• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Mood accounting
 

Mood accounting

on

  • 1,139 views

This is the presentation at Department of Finance, National Central University on Oct. 7, 2011.

This is the presentation at Department of Finance, National Central University on Oct. 7, 2011.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,139
Views on SlideShare
576
Embed Views
563

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

1 Embed 563

http://jacobpeng.wordpress.com 563

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Mood accounting Mood accounting Presentation Transcript

    • Bad Mood AccountingBehavioral Implications of Accounting InformationPresented at the National Central University Jacob Peng, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Accounting School of Management University of Michigan-Flint
    • INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTINGRESEARCH (A VERY INCOMPLETE ONE)
    • Not-Completed-At-All Snapshot of Accounting Research• By fields/topics • By method – Analytical, modeling – Archival, capital market research – Experiment, behavior al research – Others • Survey • Case • Field study
    • New Alphabets in Accounting (Brian Summer’s presentation at 2011 AAA Annual Meeting)• SOX - control: workflow, segregation, process testing, SAAS: SAS 70: security• XBRL - XML, tagging, integration, schemas• IFRS - convergence, historical restatement, simultaneous ledgers ( US GAAP book and IFRS book)
    • Archival Research• Archival: data collection from databases• Efficient market hypothesis, earnings management, event studies, etc. – Fama lecture: http://www.dimensional.com/famafrench/2009/10/fama-lecture- masters-of-finance.html – More publication outlets – Finance, econ journals
    • Experimental Research• Experimental: study limited number of variables in a controlled environment where causal relationship can be verified – Major variables – Interactions – Must by carefully designed because of high “transaction cost”• Understand the “black box” of human information processing – Theories from cognitive psychology – Heuristics – Decision making bias
    • MY MOOD AND SOCIAL PRESENCEPAPER
    • Who Will You Hire?• Candidate A • Candidate B – Graduate from top – Graduate from top university university – Extensive work – Extensive work experiences experiences – Strong – Strong recommendations recommendations
    • What if…..• Candidate A • Candidate B – Knowledgeable about – Confident in his ability baseball – You happen to but far less impressed be an ESPN junkie with his interpersonal skills
    • Mind Reader• Emotional response (heuristic decision making) vs. analytical reasoning (normative decision making)• Use MRIs to examine financial decision making (University of Illinois)
    • Are You in Good Mood Today?• Affect, Mood, Emotion• Why study mood? – Factors that influence decision-making – Cognition uninfluenced by mood may be relatively rare• General question: – Mood  Decision making (improve or impair?)
    • Research of Mood in Accounting• Kadous 2001 @ Contemporary Accounting Research• Kida et al. 2001 @ Contemporary Accounting Research• Moreno et al. 2002 @ Journal of Accounting Research• Bhattacharjee and Moreno 2002 @ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making• Rose et al. 2004 @ International Journal of Accounting Information Systems• Curtis 2006 @ Journal of Business Ethics• Chung et al. 2008 @ Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory• Cianci and Bierstaker 2009 @ Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory• Ford and Peng 20XX
    • Theoretical Background (1)• According to neurobiological studies, individuals have difficulty functioning when the link between affective and cognitive system is destroyed (Kida et al. 2001)• Affect and cognition are intertwined to influence decision making (Bhattacharjee and Moreno (2002)• Affect-as-information theory (Kadous 2001): affect facilitates evidence retrieval or treated as information relevant to decision at hand
    • Theoretical Background (2)• Memory reconstruction effect (Rose et al. 2004): memories are reconstructed to match affective response• Affect infusion model (Curtis 2006): affect has strongest impact when cognitive processing is substantive or heuristic, least when processing is direct or motivated• Mood-congruent retrieval of information (Chung et al. 2008): positive (negative) mood individuals retrieve more positive (negative) information from memory which lead to positive (negative) evaluations• Mood maintenance theory (Chung et al. 2008): Positive mood individuals are more interested in maintaining their positive mood; while negative mood individuals are more interested in repairing their mood state• Cognitive-affective model of ethical decision making (Curtis 2004; Cianci and Bierstaker 2009): positive mood leads to more ethical decisions
    • Task Used in Experiments• Capital budgeting decisions (Kida et al. 2001; Moreno et al. 2002): which involve negotiations among parties on transfer pricing, inter-departmental divisions and cross-functional teams• Jurors’ auditor negligence case evaluations (Kadous 2001)• Inventory obsolescence risk judgment (Bhattacharjee and Moreno 2002)• Financial data analyses (Rose et al. 2004)• Whistle-blowing intentions (Curtis 2006)• Inventory valuation decisions (Chung et al. 2008)• Hypothesis generation for financial rations fluctuations (Cianci and Bierstaker 2009)
    • Main Findings• Negative affect created during auditor negligence trial  judgments against auditors (Kadous 2001)• Negative mood  Higher Risk assessment; mediated by auditor experiences (Bhattacharjee and Moreno 2002)• Auditor Risk-taking tendencies are alerted by mood state (Morena et al. 2002)• Information load and cognitive load mediated the reliance on affective responses (Rose et al. 2004)• Negative mood  lower intention to report unethical behavior (Curtis 2006)• Positive (negative) mood ==? Lowest (highest) judgment consensus and make least (most) conservative judgment (Chung et al. 2008)
