Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Employment Law Workshop
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Employment Law Workshop


Published on

Powerpoint presentation to the 2011 annual conference of American Agents Alliance (Palm Springs, CA; September 29-30). Presentation by Steve L. Simas, Simas & Associates, Ltd.

Powerpoint presentation to the 2011 annual conference of American Agents Alliance (Palm Springs, CA; September 29-30). Presentation by Steve L. Simas, Simas & Associates, Ltd.

Published in: Business, Career
1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


    For Agency Principals Only!
  • 2. Alliance Partnership with Simas & Associates, Ltd.
    • Labor Law Helpline
    • 3. Alliance Newsletter Articles
    • 4. Legal Representation
    For Members (Discounted Hourly Rates)
    • Department of Insurance Issues
    • 5. Investigations
    • 6. Applications
    • 7. Accusations
    • 8. License Denials
  • Experience
    Simas & Associates, Ltd. –2002 to present
    Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General
    Legal Counsel, Public Employment Relations Board
    Chief Consultant, California State Assembly, Committee on Labor and Employment
    Practice Areas
    Employment Law and Workplace Regulation
    Professional Licensing and Regulation
    Civil Litigation and Appeals
    Healthcare Law and Regulation
    Steven L. Simas
  • 9.
    • September 29, 2011, 3:00 - 5:00 p.m.
    • 10. Exempt/Non Exempt Employees
    • 11. Independent Contractor –To Be or Not to Be?
    • 12. Avoiding Wrongful Termination
    • 13. Questions
  • 14.
    • September 30, 2011, 8:00 - 10:00 a.m.
    • 15. Meal and Rest Periods
    • 16. The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum
    • 17. Brief Overview of Unemployment
    • 18. Avoiding Wrongful Termination
    • 19. Questions
  • 20.
    • October 1, 2011, 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 noon
    • 21. Selected Topics from Day 1 and Day 2
  • 22. It all starts here…
    Demystifying Exempt v. Non-Exempt Employees
  • 23. Why do we care?
    Overtime –daily and weekly
    Meal and rest periods
    Labor Commissioner Claims
    Waiting time penalties
    Three-year statute of limitations for most claims
    Federal Law –Fair Labor Standards Act
    State Law – Labor Commissioner (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt
  • 24. Questions:
    If Susan is the Office Manager of Acme Insurance Agency, is she an exempt or non-exempt employee?
    What if she has business cards that say “Office Manager?”
    What if she gets paid by the hour and not salary?
    What if she makes $3000 per month as a salary?
    If Bob is the Shop Foreman of Miracle Muffler Shop and supervises the mechanics and flow of work on the “shop floor.” Is he exempt?
    If Phil is the Vice President of Purchasing for Solid Gold Productions, a D.J. services company, and makes a salary of $2500 per month, is he exempt or non-exempt?
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 25. General Requirements for an Employee to be exempt:
    Job title is irrelevant (not even helpful)
    “Manager,” “Supervisor,” etc. not helpful
    Calling someone a title that sounds exempt such as “Computer Systems Analyst” which sounds like a specifically exempt position is not relevant
    Salary Requirements
    The minimum salary level for exempt employees is $2,773 per month. Calculate this amount by multiplying the state minimum wage of $8.00 by 2,080 hours, multiplying by two and dividing by 12 months ($8.00 x 2,080 = 16,640 x 2 = 33,280/12 = $2,773.33). These amounts are unchanged for 2011.
    Exercises Independent Judgment
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 26. Exercises Independent Judgment
    Common theme among the specific exemptions
    Most common pitfall in employee misclassification
    Must be day-to-day part of job and not occasional
    Employee has the power to make independent choices free from immediate supervision and with respect to matters of significance; OR
    Employee must be able to make a recommendation for action subject to the final authority of a superior, as long as employee has sufficient authority for recommendations to affect matters of consequence to the business or its customers.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 27. Types of Exemptions
    Executive Exemption *
    Administrative Exemption *
    Professional Exemption *
    Computer Professional Exemption
    Outside Salesperson Exemption
    Inside Commissioned Salesperson Exemption *
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 28. Administrative Exemption 
    Employee’s duties and responsibilities must involve office or non-manual work;
    Directly related to management policies, or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and
    Employee must be “primarily engaged in” the following:
    Customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment involving:
    Assisting the company owner(s) or employee in a bona fide executive or administrative capacity;
    Performing, under only general supervision, specialized or technical work requiring special training, experience or knowledge; and
    Executing, under only general supervision, special assignments and tasks.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 29. Definition of “Primarily Engaged In”:
    For purposes of the administrative exemption, “primarily engaged in” means that more than one-half of the employee’s work time is spent engaged in exempt work. This means an exempt employee spends more than half of his/her time performing duties such as advising management, planning, representing the company, negotiating, promoting sales, researching business opportunities, making company policy, and purchasing supplies and materials.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 30. Eicher v. Advanced Business Integrations, Inc.
