New gTLD Program Update
                      &
            Consideration of an
       Expressions of Interest Round




N...
Agenda

    Open issues & the Applicant Guidebook

        What’s been done

        Getting to closure


    EOI/Pre‐Regi...
Resolution of Open Issues

       Trademark & community protections
       Mitigating malicious conduct
       Root zone s...
What we are not going to discuss today

     Who can apply?             Evaluation times
     DNS stability check        F...
nor are we talking about…

     Community priority     Objection consolidation
     Auctions               Panel size
    ...
What’s Been Published
    http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐4‐15feb10‐en.htm



       Trademark & commun...
Resolution of Open Issues
       Trademark & community protections
      Mitigating malicious conduct
      Root zone scal...
Trademark Protection
    Session on Monday (16:00 to 17:30 @ Tsavo A)

     Solutions for this set of issues are (virtuall...
Proposed RPMs
REGISTRY
LIFECYCLE



PRE-LAUNCH             LAUNCH   ONGOING OPERATIONS




IP CLEARINGHOUSE               ...
Mitigating Malicious Conduct
     Session on Thursday (2:00 to 3:30 @ Tsavo A)

       Set of seven modifications complete...
Economic Study

 Economists retained to undertake additional study

 Three phase study – second phase (after Nairobi) will...
A Few Preliminary Questions Posed by Economists

     A survey is being undertaken to provide direction to the study.

   ...
Root Zone Scaling
      Root zone scaling study completed; reports anticipated from 
      SSAC and RSSAC 
       – Delega...
Delegation projections




                         14
IDNs

      IDN will be available at the opening of the new gTLD program
      Implementation based on Working Group recom...
Vertical Integration

      New model to be proposed based on:
       – Debates in Seoul 
       – Consultation held in Ja...
Registry Agreement:  Amendment Process

       Process for future amendments to new gTLD registry 
       agreements still...
Participate in ICANN: Ten Open Comment Fora

     Trademark & Community Protections    Malicious Conduct
        Registry ...
Expression of Interest & Pre‐Registration Process 
                            (EOI)




19
Panelists

Dr. Bruce Tonkin ‐ Moderator, ICANN Board

Avri Doria (NCSG)

Bertrand de La Chapelle (Government of France)

Z...
EOI / pre-registration process

To serve the public interest by facilitating the launch of the 
New gTLD Program in a secu...
EOI Model


      Published two public comment periods and analysis

      Published draft model 

      Explanatory memor...
Key elements of the proposed model

 Mandatory for eligibility in the first gTLD round.
  – Voluntary EOI: substantial cos...
Pre-requisites to EOI


 Publish version 4 of Guidebook

 Resolution required for:
 – Trademark RPMs settled
 – Three‐char...
Questions for Panel and Audience

     What are the expected benefits of the EOI/Pre‐registration 
     program, how does ...
Thank You

      Asante




26
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Icann Ppt Re New G Tld Eoi Nairobi (2595320)

999

Published on

New gTLD Rollout Summarized

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
999
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Icann Ppt Re New G Tld Eoi Nairobi (2595320)

