awareness of the psychological and emotional well-being of patients in recovery. • Even though some medical personnel receive minimal instruction in crisis theory, most hospital staff simply do not feel comfortable dealing with patients in psychological or emotional crisis. • Many hospitals do recognize the value of trained crisis intervention workers in the emergency department.
    7. Crisis Intervention in ER • Medical personnel have become more receptive to services that address these psychological and emotional factors in recognition of the impact that treatment of these issues has on physical recovery. • Psychiatric Nurses • Chaplains • Social Workers • Counselors and crisis intervention specialists.
    8. Four Advantages of Crisis Intervention in ER • First, crisis intervention services help prevent additional psychological problems and complications that may accompany hospitalization. • Second, crisis intervention in emergency departments may serve to alleviate possible exacerbation of physical trauma.
    9. Four Advantages of Crisis Intervention in ER • Third, crisis intervention may serve to make patients more responsive to treatment (e.g., psychological problems can interfere with patients' ability or desire to perform the behaviors necessary to control a medical problem). • Fourth, crisis intervention in emergency departments can identify abuse victims (e.g., records indicate that 22-35 percent of women who present at emergency departments do so because of symptoms related to physical abuse).
    10. CRISIS THEORY • Robert’s Model is Flexible • Roberts' seven-step model for crisis intervention provides an excellent guide for crisis workers in hospital emergency departments. • Crisis workers, however, should recognize that this model is not set up to be rigidly followed in a step-by-step fashion.
    11. CRISIS THEORY • The model should be viewed as fluid and adaptable for work in emergency departments. • Crisis workers must be attentive to changes in clients and the environment that might influence reactions to the crisis event. • As changes occur, crisis workers must be flexible in moving to that part of the model that best corresponds with current circumstances.
    12. Accurate Assessment (a key element). Assessment should be holistic, taking into account affective, cognitive, and behavioral reactions. Affective reactions to crises fall into three primary types: • (a) anger/hostility; • (b) fear/ anxiety; • (c) sadness/melancholy.
    13. Accurate Assessment (a key element). Cognitive perceptions of crisis events are experienced as these impact four areas: (a) physical - food, water, shelter; (b) psychological -identity, emotional well- being; (c) relationship -family, friends, coworkers; (d) moral/spiritual - personal integrity, values, and belief system aspects of patients and their family.
    14. Accurate Assessment (a key element). Cognitive reactions to crises are: • (a) transgression, which occurs when patients' or their families' rights have been violated; • (b) threat, which occurs when a person judges the event as having potential harm or damage to themselves or others; • (c) loss, which involves the belief that an irretrievable loss has occurred.
    15. Accurate Assessment (a key element). Behavioral reactions to crises are: • approach, in which individuals make overt or covert attempts to address the crisis; • avoidance, in which active attempts are made to ignore, evade, or escape the crisis event; and • immobility, in which nonproductive, disorganized, or self-canceling coping behaviors are displayed.
    16. Accurate Assessment (a key element). Assessment should be Continuous • Ongoing assessment is essential in determining the needs of patients and their families at that moment. • New information may result in crisis workers adjusting their approach to match the current state of patients and their families.
    17. Robert’s Seven-Step Model
    18. 1. Make psychological contact and rapidly establish the relationship. Establishing rapport involves active listening skills including … • Attentiveness. • Reflection of feelings. • Restatements of content. • Asking open and closed questions. • The use of minimal encouragers.
    19. 1. Make psychological contact and rapidly establish the relationship. • Show respect. • Show interest. • Show care and concern.
    20. 1. Make psychological contact and rapidly establish the relationship. Gather information important to the assessment process. This information will help crisis workers to judge the affective, cognitive, and behavioral reaction along with the severity of these reactions.
    21. 1. Make psychological contact and rapidly establish the relationship. To gauge the reactions, three basic questions need to be answered. • First, what are the feelings that patients and their families have about the crisis event? • Second, how have they perceived the crisis event affecting their lives? • Third, what have they done to overcome the impact of the crisis event?
    22. 2. Examine the dimensions of the problem Steps 1 and 2 frequently blend together. Do not assume that the crisis reaction is concerned with medical issues. Crisis workers should ask themselves: "Will the affective, cognitive, and/or behavioral reaction interfere with the day-to-day activities and if so, how and to what degree?" Also important during step 2 is to assess patients' and families' potential to harm themselves or others.
    23. 3. Encourage an exploration of feelings and emotions. • At times, this step can be overlooked as crisis workers attempt to focus more on the crisis event rather than the reaction to that event. • Active listening skills along with the demonstration of a nonjudgmental attitude, empathy, and genuineness are invaluable in this step.
    24. 3. Encourage an exploration of feelings and emotions. As patients and their families perceive they are being supported, they will be more open to expressing their feelings. This catharsis is therapeutic and can lead to a healthy resolution of the crisis. Assess the patients' and their families' affective reactions to the crisis event. This assessment will determine the primary affective reaction and the severity of the reaction.
    25. 4. Explore and assess past coping attempts. • The shock of an unexpected visit to a hospital emergency department may result in the inability of patients and their families to cope. • Simply exploring coping skills used in the past may be all that is needed. • In more severe cases the crisis worker may have to teach coping skills.
    26. 5. Generate and explore alternatives and specific solutions. • Generating and exploring alternatives and solutions to crisis events depend on the severity of patients' and their families' reactions. • The more severe the reaction, the more directive the intervention needed.
