• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Peopling of New York City, Lecture 4 slides

Peopling of New York City, Lecture 4 slides






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 23

http://macaulay.cuny.edu 23



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Peopling of New York City, Lecture 4 slides Peopling of New York City, Lecture 4 slides Presentation Transcript

    • Economics of Immigration
    • The Age-Earnings Profiles of Immigrant and Native Men in the Cross Section 9,000 Immigrants 8,000Annual Earnings (1970 Dollars) Natives 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Age
    • The Decision to Immigrate• Skills vary across country-of-origin (or source country) immigrant groups.• The general rule: Workers decide to immigrate if U.S. earnings exceed earnings in the source country. – The decision ultimately depends on individual skills and the returns to those skills in the source and destination countries.
    • Cohort Effects and the Immigrant Age- Earnings Profile Dollars C The cross-sectional P 1960 Wave age-earnings profile P* erroneously suggests P that immigrant Q 1980 Wave earnings grow faster and Natives than those of natives. Q Q* R 2000 Wave R R* C Age 20 40 60
    • The Wage Differential between Immigrants and Native Men at Time of Entry 0 -0.1Log wage gap -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 1955-1959 1965-1969 1975-1979 1985-1989 1995-2000 Year of entry
    • Evolution of Wages for Specific Immigrant Cohorts over the Life CycleRelative wage of immigrants who arrivedwhen they were 25-34 years old 0.1 Arrived in 1955-59 0 Log wage gap -0.1 Arrived in 1965-69 -0.2 Arrived in 1975-79 Arrived in 1985-89 -0.3 -0.4 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year
    • The Distribution of Skills in the Source Country Frequency NegativelySelected - Immigrant Flow Positively-Selected Immigrant Flow s N s P Skills The distribution of skills in the source country gives the frequency of workers in each skill level. If immigrants have above-average skills, the immigrant flow is positively selected. If immigrants have below- average skills, the immigrant flow is negatively selected.
    • The Self-Selection of the Immigrant FlowDollars Dollars Positive Selection U.S. Source Country Source U.S. Country Do Not Move Do Not Move Move Move sP Skills sN Skills (a) Positive selection (b) Negative selection
    • Policy Application: Economic Benefits of Migration• The immigrant surplus is a measure of the increase in national income that occurs as a result of immigration. (The surplus accrues to natives.)• Immigration raises national income by more than it costs to employ immigrants.
    • The Impact of a Decline in U.S. IncomesDollars Dollars U.S. Source Country U.S. Source Country sP  sN sN Skills Skills (a) Positive selection (b) Negative selection
    • Decline in U.S. Incomes• The previous graphs shows that when U.S. incomes decrease (shift down in the returns- to-skills curve): – Fewer workers migrate to the U.S. – The type of selection (positive vs. negative) doesn’t change.
    • Policy Application: Labor Flows in Puerto Rico• The case study of Puerto Rico confirms an important insight of the Roy model: skills flow to where they receive their highest return. – The rate of return to skills is much higher in Puerto Rico than in the United States, so the Roy model predicts that a relatively higher fraction of the least-educated Puerto Ricans would leave the island. – As of 2000, nearly 45 percent of Puerto Rican-born working age men who lacked a high school diploma had moved to the United States. In contrast, only 30 percent of working age men with at least a college education had moved to the United States.
    • Earnings Mobility between 1st and 2nd Generations of Americans, 1970-2000 0.6Relative wage, 2nd generation, 2000 Belgium Poland India Philippines Italy UK Germany Cuba China Sweden 0 Honduras Mexico Haiti Dominican Republic -0.6 -0.4 0 0.4 Relative wage, 1st generation, 1970