Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Market or perish - Academic SEO
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Market or perish - Academic SEO

7,044

Published on

From my Mendeley Open Office Talk on November 26, 2010. Speech bubbles have been added for better context. See the blog at http://mendeley.com/

From my Mendeley Open Office Talk on November 26, 2010. Speech bubbles have been added for better context. See the blog at http://mendeley.com/

2 Comments
17 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
7,044
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
2
Likes
17
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Going to show you a photo in next slide. Want you to shout out the first things that come to mind.
  • Going to show you a photo in next slide. Want you to shout out the first things that come to mind.
  • We support academics, students and other professionals (or researchers) in their work with scientific literature.
    We provide scientific knowledge.
    We organize scientific knowledge.
    We help to explore and share scientific knowledge.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Publish or Perish Jason Hoyt, Ph.D. Chief Scientist + VP of R&D Mendeley Open Office Talks 26 Nov 2010 twitter: @jasonHoyt
    • 2. Creative Commons licensed http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi le:Ladygaga_b8dn415_1209.jpg Academics should learn how to market themselves; Lady Gaga style.
    • 3. MARKET YOURSELF Or get of academia now. Visibility = Citations = Tenure We have grant writing courses to help our careers, but nothing about marketing our research. Marketing in this case isn’t a dirty word. It’s simply making our research visible.
    • 4. SELF-ARCHIVING #1 Marketing Tool. Publishing is no longer enough. Self-archiving should occur before (pre-prints), during, and after (post-print) we publish
    • 5. SELF-ARCHIVING The juicy secrets. 58% of publishers allow it That 58% covers 83% of all journals 41% of publishers allow pre-prints
    • 6. WHO ALLOWS PRE-PRINTS? A small sample. Visit Sherpa Romeo for publisher/journal specifics ASBMB ASCB BioMed Central Blackwell Publishing BMJ Publishing Group Cambridge University Press Elsevier (except journals of Cell Press) Humana Press Nature Publishing Group Oxford Journals PNAS Public Library of Science (PLoS) SAGE Springer Taylor & Francis Wiley Many more…
    • 7. WHY DO PUBLISHERS ALLOW PRE- PRINTS? Impact Factor Cherry Picking Pre-prints help publishers gauge what they should publish A popular pre- print can jump the line in a giant 12-18 month backlog
    • 8. Search Engines Search engines are key to marketing our research. This is known as Academic SEO (Search Engine Optimization)
    • 9. WHAT’S THE COVERAGE? Catalog Journals Articles Google Scholar 20K+ Unknown PubMed 6,000+ 20M Scopus (Now SciVerse) 15,000 ISI Web of Science 9,300 46M Mendeley 20K+ 28M+ (+22M being cleaned) People search aggregators that have the coverage. Focus on the aggregators.
    • 10. RANKING ALGORITHMS Understand the basics of how search engines rank literature. We’ll look at the biggest Search Engines. Mendeley, Google Scholar, & PubMed
    • 11. PUBMED 1. Content Relevance 1. Title 2. Abstract 3. MeSH terms 4. Synonyms 2. ‘Freshness’ How recent is the publication?
    • 12. GOOGLE SCHOLAR 1. Content Relevance 2. Citation count 3. Impact factor of journal 4. Freshness of cited by 5. Who authored the paper 6. Quality of metadata
    • 13. MENDELEY 1. Content Relevance 2. Quality of metadata 3. Readership 4. ‘Freshness’ 5. Citations (future) Quality of metadata means how complete is it? Abstract, full- text to be found?
    • 14. Google Scholar Mendeley ? GS favors citation count too strongly. Expected result is 5th on GS.
    • 15. IMPROVING YOUR VISIBILITY So we’ve seen how Mendeley, PubMed, & GS rank. What can we do to make sure our research is properly included & ranked?
    • 16. After you Publish For Mendeley users • Make sure we have complete metadata & abstract at least • Use Tags – Google will also index these on Mendeley article pages. Remember synonyms. • Author keywords – Make sure they are extracted or copy them in. Google also indexes these • External links. Do you have the URL to your self-archive? Google will find these as well as people searching on Mendeley. Use the URL field! And use the DOI link. • Create a public group for your paper and similar ones. Google indexes these as well. • When self-archiving, make sure your Web page (or University’s) uses CoiNS and meta tags (e.g. Eprints, Highwire). Google and Mendeley both index these. Before & when you publish • Use synonyms in title/abstract • Use vector graphics for figures/tables text (SVG is XML and can be indexed) Mendeley & GS will rank papers with abstracts and a pre- print or full-text available slightly higher than those without. If you forgot synonyms when you published, it isn’t too late. Put them in the tags field on Mendeley. People often search for synonyms.
    • 17. It’s a paper that I co- authored back in the day. I could add more tags with synonyms. This might improve its visibility years after being published. I should also create a public group for it. This is from the ‘My Publications’ folder in Mendeley. It’s for papers I authored.
    • 18. This is Chris Wiggins’ faculty page at Columbia.
    • 19. His ‘papers’ link on the left displays his Mendeley profile. He doesn’t need to rely on the school IT to update his CV. All of his papers are updated in real-time from his ‘My Publications’ folder in Mendeley
    • 20. ETHICAL BOUNDARIES black hat vs. white hat SEO for academia There is a line to ‘marketing’ or Academic SEO that shouldn’t be crossed.
    • 21. FURTHER READING Aalst, J. van (2010). Using Google Scholar to Estimate the Impact of Journal Articles in Education. Educational Researcher 39, 387-400. Available at: http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0013189X10371120 Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., and Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical digital libraries 3, 7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16805916 Beel, J., Vlba-lab, F. I. N. I. T. I., and Wilde, E. (2010). Academic Search Engine Optimization ( ASEO ): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar & Co . Journal of Scholarly Publishing 41. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.41.2.176 Mikki, S. (2009). Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences. Scientometrics 82, 321-331. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11192-009-0038-6
    • 22. Publish or Perish

    ×