• Save
sustainable neighborhoods, Scott Demark, GBF2008
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

sustainable neighborhoods, Scott Demark, GBF2008






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

sustainable neighborhoods, Scott Demark, GBF2008 sustainable neighborhoods, Scott Demark, GBF2008 Presentation Transcript

  • G Sustainable Neighbourhood Planning: Lessons Learned Toronto Green Building Festival, September 10, 2008
  • Purpose Convey the lessons learned from recent attempts as planning “sustainable” communities VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • AGENDA • Halsall‟s Role in Planning • Frameworks to understand “sustainable” communities – One Planet Living – LEED-ND • Lessons - Case study examples • Primary blockers to net-zero • Integrating sustainability into the planning process • Discussion VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION View slide
  • Halsall’s Role in Planning • Facilitator • Generalist: High-level strategy in all engineering disciplines • Change Agent to Triple People Planet Bottom Line Thinking Profit VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION View slide
  • Halsall Deliverables • Identify and Communicate Sustainability Drivers • Develop the Framework (“Green DNA”) and Precedents • Move team to Commit to Green DNA • Critique/Filter emerging plans against Green DNA • Green Development Strategy – Energy – Water: potable, storm, foul – Buildings and Infrastructure – Transportation – Lifestyles • Connect Developer to Partners • LEED ND VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Frameworks for “Sustainability” • What is a “sustainable neighbourhood”? • Why is it important? • How could you measure it? • Discuss two Frameworks – One Planet Communities and LEED-ND VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Spectrum of Green Developments VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Why do we need to change the way we Plan? Our Ecological Deficit (or Overshoot) October 9 Globally, our Ecological Footprint is 30% larger than what the planet can regenerate… and climbing steadily. VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Context If everyone consumed as much as the average person in Canada we would need 4.5 planets to support us + + + + =? VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Canada 7.5 ha/person Global Capacity 1.8 ha/person VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • The Impact of our Planning Decisions Energy Built Env. Agr. Land Forest Total Food 0.4 0 0.9 0 1.3 Housing 0.5 0.1 0 1 1.6 Transport 1 .1 0 0 1.1 50% Consumer Goods .6 0 .2 .2 1.0 Resources in Services .4 0 0 0 .4 Total 2.9 .2 1.1 .6 5.4 (2003 Data) Ecological footprint of avg. Cdn ha/capita Sustainable Level= 1.8 ha/capita VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Planning Legacy VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • One Planet Communities • London based NGO: BioRegional • Formed by WWF and BioRegional • BedZed • Greg Searle – NA Director • greg.searle@bioregional.com VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Ten Principles of One Planet Communities VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Ten Principles of One Planet Communities VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • 1 Zero Carbon OPTIMIZE ENERGY DEMAND • Insulation levels in excess of Building Regulation minimums • • Footprint: .61 planets / 21% High levels of airtightness with efficient natural ventilation strategies; Using energy-efficient internal lights, external lights and domestic appliances • CHP + energy efficiency + Influencing user behaviour through visible metering and lifestyles program MEET OPTIMIZED DEMAND WITH SUSTAINABLE SOURCES • • green lifestyles = 37% CO2 Maximising use of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) site energy centre through district heating solution Provision for bay water use for cooling in all commercial blocks – ducts provided around cores in all • commercial areas Reduction. Windfarm Offset = Reduce energy demand of white water rafting feature – e.g. Archimedes screw • 8,000 Tons CO2 annually. Offsetting remaining carbon emissions through off-site wind generation to achieve carbon-neutral status VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • 5 Local and Sustainable Food Creating demand for local organic food • Encouraging regular farmers‟ market at the public level of the Alsop pier • • Footprint: .72 planets / 24% Encouraging on-site restaurant to use local and organic produce Encouraging food box deliveries through community extranet and drop-off/ pick-up space provided • Local, organic food supply + Extensive coverage of food related issues in community extranet and in the community information centre Food growing activity on site • on-site gardens + windfarm „Orchard Car Park‟ – fruit orchards will form most of the „forest‟ on southern side of boardwalk • offset = Zero food-related Window and balcony boxes provided for each residence to encourage herb growing Reducing net food emissions to Zero • emissions Our wind farm is sized to offset the minimised food related emissions, in addition to transport and energy related emissions VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • 9 Equity and Fair Trade • Homes to a wide range of income groups, from eco-studios to luxury penthouses • Amenities for different age groups – from young children‟s play facilities to playing fields and