    The employee was a “senior consultant” for installing a software program. He spent half of his time in the office and the other half training customers at their sites. While he met the minimum salary requirements and worked 40 or more hours per week, the court held that his primary duties involved the day-to-day business of implementing the software and training. Because he did not participate in policy making or otherwise impact the company operations, he did not qualify for the administrative exemption. The court confirmed he was a production worker who did what he was told by his supervisors. Therefore, he was not exempt. 151 Cal.App.4th 1363 (2007).
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 31. Executive Exemption 
    Requirements (primarily engaged in):
    Has duties and responsibilities involving the management of the business of a customarily recognized department or subdivision of the business;
    Customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees;
    Has the authority to hire or fire other employees or to make suggestions and recommendations regarding hiring, firing, advancement, promotion; and
    Customarily and regularly exercises discretionary powers.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 32. Problems with Executive Exemption
    Managing business or working in it?
    Working managers are primarily engaged in working such as taking orders, serving customers, etc. which means they do not qualify
    Taco Bell Example
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 33. Professional Exemption Requirements (primarily engaged in):
    One who is primarily engaged in a commonly recognized occupation as a learned or artistic profession such as work that requires advanced knowledge in a science or learning field customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction and study.
    Usually law, medicine, dentistry, optometry, architecture, teaching, accounting, engineering.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 34. Other Exemptions
    Commissioned Inside Sales Employee Exemption
    Confusing and difficult to comply with
    Wage Order 4 (insurance companies)
    Earnings must be 1.5 times minimum wage andover 50% of employee’s earnings must be from sales
    Guaranteed draw may disqualify
    Federal law does not consider insurance sales a “retail establishment” so exemption from overtime may not apply
    Outside Sales Employee Exemption
    18 years old or older
    Spend more than 50% away from office selling, taking orders, or signing contracts for orders
    Cannot have more than 50% incidental work (must be sales)
    Computer Professional Exemption (not discussed)
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 35. Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
    Let’s look at Susan:
    Which Exemption may fit her job?
    Office Manager Acme Insurance Agency
    Examine her duties
    What is she “primarily engaged in (over 50% of her time)?
    Does she answer phones? Make coffee? Supervise people?
  • 36. Administrative Exemption
    Do Susan’s duties involve office or non-manual work?
    Do they directly relate to management policies, or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers?
    Do she (more than 50% of the time) regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment involving:
    Assisting the company owner(s) or employee in a bona fide executive or administrative capacity;
    Performing, under only general supervision, specialized or technical work requiring special training, experience or knowledge; and
    Executing, under only general supervision, special assignments and tasks.
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 37. Executive Exemption applied to Susan
    Is Susan primarily engaged in:
    The management of the business of a customarily recognized department or subdivision of the business?
    Customarily and regularly directing the work of two or more other employees?
    Doe she have the authority to hire or fire other employees or to make suggestions and recommendations regarding hiring, firing, advancement, promotion?
    Does she customarily and regularly exercises discretionary powers?
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 38. Consequences of Misclassifying Workers as Exempt/Non-Exempt
    Employer could be ordered to pay overtime
    All hours worked beyond 8 in a day
    All hours worked beyond 40 in a week
    Possible double time for more than 12 in a day or on 7th consecutive day
    Statute of limitations is long
    Three years to file suit (Labor Code section 98.1)
    Three years to file a Labor Commissioner claim (Labor Code section 98.2)
    Four years to file suit under the California Unfair Competition Law (See Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Company (2000) 23 Cal.4th 163).
    Labor Commissioner Civil Penalties
    Up to $100 per employee plus 25% of underpaid wages
    Up to $200 for subsequent offenses and 25% of wages
    Can go back the entire 3 years!
