• Like
  • Save
Topo recherche Oct 2008
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Topo recherche Oct 2008

  • 509 views
Published

Presentation made during the doctoral colloquium at Internet research 9.0 on Oct 15. Mentors who commented my work included Axel Bruns.

Presentation made during the doctoral colloquium at Internet research 9.0 on Oct 15. Mentors who commented my work included Axel Bruns.

Published in Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
509
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Information Quality Assessment and Source © Jeremy Depauw 2008 Selection How do Corporate Information Managers deal with the challenges raised by Web 2.0? Jeremy Depauw  jdepauw@ulb.ac.be
  • 2. Research project details How do corporate information © Jeremy Depauw 2008 specialists (i) assess the quality of information and select online sources (ii) in the recently reconfigured online informational landscape (iii) ?
  • 3. Corporate Information Management Alert threats and opportunities © Jeremy Depauw 2008 Collect Treatment Mediation CIM support in Decision Making Distribution Influence actions
  • 4. Information Quality Assessment and online Source Selection Info quality assessment source selection Collect © Jeremy Depauw 2008 Treatment Mediation CIM Distribution Criteria used: objectives, coverage, authority, accuracy, currency, accessibility, presentation, ease of use, comparison Source: Cooke, 2001
  • 5. Framing Web 2.0 ‣ Literature review about Web 2.0 ‣ Framework © Jeremy Depauw 2008 • A set of tools • A set of practices • A set of trends ‣ Guidelines for fieldwork research ‣ Suggestions ?
  • 6. Framing Web 2.0 : transversal reading Effects Data on an epic scale Content publish! ing vs Webpage creation Anyone can publish (more than ever) Ease of use Reduction of technical skills requirement CM & K° Blurring limit between informa! tion producer and consumer a set of threads and © Jeremy Depauw 2008 Bottom-up tendencies Any time, any place Open Media intensive Dynamic Often open source Collaboration Blogs Web 2.0 Is... Community Wikis initiated by an interacting... Podcast CM & K° File sharing Actors Intermediaries Social Networks sites Instant Messaging Anyone can publish (more than ever) a set of tools. RSS Read-Write web Collaboration Control Monitoring Technology User Generated CM & K° Content (UGC) that are mobilized by... Manage information Retarget information ...set of principles and practices... Information & Knowledge remix Any time, any place Elicit and reuse information Content creation Collaboration Community
  • 7. Fieldwork Research: Phase 1 ‣ 50+ interviews with IM pros in Belgium • Relative importance of criteria (Cooke’s checklist) © Jeremy Depauw 2008 • Blogs, wikis, podcasts, file sharing, social networks • +, -, = ‣ Perceived shift of IQ & SS processes Quantitative approach, statistical analysis with SPSS (see paper at IR9.0)
  • 8. Fieldwork Research: Phase 2 ‣ 14 semi-directed interviews (out of the 50) © Jeremy Depauw 2008 ‣ Looking for the reasons of the perceived shift ‣ Tracing characteristics of Web 2.0 in professionals discourses Qualitative approach, Discourse analysis with Cassandre
  • 9. To do list ‣ Statistical analysis (phase 1): done ‣ Interviews analysis (phase 2): ongoing © Jeremy Depauw 2008 ‣ What’s left • Back on theory (suggestions ?) • Compilation of every piece of content (advices?) • Write-up