The Effect of SensoryDeprivation on the Density of M1 Microglia in the Mouse       Barrel Cortex              Yuhong Wang ...
Cells of The Central       Nervous SystemNeurons                    Glia  • Processes, transmits   • Maintains homeostasis...
Microglia• Resident macrophage of the Central  Nervous System• Constantly surveying its environment• Processes engage in p...
The Barrel Cortex• In the present study, we are looking at the presence  of microglial cells in the barrel cortex• Barrel ...
The Effect of Sensory           Deprivation• Trimming a rodent’s whiskers for the first postnatal  month has been shown to...
Previous Studies• Following trimming,  there is a significant  increase in cell  body area and a  significant  decrease in...
Activated Microglia• Expresses 2 distinct phenotypes   o M1 phenotype, or classically activated microglia,     are neuroto...
Problem: How are M1  Microglia Impacted by   Sensory Derivation? Due to the previously describedstructural arrangements in...
Trimming and Perfusion• Sensory deprivation was achieved in mice by  bilaterally trimming whiskers every other day for  31...
Sectioning and Staining• Brains were sectioned into 50 μm slices using  a vibratome• Brain sections were immunohistochemic...
Imaging and Analysis• Slices were mounted using 0.01M phosphate  buffer saline medium and cover slipped• Slides were image...
Iba-1 Rhodamine Staining      Stains for all microglial cells
MHC-II FITC Staining Stains for all microglia expressing the M1 phenotype
FITC, Rhodamine overlap   The overlap shows the number of M1   microglia (yellow) and the number that is not   expressing ...
Results                                  Number of Cells expressing the M1                                  phenotype in t...
The percentage of microglia stained MHC-II (M1     phenotype)                           1.2                           1.0 ...
Conclusions• Most microglia in the mouse barrel cortex  expresses the M1 phenotype as opposed to  M2• Sensory deprivation ...
Future Directions• M2 microglia plays just as an important  role as M1 microglia does in  neuroplasticity. Future experime...
Acknowledgements• This research was supported by the City University of  New York at Queens College• Thanks to Dr.Joshua B...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The Effect of Sensory Deprivation on the Density of M1 Microglia in the Mouse Barrel Cortex

1,304 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,304
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
255
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The Effect of Sensory Deprivation on the Density of M1 Microglia in the Mouse Barrel Cortex

  1. 1. The Effect of SensoryDeprivation on the Density of M1 Microglia in the Mouse Barrel Cortex Yuhong Wang The Bronx High School of Science
  2. 2. Cells of The Central Nervous SystemNeurons Glia • Processes, transmits • Maintains homeostasis information • Includes: • Astrocytes • Schwann Cells • Microglia
  3. 3. Microglia• Resident macrophage of the Central Nervous System• Constantly surveying its environment• Processes engage in phagocytosis of pathogens and debris• Releases various cytokines to maintain homeostasis in the CNS
  4. 4. The Barrel Cortex• In the present study, we are looking at the presence of microglial cells in the barrel cortex• Barrel Cortex o A region of the somatosensory cortex that processes information from a rodent’s whiskers o Organized topographically; Each whisker is represented by a discrete aggregation of neurons called a barrel Barrel Cortex
  5. 5. The Effect of Sensory Deprivation• Trimming a rodent’s whiskers for the first postnatal month has been shown to result in neuronal remodeling But, it seems microglia are also impacted by sensory deprivation How So?
  6. 6. Previous Studies• Following trimming, there is a significant increase in cell body area and a significant decrease in process length of microglia The fact that sensory deprivation leads to a change in microglial morphology suggests that microglia are changing from a resting state phenotype to an activated phenotype
  7. 7. Activated Microglia• Expresses 2 distinct phenotypes o M1 phenotype, or classically activated microglia, are neurotoxic, as they release reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines o M2 phenotype, or alternatively activated microglia, are neuroprotective, as they block proinflammatory responses and instead produce high levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines and neurotropic factors.
  8. 8. Problem: How are M1 Microglia Impacted by Sensory Derivation? Due to the previously describedstructural arrangements in the barrelcortex following trimming, we aim todetermine if sensory deprivation willhave an significant impact on thedensity of M1 microglia.
  9. 9. Trimming and Perfusion• Sensory deprivation was achieved in mice by bilaterally trimming whiskers every other day for 31 days, starting from birth. Some mice were allocated to the p60 and p90 whisker regrow group in order to prove that microglial remodeling occurs in the first 30 days of development.• There were untrimmed mice in each group that served as control• Respective mice were perfused on the p31, p61, and p91 days using saline and 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were post-fixed for 24 hours in 4% paraformaldehyde.
  10. 10. Sectioning and Staining• Brains were sectioned into 50 μm slices using a vibratome• Brain sections were immunohistochemically stained for microglia using primary antibody Iba-1• Sections were double stained with MHC-II antibody in order to detect microglia expressing the M1 phenotype.
  11. 11. Imaging and Analysis• Slices were mounted using 0.01M phosphate buffer saline medium and cover slipped• Slides were imaged using confocal microscopy and image stacks will be analyzed using computer assisted program Neurolucida 8.0 to determine the quantity and distribution of M1 microglia.
  12. 12. Iba-1 Rhodamine Staining Stains for all microglial cells
  13. 13. MHC-II FITC Staining Stains for all microglia expressing the M1 phenotype
  14. 14. FITC, Rhodamine overlap The overlap shows the number of M1 microglia (yellow) and the number that is not expressing that phenotype (remains red)
  15. 15. Results Number of Cells expressing the M1 phenotype in the sensory deprived and control 30Number of Cells per 100m3 25 20 15 10 5 0 IBA + MHCII+ IBA + MHCII+ Sensory Deprived Control Cell Type
  16. 16. The percentage of microglia stained MHC-II (M1 phenotype) 1.2 1.0 Percentage MHCII+ 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Sensory Deprived ControlSensory Deprivation does not seem to have aneffect on M1 expression of microglial cells
  17. 17. Conclusions• Most microglia in the mouse barrel cortex expresses the M1 phenotype as opposed to M2• Sensory deprivation did not have a significant impact on the density of cells expressing M1 phenotype, therefore our hypothesis was proven wrong
  18. 18. Future Directions• M2 microglia plays just as an important role as M1 microglia does in neuroplasticity. Future experiments should characterize the effect of sensory deprivation on the distribution of M2 microglial cells.
  19. 19. Acknowledgements• This research was supported by the City University of New York at Queens College• Thanks to Dr.Joshua Brumberg, Racheli Wercberger and Zissy Turner for their contribution and guidance.

×