• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Ppt deherdt its the state economy society
 

Ppt deherdt its the state economy society

on

  • 399 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
399
Views on SlideShare
312
Embed Views
87

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 87

http://www.ua.ac.be 87

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Ppt deherdt its the state economy society Ppt deherdt its the state economy society Document Transcript

    • 2-5-2012 It’s the State-Economy-Society stupid! Contribution to seminar on rethinking state economy and society Tom De Herdt Governance is good for development?• Reflecting a respectable tradition on “getting getting institutions right” - To achieve pacification and build an effective administration • Well functioning police and military • Linking the state and the citizens - To re-establish funding • Efficient and transparent revenue collection - To realise rule of law • To protect its citizens • To protect investors’ assets1 1
    • 2-5-2012 Development is good for governance• But recent literature takes precisely a “relative” view on “rule of law” • Institutions are viewed as malleable – as the product of ongoing conflict, negotiation, and compromise among powerful groups; • “rolling agreements”• Essentially because the state cannot discipline itself  degree of state effectiveness is reflecting society and eco o y economy good governance as a by-product of socio-economic interests strong enough to press for it• Points of divergence: • “Leadership” vs LAO vs “political settlement” 2 Transitional or inevitable? • Leadership• Booth: country ownership= “a leadership with a long-term development vision and p g p some kind of machinery for managing well the rent generation and utilization which are central to early development processes” (Booth 2011)Good governance may be by-product, development is notTension with democracy y <-> electoral incentives focused on short-term interests <-> elections to divert rents from productive destinationsTension with pro-poor agenda: development builds on capital accumulation and elite 3 consensus 2
    • 2-5-2012 Limited access orders (North)• Development as by-product of individual efforts by leaders of contending organizations for not engaging in violence. - Importance of Peace Dividend - State’s first role to strengthen intermediary social groups <-> “statist” approaches to state reconstruction 4 “Clientelist” Political Settlements (Khan) • “political settlement” = Modus vivendi, realised as long as the peace dividend is distributed more or less according to the relative (perceived) holding power of each group • “clientelist” = relative importance of ‘non-formal power’ • Development implies a gradual increase in the importance of economic resources as d t i t f i determinants of i t f holding power increased importance of property rights & rule of law. But initially developmentalism must be compatible with a settlement based predominantly on informal holding power 5 3
    • 2-5-2012 Back to Weber?• State law&institutions not as pre-condition for development  Gradual disappearance of legal pluralism in favour of state  Gradual evolution of state law&institutions in the interests of the economy• Patrimonialism as one source of legitimate authority • Besides others • In ordinary settings: a mixture. 6 Back to Weber?• State law&institutions not as pre-condition for development  Gradual disappearance of legal pluralism in favour of state  Gradual evolution of state law&institutions in the interests of the economy• Patrimonialism as one source of legitimate authority • Besides others • In ordinary settings: a mixture.Patrimonialism compatible with developmentalismOur dealing with formal institutions is always evolvingNeed of a (local) political economy analysis: rising to the concrete! 7 4