    Failure to pay minimum wage (Labor Code section 223)
    Exempt v. Non-Exempt (cont.)
  • 39. Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be?
    And regardless of the intent of the parties, this is always the question.
  • 40. Hypotheticals
    Stewart does office work for your agency part time after his classes at the University where is studying Political Science. His schedule depends upon his class schedule and changes quarterly. He is paid by the hour for his time Stewart and you have a written agreement where both parties confirm that Stewart is an independent contractor and not an employee. Is Stewart an independent contractor or employee? Why?
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 41. Hypotheticals (cont.)
    Susan is a dance instructor who teaches at schools, homes and other facilities she selects. She has her own sound system and collects her own fees from customers. While Susan works for three schools, a youth dance program and a church, 90% of her fees come from the Riverdale Dance Academy which hires Susan to choreograph and produce its Spring and Winter Dance Recitals. Is Susan an independent contractor or employee? Why?
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 42. For what purpose are we looking at independent contractor status?
    Multiple tests for Independent Contractors
    IRS “Twenty Factors” (payroll taxes)
    CA Employment Development Department (unemployment and taxes)
    Workers Compensation (coverage or not)
    US Department of Labor (Fair Labor Standards Act)
    California Labor Commissioner (Wage and hour law)
    California Common Law (Liability)
    EEOC/DFEH (coverage of anti-discrimination laws)
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 43. Consequences of misclassification
    Liability for payroll taxes and penalties
    Penalties and liability for failure to provide workers compensation coverage
    Federal and wage and hour law liability for overtime, meal and rest periods, etc.
    Civil liability
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 44. Generally Classifying Independent Contractors
    California Common Law Test (No single factor is conclusive):
    Right to control worker (most important factor)
    Right to discharge at-will without cause or notice
    Skills required in particular occupation
    Distinct occupation or business
    Who supplies instruments, tools, location for performing
    Method of payment (time versus job)
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 45. Recent Cases:
    Cristler v. Express Messenger Systems (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 72 – delivery company switched its drivers to independent contractor status using subcontractor firm. The Court of Appeal held that the most significant factor is who has the right to control the work and restated current California law.
    California law uses the "multi-factor" or "economic realities" test enunciated in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 46. JKH Enterprises v. Department of Industrial Relations (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1046
    Workers were delivery drivers who drove own cars, had own insurance, used own cell phones, had no training, controlled own route, schedule, order of work performed and signed written contracts and acknowledgements that they were independent contractors.
    The Court of Appeal held (any guesses?):
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 47. JKH Enterprises Holding:
    The hearing officer's decision stated: "Although some of the factors in this case can be indicative of the workers being independent contractors, the overriding factor is that the persons performing the work are not engaged in occupations or businesses distinct from that of [JKH]. Rather, their work is the basis for [JKH's] business. [JKH] obtains the clients who are in need of delivery services and provides the workers who conduct the service on behalf of [JKH]. In addition, even though there is an absence of control over the details, an employee-employer relationship will be found if the [principal] retains pervasive control over the operation as a whole, the worker's duties are an integral part of the operation, and the nature of the work makes detailed control unnecessary. (Yellow Cab Cooperative v. Workers‘ Compensation Appeals Board (1991) 226 Cal. App. 3d 1288 [277 Cal. Rptr. 434]). Therefore, the finding is that these workers are in fact employees of [JKH]."
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 48. Avoiding independent contractor issues
    Use caution in classifying workers as contractors
    Analyze the facts surrounding the work to be done and the worker doing it
    Consider the consequences if the classification is wrong
    If you cannot tell, make them an employee!
    Hire legal counsel
    Independent Contractor: To Be or Not To Be? (cont.)
  • 49. The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum
  • 50. The importance of Exempt versus Non-Exempt classification of employees
    Articles from Alliance Newsletter
    Depends upon job duties
    Hire legal counsel to examine this
    Two types of “producers” under California Law
    Outside Salesperson Exemption
    Commissioned Inside Salesperson Exemption
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 51. Outside Salesperson Exemption
    Eighteen Years old or older
    Spends greater than 50% of work time away from office selling, taking orders, etc.
    Commissioned Inside Salesperson Exemption (Applies only to overtime)
    Employee’s earnings must exceed 1 and ½ times the minimum wage
    More than half of the employee’s compensation must be commissions (IWC, Wage Order 4)
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 52. Definition of Commission
    Exemption applies to Wage Orders 4 (Professional Services) and 7 (Retail)
    The employee must be involved principally in sales activities (not manufacturing or rendering service)
    Compensation must be a percentage of the price of the product or service (Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co.(1999) 20 Cal. 4th 784, 804).
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 53. What is not a commission
    Auto Mechanics – while they get a percentage of the sale price of their service, there are not principally involved in sales(Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 557, 562-564)
    Telemarketers – when their commission is based upon number of subscriptions sold, it is not a percentage of price (Harris v. Investor’s Business Daily (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 28, 38)
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 54. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
    Applies broadly to “industries engaged in interstate commerce” (29 U.S.C. § 202(a)) unless an exemption applies
    Employers have burden of proof to show exception to overtime requirement (29 U.S.C. § 207(a))
    Employers must prove:
    Employer is a “retail or service establishment”
    Each employee’s rate of pay is more than 1.5 times minimum wage
    More than 50% of employee’s compensation was commissions on the sale of goods
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 55. Retail or Service Establishment
    A “retail or service establishment” shall mean an establishment 75 per centum of whose annual dollar volume of sales of goods or services (or of both) is not for resale and is recognized as retail sales or services in the particular industry.
    The “retail concept” does not apply to: “Insurance; mutual, stock and fraternal benefit, including insurance brokers, agents, and claims adjustment offices.” (29 C.F.R. 779.317)
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 56. Summary of the Conundrum:
    California law may or may not apply regarding overtime only (not meals, breaks, etc.)
    Federal law does not exempt insurance producers from overtime as insurance agencies lack the “retail concept” under the FLSA
    The Inside Insurance “Producer” Conundrum (cont.)
  • 57. Meal and Rest Periods
    • Why is this issue important?
    • 58. Requirements for Meal Periods
    • 59. Requirements for Rest Periods
    • 60. Penalties
    • 61. Statute of limitations
    • 62. Unresolved issues in the courts
  • Why is this issue important?
    Many employers do not provide meal and rest periods to employers
    Can result in significant penalties and fines from Labor Commissioner
    Applies to non-exempt employees
    There is much litigation on this issue most of which involves class actions
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 63. Requirements for Meal Periods
    Non-exempt or hourly employees
    Required to take a 30-minute meal break if the employee’s shift:
    is over 5 hours long and
    will not be completed in 6 hours
    Meal breaks can be unpaid if the employee is relieved of duty for at least 30 minutes and is free to leave the premises
    If the employee’ shift is more than 10 hours, a second meal break of 30 minutes is required.
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 64. Requirements for Rest Periods
    Non-exempt hourly employees
    Employers are required to offer non-exempt or hourly employees a 10-minute rest break for every four hours worked
    Rest breaks are generally paid; thus, the employer can require the employees to be on the premises.
    California law provides that extended rest breaks must be provided for breastfeeding mothers (Labor Code sections 1030 to 1033).
    Unlike meal periods, an employer is only required to “authorize and permit” employees to take rest periods.
    Rest breaks may not be combined or added to meal periods, even at the employee’s request.
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 65. Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
    The number of rest breaks depends upon the length of the employee’s shift as set forth below:
  • 66. The Penalties
    Rest Breaks
    For each day an employer fails to permit an employee to take a rest break, the employer owes the employee one additional hour of pay
    Paid at the employee’s regular rate of pay no later than the next paycheck
    Meal Breaks
    Employer must ensure the worker takes a meal break, is free to leave the premises and is free from duty.
    This is the best practice under California law at this time, although one federal court has noted that the employer does not have to force worker to take meal breaks.
    An employer owes an employee who does not take a required meal beak an hour of pay for each day the employer is out of compliance (Labor Code section 226.7)
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 67. Statute of Limitations
    The statute of limitations for an employee to seek the extra hour of pay per day for missed breaks and lunch periods is three years. The California Supreme Court recently confirmed in Murphy v. v. Kenneth Cole that the hour of additional pay is “wages” and not just a “penalty.” Thus, the employee can go back three years to claim such lost “wages.” (Murphy v. Kenneth Cole (2007) 40 Cal.4th1094).
    For employers, an employee’s claim for three years of missed breaks and meal periods can be financially devastating.
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 68. Unresolved issues in the law
    Must an employer ensure that an employee takes required meal breaks?
    The question of whether a California employer must ensure breaks and meal periods are taken is the subject of significant litigation in both state and federal courts.
    Federal Court in Brown v. Federal Express held that California does not require the employer to ensure that meal periods were taken.
    California Court of Appeal agreed in Brinker v. Superior Court.
    But California Supreme Court has granted review to hopefully resolve this issue.
    In the meantime, employers cannot yet rely upon these cases until the California Supreme Court issues its decision in Brinker and should seek legal counsel. (Brinker v. Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th25).
    Meal and Rest Periods (cont.)
  • 69. What governs discipline and termination?
    Progressive discipline
    Avoiding claims of discrimination/retaliation
    The mechanics of termination
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination
  • 70. What governs discipline and termination?
    At Will Employment Contract
    Employee Handbook/Policy Manual (Terms of Employment Contract)
    At will policy
    Internal dispute resolution/investigation policies
    Progressive discipline policies
    “Just cause” policies
    Other Oral or Implied Contracts
    Was employee “promised” continued employment by someone who has authority over employee?
    Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
    Performance reviews
    Lack of criticism
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination (cont.)
  • 71. Federal, State and Local Laws
    Title VII
    Fair Employment and Housing Act
    Protected types of leave
    Workers compensation
    Retaliation/Protected activity
    Testifying or participating in investigation
    Whistle blowing
    Freedom of speech
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination (cont.)
  • 72. Disability
    Reasonable accommodation
    Interactive process
    Disparate treatment based on protected class
    Does sufficient documentation support the reasons for termination?
    Support such as counseling memos, attendance reports, etc.
    Negative such as warning pregnant employee she is absent too often or depressed employee she does not “smile” (true example)
    Unemployment considerations
    Legal ramifications of not terminating employee (such as harassment or threats to other employees)
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination (cont.)
  • 73. Progressive Discipline
    What is it?
    Is it required?
    Employee manual
    Fair treatment
    Exception for severe misconduct
    Avoiding Claims of Discrimination/Retaliation
    This could be the subject of an entire seminar
    Top Five Tips:
    Train employees regarding company harassment and discrimination policy
    Fairly investigate any claims by employees
    Take prompt action to determine veracity of claims
    Take prompt remedial action to discipline offending employees
    Consult legal counsel
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination (cont.)
  • 74. The Mechanics of Termination (after deciding to terminate an employee)
    Final paycheck at the time of termination
    Written notice of termination (EDD has form)
    Employee Acknowledgement of receiving final pay
    COBRA/Cal-Cobra Notices to plan and employee
    Employee acknowledgement
    Avoiding Wrongful Termination (cont.)
  • 75. Eligibility or Unemployment Benefits
    An employee is eligible for Unemployment Benefits if he or she:
    Has made a claim for benefits
    Has earned $1,300 in one quarter, or had high quarter wages of $900 and total base period earnings of 1.25 times that amount (UI Code sec. 1281(a)(3))
    Is able or available to work
    Is actively looking for work
    Has become unemployed through “no fault of the employee’s own”
    Brief Overview of Unemployment
  • 76.
    • Has become unemployed through “no fault of the employee’s own” (Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, (1984) 35 Cal.3d 671)
    Voluntarily quit without good cause
    Discharged for misconduct
    Willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interest
    Deliberate disregard of standards of behavior
    Carelessness or negligence to such a degree or recurrence that it demonstrates substantial disregard for employer’s interest
    Refusal to perform suitable work
    Does not mean
    Isolated negligence
    Failure of good performance
    Brief Overview of Unemployment (cont.)
  • 77. Appealing a decision of the Employment Development Department
    Administrative Law Judge Hearing
    Within 20 days of mailing of the EDD determination
    Must be in writing and state the grounds for an appeal
    Present evidence, witnesses, documents
    ALJ will issue written decision
    Appeal to Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (UIAB)
    Within 20 days of mailing of the ALJ’s decision
    Confirmation letter from UIAB
    Request oral or written argument within 10 days of confirmation letter
    UIAB will issue written decision
    Brief Overview of Unemployment (cont.)
  • 78. This Power Point Presentation is available at
  • 79. Steven L. Simas, Esq.
    Government & Administrative Law
    Sacramento -916.789.9800
    San Luis Obispo -805.547.9300