mountain • Invest locally in youth, skills biking for teenagers, to a gym for working people During construction, a set of multi-skilled construction teams comprising local young people could be • development & materials; formed to work throughout the various development phases The construction phase will involve local industry and labour as possible within the overall aims of providing sustainable construction practices • create an inclusive Fair trade retailers such as Co-op, Starbucks and Oxfam will be encouraged to open within the development • community; engage fair The community extranet will provide information on local fair trade retailers, suppliers, organisations and initiatives • trade retailers The community extranet could facilitate „time bank‟ schemes where people offer services eg. gardening, care services, help with shopping etc. to each other in exchange for similar services; the currency is the time spent providing the services VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION copyright 2004
  • Current OPC Projects VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • What is LEED-ND? • LEED for Neighbourhood Development • Certifies development projects based on smart growth, new urbanism, and green building principles. • Projects can be whole, fractions of, or multiple neighbourhoods VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • LEED-ND • Currently a Pilot run by the USGBC with 238 projects (24 of these are in Canada) - expected general release in 2009 • CaGBC Task Force is working simultaneously with US pilot to develop the system in Canada in 2010 VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • LEED-ND Credit Categories • Smart Location and Linkages – Proximity to water/wastewater infrastructure, housing, jobs, and schools – Conservation of species, ecological communities, and wetlands • Neighbourhood Pattern & Design – Compact, diverse, and affordable development – Walkability, public transit, public spaces – Local food production VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • LEED-ND Credit Categories • Green Construction & Technology – LEED certified buildings – Building and infrastructure energy efficiency – Application of LEED-NC credits on a neighbourhood scale (i.e. heat island reduction, construction waste management, stormwater management) • Innovation and Design Process VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • OPL vs. LEED OPL: LEED ND: • Very active lifestyles • Concentrates on where, program how, and what you build • Completely non- vs. lifestyle prescriptive • Prescriptive – pre- • Active and collaborative requisites geared to urban partnership model (not infill 3rd party certification) • Certification by 3rd party – • Select few, super-green like all LEED programs projects • Intended to drive market • Very expensive transformation through a range of early adopters VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Lessons Through Case Studies • Rockcliffe Redevelopment • LEED ND: » Point Nord » Batawa • One Planet Commuties » Meadowbrook VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • CFB Rockcliffe: Ottawa • Canada Lands Corporation CFB Rockcliffe • DND surplus land • Mixed use development • Cancelled – Native Land Claims Dispute Parliament Hill VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Rockcliffe Redevelopment •4500 residential units •Community Energy Plan •1Mm2 commercial •Grid tied – but near net •Sustainable village concept zero energy • LEED-ND Gold Target Image KPMB VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Rockcliffe: Key Lessons • Team must commit early to a Framework – a decision process, measures, and targets • Municipality needs a champion – politically and at the implementation level – road standards, street lights, maintenance, pipe sizes, density etc. • Local Electric Distribution Company plays a critical role in Energy decisions • Provincial regulations have unintended consequences for alternative infrastructure • Condo Act does not allow developers to tie future owners to investment for sustainability initiatives VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Batawa, Eastern Ontario • Batawa Development Corporation • Former Company Town • Preliminary Design Phase • Eco-Village Concept 2 hrs to Toronto Lake Ontario VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • •LEED ND and Principles impacted •Difficult to achieve LEED Prereq. for S.L.L. design decisions •Road Standards – snow/ice •Questionable site – ANSI lands •Transportation •Economic viability 5-10km to jobs – no existing transit •Density vs. Absorption Image: Bousfields/Montgomery Sisam VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Batawa: Key Lessons • Municipality can only make decisions based on lowest cost – Example: Batawa needs water and sewage upgrades. Modifying existing regional plants and connecting with pipes and pumps is more economically viable than local solutions – but relies on unsustainable technologies • 3rd party utility model could work – but developer concerned about potential buyer‟s perception. • LEED ND is not a good „fit‟ for exurban sites • Existing residents excited by Green, but not committed to changes if it affects them VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Pointe Nord, Montreal • Proment Corporation City Centre • Previously Developed • New Bell campus • Primarily residential • Community Design Completed • Phase 1 Building Design Started • 10-year phased Project build-out VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Bell Campus – opens late „08 Residential VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • • Developed a Conceptual Community Energy Plan • 3rd Party Energy Provider in place (Corix) • ND has had Minimal impacts on design to date LEED ND • Maximum credit for Neighbourhood Design (density) • SLL P4-challenge • Poor Linkage – but good Transit plan • Appropriate infill – but hard to meet ND requirements VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Point Nord: Key Lessons • Density is critical for alternative infrastructure (central plant) and supports pro-forma • Market absorption of dense form may be a gamble • Is high density the best for the social aspects of sustainability? To be tested, but LEED encourages this with the current point structure • Municipal (Verdun) participation critical for transportation infrastructure and public lands • LEED ND pre-requisites difficult where suburban densities exist, even on an ideal “infill” site like this. VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • One Planet Communities: Meadowbrook • Groupe Pacific • On its way to being an OPC, pending further public consultation • Net Zero Carbon and Waste etc. • L‟OEUF with BNIM and Engineers VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Image: L‟OEUF • Plan centered on new commuter train station and associated retail • High Density Residential • Leave maximum amount of Natural Area • If it was LEED ND – Platinum VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Meadowbrook: Key Lessons • BioRegional, WWF (and others) do not accept large- scale Hydro as Carbon Neutral. • Energy systems – Hydro provinces , Manitoba, Quebec and BC selling electricity below cost. Very complicated. • Any energy scheme must compete against 6¢/kWh hydro • Density=Traffic=Fear: NIMBYism (as always) is a powerful force in a democracy. If we are to densify our suburbs, we have to overcome this. • “Green” may be the only way to unlock this development – but the risk/return is questionable. VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • General Lessons The Primary Blockers to Near Net Zero Communities: • Economics • Codes VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Typical Developer’s View of Building Green Rate of Return Trad. Dev Green Dev 20% 0 Risk of this Risk development VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Most Developers View of Building Green Rate of How can the developer lower Return their perception of risk? Trad. Dev Green Dev 20% 0 Risk of this Risk development VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • General Lessons: Economics • Even if the Developer understands the balance of the Triple Bottom Line - you can‟t count on the consumers or the government to be there. Social Environ mental Social Environm ental Economic Economic VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Economic Considerations • Green or Smart Growth Development is only successful if it sells • Absorption not proven in Eastern Canada, studies show premium for green is not marketable to the masses...yet • Premium for land, cost of green construction, alternative infrastructure – ALL add Risk • “LEED ®” has brand power – possibly a way to ensure a premium VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • General Lessons: Codes • Codes do not eliminate risk – they move it in space and time • Codes developed to protect the public have unintended consequences for sustainable infrastructure • Changing codes to improve pedestrian environment difficult • Changing codes for Infrastructure difficult VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Integrating Sustainability into Planning • Sustainability is not an overlay it must be embedded in the planning process • Sustainable communities cost more because they are paying the “true” cost of infrastructure – Accept this and find means to fund. • Integrated Design – including the Municipality, Utilities, and Public • Need visionary developers and political leaders – Example Dockside Green VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Integrating Sustainability into Planning • Regional governments need to study the full life cycle costs of investing in distributed, sustainable infrastructure vs. large centralized systems • Politicians and bureaucrats – take some risk with codes on a pilot basis. We need leaders. • Incremental changes on every planning project increases awareness and acceptance – push the Green agenda on all projects VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Discussion Photos from: SolarRegion Freiburg. Sustainable City – Freiburg. Retrieved on March 31, 2008, from http://madisonfreiburg.org/sustainablecity.htm. BioRegional. (2008). Sonoma Mountain Village: North America’s first endorsed One Planet Community. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from http://www.bioregional.com/oneplanetcommunities/na/sonoma. Sonoma Mountain Village. North America’s First Truly Sustainable Community: Sonoma Mountain Village Arieff, A. (2006). Sustainability Begins at Home. The New York Times. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from http://arieff.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/sustainability-begins-at-home/ VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION
  • Thank You • Contact me at: • sdemark@halsall.com • www.halsall.com VISION • DEPTH • INNOVATION