Sfot Presentation July 28 2008 Tol Special Council Solutions And Issues

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Sfot Presentation July 28 2008 Tol Special Council Solutions And Issues - Presentation Transcript

    1. South Fraser OnTrax Langley Township Council Presentation July 28, 2008 with Mr. Brent Graham, BSc MSc Dipl T
    2. The Issues
      • “ Transit Deficit” in South Fraser Region
      • Current focus - get people to Vancouver
      • SF - Roads and buses only - no LRT or streetcars
      • Lack of TOD in South Fraser Region
      • Disconnect between development & transit
      • Cities built around roads (mobility) vs. people
      • We own an Interurban right-of-way
      • Long-term sustainable living/working/transport solutions
      • No progressive alternatives to goods movement
      • Strategies to connect walking, cycling & people movement
      • Need for complete roads
      • Stop wasting value land for parking lots
    3. The Solutions
      • Re-activate Interurban as LRT Phase 1 Langley to Surrey
      • Light rail corridor along King George Hwy & 104th Ave, Surrey
      • Streetcar along 200th Street, Langley - then circles
      • Downtown Langley City streetcar - Fraser Hwy. & circle
      • Abbotsford connects to Interurban (Chilliwack in time)
      • Frequent transit connection to LRT - Langley & Abby Airports
      • Use management technology - make buses fast & reliable
      • Improve local bus service & frequency 15/15/7 across SF
      • More Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
      • Land use planning & transportation planning that fit together
      • LRT & transit upgrades followed by road pricing system
      • Complete Roads, TOD & Car Share Programs - Reduce need for parking lots
    4. Langley Tram
    5. Melbourne’s Tram System
      • 3 rd Largest in the World
      • 28 Routes
      • 1,900 Stops
      • 8 Depots
      • 2,600,000 tram trips per week
      • 1,800 Staff
      • 500 km of double track
    6. Demographics
      • 54% female
      • 43% are aged between 15 and 30 years
      • Mostly from 1-2 car households
      • 25% from households with no car
      • 61% have a drivers licence
      • 58% are employed
      • 35% are studying
      • over 70% travel for shopping/personal or work
    7. The Good, Bad & Ugly
      • 150 years of tram
      • Electrified for 100 yr
      • Lessons learned
    8. The Good
      • Reduced non-productive parking lots
      • Disabled access on trams and at stops
      • Stress free travel
      • Fewer car accidents/injuries
      • Reduced traffic congestion
      • Increased pedestrian traffic
    9. The Good
      • More walking – health benefits
      • Promotes multimodal public transport
      • Property value increase
      • Promotes tourism
    10. Stops
      • Wheelchair accessible
      • Talking Timetable
      • Next tram display
      • Ticket Machines
      • Local information
      • Shelters at no cost
    11. The Bad
      • Electrolysis
      • Hook Turns
      • Construction
      • Center Stops/Jaywalking
      • Mountable Stops
    12. Poor Overhead Design
      • Rigid systems being replaced with elastic system
    13. Poor Track Maintenance
      • Pedestrian risk
      • Particularly for disabled
    14. Traction Power
      • Poorly designed overhead
      • Electrified for 100 yr
      • Lessons learned
    15. Benefits
      • 5 km route (10k round trip)
      • 13 minute tram frequency requires 3 trams @15 km/h
      • 1 Tram = 140 single occupancy cars
      • 1 car = 3m x 5m
      • 1 tram will reduce the need for parking by (3x5x140)= 2100m 2
      • 3 trams = 6300m 2
      • 6300m 2 could be converted to more productive use
    16. Benefits
      • 1 car length @25 km/h = 5m +7m (2 seconds) = 12m
      • 3 trams will eliminate (3x140x12) = 5 km of traffic
      • 5 km of traffic will take 12 min. to pass @ 25km/h
      • 3 trams will save 12 minutes
    17. How will Langley Change?
      • Reduced stress
      • More cross-town trips
      • More pedestrian activity = increased safety
      • Improved health
      • Reduced carbon emissions
      • Increased visibility for small businesses
      • Business potential for local tram-related businesses
      • Elderly & handicap stay connected to the community
    18. Moving Forward
      • Promote Langley as a Center of Excellence for Trams
      • University Challenge – scholarship & publicity
      • Long Range Plans
      • Developer participation/integration
      • Refine Scope
      • Project Delivery Mechanism
    19. Moving Forward
      • Prepare concept design
      • Risk Assessment
      • Issue Expression of Interest
      • Stakeholder Consultation – Open House
      • RFQ
      • Project delivery
    20. Q & A South Fraser OnTrax Website: www.sfot.info Daily Blog: www.southfraser.net

    + jgabatemanjgabateman, 2 years ago

    custom

    433 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation by light rail expert Brent Graham and more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 433
      • 433 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 3
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories