Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Stamp investigation

• 174 views
Uploaded on

More in: Sports
• Comment goes here.
Are you sure you want to
Your message goes here
Be the first to comment
Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Total Views
174
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

No embeds

Report content

No notes for slide

Transcript

• 1. Julia Li Stamp Investigation is piece of worksheet will be presenting the process of investigating a pattern for stamps.1. e table below shows which postage values of 1 cent up to 20 cents can/cannot be representedfrom 3 cent stamps and 5 cent stamps. Postage Stamps Postage Stamps 1 No 11 5+3+3 2 No 12 3+3+3+3 3 3 13 5+5+3 4 No 14 5+3+3+3 5 No 15 5+5+5 6 3+3 16 5+5+3+3 7 No 17 5+3+3+3+3 8 5+3 18 5+5+5+3 9 3+3+3 19 5+5+3+3+3 10 5+5 20 5+5+5+5(Table 1)2.After postage value 7, every postage value can be represented. erefore 7 is the largest postagenumber that cannot be represented according to Table 1.3. e two values of stamps has been changed to 3 cent stamps and 7 cent stamps. Which leads to adiﬀerent table: Postage Stamps Postage Stamps 1 No 11 No 2 No 12 3+3+3+3 3 3 13 7+3+3 4 No 14 7+7 5 No 15 3+3+3+3+3 6 3+3 16 7+3+3+3 7 7 17 7+7+3 8 No 18 3+3+3+3+3+3 9 3+3+3 19 7+3+3+3+3 10 7+3 20 7+7+3+3(Table 2)
• 2. erefore the postage value 11 is the largest number that cannot be represented out of 3 cent stampsand 7 cent stamps. (Source: Table 2)4. e country issues two stamps - 3 cent stamp and n cent stamp.Working with diﬀerent values of n to nd the largest postage value that cannot be represented.3 cent stamps & 4 cent stamps (Table 3) 3 cent stamps & 6 cent stamps (Table 4)Largest number: 5 Largest number: In nite3 cent stamps & 8 cent stamps (Table 5) 3 stamps & 9 cent stamps (Table 6)Largest number: 13 Largest number: In nite
• 3. 3 cent stamps & 8 cent stamps (Table 7) I have chosen to replace number 4, 6, 8, 9 & 10 for n, because all of the numbers are larger than 3. I also think 5 others are enough for many.Largest number: 17Final table showing all of the largest post numbers that cannot be represented to compare: 3 cent Diﬀerence n cent Diﬀerence Largest postage value stamp stamp that cannot be represented 3 +1 4 +1 5 3 +2 5 +2 7 3 +3 6 N/A In nite 3 +4 7 +4 11 3 +5 8 +5 13 3 +6 9 N/A In nite 3 +7 10 +7 17(Table 8)5.Finding pattern Let x=Largest postage value that cannot be represented According to Table 8, n - 3 = x - n, because their diﬀerences are equivalent. Too simplify thisequation: n-3=x-n= n-3+n=x= 2n - 3 = x
• 4. erefore the rule is: 2n - 3 = e largest postage value that cannot be represented through 3cent stamps and n cent stamps. Although if n is a multiple of 3, the rule won’t work, because Table 4 & 6 has proven that thelargest postage value that cannot be represented is in nitely large. If n is a multiple of 3, n is justadding on more 3s. e amount you add won’t change a fact, the amount stays as a multiple of 3forever. Not every number can be represented out of 3, only 1/3 of all positive numbers can berepresented from 3 and its multiples. So there’s no end of postage number that can be represented,the pattern will go on like this:no, no, 3, no, no, 3+3, no no, 3+3+3... My rule: 2n - 3 only applies when n isn’t a multiple of 3. Table 8 has shown the diﬀerences.Every time working on a pattern, you usually try to nd the diﬀerence between the numbers, and Ifound the diﬀerence.6. e text below shows my prediction answering for numbers 21-30 using my rule. e numbers 21, 24, 27 & 30 will not be done for the reason of being a multiple of 3.22. 2n - 3 23. 2n - 3= 2 * 22 - 3 = 2 * 23 - 3= 44 - 3 = 46 - 3= 41 = 4325. 2n - 3 26. 2n - 3= 2 * 25 - 3 = 2 * 26 - 3= 50 - 3 = 52 - 3= 47 = 4928. 2n - 3 29. 2n - 3= 2 * 28 - 3 = 2 * 29 - 3= 56 - 3 = 58 - 3= 53 = 55
• 5. 7.Justifying my rule.I am choosing to pick a random number to replace n: 13 e table below proves that 23 is the largest postage number that can’t be represented. Post Stamps Post Stamps Post Stamps age age age 1 No 11 No 21 3+3+3+3+3+3+3 2 No 12 3+3+3+3 22 13+3+3+3 3 3 13 13 23 No 4 No 14 No 24 3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 5 No 15 3+3+3+3+3 25 13+3+3+3+3 6 3+3 16 13+3 26 13+13 7 No 17 No 27 3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 8 No 18 3+3+3+3+3+3 28 13+3+3+3+3+3 9 3+3+3 19 13+3+3 29 13+13+3 10 No 20 No 30 3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3Using my rule: 2n - 3n = 13= 2 * 13 - 3= 26 -3= 23 is justi es that my rule works.8.Further math: Extending the problem is problem can be extended by including 4 cent stamps and n cent stamps to compare with3 cent stamps and n cent stamps. en we can try to nd another pattern, if there’s anotherdiﬀerence and a formula to convert.