Project Quality Plan
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Project Quality Plan

on

  • 1,539 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,539
Views on SlideShare
1,531
Embed Views
8

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 8

http://www.linkedin.com 7
http://www.slideshare.net 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Project Quality Plan Project Quality Plan Presentation Transcript

  • PROJECT MODELS FOR SYSTEM UPGRADE BY: JASON E LEWIS DATE: 9/04/2009 Comparing Project Management Models & Methodologies
  • Project Summary
    • Discussion o f comparing Project Management Models for the Email systems upgrade
    • Discussion of a variety of Project Management Methodologies
    • Discussion Models
      • Dynamic Systems Development Model
      • Maturity Model
      • Prince2 Model
      • Waterfall Model
      • Spiral Model
    • Project Summary/ Problem Statement
      • Identified email system business interruptions
      • Identified the need for the reduction of redundant systems
    • Focus
      • New email standards
      • Upgrade of the email system
      • One email system
    • Scope
      • Consolidation of the five email systems
      • Users will have both LAN and Remote access to email
      • User PCs will be upgraded to accommodate the new email system
      • Take advantage of the opportunity to develop collaboration among the 12 departments
      • Maximize coat savings potential by generating direct coat savings
  • Dynamic Systems Development Model (DSDM )
    • DSDM was developed in the U.K. in the mid 1990’s.
    • Boast of being better than the Agile techniques.
    • Philosophy that nothing is built perfect.
    • Believes software is a exploratory endeavor.
    • Uses nine principles and five phases.
          • Active user involvement
          • Empowered teams that the authority to make decisions
          • Focus on frequent delivery of products
          • Fitness of business as the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables
          • Iterative and incremental development to ensure convergence on accurate business solutions
          • Reversible changes during development
          • Requirements that are baselined at a high level
          • Integrated testing throughout the life cycle
          • Collaboration and cooperation between all stakeholders
  • Maturity Model
    • Model was formed t refine an organization software development process.
    • Methodology is to optimize the development process.
    • It is used by DOD and is promoted by SEI and was founded in 1984.
    • Easily establishes the framework for continuous process improvement.
    • Has five maturity levels and operates on the following.
        • Initial Level
        • Repeatable Level
        • Defined Level
        • Managed Level
        • Optimizing Level
  • Prince2 Model
    • Prince2 is a project management Methodology that is process-based.
    • Has Eight high level processes.
        • Directing a Project
        • Planning
        • Starting up a Project
        • Initiating the Project
        • Controlling a Stage
        • Managing Product Delivery
        • Managing Stage Boundaries
        • Closing a Project
  • WaterFall Model
    • Waterfall model is a methodology for software engineering.
    • Considered a classic approach to the systems development life cycle.
    • The model is a development method that is rigid and linear.
    • Often falls short of expectations as it does not embrace the inevitable changes and revisions.
    • Difficult to make changes during testing.
    • Alternatives to the Waterfall model include
        • JAD – creates a shorter development time and greater customer
        • satisfaction
        • RAD - is a variation on JAD, creates an application more quickly through
        • strategies that include fewer formal methodologies
  • Spiral Model
    • Extends the Waterfall model by prototyping and is preferred over Waterfall.
    • Has Nine high-level steps
        • System requirements needs to be defined in large detail.
        • A preliminary design is created for the implementation.
        • First prototype for the new system is constructed off of the preliminary design.
        • At the second prototype evolves four steps.
            • Evaluate the first prototype
            • Define the requirements of the second stage
            • Plan and design the second prototype
            • Construct and test the second prototype
        • Sponsor can choose to stop the project due to high risk factors shown during prototype.
        • The prototype is evaluated in the same way as the previous prototype
        • The preceding steps are iterated until the customer is satisfied
        • The final system is constructed based on the refined prototype
        • The final system is thoroughly evaluated and tested
  • Benefits of Implementing Spiral Model
    • Easy to implement
    • Customizable for company size
    • Implementation in months not years
    • Increase Profitability
    • Reduce paperwork
    • Ability to track business
    • Generate sales leads
    • Technical support available
  • References
    •   Active Directory & E-Mail Consolidation.(2005) Category Enterprise IT Management Initiatives . Retrieved August 29 th , 2009 from
    • http://www.nascio.org/awards/nominations/2008/2008MO7-Nascio2008.pdf
    • Buzzle.com.(2009) Project Management Models . Retrieved September 2, 2009 from http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/1-5-2005-63768.asp
    • Cutter Consortium Business Intelligence.(2006) A Strategy for implementing BI/BPM to gain competitive advantage . Retrieved August 18, 2009 from
    • http://www.cutter.com/content-and-analysis/resource-centers/business-intelligence/sample-our-research/biar0502.html
    • Computer Security Resource Center (May 8, 2009). Risk Management Framework (RMF) Overview. Retrieved August 21, 2009 from
    • http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SMA/fisma/framework.html
    • Diigo.com.(2008) Waterfall/spiral. Retrieved September 2, 2009 from http://www.diigo.com/list/mikeem/waterfallspiral
    •  
    • Statz, J. TeraQuest Metrics, Inc., Microsoft TechNet (December 1999). Site Server – Risk Management Process for Product Development, Retrieved August 21, 2009 from
    • http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb687466.aspx