    27. 5. Generate and explore alternatives and specific solutions. • Mild types of crisis generally require a more non-direct level of intervention. • This intervention level uses active listening skills to support and demonstrate caring. • Moderately severe crises necessitate a collaborative intervention level. In this level of intervention, crisis workers, patients, and their families work together as a team.
    28. 5. Generate and explore alternatives and specific solutions. • Crisis workers are compelled to use a direct level of intervention for patients and families who have suffered a severe crisis. • This intervention level requires crisis workers to use directives with patients and their families.
    29. 5. Generate and explore alternatives and specific solutions. • Care must be taken with intervention levels not to foster undue dependence on crisis workers. • After the initial shock of the crisis is over, crisis workers might then retreat to a more collaborative rather than a direct intervention level.
    30. 6. Restore cognitive functioning through implementation of action plan. • To Restore Cognitive Functioning. • Patients and their families must have a realistic understanding of the crisis event . (e.g., if the patient has just suffered a massive stroke, it is unrealistic to believe that he/she will return to work in a short period of time). • Patients and their families should understand the meaning of the event and its likely effect on their lives (how the injury will influence their lives on a short- and long-term basis e.g., rehabilitation, doctor visits).
    31. 7. Follow up. • Follow-up is important to ensure the well-being of patients and their families. • Follow up is useful to evaluate the effectiveness of the services, and subsequently, to improve those services.
    32. 7. Follow up. • Follow up may involve visits to the hospital room if the patient is admitted. • If the patient is not admitted, crisis workers may telephone or correspond with patients and their families.
    33. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS • Returning to former level of functioning. A primary goal is to return patients and families to their state of functioning prior to the onset of the crisis.
    34. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 2. Adapting to the hospital setting. ERs are a new environment, one that very few persons would choose willingly. A goal of intervention would be to facilitate a tolerance of the hospital environment so that the hospital becomes a familiar place in which functioning can take place.
    35. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 3. Setting up a referral network. Provide patients and families with a list of support sources and groups that can ease the sense of isolation accompanying the emergency. Show how these can be contacted and utilized.
    36. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 4. Mobilizing coping skills Patients’ established coping skills may be inadequate with the chaos of the crisis. A goal is to help patients adapt their inherent coping skills to the new environment and situation which allows them to tolerate and respond to the demands of the new situation.
    37. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 5. Providing psychoeducation. Serious psychological ramifications can be associated with crisis events of a medical nature. These can often manifest after the initial shock has passed. The crisis worker's aims to inform patients and families to expect certain psychological consequences such as depression, despair, and anxiety as appropriate to the situation.
    38. GOALS FOR CRISIS INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 6. Establishing lines of communication. A smoothly operating communication network should be established between crisis worker(s), staff, patients, and, families. This minimizes confusion for all concerned and provides a sense of order and organization. This network can be structured in such a way as to allow a policy of who talks to whom, when, and under what circumstances.
    39. GUIDELINES FOR WORKING IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS
    40. Role of Crisis Workers Many professionals typically interact to assist in the over-all care of patients and their families. One part of a multidisciplinary team (e.g., physicians, nurses, x-ray technicians, phlebotomists, respiratory therapists), and the other is support staff (e.g., receptionists, clerks, chaplains, social workers).
    41. Role of Crisis Workers To function effectively multidisciplinary teams should demonstrate a sense of mutual trust, collaboration, and willingness to compromise when needed. The crisis worker's primary role is that of mental health specialist to specifically address the psychological and emotional effects of trauma on patients and their families. Part of their role is also to enlighten other team members regarding such phenomena.
    42. Functions of Crisis Workers Function within guidelines established by the hospital. Some hospitals may have vague guidelines while others may have precise rules about contact with patients and their families. These rules may be written or unwritten and typically involve procedures and/or lines of authority to be followed. A knowledge and understanding of these guidelines promote the effective performance of crisis workers.
    43. Five Functions of Crisis Workers First, crisis workers function as advocates. Second, crisis workers function as case coordinators. Third, crisis workers function as counselors. Fourth, crisis workers function as educators. Fifth, crisis workers serve to mobilize resources and provide referrals. Crisis workers will seldom perform all of these functions with any one case. Instead, functions are performed on the basis of the needs, both immediate and necessary, of patients and their families.
    44. Training Crisis Workers Knowledge of this nature is gained through two interrelated methods. 1. Didactic training 2. Supervised experience.
    45. Eleven Desirable Qualities of Crisis Workers 1. Quick Thinking. 2. Creativity and Flexibility. 3. Parallel Process. 4. Quick and Easy Rapport Building. 5. Tolerance of Medical Trauma. 6. The Ability to Maintain Calm and Inspire It in Others. 7. Self-Awareness. 8. A Sense o f Reconciliation with Death. 9. Ability to Maintain Objectivity and Derole. 10. A Sense of Humor as Appropriate. 11. Space Allocation.

    + Jeff GarretJeff Garret, 6 months ago

    custom

    205 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Week 6

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 205
      • 205 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 13
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories