• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
TowerLabs: Accelerating Adoption of Green Building Technologies for Condos
 

TowerLabs: Accelerating Adoption of Green Building Technologies for Condos

on

  • 1,631 views

Jamie James, Founder of TowerLabs @ MaRS showcases some of their research and the technology they are incubating to accelerate the uptake of cleantech in the condo sector.

Jamie James, Founder of TowerLabs @ MaRS showcases some of their research and the technology they are incubating to accelerate the uptake of cleantech in the condo sector.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,631
Views on SlideShare
1,594
Embed Views
37

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
0
Comments
0

7 Embeds 37

http://www.sbcanada.org 21
http://mohdshamsudinabdhamid.blogspot.com 4
http://www.bbvatech.com 3
http://www.ism3d.es 3
http://sbcanada.org 3
https://si0.twimg.com 2
http://www.linkedin.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • If you start to look at developing a taxonomy of green building products and technologies, you see a lot of overlap with the cleantech sector.
  • ERV cores are installed inside the suites, usually in a ceiling bulkhead, and connected to the fan coil units. Outside air is delivered directly into the suites.
  • The video above illustrates the pulley segments shifting into position as they complete a gear change. Much like a bike ’ s gears, except the gears move to the belt, not the belt to the gears.
  • Describe Process: Measured performance of a VSD for a couple of weeks with power meter Assembled inMotive MVSD on skid Replaced baseline VSD with MVSD for a period of 2 weeks, measured power consumption Returned system to base
  • Green loan costs: $87,000/yr fixed for 7 years. Net savings of >$35,000/yr for years. Then full amount accrues to Condo Corp in 2015. Caveat: Warm winters = lower savings.

TowerLabs: Accelerating Adoption of Green Building Technologies for Condos TowerLabs: Accelerating Adoption of Green Building Technologies for Condos Presentation Transcript

  • Sustainable Buildings Canada April 25, 2012Accelerating Adoption of Green Building Technologies Jamie James President, Tower Labs @MaRS
  • 2011Living Building,Portland, OR
  • Slide Courtesy ofwww.USGBC.org
  • Buildings & Construction• Canadian Construction, Machinery & Equipment = $345B-$350B (www.statcan.gc.ca)• ON Construction (2009) = $97B (5% of GDP)• US Construction = ~13% of $13T GDP• Global construction = 8%-10% of global GDP
  • (US)Slide Courtesy ofwww.USGBC.org
  • Cleantech* & Buildings Agriculture Energy Efficiency Recycling & Waste Transportation OtherLand Management Monitoring Recycling Vehicles Renewable Energy ProvidersNatural Pesticides Building Envelope & Insulation Waste-to-energy Vehicle Component/Engines Hydro/MarineCrop Yield Lighting Mixed Wastes Electric & Hybrid GeothermalSustainable Fertilizers Building Automation Waste Treatment Fuels On-Site SystemsPrecision Agriculture HVAC Metals Logistics Hydrogen Production Appliances Plastic/Rubber Combined Heat/Power Air & Environment Energy Storage Smart Grid Water & WastewaterEmissions Control Advanced Batteries Energy Infrastructure Water Treatment YESCleanup/Safety Fuel Cells Transmission Wastewater Treatment PROBABLY NOMonitoring/Compliance Other Storage Technologies Management Purification DEPENDSTrading & Offset Lithium-Ion Filtration ??Clean Coal Charging & Managament Water ConservationCarbon/Emissions Biofuels & BioMaterials Materials Solar WindBiodiesel Bio Systems Gearboxes & ComponentsBiomass Nano Cells & Modules TurbinesGrain Ethanol Chemical Thin Films FarmsCellulosic Ethanol Biodegradeable Products Concentrated PVBiogas Polymers Concentrated Solar ThermalAlgae Biodiesel * Based on Cleantech taxonomy: http://research.cleantech.com/browse-taxonomy/
  • Research Spending by Industrial Sector R&D Spending Industry Sector (as % of annual sales)Biotechnology 13% - 15%Semiconductors 11-14%Pharmaceuticals 8-12%Electronics 4-7%Medical devices 7-10%Software 8-10%Aerospace 6-9%Mechanicaldevices/machines 2-5%Automotive 2-4%Chemicals 2-3%International industryaverage 4.10%Construction industry 0.2-0.5%Source: R&D Magazine, 2003 Annual R&D Funding ForecastAs reprinted in Building Design & Construction Magazine, White Paper on Sustainability, Nov. 2003
  • D & DRDemonstration Deployment
  • Demonstration-to-Deployment Project MGTInnovation, M&V EmergingTechnology real estate owners/ developers
  • FOUNDERS The Tridel Group of Companies • Family-owned, Toronto-Based • Vertically integrated Condominium Developer • 7 decades, 65,500 homes • ~1,500 homes/year The MaRS Institute & Discovery District • Toronto’s Innovation Hub • Independent NGO • 3 Practices: ICT, CleanTech, Health Sciences • 500 Active Clients across sectors • Advisory services for entrepreneursTridelXXXXXXXXXXXXX
  • PROGRAMS
  • Advanced Materials for Building Energy Recovery
  • In Suite Ventilation Air HRV vs ERVHRV: Heat RecoveryVentilators. Sensibleheat only recoveredERV: EnergyRecovery Ventilator -total energy in the airis recovered (heat + HRVmoisture) ERV
  • EVOLUTION OF CONDOMINIUM VENTILATION The Old Way of Doing Things
  • EVOLUTION OF CONDOMINIUM VENTILATION 2nd Generation: Improved Ventilation Air Energy Recovery
  • EVOLUTION OF CONDOMINIUM VENTILATION 3rd Generation: Stand Alone In-Suite Units
  • EVOLUTION OF CONDOMINIUM VENTILATION3rd Generation (Phase 2): Integrated HVAC Systems Integrated De-centralized ER Ventilation
  • Evaluating New Approaches for Greater Flexibility ERV with dPointERVFANCOIL Fan Coil With ERV + dPoint
  • Test Units Test Units ~700 Units Multi-Phase Pilot/Demonstration + M&V Deployment With Support From: Test Units Test Units
  • Solar Co-generationSource: The Toronto Star
  • The First Mechatronic Variable Speed Drive (MVSD)What?•To become the world’s most efficient and cost-effective VariableSpeed Drive (VSD)•VSDs vary the speed of electric motors, dramatically reducingenergy consumptionFor?•Any motor, engine or generator that will benefit from variable speed•First target market: Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning (HVAC)motors driving fans & pumps = a billion $ market opportunityWhy? reduce VSD costs & harmonics
  • • Morphing pulleys, synchronized shifting a world’s first• less expensive, more efficient & robust than VFDs - no problematic harmonics• Shifts under load• High torque start-up capability
  • Technology Validation•Beta Assembly Proven in a live environment • 20hp motor, York Makeup Air Unit (rooftop fan) • 24 story condominium in Toronto, Canada•Higher efficiency and harmonic claims verified
  • Business Size GEW Commercial Readiness/Penetration
  • Building Energy Use Comparison
  • LEED vs pre-LEED Building ComparisonResidential Electricity-18%Building Electricity Pre- LEED-7% LEEDNatural Gas- 50%
  • Building Energy Use Comparison 25% reduction in energy costs
  • Modeling Stack Effect
  • Modeling Stack Effect Problem: • Uncontrolled airflows in tall buildings may increase Make Up Air requirements and negatively impact the performance of mechanical systems
  • Stack Effect Modeling Study
  • For more information, please contact: For more information, please contact: Paul Bottero, President David Kriebel Phone: 416-605-7470 Phone: 604-488-1132 Email: pbottero@inmotive.com Email: dkriebel@dpoint.ca www.inmotive.com www.dpoint.ca Tower Labs is grateful for support from our initial sponsors:
  • THANK YOUFor more information, please contact: Jamie James, President Subhi Alsayed, Director of Projects Phone: 416-673-6516 Phone: 416-673-6516 Email: jjames@towerlabs.org Email: salsayed@towerbs.org www.towerlabs.org
  • Building Energy Use Comparison2009/2010 Average Residential Electricity Comparison Building 1’s annual average residential electricity consumption is18% above that of Building 2’s.
  • Building Energy Use Comparison 2009/2010 Average Building Electricity ComparisonBuilding 1’s annual average building electricity consumption is 7% above that of Building 2’s.
  • Building Energy Use Comparison 2009/2010 Average Building Natural Gas ComparisonBuilding 1’s annual averaged natural gas consumption is 105% above that of Building 2’s.