Mitzi Hanold, MPH Food for the Hungry
Background: <ul><li>Survey size: 40 respondents </li></ul><ul><li>Doer and Nondoer Analysis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Doers ar...
Significant Findings: <ul><li>Doers were 5.6 times more likely to believe that NOT participating in a working group is a v...
Additional Findings  (not ss) <ul><li>Advantages of participating in WG: </li></ul><ul><li>Networking (OR = 3.00) </li></u...
Significant Findings <ul><li>Doers were 5.1 times more likely to believe that they could be a working group member in the ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

935

Published on

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

Mitzi Hanold, Food for the Hungry

SBC Working Group Showcase

CORE Group Spring Meeting, April 29, 2010

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
935
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

  1. 1. Mitzi Hanold, MPH Food for the Hungry
  2. 2. Background: <ul><li>Survey size: 40 respondents </li></ul><ul><li>Doer and Nondoer Analysis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Doers are those who have met in a working group 2 or more times in the last six months. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>14 Doers versus 26 Non-doers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Purpose: To find the reasons the help and/or hinder active participation and the advantages and disadvantages of participation. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Significant Findings: <ul><li>Doers were 5.6 times more likely to believe that NOT participating in a working group is a very serious or somewhat serious problem. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Help CORE members to understand the role of working groups and how they are instrumental in CORE’s survival. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Non-doers were more likely to believe that NOT participating in a working group would NOT have a negative impact on their organization. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Help CORE members to understand the value added of their participation and how it can positively impact their organization. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Additional Findings (not ss) <ul><li>Advantages of participating in WG: </li></ul><ul><li>Networking (OR = 3.00) </li></ul><ul><li>Things that make being an active member easier: </li></ul><ul><li>Greater involvement by others in working group; discreet tasks for each person. (OR = 4.80) </li></ul><ul><li>Regular meetings (OR = 4.80) </li></ul><ul><li>Doers were more likely to believe that their religious beliefs are in keeping with active participation in working groups. (OR = 3.41) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Significant Findings <ul><li>Doers were 5.1 times more likely to believe that they could be a working group member in the next year with their time, experience, skills and resources. </li></ul><ul><li>Non-doers were 10 times more likely to say that they were LURKERS/ Invisible men in the Working group. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to find a way to help people stop lurking and become visible and active! </li></ul></ul><ul><li>To the person who wanted to be personally invited…. </li></ul>
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×