Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Raid
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Raid

1,307
views

Published on

all about raid

all about raid

Published in: Technology

0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,307
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
172
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Operating Systems RAID – Redundant Array of Independent Disks Submitted by Ankur Niyogi 2003EE20367
  • 2. YOUR DATA IS LOST@#!!• Dowe have backups of all our data???? - The stuff we cannot afford to lose??• How often do we do backups??? - Daily, Weekly or Monthly??• Are they magnetic, optical or physical??• How long would it take to totally recover from thedisaster???
  • 3. FLOW OF PRESENTATION• Secondary storage – advantages and limitations• Increasing Reliability via Redundancy• RAID• Mirroring and Data-Striping• RAID Levels
  • 4. Secondary Storage Devices•Significant role in storing large amount of data asmemory is expensive• Plays a vital role when disk is used as virtual memory• Magnetic in nature• Characteristically uses a “moving head disk” mechanismto read and write data
  • 5. RAID : Redundant Array of Inexpensive DisksPerformance limitation of Disks: - Performance of a single disk is very limited• Throughput : 125 reqs/s• Bandwidth : 20-200MB/s (max) 15-30MB/s (sustained)• Very difficult to significantly improve the performance of diskdrives - Disks are electromechanical devices• Speed gap between disks and CPU/Memory is widening - CPU speed increases @ 60% / year - Disks speed increase @ 10-15% / year• Improvement in disk technologies is still very impressive BUT onlyin the capacity / cost area.
  • 6. What does RAID stand for?In 1987, Patterson, Gibson and Katz at the University of CaliforniaBerkeley, published a paper entitled “ A Case for Redundant Arrayof Inexpensive Disks(RAID)”.Described the various types of Disk Arrays, referred to as theacronym RAID.The basic idea of RAID was to combine multiple, small inexpensivedisks drive into an array of disk drives which yields performanceexceeding that of a Single, Large Expensive Drive(SLED).Additionally this array of drives appear to the computer as a singlelogical storage unit or drive.
  • 7. Improvement of Reliability via Redundancy•In a SLED Reliabity becomes a big problem as the data in anentire disk may be lost . As the number of disks per component increases, theprobability of failure also increases .- Suppose a (reliable) disk fails every 100,000 hrs.Reliabity of a disk in an array of N disks = Reliability of 1 disk/N100000hrs / 100 = 1000 hrs = 41.66 days !! Solution ? Redundancy
  • 8. RedundancyMirroringData Striping
  • 9. Mirroring Duplicate every disk Logical disk consists of two physical disks. Every write is carried out on both disks. If one of the disk fails, data read from the other Data permanently lost only if the second disk fails before the firstfailed disk is replaced.
  • 10. Reliability in MirroringSuppose mean time to repair is 10 hrs ,the mean time to data loss of a mirrored disk system is 100,000 ^ 2 / (2 * 10) hrs ~ 57,000 years !Main disadvantage :Most expensive approach .
  • 11. Parallel Disk Systems• We cannot improve the disk performance significantly as a singledrive - But many applications require high performance storage systems ?• Solutions : - Parallel Disk Systems- Higher Reliability and Higher data-transfer rate.
  • 12. DATA STRIPING Fundamental to RAID A method of concatenating multiple drives into one logical storageunit. Splitting the bits of each byte across multiple disks : bit – levelstriping e.g. an array of eight disks, write bit i of each byte to disk I Sectors are eight times the normal size Eight times the access rate Similarly for blocks of file, block-level striping
  • 13. Logical to Physical Data mapping for striping strip 0 Physical Physical Physical Physical strip 1 Disk 0 Disk 1 Disk 2 Disk 3 strip 2 strip 3 strip 0 strip 1 strip 2 strip 3 strip 4 strip 4 strip 5 strip 6 strip 7 strip 5 strip 9 strip 8 strip 10 strip 11 strip 6 strip 12 strip 13 strip 14 strip 15 strip 7 strip 8 strip 9 strip 10 strip11 strip 12 strip 13 strip 14 strip 15
  • 14. RAID LEVELS Data are distributed across the array of disk drives Redundant disk capacity is used to store parity information, whichguarantees data recoverability in case of a disk failure Levels decided according to schemes to provide redundancy atlower cost by using striping and “parity” bits Different cost-performance trade-offs
  • 15. RAID 0 Striping at the level of blocks Data split across in drives resulting in higher data throughput Performance is very good but the failure of any disk in the arrayresults in data loss RAID 0 commonly referred to as striping Reliability Problems : No mirroring or parity bits
  • 16. RAID 1• Introduce redundancy through mirroring• Expensive• Performance Issues-- No data loss if either drive fails– Good read performance– Reasonable write performance• Cost / MB is high• Commonly referred to as “mirroring”
  • 17. RAID 1(Mirrored)strip 0 strip 1 strip 2 strip 3strip 4 strip 5 strip 6 strip 7strip 8 strip 9 strip 10 strip 11strip 12 strip 13 strip 14 strip 15 strip 0 strip 1 strip 2 strip 3 strip 4 strip 5 strip 6 strip 7 strip 8 strip 9 strip 10 strip 11 strip 12 strip 13 strip 14 strip 15
  • 18. RAID 2• Uses Hamming (or any other) error-correcting code (ECC)• Intended for use in drives which do not have built-in error detection• Central idea is if one of the disks fail the remaining bits of the byteand the associated ECC bits can be used to reconstruct the data• Not very popular b0 b1 b2 f0(b) f1(b) f2(b) b2
  • 19. RAID 3• Improves upon RAID 2, known as Bit-Interleaved Parity• Disk Controllers can detect whether a sector has been readcorrectly.• Storage overhead is reduced – only 1 parity disk• Expense of computing and writing parity• Need to include a dedicated parity hardware b0 b1 b2 b2 P(b)
  • 20. RAID 4• Stripes data at a block level across several drives, with paritystored on one drive - block-interleaved parity• Allows recovery from the failure of any of the disks• Performance is very good for reads• Writes require that parity data be updated each time. Slows smallrandom writes but large writes are fairly fast block 0 block 1 block 2 block 3 P(0-3) block 4 block 5 block 6 block 7 P(4-7) block 9 block 10 block 11 block 8 P(8-11) block 12 block 13 block 14 block 15 P(12-15)
  • 21. RAID 5• Block-interleaved Distributed parity• Spreads data and parity among all N+1 disks, rather than storingdata in N disks and parity in 1 disk• Avoids potential overuse of a single parity disk – improvementover RAID 4• Most common parity RAID system block 0 block 1 block 2 block 3 P(0-3) block 4 block 5 block 6 P(4-7) block 7 block 8 block 9 P(8-11) block 10 block 11 block 12 P(12-15) block 13 block 14 block 15 P(16-19) block 16 block 17 block 18 block 19
  • 22. RAID 6• P+Q Redundancy
  • 23. RAID(0+1) and RAID(1+0)
  • 24. RAID 10• Advantages– Highly fault tolerant– High data availability– Very good read / write performance• Disadvantages– Very expensive• Applications– Where high performance and redundancy are critical
  • 25. Selecting a RAID Level•RAID 0 – High-Performance applications where data loss is notcritical• RAID 1 – High Reliability with fast recovery• RAID 10/01 – Both performance and reliability are important,e.g. in small databases• RAID 5 – Preferred for storing large volumes of data• RAID 6 – Not Supported currently by many RAIDimplementations
  • 26. References1.www.bridgeport.edu/sed/fcourses/cpe473/Lectures/RAID.ppt2. r61505.csie.nctu.edu.tw/OG/project/extra6-Ch8-RAID.ppt3. A. Silberschatz, P. B. Galvin, and G. Gagne, Operating SystemConcepts, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2005