Comparative  Methods In  Social  Sciences
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Comparative Methods In Social Sciences






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Comparative Methods In Social Sciences Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Comparative Methods in Social Sciences, I
    Kazimierz Maciek Slomczynski
    Irina Tomescu-Dubrow
  • 2. Syllabus
    • Course Description
    • Required Readings
    • Additional Texts
    • Course Requirements
    • Important dates
    • Agenda
  • Comparative methods – purpose
    The purpose of comparative research is, as in the case of all scientific research, to test hypotheses.
    Hypothesis is a statement, stipulated within a given theory, about the relationship between variables (constructs) defined on some objects (units of observation) within a causal framework (time and sequencing).
    In comparative sociology hypotheses deal with space and/or time.
  • 3. Space and time
    Cross-national studies involve, explicitly or implicitly, nations (states, countries, societies) as units of observation and at least one variable is defined on the national (country, society) level.
    In historical studies the same units of observations are compared through time
  • 4. Comparative methods
    Comparative methods refer specifically to the methodology of comparing “something” through space and/or time.
    Generally, comparative methods for cross-national research and historical research do not differ very much.
  • 5. Comparative methods and comparative sociology
    Most sociology is within-country, present-time sociology.
    Comparative methods are specific in that they address problems inherent in cross-national and/or historical studies.
    Cross-national and/or historical studies constitute comparative sociology. As it will be argued comparative sociology is a sub-discipline of sociology as such.
  • 6. Traditions of comparative sociology
    Karl Marx (1818-1883) and his work (Capital, 1883) on evolutionary processes of economic systems (cross-national and historical).
    Max Weber (1864-1920) and his work on The Protestant Ethics and Spirit of Capitalism, 1905, (historical and cross-national).
    Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) and his Suicide, 1897, as an example of quantitative studies on nations' characteristics.
    In his Rules of Sociological Methods, 1885, Durkheim insists that comparative sociology is not a particular branch of sociology; it is sociology itself.
  • 7. Does comparative sociology constitute a paradigm?
    “A paradigm is a fundamental image of the subject matter within a science. It serves to define what should be studied, what questions should be asked, how they should be asked, and what rules should be followed in interpreting the answers obtained.” (Ritzer, Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, 1980: 7)
    Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution (1962)
  • 8. Comparative sociology
    -- what should be studied?
    -- what questions should be asked?
    -- how they should be asked?
    -- what rules should be followed?
  • 9. Understanding comparative sociology
    To understand comparative sociology, we start with cross-national research. In particular, we ask:
    What are the units of observation in this kind of research?
  • 10. Nations
    Since the late 18th century, the idea of nation assumed a fundamental political significance, with the rise of the ideology of nationalism. From that time – nation as an entity – a collection of people – entitled to sovereignty because of:
    common ethnic origin
    common language
    common culture
    common religion
    common self-identification
  • 11. Nation-states
    In practice all criteria of distinguishing nations are in dispute. However, in the 20th century an ideology of nation-states came into existence, with more and more emphasis on state.
    The word state has both an empirical (de facto) and a juridical (de jure) sense.
    De facto, an entity is a state if there is an organization on a specific territory that has a monopoly on legitimate violence over this territory, defending the social order externally and internally.
    De jure, an entity is a state, if it is recognized as such by other states through their representation. International law and international organization is involved. The role of the UN.
  • 12. Examples
    Nation-states: correspondence between the nation and the state
    Two-nation states
    Nations without states, “stateless people”
    A tendency to equate nation with a cultural entity, and state with political entity.
  • 13. State
    territory with internationally recognized boundaries;
    sovereignty: no other state has power over the country's territory;
    people who live there on ongoing basis;
    a government which (a) provides police and army power, (b) regulates foreign and domestic trade, and (c) issues money;
    a transportation system for moving goods and people;
    external recognition: a country has been "voted into the club” by other countries.
  • 14. Country
    Commonly, the term is used casually in the sense of both nation (a cultural entity?) and state (a political entity?)
    In terms of political geography the world is divided into independent states and “other teritiories”: dependencies and areas of special sovereignty.
  • 15. Independent states
    Presently, there are 192 countries as independent states, members of the UN, and 65 countries that are called dependencies and areas of special sovereignty.
    In practice, cross-national research means research restricted to subset of independent states.
  • 16. Society
    Robert E. Marsh, Comparative Sociology, p. 12, defines society as a plurality of interacting individuals that has the following four characteristics:
    - definite territory
    - sexual reproduction
    - comprehensive culture
    - political independence
  • 17. Counting societies
    Marsh asks the question: what is the universe of societies through space and time?
    The estimate is that the universe of societies consists of about 5,000 units. The sizes of these societies vary from ca. 100 people of primitive hunting bands to over 1 billion people of contemporary China.
    George Murdock in his World Ethnographic Sample (1957) made a first comprehensive attempt to map the universe by selecting 522 independent societies.
  • 18. Approaches to cross-national research
    The proposed typology takes into account the nature of dependent variable (explanandum) and independent variable(s) (explanans).
  • 19. Macro-macro, sub-type 1a
    Type of explanation: macro-macro.
    Both the dependent variable and independent variable(s) are defined for a country as a whole. This refers to the Country-Level Data, CLD.
    Sub-type 1a. Positional characteristics:
    Matrix A = aij
    where a is a value of variable j in country i.
    E.g., for or a set of counties, we have such variable as GNP per capita, presence of the multi-party system, activity of NGOs, etc.
    This type is called: Studies on Nations' Characteristics.
  • 20. Macro-macro, sub-type 1b
    Sub-type 1b. Relational characteristics:
    Matrix B = bkl
    where b is a value of a variable showing the relationship between country k and country l.
    E.g, for a set of countries, we have variables reflecting the amount of export, number of common international organizations, flow of tourists – each time from country k to country l.
    This type of research originated with Studies of the World System and its Elements
  • 21. Micro-micro
    Type of explanation: micro-micro. The dependent variable is micro (on individual level) and independent variable(s) is also micro (on individual level), but research is done in separate countries and the results are compared. This refers to the Individual-Level Data, ILD.
    Matrix A = aij
    where a is a value of variable j for individual i.
    We have another matrix of this type:
    Matrix C = cij
    where c is a value of variable j for individual i.
    Results from data for country A and country C are compared.
  • 22. Macro-micro
    3. Type of explanation: macro-micro. The dependent variable is micro (on individual level) and independent variable(s) is macro (on country-level). This combines ILD and CLD
    Matrix A = aijk
    where a is a value of variable j for individual i in country k.