    • MEDIATORS OF THE EFFECT OF MOOD ON EXPENSEREPORTING BEHAVIOR:COMMUNICATION MEDIUM AND DEBRIEFING
    • Motivation• “Phantom costs” as one of the top red flags for increased opportunity for corporate fraud.• Expense report fraud as one of the most common types of fraud allegations• Why? Two factors are examined in this paper: – Mood – Communication medium
    • Research Questions• Does “mood state” affect expense reporting behavior?• Does communication medium used influence expense reporting behavior?• Can “mood state” effect on expense reporting behavior be altered?
    • Literature Review (1)• Effect of mood on ethical behavior – Mood is well documented that it is an essential component of social life and organizational behavior – Generally speaking, mood can be categorized into different states: positive, negative, and neutral – Relationship between mood and ethical behavior • Cianci and Bierstaker (2009): auditors in a positive (compared to negative) mood state did, in fact, perform better in an inventory ethical task by indicating that they would be more likely to recommend a write-off of obsolete inventory. • Curtis (2006): negative mood is associated with lower intentions to report the unethical actions of others to a superior (whistle-blowing) within the organization.
    • Mood and Ethical Judgment Source: Gaudine and Thorne (2001)
    • Literature Review (2)• Social presence = the degree to which a medium is perceived as conveying the presence of the communicating participants• Relationship between social presence and ethical behavior: – Logsdon and Patterson (2009): increased deception in online business networks due to weak ties (less empathy between sender and receiver), increased opportunity for asymmetrical emotional relationships (one party has empathy, other does not), differential power relationships, and decreased proximity among participants. – Kachelmeier and Towry (2002): the means of negotiation, whether conducted face-to-face or via a computer network, influenced fairness pressures during transfer price negotiations. – Valley et al. (1998): participants negotiating face-to-face achieved higher joint benefit due to higher levels of truth-telling than those negotiating by telephone or in writing
    • Method• 3 x 2 between subject experiment – Mood: positive, neutral, negative – Social presence (communication medium): face-to-face and web-based Positive MOOD Neutral Mood Negative MOODHigh SOCIAL Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3PRESENCE (faceto face)Low Social Treatment 4 Treatment 5 Treatment 6PRESENCE(online)
    • Experiment ProceduresSubjects Mood Mood- Expense Expense sign in manipulation and including report removal report task Debrief task 1 procedures 2consent instructions
    • Mood Manipulations• Videos• Unrelated events• Stories• Short statements
    • Read the Following Statements to Yourself (Velten Instrument)• I feel a little low today.• I ‘m getting tired out I can feel my body getting exhausted and heavy.• Sometimes I wonder whether school is all that worthwhile.• People annoy me; I wish I could be myself.• I’ve doubted that I’m a worthwhile person.• Sometime I’ve wished I could die.
    • Velten Statement (2)• This might turn out to have been one of my good days• I feel cheerful and lively• If I set my mind to it, I can make things turn out fine• I feel superb! I think I can work to the best of my ability• Life is so much fun; it seems to offer so many sources of fulfillment
    • Experiment Task• Task 1: subjects to assume the role of a business traveler traveling for business purposes. Subjects read scenarios describing business expenditures and are asked to determine the amount of business expenses to be included in their request for reimbursements. The scenarios are intentionally ambiguous and are subject to each individual’s judgment about whether the expenses are indeed legitimate business expenses and should be included in the expense report.• Task 2 (debriefed): subjects are told to intentionally clear their minds and empty the feelings induced by the mood statements. They are asked to make the next decisions free from affected mood. Subjects are presented with the same business scenarios with additional information regarding their colleagues’ responses to the same business expenses described in each scenario.
    • Experiment Task Example: Task 1
    • Experiment Task Example: Task 2
    • Results 1• Mood manipulation was successful• Subjects with negative mood reported on average 10% more on their expense report• Subjects using web-based system reported 5% more than their counterparts who filed in-person• Debriefing was not successful
    • Supplemental Analysis
    • Results 2Expense Report Amount positive mood negative mood F2F (High Social Presence) Online (Low Social Presence)
    • Conclusions• Confirmed prior findings that negative mood leads to undesired behavior• Our contribution: the effect of negative mood on behavior can be mediated to some degree by increasing social presence of the communication medium• Additional research: our debriefing technique was not successful. Simply asking subjects to recognize their mood and the potential it may have to influence their decisions was not enough to alter their decisions. This is definitely a potential arena for future research. Implementing a more formal approach to change mood may still have implications for behavior changes.
    • http://www.jacobpeng.net