  1. 1. New gTLD Program Update & Consideration of an Expressions of Interest Round New gTLD Workshop 8 March, 2010
  2. 2. Agenda Open issues & the Applicant Guidebook What’s been done Getting to closure EOI/Pre‐Registration overview followed by EOI/Pre‐Registration panel discussion 2
  3. 3. Resolution of Open Issues Trademark & community protections Mitigating malicious conduct Root zone scaling Economic analysis IDN 3‐character requirement IDN variants Registry agreement – Vertical integration – Process for future amendments 3
  4. 4. What we are not going to discuss today Who can apply? Evaluation times DNS stability check Fees Geographical names Dispute resolution fees Technical criteria The other fees Financial criteria Revenue neutral fees Registry services review Legal rights objection  Extended evaluation standards & standing Objection filing String confusion  Morality & Public Order  objection standard standards & standing Auctions Community objection,  String similarity 4 standards, standing  Algorithm
  5. 5. nor are we talking about… Community priority Objection consolidation Auctions Panel size Price controls Evaluation times Renewal pricing Financial instrument Confidentiality Nexus Contention sets:  Country names list indirect & direct Sub‐region names list Thick Whois Reserved name Evaluation panels Role of public comment Dispute resolution  Refunds  providers Evaluator selection 5
  6. 6. What’s Been Published http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐4‐15feb10‐en.htm Trademark & community protection models Mitigating malicious conduct solution papers IDN 3‐character & variant management proposals Registry amendment process memorandum Registry benchmarking study Comment analyses – Guidebook version 3 – EOI model – STI (GNSO) report on trademark protections – IDN working group report 6
  7. 7. Resolution of Open Issues Trademark & community protections Mitigating malicious conduct Root zone scaling Economic analysis IDN 3‐character requirement IDN variants Registry agreement – Vertical integration – Process for future amendments 7
  8. 8. Trademark Protection Session on Monday (16:00 to 17:30 @ Tsavo A) Solutions for this set of issues are (virtually complete?): – GNSO completed its deliverable to consider Trademark  Clearinghouse and URS mechanisms  – STI reached unanimous consensus in most areas, rough  consensus in others – New versions of Trademark Clearinghouse and URS are posted  based on STI work – New version of Trademark Post‐Delegation Dispute Resolution  Procedure (PDDRP) posted based on public comment and  discussion http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐4‐15feb10‐ 8 en.htm
  9. 9. Proposed RPMs REGISTRY LIFECYCLE PRE-LAUNCH LAUNCH ONGOING OPERATIONS IP CLEARINGHOUSE URS IP CLAIMS POST-DELEGATION PROCESS SUNRISE THICK PROPOSED WHOIS RPMs UDRP
  10. 10. Mitigating Malicious Conduct Session on Thursday (2:00 to 3:30 @ Tsavo A) Set of seven modifications completed for draft version 3 of  Applicant Guidebook Remaining areas being completed by advisory groups working  two issues: – Zone file access  • a tool used to combat abuses. • working group proposed solutions to centralise access to zone  file information – High Security Top‐Level Domain • Outlines a voluntary, structured approach to security of  domain names registered in participating TLDs 10 http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐4‐15feb10‐ en.htm
  11. 11. Economic Study Economists retained to undertake additional study Three phase study – second phase (after Nairobi) will: – perform empirical analysis to estimate cost of defensive  registrations,  – develop metric to assess overall expected benefits / costs  – develop a process to assess whether net economic consumer  harm might result from individual applications. Third phase might be to develop mechanisms to enhance  benefits of new gTLDs  11
  12. 12. A Few Preliminary Questions Posed by Economists A survey is being undertaken to provide direction to the study. It is difficult to ascertain the benefits of new gTLDs. Benefit can be  realised through innovation, which is not easy to predict Can accomplish much through existing DNS structure but we may  not want to preclude innovation that is possible through new gTLDs.  Identify benefits due to competition and to serving communities. What is market power of individual TLDs? Is it of importance or  effect? What is the effect (cost / benefit) of new gTLDs on navigation? Undertaking DNS data collection to inform work. 12
  13. 13. Root Zone Scaling Root zone scaling study completed; reports anticipated from  SSAC and RSSAC  – Delegation rate is of paramount importance Models created and published for different delegation rate  scenarios for application volumes:  – below expected – expected – above expected  – significantly above expected http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐03mar10‐en.htm 13
  14. 14. Delegation projections 14
  15. 15. IDNs IDN will be available at the opening of the new gTLD program Implementation based on Working Group recommendations Relaxes the 3‐character rule for gTLD strings in some cases – two‐character strings available unless likely to cause confusion – No one‐character TLD strings, pending additional policy work Provides an interim solution for variant management pending  a final technical solution www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement‐2‐03dec09‐en.htm 15
  16. 16. Vertical Integration New model to be proposed based on: – Debates in Seoul  – Consultation held in January 2010 – Ongoing study Additionally, the Board and community members will be  discussing the issue in Nairobi GNSO PDP on vertical integration is proceeding in parallel – neither process is expected to delay the other 16
  17. 17. Registry Agreement:  Amendment Process Process for future amendments to new gTLD registry  agreements still under discussion Explanatory memo outlines several possible models, including  a model proposed by the GNSO’s Registry Stakeholder Group – based on periodic good faith discussions, with amendments  binding only if each registry operator individually agrees.  Comment sought on RySG proposal and other possible models http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new‐gtlds/registry‐agreement‐amendment‐ process‐15feb10‐en.pdf 17
  18. 18. Participate in ICANN: Ten Open Comment Fora Trademark & Community Protections Malicious Conduct Registry Restrictions Dispute  Zone File Access Concept Paper Resolution Procedure (RRDRP) High Security Top‐Level Domain  Trademark Post Delegation  (HSTLD) ‐ Draft Program  Dispute Resolution Procedure  Development Snapshot (Trademark PPDRP) Trademark Clearinghouse Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) Registry Operations & Agreement IDN Issues Process for gTLD Registry  3‐character restriction Agreement Amendment Variant management Benchmarking of Registry  Operations 18
  19. 19. Expression of Interest & Pre‐Registration Process  (EOI) 19
  20. 20. Panelists Dr. Bruce Tonkin ‐ Moderator, ICANN Board Avri Doria (NCSG) Bertrand de La Chapelle (Government of France) Zahid Jamil (DNDRC) Dr. Olivier Crepin‐Leblond (At‐Large) Richard Tindal (Independent/New gTLD Applicant) Antony Van Couvering (Minds & Machines) 20
  21. 21. EOI / pre-registration process To serve the public interest by facilitating the launch of the  New gTLD Program in a secure, stable, well‐organised and  efficient manner  Benefits – Ascertain number of first round applications  – Identifying instances of possible string contention  – Identifying areas of potential objection – Informing the economic benefits / risks discussion  – Identifying unanticipated issues, providing flexibility – Hasten the launch of the new gTLD program by answering  or raising issues before the decision to launch is made 21
  22. 22. EOI Model Published two public comment periods and analysis Published draft model  Explanatory memorandum posted to inform discussion at this  meeting: – Objectives of the EOI – Proposed EOI model – Outline of costs – Prerequisites and timeline 22
  23. 23. Key elements of the proposed model Mandatory for eligibility in the first gTLD round. – Voluntary EOI: substantial cost / no value A deposit of US $55,000 required. – Discourage speculation / tied to gTLD fee structure  Non‐refundable, unless round not launched – Bright line rule / settle issues before launching Participant and string information will be made public – Transparency / inform operational readiness & objections A fully executed communications plan, to promote global  awareness – Will not work to disadvantage various groups 23
  24. 24. Pre-requisites to EOI Publish version 4 of Guidebook Resolution required for: – Trademark RPMs settled – Three‐character issue – Vertical integration Full communications plan (≥ 4 months) executed Operationally ready to conduct process 24
  25. 25. Questions for Panel and Audience What are the expected benefits of the EOI/Pre‐registration  program, how does it serve the public interest? What is the best way to ensure an inclusive, global and fair  process? Should the EOI be mandatory? Why? What information colleted during the EOI submission should  be made public? How can "gaming"  be avoided in this process?  – i.e., if parties lodging submissions for the purposes of  transferring the entry for value. 25
  26. 26. Thank You Asante 26
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×