Proseminar in Cross-National Studies: From Idea to Publishing in the Social Sciences

  • 423 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
423
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Proseminar in Cross-National Studies From Idea to Publishing in the Social Sciences Joshua Kjerulf Dubrow, Cross-National Studies: Interdisciplinary Research and Training (CONSIRT) Program www.crossnationalstudies.org
  • 2.
    • This is what the presentation will cover:
    • I. Structure/organization of empirical research articles
    • Content and Introduction sections
    • Theory and hypotheses sections
    • IV. Data and methods sections
    • V. Results sections
    • VI. Conclusion and discussion sections
    • VII. Framing papers for publication
    • Practical considerations for pursuing article length research
    • We will use the following research article as reference:
    • Guestzkow, Joshua, Michele Lamont and Gregoire Mallard. 2004. “What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences?” American Sociological Review 69(April): 190-212.
  • 3. I. Structure/Organization
    • The structure of empirical research articles most familiar to readers (and reviewers):
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Theory and hypotheses
    • 3. Data and methods
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 6. Appendix
  • 4. II. Content and Introduction
    • Articles should be as short as possible
    • Read as a reviewer – a hostile, picayune-minded reviewer – would read it
    • Be clear
    • Answer the question: SO WHAT?
  • 5. III. Theory and hypotheses
    • Empirical papers must go beyond mere description
    • Explicit, clear and concise definition of the main concepts
    • Connections between concepts must also be explicitly stated
    • Explicitly theorize each variable’s effect on the dependent variable
    • Clear hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Controlling for household size, the greater the household income, the greater probability of attending university.
  • 6. IV. Data and Methods
    • Who : Units of analysis: individuals? Organizations? Countries?
    • What : Type of data: interviews? Survey? Participant observation?
    • When : Year(s) data was collected
    • Where : Where was data collected? Country or countries and relevant social, political and other historical context of the data
    • Why : Why is this data best suited to addressing your research question?
  • 7. IV. Data and Methods
    • Validity, reliability and biases must be explicitly stated
    • Method section must describe the procedure clearly; it should address concerns of those who are unfamiliar with the methods you use, and the specialists
  • 8. V. Results
    • Results should highlight major findings, and relevant minor findings.
    • All of these are foreshadowing for the conclusion and discussion section.
    • Each hypothesis must be addressed.
    • All parts of tables should be addressed.
  • 9. VI. Conclusion and discussions
    • Begin with a restatement of the goal of the paper and what data/methods are used.
    • Should contain a summary of the major findings and their implications for advancing theory or methods.
    • Should discuss the major limitations of the study. This is a good way to introduce suggestions for future research.
  • 10. VII. Framing papers for publication
    • Proper framing of the paper requires knowledge of:
    • A. The field
    • B. What’s in the literature, what’s not, and what is needed
    • C. The journals, specifically the types of articles they publish
    Ideally, you would write an article with one or two journals in mind.
  • 11. VIII. Practical considerations for pursuing article length research
    • Collaborate
    • Do
    • Seek Criticism
    • Accept Rejection, and Move Forward